Syria demands 1/3 of Golan, Lebanese areas for 'Israel' normalization
"There is no such thing as peace for free," the source said, outlining two potential scenarios for a political settlement.
The first scenario, the official indicated, would see "Israel" retaining strategic areas equivalent to one-third of the Golan Heights and handing over a third to Syria. The remaining third is leased to "Israel" by Syria for 25 years.
Read more: 'Israel', Syria discuss security agreement against Hezbollah, Iran
According to the Syrian official, the second scenario would see "Israel" keeping two-thirds of the occupied Golan Heights and handing over one-third to Syria, with the possibility of leasing it.
Under this scenario, the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli and possibly additional Lebanese territories, including the Beqaa Valley, would be handed over to Syria, the official revealed.
The source said that Syria aims to "reclaim sovereignty" over Tripoli, which it considers one of five regions detached from Syria to form the Lebanese state during the French Mandate, pointing out that the return of these areas, including other northern Lebanese regions, should be part of a comprehensive agreement.
As part of the broader settlement, Syria is proposing a regional water agreement involving Turkey, Syria, and "Israel". This would allow "Israel" to extend a pipeline to transport water from the Euphrates River.
Al-Sharaa "has demonstrated unprecedented openness and opened direct lines of communication with Israel for security and military coordination in southern Syria," the source mentioned.
The Syrian source emphasized that the return of parts of the Golan Heights, particularly areas seized by "Israel" after the fall of former President Bashar al-Assad's rule, is crucial for gaining domestic support for any agreement.
"Al-Sharaa would likely face significant internal resistance should he fail to do so," according to the source.
While US sanctions relief is under discussion, the source stressed it should not be considered as "Israeli payment" for peace with Syria, noting that "the sanctions removal is a separate matter."
Read more: US backs Syria-Israeli talks, disarmament of Resistance: NYT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
L'Orient-Le Jour
10 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
No breakthrough in Barrack's latest trip to Beirut, all eyes on Berri
BEIRUT — The ball is in the Lebanese court. That is the main message from U.S. envoy Tom Barrack during his third visit to Beirut on Monday, to discuss the issue of Hezbollah's disarmament. The diplomat reaffirmed that this matter is up to the Lebanese authorities, who must define the approach themselves. After his meeting with Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, the U.S. envoy said that Hezbollah's disarmament is "an internal Lebanese issue," as Hezbollah circles accuse the Americans of wanting to impose this disarmament to "reassure Israel." 'The United States is not here to force Israel to do anything. We are here to use our influence to bring calm minds together around a solution,' he continued, believing that the cease-fire agreement reached in November to end the war between Hezbollah and the Hebrew state 'did not work.' Arriving in Beirut on Sunday evening, the U.S. envoy was first received by President Joseph Aoun before his meeting at the Grand Serail. According to the presidency, Aoun handed him a 'draft memorandum of understanding' outlining Lebanon's commitments since the cease-fire. These include points from the truce agreement, the president's inauguration speech, and the ministerial statement of Salam's Cabinet. Among these commitments, the presidency cited 'the urgent need to save Lebanon by extending the state's authority over its entire territory with nothing but its own forces, monopolizing arms exclusively in the hands of the Lebanese Army and asserting the authority of the Lebanese constitutional institutions over decisions of war and peace.' These factors must be ensured 'simultaneously and in parallel with maintaining Lebanese sovereignty over all its international borders, reconstruction, and the initiation of economic recovery.' Hezbollah is 'a terrorist organization' In his remarks, Barrack stated that 'President Donald Trump attaches importance to the situation in Lebanon and the restoration of stability in the region.' 'My return to Lebanon comes as Syria and the region have once again become unstable, and today we must focus on Lebanon to restore stability,' he stressed, affirming that he would 'continue his meetings with Lebanese officials working towards solutions,' whether on security issues or economic reforms. He also claims not to have taken note of Hezbollah's 'remarks' on his roadmap, adding that for the American administration, Hezbollah is 'a terrorist organization' with which it does not engage in dialogue. In short, no tangible progress was recorded during this tour. The U.S. envoy still insists on the need to move to operational steps for the state's weapons monopoly, through a clear and public decision by official Lebanon and with the approval of all parties. Certainly, according to L'Orient Today's information, the Lebanese response he received reaffirms Lebanon's attachment to the weapons monopoly as well as its commitment to the ministerial statement and the presidential inaugural address. But what Washington now expects is a concrete mechanism for implementation and the start of its execution. This mechanism is still to be defined in its details. These details concern the launch date of its implementation, considering it is meant to be conducted in several stages. The first would consist of a clear government decision in favor of the state's monopoly on arms. The second would see Hezbollah begin to hand over its weapons north of the Litani River, notably missiles and drones, with the United States pressuring Israel to avoid escalation, cease its aggressions, violations, and targeted assassinations. The third step should concern Beirut and its suburbs, especially the southern suburb, concurrently with American pressure on Israel to initiate a withdrawal from occupied points. The fourth stage would be dedicated to the withdrawal of weapons from the Bekaa region. Nabih Berri's proposal In this context, Lebanon has clearly expressed its requirements, particularly the effective cease-fire implementation by Israel, the need to activate the monitoring committee's work on the agreement, and the importance of maintaining the role of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL). Barrack emphasized that the Lebanese state must prove its effectiveness and remain attentive to regional developments. Lebanon has also insisted on obtaining guarantees regarding control of the situation in Syria, in light of concerns expressed by several Lebanese factions regarding the repercussions of recent events in Syria, especially after the clashes in Sweida. Some believe that Hezbollah is using Syrian instability as a pretext to keep its weapons, citing the defense of the Shiite communities' presence in the area and the protection of border region. But Barrack's logic is clear: to end Israeli violations and strikes, Lebanon must begin to regain the weapons monopoly, as the State alone is responsible for the security of its citizens. The Lebanese response has not received Hezbollah's approval, as it does not consider itself concerned by this document. On Friday, Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem rejected the American proposal, believing that Washington is trying to reach a new agreement and is pressuring the Lebanese Army to remove his party's weapons at the risk of provoking civil war. In this context, the main issue remains Tuesday's scheduled meeting between Barrack and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. According to some reports, Berri is expected to put forward a proposal consisting of a 15-day suspension of Israeli military operations during which a serious dialogue would take place with Hezbollah on the mechanism for returning weapons to the state. The Americans have not yet responded to this proposal, but according to well-informed sources, Barrack should travel to Israel to discuss it with officials. Other meetings The envoy was also received by Elias Audi, the Greek Orthodox Metropolitan of Beirut, with whom he discussed the situation in Lebanon and the region, and by Druze leader Walid Jumblatt. L'Orient Today learned that Maronite Patriarch Bechara Rai will meet with Barrack on Wednesday, who is also expected to meet with the commander of the army, General Rodolphe Haykal. A dinner bringing together several MPs is also planned at the U.S. Embassy.
L'Orient-Le Jour
10 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Bisat: No economic recovery without security or monopoly on weapons
Minister of Economy and Trade Amer Bisat said Monday that Lebanon cannot recover economically without first restoring security, chiefly through the state's monopoly on weapons. Since the start of Joseph Aoun's presidency, Lebanese authorities have reaffirmed their willingness to reclaim exclusive control over armed forces, particularly after the latest war between Israel and Hezbollah. 'There will be no economic recovery without security,' Bisat said. 'And there will be no security without the state's monopoly on weapons and on decisions of war and peace.' Two silo projects Turning to Beirut port's grain silos — nearly destroyed in the Aug. 4, 2020, explosion — Bisat said the ministry is pursuing two separate initiatives. 'The first project concerns the old silos in Beirut. It's a complicated issue — ecologically, administratively and politically,' he said. 'The second is to build new silos in strategic areas, including Tripoli and the Bekaa.' Bisat stressed the north's importance, saying, 'There can be no recovery of the Lebanese economy without recovery in Tripoli's economy.' He highlighted the city's labor force, export capacity and artisanal industries. 'We'll do everything we can to support them.' The minister added that the government is 'very optimistic' about an investment plan linking Tripoli's port to the Rachid Karameh International Fair and Qleiaat airport. 'It's an advanced project, and many factors — political, economic and others — are needed to make it succeed,' he said. 'International funding is available, but we must implement reforms.' He confirmed that a board of directors will be formed to oversee the Karameh Fair. 'Tripoli is not being left off the economic map. The North is central to the state's economic plan,' Bisat said, announcing $250 million in World Bank funding for development, including $70 million in low-interest loans. 'We will try to distribute these funds fairly and efficiently.' In early July, rumors of a potential territorial deal between Damascus and Tel Aviv — reportedly involving Israel's occupied Golan Heights and the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli — sparked alarm in Lebanon. Tripoli remains one of the country's poorest cities. The Rachid Karameh International Fair, designed in the 1960s by Brazilian architect Oscar Niemeyer, was meant to be a regional hub for trade shows, cultural events and exhibitions. Once a symbol of Lebanon's post-independence ambitions, it has long sat idle. 'This is a national treasure,' Bisat said earlier this month. 'It can no longer be treated as just a beautiful architectural site. It must fulfill its economic potential.' Government 'committed' to Qleiaat Airport On the proposed redevelopment of Rene Moawad Airport in Qleiaat, Bisat said the government is finalizing studies on its economic and financial viability, with results expected by year's end. 'Prime Minister Nawaf Salam is committed to this project,' he said. 'We are studying the best path to launch it.' Built by the French military in 1938 and handed to the Lebanese Army in 1966, the airport was renamed in honor of President Rene Moawad, who was elected there before his assassination in 1989. The Salam government hopes to rehabilitate the site to supplement Beirut's main airport and bolster Akkar's long-overlooked economy.
LBCI
10 hours ago
- LBCI
Russian and Iranian Defense Ministers discuss boosting cooperation
Russia's defense minister Andrey Belousov and his Iranian counterpart Aziz Nasirzadeh discussed strengthening military cooperation during a meeting in Moscow on Monday, according to Russia's state-run RIA news agency. The meeting took place a day after Russian President Vladimir Putin held talks with Ali Larijani, an advisor to Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Their discussions focused on the situation in the Middle East and issues related to Iran's nuclear program. A strategic partnership agreement binds Russia and Iran. Moscow has condemned Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites that took place in June. Reuters
