Reeves braced for OBR forecasts to blow £20bn hole in tax and spending plans
Rachel Reeves is braced for revised forecasts by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) to blow a £20bn hole in her tax and spending plans before the autumn budget.
Even without changing the totals the chancellor set out in her spending review on Wednesday, a weaker forecast from the the Treasury's independent watchdog could force her to find significantly more money at the budget to meet her 'non-negotiable' fiscal rules.
Reeves has said repeatedly that flexing her fiscal rules – designed to provide certainty over UK public finances – is not an option even if the economic outlook deteriorates.
At her spring statement, she left herself on course to meet those rules with less than £10bn of headroom to spare, on a total budget for day-to-day spending of more than £1.3tn.
Amid trepidation at the Treasury, the OBR has kicked off its annual summer review of the 'supply side' of the economy – including productivity, which it has consistently overestimated.
Sources with knowledge of the OBR's thinking told the Guardian that the watchdog was 'uncomfortable', with the fact its current forecast for productivity growth was more positive than the consensus from other economic forecasters, and wanted to 'rein it in'.
Productivity is one of the key determinants of economic growth, and revising it down would have a significant knock on effect on the OBR's forecasts for gross domestic product.
The consultancy Oxford Economics estimates that moving the productivity forecast back in line with the average independent projection, would knock 1.4% off forecast GDP at the end of the OBR's five-year forecast period.
That would force Reeves to increase taxes or cut spending by an eye-watering £20bn, to meet her fiscal rules and maintain her slim £10bn of headroom. That would be roughly equivalent to raising both the main and higher rates of income tax by 2p.
A more cautious approach, taking the middle path between two alternative 'scenarios' the OBR set out in its March economic and financial outlook, could still force the chancellor to make a £12bn correction.
The OBR could send an early signal of its intention to revisit its productivity outlook as soon as 1 July, in its regular forecast evaluation report.
Andy King, a former member of the OBR's budget responsibility committee, now at the consultancy Flint Global, said: 'The reason why anyone in the Treasury who cares about this will be worried, is that the OBR is currently more optimistic than everyone else.
'What can happen next? Either everyone else thinks, 'We're too pessimistic'; or the OBR thinks, 'We are too far away from the pack, there's been more bad news than good since March, we should revise down.' I think that's the expectation for many.'
The Treasury is likely to point the OBR to policies it hopes will be positive for productivity growth in the long term, including infrastructure investment, though the scale of this was already known before the OBR's last forecast in March.
Alongside weaker productivity, slower net migration as a result of the government's recent white paper could also prompt the OBR to be more pessimistic.
James Smith an economist at ING, said: 'Further downgrades to trend productivity growth projections, as well as net migration, mean the chancellor is likely in the red, before even considering the mounting pressures on the public purse.
'The overall shortfall may amount to at least £20bn, and that means tax rises are highly likely.'
Adrian Pabst, the deputy director of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, said the prospect of another significant forecast revision underlined the current instability of tax and spend policy.
'We're in this vicious circle where we've got these fiscal rules, then the OBR have to take a view, because that's their remit, that's their mandate; and then we're constantly speculating about what is going to happen at the next fiscal event,' he said, adding: 'It's not a good place for fiscal policy to be.'
In a recent speech, Reeves said: 'Strong and transparent fiscal rules are an indispensable safeguard for working people – and that is why my rules are non-negotiable.'
The Treasury declined to comment on the prospect of an OBR growth downgrade but underlined Reeves's determination to stick to her fiscal rules.
The OBR declined to comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Economic heart attack': 3 top experts detail how they see a possible US debt crisis unfolding
Top experts are sounding the alarm about a potential debt crisis, Goldman Sachs said. The bank interviewed three economy pros about their outlook for the US fiscal situation. The top insights from Ray Dalio, Ken Rogoff, and Niall Ferguson are detailed below. Investor concerns over a swelling government debt load were soothed last week. But some experts say the US isn't out of the woods yet. Goldman Sachs spoke to three top economic experts — Ray Dalio, Ken Rogoff, and Niall Ferguson — about rising debt levels in the US. All three said they were worried about an impending debt crisis, particularly when considering the effects of President Donald Trump's GOP tax and spending bill, which has been estimated to add trillions to the budget deficit over the next decade. That reflects a slightly more pessimistic view than the market. After a scare last month, demand for long-dated government bonds was strong this week. It was a sign that investors are feeling more comfortable about the fiscal situation in the US, after showing nerves last month after Moody's downgraded US debt and Trump's tax bill began making its way through Congress. Here are the top points each of the experts had to make: The billionaire hedge fund manager said he sees three factors determining the outlook for the US debt. How much the government pays on debt interest relative to its revenue. If interest payments keep rising, it can "unacceptably" prevent the government from spending money on other things. How much debt the government needs to sell relative to demand. If the government needs to sell more Treasurys than people are willing to buy, interest rates will have to rise. That provides a more attractive yield to investors to hold onto the US debt, but high rates also hurt markets and the economy. How much money the central bank needs to print in other to purchase the remaining debt. If demand for US Treasurys is especially weak, the Fed can step in to purchase bonds to keep the government funded. If it has to print more money to do so, that can raise inflation and ding the value of the US dollar. "One can easily measure these signs of deterioration and see movement toward an impending debt crisis," Dalio, who has long warned of troubling debt dynamics in the US, said. "Such a crisis occurs when the constriction of debt-financed spending happens, like a debt-induced economic heart attack." To prevent a crisis, Dalio said he believed the government should reduce the budget deficit to 3% of GDP. Reducing the debt could cause interest rates to decline around 150 basis points, he estimated, reducing interest payments on the national debt and stimulating the economy. Given Trump's current agenda, Rogoff thinks the US will likely enter a debt crisis within the next four to five years. That's faster than the five- to seven-year timeline he predicted prior to Trump's reelection. "The notion that debt is a free lunch that had been pushed by many economy-watchers is absurd," Rogoff said. "Today's larger deficit on top of already-high debt levels is setting up for a crisis that will necessitate a significant adjustment." Rogoff thinks a debt crisis could play out in two ways: Inflation spikes and results in an economic shock. "Exactly what that shock will look like is difficult to say, but it will likely be more painful than the Covid inflation shock that precipitated only relatively minor adjustments in bond markets," Rogoff said. The government could manage the debt by keeping interest rates artificially low and restricting capital flows. But those measures will hurt economic growth and essentially serve as a tax on savers in the economy, he said. Investors have long been concerned about the US debt, but the outlook is especially worrying now because long-term interest rates are going through a "normalization" from low levels that stretched over the past decade, Rogoff said. "People need to recognize that higher interest rates are here to stay and that a return to the low-rate era of the past might well prove wishful thinking," he added. Ferguson thinks a crisis could be triggered by a military challenge that results in the US losing its position as a global power, as it goes deeper into debt. The British-American financial historian said his favorite gauge to determine how unsustainable national debt was is when a country spends more on interest payments for its debt than on defense. That rule, which he calls "Ferguson's Law," now applies to the US, which spent $1.1 trillion on interest payments on the national debt over the 2024 fiscal year, according to the Treasury Department. It was more than the $883.7 billion approved that year for total defense spending. Nearly every nation that has violated Ferguson's Law has lost its status as " great power" in financial markets, he said. "Any great power that pursues a reckless fiscal policy by allowing the cost of its debt to exceed the cost of its armed services is opening itself up to challenge," Ferguson said. "The US is just the latest great power to find itself in this fiscal jam." The US has been able to borrow as much as it has through now with no issues, in part because the US dollar remains the world's reserve currency and investors still see Treasurys as "risk-free," Ferguson said, meaning they have faith in the US's ability to make good on its interest payments. But that already appears to be shifting, he said, pointing to investors around the world shedding their exposure to US Treasurys and moving away from dollar assets. "I've warned the US is on an unsustainable fiscal path for 20 years now, and so at times have felt like the boy who cried 'wolf,'" Ferguson added. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sober karaoke on the rise as Gen Z ditch booze
Young people who shun alcohol are driving a boom in 'sober karaoke', putting them at odds with older generations who typically only sing after a few drinks. Charlie Elek, chief executive of Britain's biggest chain of karaoke bars Lucky Voice, said he had seen an increase Gen Z eschewing booze during their singing sessions – breaking with the popular image of karaoke as a late night activity only undertaken when the pubs have shut. He said 8pm was now the most popular time for bookings, compared to 10pm 'back in the day', because of a shift in drinking culture. 'Back in the day we were very much about post-pub activity. People would feel the need to have five drinks before coming to Lucky Voice. With Gen Z not not drinking the same ways that we used to, that that has changed over time,' he said. He said that older people were still drinking more ahead of karaoke sessions. 'There's definitely some people who feel – it's an older generation – that, 'well, I'm not going to do karaoke until I have about five pints'. 'There's something kind of more guarded about the older generations.' It comes amid a broader shift away from traditional pubs in terms of where younger people socialise. While Britain's pub industry has suffered many closures in recent years, so-called 'competitive socialising' venues offering activities like karaoke, axe throwing and shuffleboard have become more popular. Younger people in particular are cutting down on alcohol – with many now going completely teetotal. In a survey by Kantar last year, 59pc of Gen Z – which are defined as people born in or after 1997 – claimed not to have drunk any alcohol in the last 12 months. Mr Elek said this meant the chain was having to cater to a 'different type of customer'. 'They do come earlier,' he said. 'We have had to work a lot on our low & no [alcohol] menu, and that's getting really big pick up.' Founded in 2005 by Martha Lane Fox, the Baroness of Soho and her business partners Julian Douglas and Nick Thistleton, Lucky Voice is Britain's biggest chain dedicated exclusively to karaoke. It runs five bars in London and one in Brighton. As drinking habits have changed, the chain has also begun taking more corporate bookings and hosting more parties for children. The business pulled in its best Christmas on record in 2024, with sales rising 17pc compared with the prior year. However, as well as seeing a rise in sober karaoke, Mr Elek said he had noticed some customers staying out later on Sundays and week nights because they are working from home and do not have to go into the office the next day. He said: 'There's just a slight different attitude from the days where everyone was working five days a week and you knew that you were going to be at desk at 8:30am.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fortnum & Mason plots first UK stores outside London
Fortnum & Mason is plotting its first UK stores outside of London after a surge in customer demand for regular top-ups of luxury teas, biscuits and jam. Tom Athron, the chief of the luxury retailer, said he would be interested in opening stores 'up the spine of the country', adding: 'We do like the idea of stepping beyond Piccadilly [where it has its flagship store], and certainly stepping beyond London.' Fortnum & Mason currently only has four UK stores – including at St Pancras station, a 'tea salon' in London and Heathrow Terminal 5, as well as one site in Hong Kong. Opening outside London would mark the first time the Royal grocer has set up a permanent UK base away from the capital in its 318-year-history. Mr Athron did not say where a new Fortnums could open – but said he would look at sites in a 'beautiful location' with 'beautiful architecture'. He suggested Fortnum would probably consider opening one or two outposts, adding: 'This isn't about ubiquity. But there are other locations across the country where we think that Fortnum could offer both retail and restaurants, where it would be relevant. And we're looking at those now.' It comes as the retailer said it was no longer seen as a 'Christmas focused' business, with customers using Fortnum & Mason to 'stock their own larders' throughout the year. Fortnum & Mason earlier this month launched a new membership scheme – with those signing up to the 'Friends of Fortnum's' programme getting access to tickets for dining events as well as free delivery. Mr Athron said any new store away from London would 'remove the barriers' for the membership scheme and allow members to attend these events. Fortnum & Mason will also look at opportunities to open more airport stores, with Mr Athron saying: 'We would love the opportunity to have shops and restaurants in every terminal at Heathrow.' The plans come despite signs that households are slamming the brakes on spending, amid concerns over the economy. Figures from the British Retail Consortium last week suggested retail sales rose by just 1pc in the year to May. Mr Athron said Fortnum was not seeing a drop in demand. He said: 'What we tend to find is that when people become more judicious in the way that they spend their money, they switch out handbags and trainers for small luxuries they can take home – things like a really special jar of jam.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
