Washington calls on Lebanon to set deadline for state control over Hezbollah arms: Sources to LBCI
According to sources, Lebanon is currently studying the reply, the core of which stresses the need for Lebanon to commit to a clear timeline for placing Hezbollah's weapons under the control of the state. The response sets a firm deadline, calling for this process to be completed no later than the end of this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LBCI
an hour ago
- LBCI
Israeli military says 'projectile' fired at Israel from Gaza Strip
The Israeli military said a "projectile" was fired from the Gaza Strip towards Israel on Saturday. "A projectile was identified crossing the Gaza Strip from the south and most likely falling in an open area," the military said in a statement, adding that there were no injuries reported. AFP
L'Orient-Le Jour
3 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Blerta Aliko, UNDP resident representative to OT: Lebanon's recovery hinges on recovery of its people
BEIRUT — Appointed as the head of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Lebanon, Resident Representative Blerta Aliko took on her role a year ago, shortly before the escalation of the Israel-Hezbollah conflict, which erupted on Oct. 8, 2023, into a full-scale war. Aliko began her career in her home country, Albania, and has worked within the United Nations system since 1996. She has experience in several settings and countries: conflict, mid-income and post-crisis recovery. Committed to gender equality and women's empowerment, Aliko held various positions within agencies such as UN Women, UNICEF, and served as the Resident Representative of UNDP in Algeria before relocating to Beirut. In an exclusive interview with L'Orient-Le Jour/Today, Aliko discusses the findings of a new joint report by several U.N. agencies (including the UNDP, U.N. ESCWA, UNICEF, ILO and U.N.-Habitat) on the socio-economic impact of Israel's war on Lebanon and emphasizes the need for reforms to support the country's recovery. On a socio-economic level, what impact did the war leave on Lebanon? Approximately 4,300 people have been killed by Israeli strikes, 30 percent of whom were women and children. Nearly 500,000 children saw their education disrupted for several months, and 362 schools were damaged – an impact that threatens to undermine Lebanon's education system and hinder the development of its future human capital. The country's Human Development Index (HDI) has fallen back to 2010 levels, effectively reversing over a decade of development efforts. On the economic front, the toll has been equally severe. An estimated 689,000 jobs were lost, representing a 25 percent decline in employment during the war, while 15 percent of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) were forced to shut down permanently. These figures do not account for the extensive damage sustained by productive infrastructure, including factories, farmlands and assets in the tourism sector. Lebanon's productive base has severely regressed and been paralyzed, which will have catastrophic consequences for the country's broader socio-economic development. What is the price of inaction, stalled reforms and the near-daily Israeli violations of the cease-fire for the country today? The fundamental cost of inaction is Lebanon's human capital. Unemployment rates are likely to rise further, and in a country with a young population, prolonged joblessness will inevitably push more people toward alternative means of income generation, such as migration, thereby exacerbating the ongoing brain drain. These trends are neither sustainable nor supportive of national recovery. Continued violations of the cease-fire and the stalling of reforms also risk eroding public trust in state institutions and the newly formed government, authorities in whom many had placed renewed hope. That optimism must be channeled into tangible results. Failure to do so could seriously undermine Lebanon's broader peace and security. What do you call on the government to do today to counter the lingering impact of the war and the multifaceted economic crisis? Lebanon's recovery hinges on the recovery of its people. If Lebanese citizens do not feel tangible improvements in their daily lives (basic services, job opportunities and overall living conditions), then we cannot speak of a recovery for Lebanon. Even if the country were to report economic growth, that growth must translate into real, lived improvements. I've seen firsthand how, in other countries, reported growth has failed to translate into practical improvements such as poverty reduction and meaningful job creation. For Lebanon, economic recovery must be planned in an inclusive way. In the report, we strongly emphasized that the first step toward meaningful recovery is rebuilding state institutions and restoring their core functions. A strong, capable state is essential, not only to deliver services efficiently and accountably, but also to ensure national ownership and serve its citizens with credibility. The second priority is jumpstarting the country's economic recovery. As I've mentioned, optimism and trust will only return when people begin to see and feel concrete results, such as access to jobs and equitable services like water, health and education. The third pillar is strengthening social protection and expanding assistance programs to curb rising poverty levels across all regions of Lebanon. Finally, reforming the financial sector is crucial, and financial inclusion is a top priority. Today, 80 percent of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) rely on access to financing, and this sector remains a vital engine for job and wealth creation. But with the banking sector paralyzed by delayed reforms, MSMEs can't get back on their feet or scale up at the necessary pace.
L'Orient-Le Jour
3 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
After Sweida, has Hezbollah stiffened its stance on its arsenal?
After the events in Sweida and the sectarian massacres carried out by various groups in the region, Hezbollah quickly sharpened its tone. For the party, more than ever, maintaining its arsenal remains justified. Its secretary-general, Naim Qassem, even warned that despite being severely weakened, Hezbollah remains 'ready to confront' statement came just three days before the arrival of U.S. envoy Tom Barrack in Beirut, signaling that the incidents in Syria have hardened Hezbollah's stance rather than softened it. Dig deeper Violence in Sweida: Can Lebanon be spared? Hezbollah's 'yes, but'Officially, Hezbollah reiterates that it will discuss the issue of its weapons only with Lebanese authorities, rejecting discussions on the topic with the United States while entrusting mediation to Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. The...
