Will CAO points drop due to efforts to tackle grade inflation this year?
My
Leaving Cert
daughter is upset. Due to measures to tackle grade inflation this year, she feels she will be unfairly competing against candidates with bumper grades from previous years for
CAO
places. The courses she wants to study were on about 550 points last year
.
How much will her grades be 'deflated' by? What impact will this have on CAO points this year?
There are several factors – apart from inflated grades – which can influence the entry cut-off point for the CAO's round one offers in late August.
One is the number of places offered to round one candidates on each course.
The Government has been funding additional places in some high-demand courses in recent times, such as medical and therapeutic courses.
READ MORE
Where additional places are provided, CAO points often drop. This is because the last person through the door of the lecture theatre, so to speak, will typically have a lower points score than would be the case if the additional places had not been provided.
New courses can also affect the supply and demand of courses.
For example, additional pharmacy and veterinary courses are due to come on stream next year (not, unfortunately, in time for September of this year). If and when they do, the points for the existing courses should drop.
Change in demand for places on courses is another factor.
The number of applicants, overall, has increased significantly in 2025. Demand among students across individual courses changes from year to year. Greater demand usually leads to points going up.
Finally, there's grade inflation. As your daughter is aware, grades jumped in 2020 and again in 2021 with the introduction of teacher-predicted grades. The results have since been artificially inflated at this level (about 7 per cent, on aggregate, above normal times) by a 'postmarking intervention', so as not to disadvantage students competing against students with results from previous years. This year, however, the postmarking intervention will reduce to 5.5 per cent in advance of normal results.
What does this mean for a student this year? A candidate who secured 512 CAO points in 2019 would have received, roughly, about 550 points on foot of inflated grades over recent years. The same student could expect to receive, roughly, 538 points in 2025.
Consequently, your daughter might expect CAO points for her desired courses to drop due to so many getting lower points. But about one-in-four round one applicants (about 15,000) will be Leaving Certs from previous years; many will be on bumper grades. Their higher CAO points will give them an advantage over any equivalent 2025 Leaving Cert student.
I am sure it feels very unfair for your daughter. If there is any consolation, she is in the same boat as the rest of the class of 2025. At this stage, her best bet is to try to ignore issues outside her control and simply focus on doing the best she can in the exams.
Do you have a career or education query? Email askbrian@irishtimes.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
21 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Entire country to be brought under Rent Pressure Zone in major change agreed by Government leaders
In a meeting on Monday night, leaders met and agreed on a new system of national rent control. The current system, which caps yearly rent increases at 2pc or in line with inflation, will be retained for existing tenancies. This 2pc cap would no longer apply to newly built homes, which would instead have a cap linked directly to the rate of inflation. This measure is aimed at increasing the rate of private sector investment in building more rental homes. But significantly, every area of the country will now be designated as an RPZ under the new national rent control system, meaning the remaining one fifth of tenants in Ireland not in an RPZ will benefit from rent controls. Leaders also agreed on stronger security of tenure protections for renters. This, it is understood, will include an end to no fault evictions in the case of large landlords. Landlords are also set to be categorised according to the number of properties they own with smaller landlords to be categorised as those with three or fewer properties. According to proposals going to cabinet, landlords will only be allowed reset rents if the tenant leaves voluntarily. If a landlord serves a tenant a notice to quit, the landlord will not be allowed reset the rent. The move will aim to remove the economic incentive for landlords to evict tenants. The move to expand the RPZs is seemingly one that goes against the recommendations in the report from Housing Commission. ADVERTISEMENT In its report last year, the commission said while the rental market was both challenging for both renter and landlord, the RPZs were constraining landlords. According to the report, it said the impact of RPZs has been mixed and the commission recommended changes to the system. In particular, the report said the RPZ system should be reformed and a new system of 'reference rents' be established instead. This would be landlords would be limited on how much they could increase rent by, and would be based off things like the size of the rental property and where it is located. The commission also said regulations should continue between tenancies. 'If a tenancy ends the same regulations apply to the subsequent tenancy. This will discourage termination of tenancies that is designed to increase rental income,' the report said. As reported in the Sunday Independent, the Government was considering new rules which will allow landlords to significantly hike rents beyond the current caps. Under original the proposals, landlords would be allowed to increase rents to market rates in between tenancies of at least six years. While current tenancies are expected to remain under the RPZ regulations, the cap would not apply to newly built apartments. Currently, rents in a Rent Pressure Zone can only be increased by 2pc or in line with inflation, whichever is lower. First introduced in 2016 to control the rapidly increasing rents in high demand areas like Dublin and Cork, it was a major intervention in the market. Since then, the scheme has steadily spread across the country with most areas now considered an RPZ. Almost ten years after they were first introduced, and with the current regulations are due to expire at the end of this year, it had been anticipated that the current rules around RPZs would change. The Government continues to be under pressure on the issue of housing, wth the rental sector a major focus, as the Opposition has swooped on the issue. Raise the Roof campaign will hold a rally outside Leinster House on Tuesday next week at 6pm, calling for urgent Government action on Ireland's housing and homelessness crisis. The rally is timed to coincide with a Private Members Motion tabled by Opposition parties in the Dáil, and will feature speakers from political parties, alongside a series of singers and spoken word performances. The Raise the Roof campaign group is coordinated by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, and includes trade unions, housing and homeless agencies, women's groups, human rights advocacy groups, and community organisations. Speaking at a press conference to launch the rally, Ethel Buckley, SIPTU Deputy General Secretary said: 'Ten years into the housing crisis, and that crisis remains the greatest political failure of our time. Workers are being priced out of homes or can only rent or purchase with considerable financial burden. 'In the last 10 years rents and house prices have doubled - and in some areas more than doubled - while wages have increased by less than 40%. If anything, this gap has widened in the last couple of years. Rents and house prices are out of control. 'Alongside the human cost of this, we are seeing the serious knock on effects, with thousands of unfilled vacancies in key sectors, and young people once again choosing to emigrate. 'We are deeply concerned at the lack of urgency shown so far by this new government. A government that is content to play the role of helpless bystander to this ever-worsening emergency. What is needed now is a radical reset with sustained action to deliver secure, affordable housing.'
Irish Times
31 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Expected changes to local property tax will lead to modest increases for most homeowners
Most homeowners will see modest increases in their local property tax (LPT) next year under changes likely to be approved by the Cabinet this morning to mitigate the effects rising property values have on tax bills. The changes require legislation to widen tax bands and reduce the rate of LPT, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe is expected to tell colleagues. Property prices have increased by almost a quarter since the last revaluation of properties for the tax in 2021. Fearing substantial hikes in tax bills, the Government is expected to change the way the tax is calculated ahead of the next date for revaluation on November 1st of this year. Properties on the lower bands – which include the vast majority of houses in the country with valuations under €525,000 – will see their bills increase by €5 and €23 a year. READ MORE Those with properties valued at under €240,000 will pay €95 a year, an increase of €5. Those with properties valued at between €420,000 and €525,000 will pay €428 a year, an increase of €23. Those in higher bands, however, will see their bills increase more sharply. In the top band, properties valued at between €1.995-€2.1 million will pay €3,110, an extra €389 a year. Properties valued above €2.1 million pay based on the valuation of the property, rather than a band. Projections by the Department of Finance suggest the tax will increase by 5-6 per cent for properties under €1.26 million. Local authorities will continue to be permitted to vary LPT downward by 15 per cent. In 2027, they will be permitted to increase the tax by 25 per cent in their area. [ Rent Pressure Zones: Pressure on Government as it proposes to link certain rents to inflation Opens in new window ] The Cabinet is also expected to approve proposed changes to rent caps, which are likely to be fiercely opposed in the Dáil today by Opposition parties. It is understood that Rent Pressure Zones (RPZs) will be extended to cover the entire country, with rent increases linked to inflation and capped at 2 per cent. The Government is also likely to promise new protections for renters, though some housing advocates have warned that the changes will mean higher rents and increased homelessness . In future, sources say, it will be possible to reset rents between tenancies – but only where a tenant leaves voluntarily or has breached their tenancy agreement. There was further worrying news for the Government when AIB's latest construction purchasing managers' index (PMI) warned that the level of home building contracted during May for the first time in nine months amid a wider fall in activity at Irish construction firms. While some firms were able to increase activity, there were signs of 'softening market conditions and uncertainty', leading to a drop in all types of construction activity, AIB said, though the drop in home building was 'only marginal'. However, there was better news from the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (Ifac), the Government's fiscal and budgetary watchdog. [ Corporate tax receipts forecast to rise despite Trump tariff threat Opens in new window ] It said corporation tax receipts could surge by as much as €5 billion, as a result of changes in the tax rate applying to companies and the rush to export goods to the US ahead of the imposition of tariffs. Big companies will start making payments to the exchequer under the increased 15 per cent corporate tax rate by the middle of next year, Ifac said, while most of the biggest taxpayers here are forecast to report increased profits this year, resulting in higher tax payments. A host of capital allowances used by some of the State's biggest companies are due to expire, while pharmaceutical firms will likely pay more tax this year amid a surge in exports to the US ahead of the possible imposition of tariffs, Ifac added.
Irish Times
31 minutes ago
- Irish Times
We don't need a floating liquefied natural gas facility. There is a better way
In deciding energy policy, you are confronted with the 'trilemma': the duty to provide an energy supply for your country that is sustainable, competitive and secure. On all three counts, I believe the Government's recent decision to proceed with a State-owned floating liquefied natural gas ( LNG ) facility is the wrong one. It is not too late to take a different approach. The environmental argument is relatively straightforward. While the new facility is designed to provide emergency storage rather than increasing everyday gas use, the extraction, transportation and refuelling process will drive up emissions of this 'super pollutant' methane gas. The wider concern is that it lulls our system into an ongoing fossil fuel dependency that does not serve us in any way. The security issue is more complex and technical. We do have a real risk should someone succeed in taking out the two gas pipelines coming from Scotland, which deliver some 75 per cent of the gas we use. It is a very unlikely event but one we have to protect against, especially because it would put at risk the electricity supply that currently comes from the burning of that gas. In government, I delivered an energy security strategy which committed to protecting us from this risk. However, the further analysis we commissioned – asking how a floating LNG storage facility would work, how long it would take to deliver and how much it would cost – led me to the conclusion that there was a better way of meeting our security needs. I am convinced that, rather than relying on gas storage, three alternative investments would be better value for money, more effective and cleaner to boot. READ MORE The first would be to build two new electricity interconnectors to Britain, which were sanctioned by the UK regulator only last autumn. Consultants are advising our department to 'de-rate' such a solution because they believe it still leaves Ireland reliant on other countries. However, increased interconnection is vital if we are to have a low-carbon and lower-cost electricity system. We are going to have to trust our neighbours in any case. Investing in our grid in this way gives a payback every day of the year, not just in an emergency. It would benefit our country for decades to come. y using flexible pricing and our nationwide network of smart meters, new battery storage systems can be ramped up and down. This will reduce the curtailment of wind and solar power and we can get into a virtuous circle, where power becomes cheaper, cleaner and more secure The second solution would be to rely on the likes of Moneypoint and Tarbert power stations and on the secondary distillate fuel stores which gas-fired generators are required to hold as a substitute fuel in the event of any gas disruption. The ESB is already planning to convert Moneypoint to an oil-fired reserve power station, and Tarbert could quickly be restored. Maintaining assets that have already long been paid for so that they can be deployed in an emergency makes better economic sense. The third and complementary solution would be to build more backup battery storage, which is becoming cheaper and expanding at an exponential pace. In 2022, the same consultants estimated that by 2025 we would have 335MW of such power supplies. Only three years later, we now have three times that amount. The long-duration energy storage system planned for Donegal, outlined in this newspaper last week , shows what is possible and where the better energy future lies. [ The debate: Should the State develop a terminal for liquefied natural gas? Opens in new window ] Under the third trilemma constraint – which is to make energy affordable – the LNG option again falls far short. The Government recently stated it would cost €300 million, but the bill would likely be a multiple of this. That cost is going to go on our electricity bills and in all likelihood will lead to a continued dependence on gas, which is the main reason why our electricity prices are so high. We need to get prices down, not just to protect our consumer and industries, but also to accelerate the clean energy transition. Cheaper electricity means lower running costs for electric vehicles and heat pumps, the workhorses of our clean energy future. By using flexible pricing and our nationwide network of smart meters, new battery storage systems can be ramped up and down. This will reduce the curtailment of wind and solar power and we can get into a virtuous circle, where power becomes cheaper, cleaner and more secure. It will not be easy for the Government to change course, but that is what it must do. And it can do so, because no locations have been chosen, no planning application has been made, no contracts signed. The Government should engage with the environmental movement and ask the Just Transition Commission and the Climate Change Advisory Council to carry out a detailed public consultation which considers all our options and associated costs and reports by the end of the year. The clean energy revolution is evolving so quickly that even recent energy modelling and assumptions need to be reviewed. Rather than paying for outdated and polluting gas infrastructure, we should invest in cleaner, more affordable and more secure alternatives instead.
