
ChatGPT Helped Get Me Pregnant
It began, as these things do, with a decision. My husband and I determined that 2025 would be the year. In November 2024, we made our first attempt, guided by my period tracker app that used the scant and wildly inconsistent data I fed it to estimate my fertile window. My cycle was irregular; my commitment to inputting my period's start and end dates was even more so. Unsurprisingly, a period arrived in December. I was disappointed, but also energized—I would need to get serious.
I was 34 years old. Not old, not young. Statistically speaking, women in their early thirties have about a 20% chance of conceiving each cycle. By thirty-five, that number begins to decline more sharply. The internet is littered with charts meant to alarm, statistics plotted in grim downward curves. Still, most OBs will tell you that thirty-four is a perfectly reasonable age to try. It simply requires a bit more attention to timing—and perhaps a few additional tools.
I did what most women do when entering this realm: I turned to friends. Over dinner, I quizzed those recently pregnant on their methods. Gone were the days when ovulation could be loosely inferred from intuition and a calendar—modern methods required data. 'You have to use these strips,' one friend insisted, pushing her phone toward me with an Amazon link. 'The others are garbage.' I ordered a box before the appetizers arrived.
These strips—delicate paper things with fuchsia gradients—were designed to detect a surge in luteinizing hormone (LH) in the urine, the spike that precedes ovulation. If the test line matched or darkened beyond the control line, one was said to be fertile. In theory, foolproof. In practice, utterly subjective. I stood in my bathroom many mornings holding a used strip against the printed example on the box, squinting. "Does this look the same to you?" I asked my husband, who is far from a color theorist and really had no business evaluating shades of raspberry pink before 7 a.m.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
12 minutes ago
- Forbes
12 Startups Proving Motherhood Over 40 Is A Market Advantage
For decades, motherhood over 40 was framed as a compromise. It meant climbing the corporate ladder, with family as a tradeoff. In the past couple of years, births to mothers under 20 have decreased by 73% since 1990, while births to women over 40 have increased by 193%. This shift in birth patterns indicates a trend towards women having children later in life. Nearly 71% of mothers with children under 18 are in the workforce, yet mothers of children under six have lower participation rates than those with older kids. At the same time, the U.S. fertility market is booming, valued at $36.5 billion in 2024 and projected to more than double by 2034. Here are 12 companies proving that because of more women contemplating motherhood over 40, the work-caregiving crossroads is a high-growth market with the power to reshape industries from childcare to eldercare to fertility. Redefining Parenthood Support: Joy Serving more than 50,000 parents with a 92% monthly retention rate, Joy pairs parents with expert coaches and on-demand toolkits to help them negotiate flexible hours, design return-to-work plans, and set boundaries. Founder Emily Greenberg adds that most of Joy's users are Millennial and Gen X parents who delayed parenthood for career or financial stability, bringing a strategic mindset to raising children. Allofam After giving birth prematurely and struggling to find a pediatrician, Allofam founder Heidi Schaler created a platform that matches families with vetted pediatricians, lactation consultants, child psychologists, and other specialists. Parents can filter by language, care philosophy, and needs. Allofam has served 20 families and partnered with two Denver clinics. Older parents, Schaler says, seek providers who treat the whole family, not just the symptoms. Eleplan Amanda Lukof, a former corporate lawyer, founded Eleplan while raising young children and caring for her adult brother with autism. She recognized that many mothers in their late 30s and 40s are 'sandwich generation' caregivers, juggling the needs of both young children and aging relatives. Eleplan addresses this by consolidating care plans, medical histories, and schedules in one secure place, saving caregivers an average of over 80 hours per year. Today, the platform serves over 250 users through 12 partnerships. Sage Haus Launched by Kelly Hubbell, a working mother whose life transformed after hiring a house manager, Sage Haus offers services from meal prep to executive-assistant-style household coordination. Clients, 80% of whom are in dual-career or senior-leadership households, gain back 15–30 hours a week. The company grew 480% year-over-year, serving 68 households and reaching over 4,000 additional through free resources in the U.S. and Canada. Reimagining Workplace Support: Leona Founded by Maggie Gremminger and Meredith Patrick, Leona helps employers treat parental leave as a retention strategy. It creates reintegration plans, coaches teams on empathetic communication, and turns a life transition into a culture-building opportunity, meeting the expectations of senior-level mothers. Poppins Payroll Poppins Payroll automates tax filing, direct deposit, and compliance for families employing caregivers, making the arrangement legal and fair while granting caregivers access to benefits like Social Security. Founder Mike Wussow has helped over 65,000 families nationwide, a solution particularly relevant to later parents relying on in-home childcare. Planning Parenthood as a Life Strategy: Fertility360 Founded by Eloise Drane, a fertility advocate with 17 years in surrogacy and egg donation, Fertility360 reframes fertility as a long-term plan, not a crisis. It integrates education, early planning, emotional health support, and financial readiness for IVF, surrogacy, and egg freezing, serving women who delayed family building for career or financial stability. StorkFund Launching with 500 people on the waitlist, StorkFund combines high-yield savings, employer contributions, and provider discounts for fertility, parental leave, childcare, and education. Founded by Javeste Dulcio, the company has 75 providers in its pipeline and employer interest from seven companies, including a Fortune 500. Transforming Childcare Access: Hello Nanny Founded by Stephanie Fornaro, a court-appointed special advocate for children, Hello Nanny matches families with vetted nannies, family assistants, and household managers. With a 90% placement success rate and a network of over 5,000 nannies, it has supported 1,500 families and seen 300% lead growth in 2025. Tot Squad Founded by Jen Saxton, a mother who had children at 35 and 38, Tot Squad partners with retailers like Target and Amazon so parents can register for services (lactation support, prenatal massage, and doula care) alongside traditional products. It has served 50,000 families through over 20 partnerships. Centering the Caregiver: GiveCare GiveCare delivers personalized, 160-character micro-interventions (stress reduction, curated resources, appointment prompts) while tracking caregiver well-being in real time. Founder Ali Madad spent seven years caring for both parents while raising four children, and built the platform for the growing number of dual caregivers balancing children and eldercare. Spread The Jelly Founded by Lauren Levinger and Amrit Tietz, Spread The Jelly publishes unfiltered motherhood stories on autism care, maternal health inequities, queer parenting, and more. In 10 months, it has reached approximately two million monthly views and built a community of over 26,000. Across childcare, fertility, workplace policy, care coordination, and storytelling, these founders share one truth: they are reshaping the caregiving economy from the inside out for women comfortable with motherhood over 40. They are making it intentional, inclusive, and fully integrated into modern work and life.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Speed of improvement in cancer survival rates ‘slowing', say experts
Progress in cancer survival rates in the UK has 'slowed down', experts have warned. The news comes as a study suggests survival between the most and least deadly types of the disease is wider than ever before. A national cancer plan was 'essential' to 'bring cancer survival trends back towards the best in the world', researchers said. The study, led by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and funded by Cancer Research UK, analysed long-term trends in the cancer survival index (CSI) for adults across England and Wales from 1971 to 2018. Using records from the National Disease Registration Service for England and the Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit, experts estimated net survival for up to 10 years after diagnosis for around 10.8 million people. They found that in 2018, the CSI for all cancers combined a decade after diagnosis was 49.8%, higher than the CSI at one year for those diagnosed in 1971/72. Researchers hailed the figure as 'remarkable', but warned that the 'speed of improvement in survival has slowed down'. In the five years from 2000/01 to 2005/06, the 10-year CSI rose by 4%, from 41.2% to 45.2%. But between 2010/11 and 2015/16, the rise was 1.4%, from 47.9% to 49.3%. There were also major gaps in survival when it came to different cancer types. For example, 10-year survival for testicular cancer was 97%, compared with 4.3% for pancreatic cancer. Screening programmes had bolstered survival rates for cancers in the breast, bowel and cervix, according to Cancer Research UK. But survival for other types, such as stomach, lung and brain cancer, had increased by only a small amount in the past 50 years. Writing in the Lancet Regional Health – Europe, researchers warned this slowdown for individual cancers implied a 'system-wide challenge'. Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 'Thanks to research, most patients today are far more likely to survive their cancer than at any point in the past. 'But the reality is that this progress is slowing – and for some cancers, it never got going in the first place.' The Government launched a call for evidence to help shape a national cancer plan in February. The blueprint aims to outline actions to transform how the disease is treated in a bid to reduce deaths. Ms Mitchell said: 'The upcoming National Cancer Plan for England must include commitments to spot more cancers earlier, as well as backing research into new treatments so that each patient, regardless of their diagnosis, can hope for more moments with the people they love.' Michel Coleman, a professor of epidemiology and statistics at LSHTM, said: 'Since I began my career in cancer research, I've seen substantial increases in survival for most types of cancer. 'Our understanding of cancer biology has expanded, effective screening programmes have been introduced, and new treatments have been developed. Allowing this trend to stall will have devastating consequences. 'This study was only possible because of data on millions of patients from cancer registries in England and Wales. 'It's vital that the Government provides the political and financial support to ensure we maintain this crucial data. Without these, the Government will be flying blind on cancer control. 'The National Cancer Plan is a chance to improve NHS cancer pathways and reap the benefits of new research – the Government must take it.' Cancer Research UK is calling for the national cancer plan to slash waiting times for diagnosis and treatment, saying some patients face unacceptable delays. The plan should also improve early diagnosis of cancer, with plans to boost participation in existing screening programmes and a commitment to rolling out lung cancer screening fully in England by 2029. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'We are prioritising cancer care as we turn around more than a decade of neglect of our NHS. 'We're already seeing progress, with 95,000 more people having cancer diagnosed or ruled out within 28 days between July 2024 and May 2025, compared to the same period the previous year. 'The National Cancer Plan will set out how we will improve survival rates further and address the variation between different cancer types.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
CPR questions to be added to driving theory test
Learner drivers are to be quizzed on their CPR skills in an update to the theory test. The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) – which oversees driving tests in Britain – said motorists are often 'first on the scene' when someone suffers a cardiac arrest. Adding questions on CPR and defibrillators to the theory test from early next year means candidates will 'have a better understanding of the skills to use in an emergency', it added. More than 40,000 people in the UK suffer an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest each year, with fewer than one in 10 surviving. Research has found survival rates can be as high as 70% if CPR is given and a defibrillator used within three to five minutes of collapse. DVSA chief driving examiner Mark Winn said: 'Part of being a safe and responsible driver is knowing what to do in an emergency – how to step in and make a real, life-saving difference. 'Learning CPR and how to use a defibrillator is a very simple skill, and adding this into the official learning resource is a great way for DVSA to support the drive to raise awareness.' The push for the change was led by Professor Len Nokes – chair of the Save a Life Cymru scheme – whose 24-year-old daughter Claire died in 2017 from complications following a cardiac arrest. He said: 'When Claire, my daughter, had her cardiac arrest, some knowledge of CPR might have made a difference. 'I don't want any other family to go through this experience. 'All of us in this partnership hope that by making CPR and how to use a defibrillator part of the theory test, we will be able to significantly increase the number of people who have this life-saving awareness.' James Cant, chief executive of charity Resuscitation Council UK, said: 'By embedding these life-saving skills into such a widely-taken assessment, we can help ensure that more people, from all communities, gain the knowledge and confidence to act during a cardiac arrest.' Learners must pass the theory driving test before booking a practical test. Theory test candidates are required to get at least 43 out of 50 multiple-choice questions correct, covering areas such as road signs, traffic laws, vehicle safety and first aid. They must also pass a hazard perception video test. More than two million theory tests are taken each year, with a pass rate of about 45%.