
Women's World Cup winner Divya Deshmukh becomes India's 88th GM - full list of Grandmasters
Indian chess prodigy Divya Deshmukh, aged 19, has secured the FIDE
Women's World Cup
title by defeating India's top-ranked player Koneru Humpy in the rapid tiebreaks of the final in Batumi, Georgia.
This victory holds special significance as it earned Divya her final Grandmaster norm, making her the fourth Indian woman to achieve the prestigious GM title. She becomes the 88th Indian overall to reach this milestone.
Starting as the 15th seed, Divya showcased exceptional skill throughout the tournament, defeating several top-ranked players before facing Humpy in the final match.
Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel.
SUBSCRIBE NOW!
The final began with two classical games that ended in draws, leading to rapid tiebreaks to determine the winner.
The first rapid game with Divya playing White pieces resulted in a balanced draw. In the second game, Divya played with Black pieces and maintained remarkable composure.
Humpy, 38, made several crucial mistakes during the endgame while under time pressure. Divya successfully capitalised on these errors to secure the championship title.
Divya's tournament performance was notable as she entered without being considered a top favourite.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Senior Living Homes in Kachua May Surprise You
Senior Living | Search Ads
Undo
She consistently demonstrated strong attacking play and thorough preparation against higher-ranked opponents.
Her achievement represents the emerging talent in Indian chess, with young players making their mark on the international stage.
The 19-year-old's World Cup victory marks a significant milestone in her career and adds another achievement to Indian chess history.
List of Indian chess Grandmasters
1987 – Viswanathan Anand, Tamil Nadu
1991 – Dibyendu Barua, West Bengal
1997 – Pravin Thipsay, Maharashtra
2000 – Abhijit Kunte, Maharashtra
2000 – K Sasikiran, Tamil Nadu
2001 – Pentala Harikrishna, Andhra Pradesh
2002 – Koneru Humpy, Andhra Pradesh
2003 – Surya Sekhar Ganguly, West Bengal
2003 – Sandipan Chanda, West Bengal
2004 – RB Ramesh, Tamil Nadu
2004 – Tejas Bakre, Gujarat
2006 – P.Magesh Chandran, Tamil Nadu
2006 – Deepan Chakravarthy, Tamil Nadu
2006 – Neelotpal Das, West Bengal
2006 – Parimarjan Negi, Delhi
2007 – GN Gopal, Kerala
2008 – Abhijeet Gupta, Rajasthan
2008 – S.Arun Prasad, Tamil Nadu
2009 – S.Kidambi, Tamil Nadu
2009 – RR Laxman, Tamil Nadu
2010 – Sriram Jha, Delhi
2010 – Deep Sengupta, West Bengal
2010 – B Adhiban, Tamil Nadu
2011 – SP Sethuraman, Tamil Nadu
2011 – Harika Dronavalli, Andhra Pradesh
2012 – Lalith Babu M R, Andhra Pradesh
2012 – Vaibhav Suri, Delhi
2012 – MR Venkatesh, Tamil Nadu
2012 – Sahaj Grover, Delhi
2013 – Vidit Gujrathi, Maharashtra
2013 – Shyam Sundar M, Tamil Nadu
2013 – Akhshayraj Kore, Maharashtra
2013 – Vishnu Prasanna,Tamil Nadu
2013 – Debashis Das, Odisha
2013 – Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury, West Bengal
2014 – Ankit Rajpara, Gujarat
2015 – Aravindh Chithambaram, Tamil Nadu
2015 – Karthikeyan Murali, Tamil Nadu
2015 – Ashwin Jayaram, Tamil Nadu
2015 – Swapnil S Dhopade, Maharashtra
2015 – SL Narayanan, Kerala
2016 – Shardul Gagare, Maharashtra
2016 – Diptayan Ghosh, West Bengal
2016 – Priyadarshan K, Tamil Nadu
2017 – Aryan Chopra, Delhi
2017 – Srinath Narayanan, Tamil Nadu
2017 – Himanshu Sharma, Haryana
2017 – Anurag Mhamal, Goa
2017 – Abhimanyu Puranik, Maharashtra
2017 – Thej Kumar M S, Karnataka
2018 – Saptarshi Roy, West Bengal
2018 – Rameshbabu Praggnanandhaa, Tamil Nadu
2018 – Nihal Sarin, Kerala
2018 – Erigaisi Arjun, Telangana
2018 – Karthik Venkataraman, Telangana
2018 – Harsha Bharathakoti, Telangana
2018 – P Karthikeyan, Tamil Nadu
2018 – Stany George Anthony, Karnataka
2019 – Visakh N R, Tamil Nadu
2019 – Dommaraju Gukesh, Tamil Nadu
2019 – PanneerselvamIniyan, Tamil Nadu
2019 – Swayams Mishra, Odisha
2019 – Girish Koushik, Karnataka
2019 – Prithu Gupta, Delhi
2019 – Raunak Sadhwani, Maharashtra
2020 – Akash Ganesan, Tamil Nadu
2020 – Leon Mendonca, Goa
2021 – Arjun Kalyan, Tamil Nadu
2021 – Harshit Raja, Maharashtra
2021 – Raja Rithvik, Telangana
2021 – Sankalp Gupta, Maharashtra
2021 – Mitrabha Guha, West Bengal
2022 – Bharath Subramaniyam, Tamil Nadu
2022 – Rahul Srivatshav P, Telangana
2022 – V Pranav, Tamil Nadu
2022 – Pranav Anand, Karnatka
2022 – Aditya Mittal, Maharashtra
2023 – Koustav Chatterjee, West Bengal
2023 – Pranesh M, Tamil Nadu
2023 – Vignesh N R, Tamil Nadu
2023 – Sayantan Das, West Bengal
2023 – Vuppala Prraneeth, Telengana
2023 – Aditya Samant, Maharashtra
2023 – Vaishali Rameshbabu, Tamil Nadu
2024 – Shyaam Nikhil P, Tamil Nadu
2025 – Srihari LR, Tamil Nadu
2025 – Harikrishnan A Ra, Tamil Nadu
2025 – Divya Deshmukh, Maharashtra
Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
Dale Steyn slams Washington Sundar - Ravindra Jadeja for chasing ‘free milestones', backs Ben Stokes in handshake row
A new-look Team India fought their way through the last two days of the Manchester Test to secure a draw and keep the five-match series alive going into the Oval. While there was plenty of talk about the grit and determination shown by the Indian batters, a fresh controversy emerged in the final hour of play on Day 5 when English skipper Ben Stokes offered to end the game with a handshake, only for the Indian batters to refuse as they were closing in on their respective centuries. After Stokes' offer was turned down, the English captain tried to persuade Ravindra Jadeja by asking if he really wanted to score a century against the likes of Harry Brook and Ben Duckett. Zak Crawley also jumped into the exchange, urging Jadeja to shake hands with Stokes and leave the field. While much of the cricketing fraternity—including former England captains Alastair Cook and Nasser Hussain—backed India's decision to keep batting, others criticised the move as going against the 'spirit of the game'. Former South Africa pacer Dale Steyn has now weighed in on the debate, siding with the English camp and accusing Washington Sundar and Ravindra Jadeja of chasing 'free milestones.' He said their decision to continue batting was not the most gentlemanly thing to do. Steyn was replying to a post by Proteas spinner Tabraiz Shamsi, who wrote on X (formerly Twitter): "Why is there such a big deal being made about the Indians choosing not to accept the offer to end the game in a draw immediately? The offer was made. The offer was rejected, and they were fully entitled to make their choice. They got their 100s, which they worked hard for. Game over," Steyn replied to that post stating, 'Shamo this onion has many layers to it, and each one will make someone cry. The only issue I see here is the one thing people aren't realizing, the batters weren't playing for 100s, they were batting for a DRAW. That was the goal. Draw the game. Once that was accomplished, and a result was out of the question a handshake was offered, that's the gentlemanly thing to do right? It's not then the time to realize they safe and now say no we'd prefer some free milestones… although within the rules, just seems a little, well, odd. That said, they did bat well, and maybe with the last hour approaching they should have been more aggressive in reaching those milestones, at least then, we could all agree, no team tried to out do the other in this weird situation,'


Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Divya Deshmukh's FIDE win at FIDE Women's World Cup and a turning point in Indian women's chess
Over the span of 25 days in Batumi, little cracks started to appear in China's dominance of women's chess. A nine-woman contingent made its way from China to the Georgian city to try and win the FIDE Women's World Cup, only to see two Indians — the 19-year-old champion Divya Deshmukh and the 38-year-old finalist Koneru Humpy — fighting it out for the title at the end. The contrast in India and China's fortunes was most visible during the final: While Divya fought against Humpy for the title, the Chinese duo of Tan and Lei were fighting for the third place. 'Indian chess is just unbelievable!' wrote chess legend Judit Polgar in a post on her X account. Having two Indian women fighting in the finale was a moment that could be an indicator of a seismic shift in the world of women's chess. After all, this comes on the back of the Indian women's team claiming the Chess Olympiad gold medal just last year. China has been a dominant force in women's chess for decades now. While they have not had a World Cup winner in three editions, their prowess in women's chess is strongly reflected in women's world championships, the pinnacle of women's chess. Six out of the 17 women's world champions in history have been from China. The first of these was Xie Jun, who became the first-ever women's chess champion from Asia when she claimed the title in 1991. After claiming the title thrice more, she passed the torch to Zhu Chen and Xu Yuhua. Then came the era of Hou Yifan, who won the title four times starting from 2010. The 15 years since that title from Yifan have seen three women from China claim the women's world champion's crown — Tan Zhongyi and Ju Wenjun being the other two. This reign of China on the women's world champion's throne since 2010 was only briefly interjected twice. 'Divya's win is a great thing for India because of the way the country's players dominated the World Cup. Women's chess especially was always dominated by Russia and China, two very strong countries,' points out grandmaster Abhijit Kunte, who was the captain of the Indian women's team at the Olympiad last year where the first blow to China's dominance was struck by Indian women. At the Olympiad, a team event, China had sent a second-string team without stars like women's world champion Ju Wenjun, Tan Zhongyi and Lei Tingjie. At the Women's World Cup, though, it had one of the strongest contingents, missing only two top stars: World No 1 Hou Yifan, who is semi-retired at this point, and women's world champion Ju. China's nine-player contingent was matched in numbers by India's nine players among the 107 contenders from 46 countries. 'The way India dominated the World Cup, it showed that our players are ready to take on everybody. China cannot take India lightly now, because we have gold and silver medals in the World Cup, we won a silver medal at the Asian Games and we were gold medalists in the Chess Olympiad. Having two India versus China semi-finals shows how stiff the competition between the two countries is,' says Kunte. What makes the one-two finish by Indian players even more remarkable is that the FIDE Women's World Cup is the trickiest format in the sport to navigate. It's a minefield where each round involves one-on-one battles in the two-game mini matches in the classical format. If the two classical games do not yield a winner, the battle enters a third day where there are skirmishes in the rapid format and then blitz if necessary until there's a winner. On paper, it should have been an exhausting format for someone like Humpy. And a daunting one for someone as inexperienced as Divya. But eventually, the grizzled veteran and the tenacious teenager were left standing to fight for the title. Away from the two players too, there are plenty of positives: Be it Woman International Master Priyanka K outlasting Women's Grandmaster Zsoka Gaal in tense tiebreaks, or I M Vantika Agrawal taking out former women's world champion Anna Ushenina, or India having more players in the quarter-finals (four) than China (three). 'Our Olympiad team members, Vaishali Rameshbabu and Harika Dronavalli, also made it to the quarter-finals. So if you look at the bench strength of the Indian women's players in this World Cup, we can say that for the very first time in women's chess, we sort of outperformed the Chinese players. That in itself is a show of dominance. Along with the fact that we are better, we also have players that are currently improving. Divya, for example, is far away from reaching her peak,' says Kushager Krishnater, who has been Humpy's second since August 2022. The Olympiad victory, coupled with the one-two at the World Cup, have raised hopes that the final frontier — the women's world championship title — can also be breached by an Indian woman soon. 'Chess in India was ruled by Humpy and Harika for almost 20-25 years. Humpy recently became a World Rapid Champion, her second title in the format. Humpy and Harika have performed very well at the international level. But the Women's World Championship title has always been missed by Indian players. And now the way Gukesh has come and won the World Championship title, we expect that Divya will also follow the same path. This new generation will bring these titles back to India. They are not just ensuring that the legacy of Humpy and Harika continues, they will take that flag even higher,' predicts Kunte.


Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
After 5-0 defeat, West Indies captain Shai Hope blames shoddy batting for loss
Whereas West Indies's defeat to Australia in the Test series was not a surprise, them sinking in T20 waters was a shock. Former world champions, one of the hottest suppliers of T20 gun-for-hires on the franchise circuit, Australia blanked them 5-0, pushing their cricket further into the gorge. Worryingly, the defeat was not anomalous, but a continuation of the Caribbeans' free-fall in the only format that they had offered a semblance of stability. This was West Indies's 16th defeat in the last 19 games, feeding worrying signs ahead of the T20 World Cup next year. Captain Shai Hope could say nothing more than what his predecessors had said. 'We've got to put this one behind us, and look ahead for the Pakistan series (starting Thursday), and see where we can get that combination and that success going,' he said. Batting, weakened by the premature retirement of Nicholas Pooran, has been their biggest torment. 'We never put together a proper batting display. We either started well or finished poorly or the other way round. Against a quality team you can't get away with that. And with the ball we never really gave ourselves a chance given we didn't have enough runs on the board,' Hope said. He rued the lost tosses. 'Unfortunately we didn't win any tosses. It just didn't happen for us. Chasing is always the better thing to do in the Caribbean. I must commend the guys for their effortsI think we're a bit clearer as a bowling unit heading towards the Pakistan series. We certainly executed a lot better than we did in the first few games.' Comparatively bowling offered some solace. Left-arm seamer Jediah Blades snared three wickers and impressed with his liveliness. Alzarri Joseph showed he has the slippery pace that trouble the best batsmen. Left-arm spinner Akeal Hosein could be a handful when then surface offers turn, 'Hosein is a quality bowler and we just backed him to come and do the job, and he did exceptionally well for that four-over spell. Just unfortunate that, again, we didn't have as many runs on the board as we would have liked,' Hope praised his spinner. On the other hand, Australia illustrated that they could be an intimidating proposition in the World Cup next year, a team with disturbing depth and envious firepower, winning 11 of their last 12 games. Captain Mitchell Marsh said: 'I didn't expect 5-0 at the start of the series. But we played some great cricket. It was something we spoke about after the fourth game. We knew no Australian team had completed a clean sweep. We've had guys come in and play different roles for us. We spoke pre-tour about having flexibility and fluidity as a group. The way T20 is going teams just keep going now and it's exciting and hopefully we can continue our power hitting.'