California's revamped Google journalism deal raises new questions
SAN FRANCISCO — California's bold experiment to make Big Tech pay for local journalism just hit a double-speed bump.
Last week, Gov. Gavin Newsom dialed back state support for a first-in-the-nation newsroom fund in the face of a $12 billion state deficit. Then on Wednesday, Google — the lone corporate backer of the initiative — decided to lower its own tab by a third, from $15 million to $10 million for this year.
The handshake deal to support local journalism with both state and Google funds emerged from negotiations with Sacramento lawmakers last summer, who had initially proposed legislation to force tech giants to compensate online publishers as they're required to in countries like Canada.
The deal was hailed as a landmark arrangement that could set a precedent for other states seeking to prop up struggling newsrooms decimated by lost advertising revenues as readers turn to aggregation sites such as Google News. Those concerns have been particularly acute in California, where outlets like the Los Angeles Times, the state's largest newspaper, have seen mass layoffs in recent years.
Google did leave the door open to match up to $5 million more if other private, public or philanthropic donors step up. None did on Wednesday. But the latest changes to the deal are drawing vocal criticism, both old and new, while also raising questions about what it means for the future of the initiative.
Here's a rundown of the lingering unknowns as California reworks its Google news deal.
A version of this story first appeared in California Decoded, POLITICO's morning newsletter for Pros about how the Golden State is shaping tech policy within its borders and beyond. Like this content? POLITICO Pro subscribers receive it daily. Learn more at www.politicopro.com.
That's the new name for the initiative, previously known as the 'Newsroom Transformation Fund.' The rebrand came out of discussions with stakeholders and the state library as the new public partner, a spokesperson for Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, a Bay Area Democrat who announced the details and led negotiations for the fund, told POLITICO.
California Press Forward, California Black Media and a journalism professor joined the press release with statements of support. Several skeptics of the deal turned even more doubtful.
'Google got almost everything they wanted,' bemoaned former state Sen. Steve Glazer, who had authored a shot-down bill that sought to sustain newsrooms by taxing digital ad revenue. 'One, they wanted their amount to be at a modest level. Two, they wanted a state match so they could avoid setting a precedent that other states could follow.'
Glazer added that the downsizing of the program would force newsrooms to 'fight over crumbs,' without making a dent in reversing the journalism industry's decline. He downgraded his assessment of the initiative from a '2 percent' solution last year to a '1 percent solution.'
Rebuild Local News President Steven Waldman similarly said that while he appreciates that efforts to help local news are moving forward, 'the plan is more than 50 percent smaller than the already-too-small program.'
California Broadcasters Association President Steve Stuck, whose members are not part of the deal, told POLITICO: 'It was disappointing, I think, to everybody. When Newsom released a budget and they saw it went from 30 to 10, you know it's going in the wrong direction.'
Other media groups that had been more supportive have since gone quiet. The California News Publishers Association, which issued a statement of support to Wicks' summer announcement and will have two seats on the fund's advisory board, did not respond to a request for comment.
In another twist, the California State Library is officially hosting the fund after UC Berkeley's journalism school walked away from the responsibility late last year over concerns about how the money would be distributed.
One area of hesitation from critics was oversight over and independence in allocating the millions. Under the revised agreement, an advisory board will help the state librarian create programs supported by the fund and offer direction on how they should be spent.
However, the state library still gets the final say. The board will expand from seven to nine members, adding two seats reserved for State Library appointees alongside news publishers, members of journalism ethics groups and journalists' unions.
'Whenever we encounter proposals to provide grants to news organizations from the executive branch of government, we want to ensure that it's done in a way that doesn't inadvertently undermine editorial independence,' said Waldman, who considered the issue 'fixable.'
Wicks' plan is to release a fuller proposal in a budget trailer bill in the coming days. State lawmakers will consider the bill as leaders work with Newsom's office to iron out a final state budget over the next few weeks.
Waldman urged lawmakers to reject Newsom's proposed $20 million cut to the fund, while Glazer said he would prefer a separate bill outside the budget process.
'It's actually a significant policy matter, and that should typically be the contents of a legislative bill that goes through the hearing process in both houses,' the former state senator argued.
In addition to the fund, last summer's agreement included plans to invest $12.5 million more per year of Google's funding into researching and developing AI tools as part of an accelerator program.
The program drew backlash, as news organizations feared the technology could replace reporters' jobs. Though Wednesday's announcement didn't mention the accelerator, a Google spokesperson confirmed to POLITICO that the company's funding for it remains unchanged.
Wednesday's announcement made clear that the fund is actively seeking additional funders. And OpenAI's vice president of global affairs, Chris Lehane, provided a quote for the release, saying the company 'appreciates the opportunity to collaborate on this important project.'
But spokespeople for the AI developer declined to clarify its current role in the effort. When the partnership was first announced last summer, OpenAI said it was proud to be part of the initiative 'to utilize AI in support of local journalism across California.'
A program funded in 2022 by the Legislature, called the California Local News Fellowship and run out of UC Berkeley, has put $25 million into placing more than 100 early career reporters and editors into newsrooms. It's also running out of money.
On Wednesday, a state Senate budget subcommittee heard why the program should, or should not, be given another infusion of cash in a severely budget-strapped year in Sacramento. University of California Associate Director of State Budget Relations Seija Virtanen said the money would be exhausted by the end of 2027, while Republican state Sen. Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh questioned what the value was to taxpayers.
Appearing as a witness, Glazer put it plainly, saying: 'It's important because most of the decision that you make as senators comes from learning about problems in your community.'
He added: 'Local news is essential to our ability to be an independent democracy.'
Tyler Katzenberger contributed to this report.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Android 16 Could Finally Tame Bright HDR Videos
Tired of super-bright HDR videos and photos popping up in your social feeds? Google is working on a fix that could finally give you complete control over HDR brightness. An unreleased feature, spotted in the latest Android 16 Beta by the Telegram channel Mystic Leaks, will allow you to adjust the intensity of HDR content without having to turn it off entirely. HDR displays can deliver vastly improved visual quality, but they rely on significantly increased brightness to achieve the best results. This can cause HDR content to increase your display's brightness levels to an uncomfortable degree, especially in darker environments, such as when scrolling through social media in bed. The leaked screenshots show the new Enhanced HDR brightness controls option, located in Android's display settings, which includes a slider to adjust the intensity of the effect smoothly. This slider will adjust the color range, clarity, and, most importantly, the brightness of HDR images and videos on Android devices, without affecting the appearance of standard SDR content. HDR display is one of the biggest picture quality upgrades available on mobile devices. It can deliver more true-to-life photos and videos with superior color and contrast. However, to display HDR content to full effect, your device will often have to increase screen brightness significantly. This can be especially jarring if you've deliberately dimmed the display for use in a darkened room. HDR photos and videos often stand out quite dramatically when scrolling through social media, as the brightness suddenly increases, leaving some users wishing they could turn off the HDR effect. However, disabling HDR entirely would result in a significant loss of picture quality. Instagram recently added the option for iOS users to turn off HDR display. However, no such option currently exists for Android users. In the absence of system-wide Android support, some app developers have begun taking matters into their own hands. The Netflix app, for example, doesn't respect Android's brightness setting; instead, it provides its own independent brightness slider. Android 16's new Enhanced HDR brightness control will allow users to adjust the intensity of HDR content without sacrificing so much image quality. The 'best' quality will be achieved when HDR brightness is at a high enough level to deliver the full dynamic range of the displayed content, but it appears Google is finally acknowledging that such a high brightness level isn't always comfortable for all users and is finally giving us the option to dial down the intensity without having to turn off HDR completely. It's unclear from the provided screenshots exactly how the enhanced HDR brightness slider will work. However, it appears to allow you to adjust the maximum HDR brightness level without impacting SDR content. It remains to be seen how useful the slider will be in practice, especially if you are forced to delve into Android's settings to adjust it. I would like to see the slider exposed during media playback for easy adjustment while viewing content. It's also unclear whether moving the slider all the way to the left will disable HDR output entirely and, perhaps more importantly, whether all applications will support the feature. The Enhanced HDR Brightness control is tipped to appear in a future Android 16 beta and should deliver a more comfortable and enjoyable HDR viewing experience for any Android users who don't appreciate HDR's high brightness. Follow @paul_monckton on Instagram.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Newsom's office compares LA riots against federal agents to sports celebrations
Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom's office downplayed the riots gripping Los Angeles, likening them to sports celebrations that notoriously break out in Philadelphia after an Eagles' victory. "LA riots? Have these geniuses ever seen what happens when the Eagles win a playoff game?" Izzy Gardon, Newsom's communications director, told Fox News Digital on Sunday morning. Philadelphia notoriously sees sports revelers flood the city after beloved teams such as the Eagles or Phillies win championships, sometimes setting cars ablaze and causing property damage. The city even greases city light poles to dissuade partiers from scaling them and deploys additional police to the streets while often wearing riot gear. Fox News Digital reached out to the governor's office to ask about claims by California Republicans and natives that Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass bore some of the blame for the riots. They and other local Democrats issued messages defending illegal immigrants and condemning federal agents for carrying out deportation raids in the left-wing city. California Republicans Slam Newsom, Bass For Letting La Burn With Riots Amid Trump Immigration Blitz "Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass have a real habit of letting Los Angeles burn," Republican California Rep. Darell Issa posted to X on Saturday evening. Read On The Fox News App "If only Karen Bass fought against the Los Angeles fires like she fights for illegal aliens," Issa added in another post, referring to the Palisades fire that tore through Southern California in January. Federal Officials Slam Democrats For 'Dangerous' Rhetoric As Ice Agents Face Violent Mobs In La, Nyc "Gavin Newsom is unqualified for a plethora of reasons, the least of which is his support of illegal alien insurrectionists. He is an all purpose, all around loser," Hollywood actor and California resident James Woods posted to X. Federal officials have also pinned blame for the violence on Democratic elected officials who have "villainized and demonized" ICE law enforcement, Fox Digital previously reported. "This is on you, Governor. It is a shame that California openly defies federal law and sides with illegal aliens, including hardened criminals, against its own citizens," Harmeet Dhillon, former vice chair of the California Republican Party and current assistant attorney general for civil rights at the U.S. Department of Justice, posted to X. "The violent targeting of law enforcement in Los Angeles by lawless rioters is despicable and Mayor Bass and Governor Newsom must call for it to end," DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin wrote in a statement. "The men and women of ICE put their lives on the line to protect and defend the lives of American citizens.… From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale. This violence against ICE must end." Social Media, Trump Admin Erupts Over La Mayor's Reaction To Ice Raids: 'You're A Criminal Too' Newsom on Friday described the Trump administration's immigration raids in Los Angeles as "chaotic and reckless." "Continued chaotic federal sweeps, across California, to meet an arbitrary arrest quota are as reckless as they are cruel. Donald Trump's chaos is eroding trust, tearing families apart, and undermining the workers and industries that power America's economy," Newsom's statement read. The press office doubled down in support of shielding illegal immigrants from deportation in a response X post to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Saturday. "In recent days, violent mobs have attacked ICE Officers and Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations in Los Angeles, California. These operations are essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States. In the wake of this violence, California's feckless Democrat leaders have completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens," Leavitt posted to X. Newsom's office responded: "These are anything but basic. Your indiscriminate sweeps are terrifying entire communities and detaining hardworking, tax-paying Californians. It's cruel escalation and must end." When asked about the riots, and California Republicans condemning the violence and Newsom's stance on immigration on Sunday morning, the governor's office compared the lawlessness to street parties after an Eagles win. Patel Promises Fbi Coming For Anyone Assaulting Cops As Los Angeles Erupts Over Ice Raids The riots in Los Angeles, however, have included targeted attacks on federal law enforcement officials, including violent protesters lobbing rocks and other items at immigration officials. U.S. Border Patrol Chief Michael W. Banks, for example, shared a photo of a Border Patrol agent's bloody hand that was injured by a rock flying through the windshield. Trump signed a presidential memorandum on Saturday to deploy 2,000 National Guardsmen to Paramount, California, to help quell the violence, and has also slammed the local leaders for the chaos. "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Trump posted to Truth Social on Saturday article source: Newsom's office compares LA riots against federal agents to sports celebrations
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Averting a Worst-Case Scenario in Los Angeles
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. In Los Angeles, federal agents carrying out deportations on behalf of the Trump administration are clashing with protesters, some lawful, others unlawfully disruptive and even violent. The Trump administration has ordered in the National Guard and threatened to send in the Marines. Governor Gavin Newsom calls this willful escalation. Trump-administration officials say they must protect federal agents engaged in lawful immigration actions––enforcement that some protesters regard as cruel and immoral, regardless of legality. Anytime that American citizens clash in the streets with armed agents of the state, something has gone wrong. Today's civil unrest risks expanding into the sort of violence that kills lots of people and strains civic bonds for decades. And every time looting and rioting occur in Los Angeles, the city's poorest neighborhoods suffer the aftereffects for years. Stepping back from the brink is in America's interest, regardless of where one attributes blame. As a Californian, I am especially dismayed to see this happen in L.A., a city I adore, where I long lived and where I have many friends and loved ones. For all Angelenos, so recently traumatized by this year's devastating wildfires, and for the many Americans who feel dismay when watching their fellow citizens clash, I pray the turmoil ends without loss of life. My fear that it may instead intensify is informed by several background conditions. Among them are President Donald Trump's incentives. On X, many of his supporters are gleeful about the prospect of a clash that ends in bloodied leftists wearing handcuffs and facing felonies. Even setting aside the most negatively polarized segment of the Republican base, Trump has a strong incentive to redirect public attention away from his feud with Elon Musk, his underwater approval rating on the economy, and the fight over a spending bill that divides his coalition, and toward immigration enforcement, an issue on which his approval rating is still positive. What's more, this clash concerns deportation actions that are apparently lawful, as opposed to Trump's unconstitutional deportations of foreigners to a Salvadoran prison. Newsom has urged nonviolence, but California officials also have incentives to focus on opposing Trump rather than restoring calm to protect innocents. Golden State polls show not only that Trump is more unpopular in the state than he is in the nation, but that immigration is a bad issue for him locally. Regarding undocumented immigrants, the Public Policy Institute of California finds that 'overwhelming majorities of adults (73%) and likely voters (71%) say that there should be a way for them to stay in the country legally, if certain requirements are met'; that 'eight in ten adults (79%) and likely voters (80%) favor the protections given by DACA—Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals—to undocumented immigrants brought into the US as children'; and that 'about six in ten adults (63%) and likely voters (62%) favor the California state and local governments making their own policies and taking actions, separate from the federal government, to protect the legal rights of undocumented immigrants in California.' Sentiments in Los Angeles are surely even more antagonistic to Trump's position, and the stakes for Angelenos with family members and friends who live there without legal status are high––in protesting, within or outside of the law, many seek to preserve their communities or perhaps their very families. And Trump, by his own unlawful actions, has made many fear that their intimates may not be simply deported back to their home country but instead disappeared into the prison system of an authoritarian regime. Federal and local cops have cause to feel threatened, too. More than 900 suffered injuries during the 2020 unrest that followed the killing of George Floyd. Multiple federal, state, and local agencies trying to keep order, while federal, state, and local officials fight rather than coordinate, only raises the probability of bad outcomes. And today's social-media environment facilitates the rapid communication of where deportation raids are occurring, enabling not just peaceful protesters but also, potentially, nihilistic inciters of chaos to rush to the scene. Immigration-enforcement raids will continue so long as Trump is president and the law of the land is unchanged. Opponents of such actions, even those that are entirely lawful, have every right under the Constitution to peaceably assemble to protest them. Farsighted protest leaders should do everything in their power to keep those demonstrations law-abiding. Under the Trump administration, the rule of law is among the most precious safeguards Americans possess. Appealing to it, Trump critics have repeatedly prevailed in courtrooms, where Trump is least likely to succeed with his most dangerous gambits. In contrast, street violence gives Trump the ability to fight his enemies with the law on his side and with trained, armed personnel to enforce it. In such a fight, Trump may well prevail in the court of public opinion. But if he is seen as needlessly escalating the dispute, and bloodshed follows, more Americans may come to reflect that the same man was president during the civil unrest of summer 2020; the civil unrest of January 6, 2021; and the civil unrest of today. Whether one attributes blame to Trump himself or to so-called Trump derangement syndrome, the sad and dangerous spectacle of Americans fighting one another happens alarmingly often when Trump is in the White House. A president attuned to America's long-term interests and the many global challenges our nation confronts would try to lower the temperature, rather than inflame a clash that could have deadly results. Article originally published at The Atlantic