Trump official in 'line of fire' for leaked Iran bombing intel as they're left out of major security briefing
Tulsi Gabbard is rumored to be in Donald Trump ' 'line of fire' as she is set to miss out on the first intelligence briefing between the administration and Congress over strikes on Iran 's nuclear facilities.
Gabbard, Trump's Director of National Intelligence, had to do a dramatic U-turn last week after the president said she was 'wrong' when she testified Tehran was not close to getting a nuclear weapon.
Now, she is missing out on the Thursday meeting that will offer Congress a chance to see how successful the strikes were, as Trump has angrily insisted CNN and The New York Times were wrong in saying they had minimal effect.
Gabbard was originally supposed to join members of Trump's inner circle - CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth - in the briefing.
A person familiar with Gabbard's schedule told the Associated Press said she was originally going to attend but no longer.
'The media is turning this into something it's not,' a senior Trump administration official told The Washington Post, adding that Ratcliffe will represent the intelligence community.
However, controversial Trump biographer Michael Wolff said that Trump now sees Gabbard as a 'stooge' who will take the blame for the leaks.
'It's always important in the Trump script, the fallback is always who to blame, who to blame. Just have to have someone to blame. Tulsi is in the line of fire,' Wolff told The Daily Beast.
Wolff added: 'There is an investigation that is going on. They will try to find someone to blame. Within the White House, within the West Wing, what they are saying as of this morning, who this is being pinned on, is Tulsi.'
Trump and much of his administration have raged at the media's reports based on anonymous sources that the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities from Saturday night's bombing was not as severe as they had hoped.
The leaked report from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) reportedly states that the U.S. strikes only delayed Iran from getting a nuclear weapon by a couple of months.
An investigation has begun and many in the White House have said the person who leaked incomplete intel should be jailed.
Gabbard fiercely backed the president in his rivalry with the press and said the U.S. troops eliminated Iran's nuclear capabilities.
'New intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed. If the Iranians chose to rebuild, they would have to rebuild all three facilities (Natanz, Fordow, Esfahan) entirely, which would likely take years to do,' Gabbard wrote on social media.
'The propaganda media has deployed their usual tactic: selectively release portions of illegally leaked classified intelligence assessments (intentionally leaving out the fact that the assessment was written with 'low confidence') to try to undermine President Trump's decisive leadership and the brave servicemen and women who flawlessly executed a truly historic mission to keep the American people safe and secure,' she added.
White House Communications Director Steven Cheung backed Gabbard in a statement.
Gabbard fiercely backed the president in his rivalry with the press and said the U.S. troops eliminated Iran's nuclear capabilities
Gabbard was originally supposed to join members of Trump's inner circle - CIA Director John Ratcliffe (pictured right), Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (pictured center left) - in the briefing
'President Trump's Peace through Strength foreign policy is a tried-and-true approach that keeps America safe and deters global threats,' he said.
'Efforts by the legacy media to sow internal division are a distraction that will not work. President Trump has full confidence in his entire exceptional national security team. DNI Gabbard is an important member of the President's team and her work continues to serve him and this country well.'
Cheung has previously called Wolff 'a lying sack of s***.'
Last Friday, Gabbard reversed course and admitted that Iran actually does have the ability to create nuclear weapons after a public rebuke by her boss as Israel continued to wage war against the country.
The director of national intelligence originally blamed the 'dishonest media' for a week of confusion about whether the administration believes the Persian country can develop a weapon of mass destruction.
'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly,' she wrote on X. 'President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.'
Trump warned that Tehran has a 'maximum' of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes if they don't abandon their nuclear ambitions.
In New Jersey on Friday, however, the president dismissed Gabbard's testimony in March that the intelligence community 'continues to assess Iran is not building a nuclear weapon.'
The president responded, 'Well then, my intelligence community is wrong. Who in the intelligence community said that?'
Informed that it had been Gabbard, Trump said, 'She's wrong.'
Gabbard responded on X Friday that 'The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division.'
She included video of her testimony that claims Iranians appear clearly to have 'enriched uranium stockpiles at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.'
She also noted that Iran 'contains a wide range of threats' to the United States and Israel.
The next day, Trump celebrated the strikes on Tehran by American forces.
Now, Congress will get its first inside look at the bombings as the president rages against a leak regarding its success rate.
The administration has rubbished reports by both CNN and the New York Times that the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities from Saturday night's bombing was not as severe as they had hoped, while simultaneously demanding the person who leaked incomplete intel be jailed.
The leaked report from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) reportedly states that the U.S. strikes only delayed Iran from getting a nuclear weapon by a couple of months.
Trump called for the CNN reporter who broke the story, Natasha Bertrand, to be fired and 'then thrown out like a dog' on Truth Social Media, drawing an enraged response from colleague Jake Tapper.
Tapper went off on Trump during his Wednesday show: 'Today, President Trump and his administration are going after shooting the messengers in an increasingly ugly way.'
He also defended Bertrand, saying: 'They're calling journalists 'fake news' for true stories. They're calling for an excellent CNN reporter, Natasha Bertrand, to be fired, which is preposterous — and to which a CNN statement today reads, 'we stand 100 percent behind Natasha Bertarnd's journalism, as they should.'
Tapper went into a dissection of CNN's reporting on the matter, saying that the Defense Intelligence Agency's assessment of the bombing was 'low confidence... meaning that the DIA is far from sure about it.'
'It was described to CNN by seven people briefed on the DIA assessment, and our reporting stressed that the assessment's conclusion could evolve as new information comes to light,' he said.
Tapper claimed that CNN reached out to the White House before broadcasting the story and that the administration 'attacked the assessment but confirmed it exists.'
'Even President Trump himself today confirmed it,' he said.
Tapper said he was not criticizing the troops who executed the strikes, saying they 'honor and respect' them.
Trump ripped into CNN again after Tapper defended the network's reporting and slammed the president for his 'ugly attack' on the press' coverage of the Iran bombings.
Defense Secretary Hegseth said the FBI has taken the lead on conducting the probe after CNN, the New York Times and other outlets disclosed the report's findings.
'We're doing a leak investigation with the FBI right now, because this information is for internal purposes, battle damage assessments, and CNN and others are trying to spin it to make the president look bad,' he said during a NATO meeting alongside Trump and other top officials on Wednesday.
The Pentagon chief defended the president like an attack dog, claiming the Fordow nuclear enrichment site was 'obliterated.'
Flanked by Trump, Secretary of State Rubio, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, Hegseth also mentioned how the classified document was only a preliminary assessment.
'It was a top secret report, it was preliminary, it was low confidence,' the Pentagon secretary explained.
'Given the 30,000 pounds of explosives and capability of those munitions, it was devastation underneath Fordow, and the amount of munitions, six per location, any assessment that tells you something otherwise is speculating with other motives.'
He added that the preliminary DIA battle damage assessment indicated 'moderate to severe' damage was done to the facility.
The administration, Hegseth continued, believes it was 'far more likely severe and obliterated.'
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was sitting next to Hegseth, argued the leakers had an agenda.
'This is what a leaker is telling you the intelligence says,' he said of the report.
'That's the game these people play. They read it and then they go out and characterize it the way they want it characterized.'
He added it was 'against the law' to leak the information and told the media the leakers 'characterize it for you in a way that's absolutely false.'
Israeli military spokesperson Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin similarly said Wednesday that 'it is still early to assess the results of the operation.'
Though he added, 'I believe we have delivered a significant hit to the nuclear program, and I can also say that we have delayed it by several years.'
In a Truth Social post on Wednesday afternoon, Trump revealed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth would address the public at 8am Thursday morning to provide 'both interesting and irrefutable' proof about the success of the mission.
Trump said the purpose of the conference is to 'fight for the Dignity of our Great American Pilots.
'These Patriots were very upset,' he said. 'After 36 hours of dangerously flying through Enemy Territory, they landed, they knew the Success was LEGENDARY, and then, two days later, they started reading Fake News by CNN and The Failing New York Times.
'They felt terribly!'
Trump reminded them that the doubts about the success of the mission were 'as usual, solely for the purpose of demeaning PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP.'
His comments come after the CIA confirmed Ira n's nuclear facilities suffered 'severe damage' after the devastating airstrikes Saturday night.
Trump had earlier suggested Hegseth's title should be changed to the 'Secretary of War' given the deteriorating situation in the Middle East, and kicked off meetings at the NATO summit on Wednesday by comparing Saturday's precision airstrikes to the two atomic bombings on Japan that ended World War II.
'I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima. I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki. But that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war,' he told reporters at The Hague.
Seven B-2 bombers flew from the U.S. to Iran on Saturday to carry out what Pentagon officials have said is the most sophisticated stealth airstrike in decades.
Each B-2 carried two 30,000 pound bunker buster bombs aimed at Fordow's nuclear labs hundreds of feet underground.
The 14 bunker busters dropped on Fordow weighed a total of nearly 420,000 pounds combined, Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell has said.
'Fake news, CNN and MSDNC, all of these terrible people, you know, they have no credibility,' Trump slammed the outlets reporting on the intel leak.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Zohran Mamdani has unleashed a political earthquake
The surprise electoral success of Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old democratic socialist running to be mayor of New York, most prominent city on Earth, is a political earthquake. The breadth and scope of his performance were predicted by no polls, no prognosticators, none of the wise men. The ramifications of this upset will be felt for years, across the US and the developed world. In the end, it wasn't even close. Mamdani's widespread appeal represents the total collapse of a Democratic party establishment that had weathered Donald Trump's first term with rhetorical resistance, and fumbled the beginning of the second with triangulating appeasement. This year, the favorability of the Democratic party has collapsed to record lows, not because of the popularity of the Trump administration or the Republican party, but because of its unpopularity with its own voters. Chuck Schumer caving to the president on an unpopular and devastating Republican spending bill was the last straw for many. The Democratic party and the resistance to Trump had been severed for the first time. There's anger across the country with its leadership, Democratic and Republican, in cities, suburbs, and rural areas. According to Americans, things are not going well. Prices are up, wages are down, and instability is at an all-time high. Nowhere is this more true than in our biggest city, New York, where the moderate Democratic mayor Eric Adams made a quid pro quo deal to keep himself out of prison on corruption charges in exchange for enforcing Trump's policies in a city where Trump had minimal political support. Enter Mamdani. Many major cities in the US, in recent years, had a two-party system, not between Democrats and Republicans, but between centrist Democrats and their progressive flank. The US, like all polities, has many organized political groupings, but due to byzantine electoral laws, only two official ones exist - the state-administered ballot lines. Nowhere is this more true than in New York, the crown jewel of the electoral socialist left in the United States for more than a century. Mamdani is the progeny of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), the US's largest socialist organization in a century. He is among the many young people inspired by Bernie Sanders' 2016 presidential campaign. The staying power of that campaign has asserted itself over the years. Most of the talented organizers and thinkers whom it shaped were in college or their early 20s. They were never going to stop being socialists. They just needed seasoning. Mamdani got involved in DSA as a young man and honed his skills leading campaigns in the nearly all-volunteer organization. He has spent most of his adult life as a DSA organizer. After New York City DSA had built sufficient infrastructure and he had learned the necessary skills, he was able to win election to the state assembly in 2020. But to Mamdani, democratic socialism isn't an identity or a set of principles. It is being part of and accountable to a democratic organization, the sort of working-class civil society that has atrophied in this country, but at one time built the backbone of the welfare state across western society and lent the muscle to the New Deal. Mamdani and DSA cannot be separated. It's a different, and for many Americans new, but a deeply old way of thinking about politics. Political organizations represent different classes, which are necessarily in conflict. To win for your class, you must be a representative of working-class democracy. Mamdani was built by DSA and the young leftwing milieu that emerged after the Sanders campaign. They cannot be separated. Not his charisma or campaign style. He is a product of the movement. His victory and its comprehensive level are shocking to nearly all. How did he do it? Combining new and old tactics. Mamdani had perhaps the most innovative social media campaign in American political history. Not jumping on tired memes, but showcasing his authenticity. He also borrowed old tactics. Mamdani harnessed the sort of retail diaspora politics that have always won in the world's most diverse city. He campaigned in dozens of languages, met leaders from ethnic groups from around the world, and sold his vision in the style of Fiorello LaGuardia. This way, he was able to harness both the insurgent left, often caricatured as downwardly mobile, overly educated, and overwhelmingly white, and the worldwide working-class diaspora that shapes the neighborhoods of New York. As he climbed the polls through steady mass organization, almost linearly, he began to face ever-increasing, and horrifying, attacks from capital and the powers that be, to the tune of a record $25m in outside spending. The one they honed in on was one that had been proven to take down leftwing leaders across the world, like Jeremy Corbyn: antisemitism. All social justice-minded people are horrified by antisemitism, an ancient hatred. It's an accusation that would make anyone on the left, anyone of conscience, take notice. For this reason, used in a spurious way, it was an insidious attack that could break the left. However, in this election, the baseless smear backfired. There are several reasons for this. The first is overuse. It's quite blatant to continually accuse obviously deeply compassionate and humanistic people of an evil hatred without evidence. No one believes friendly and understanding social democrats in a secular urban milieu are pogromists or jihadists (despite nasty Islamophobic baiting about Mamdani's background), for obvious reasons. The second is the actual circumstances. Most accusations of antisemitism on the left have little or nothing to do with actual overt discrimination or hatred; they are almost entirely based on opinion of the state of Israel. As Israel continues its genocide of Palestinians and long-term eliminationist and revenchist ambitions, and ties itself closer to the far right in the US, Democratic voters in the US have made the rapid and historic transition to sympathizing with Palestinians over Israel by a nearly 3-1 margin. Even last year, this issue and money could win Democratic primaries. No longer. Lastly, Mamdani is in many ways a continuation of the Jewish left tradition in the United States. New York has long been the home of the most powerful electoral socialist left in the United States. The base for the Socialist party of America or the American Labor party, many time electoral winners, was the Jewish community. Jews in New York voted in the hundreds of thousands for socialists for decades. These are the same policies of so-called 'sewer socialism' (in which socialists ran cities like Milwaukee and boasted of excellent sewer systems), the same parties (DSA being the direct inheritor of the SPA), the same tradition, and even the same neighborhoods as a century ago. The foundation of the American left. An unbroken line. Mamdani is the inheritor of the tradition of Baruch Vladeck, and of the socialists and trade unions that built New York. Even the membership of DSA and the staff of his campaign reflect this. So, how did Mamdani win support? He brought back class as the defining issue of politics. Class as a political divide has declined across the industrialized world for decades, beginning in the US. While Sanders reinjected a class message and a degree of class polarization back within the Democratic coalition, there were still shortcomings. Bernie did worse among black voters across class. And Bernie and other democratic socialists relied heavily on the good graces of socially progressive upper-middle-class professionals, rendering socialists subordinate to or in coalition with their interests and organizations. After nearly a decade of work by the left, this class polarization seemed uncrackable. Until now. Mamdani underachieved prior leftwing candidates in professional progressive areas like the Upper West Side. But he smashed through the racial barrier that had divided the working class. Few expected this before the votes rolled in. His base would be downwardly mobile white professionals, of course. But his clear message and innovative campaign brought back real class politics, of the kind that seemed a myth in the contemporary age. According to the New York Times, Mamdani did better with voters of color than with white voters. While he shed reliably progressive votes among the Times-reading, machine-hating liberals of Manhattan, he won them back many times over among working-class people of color who had never taken a second look at leftist candidates before. In this, he reversed nearly 30 years of anti-materialist political science theories. This may seem like something confined to New York City, a progressive bastion in a deep blue state. But it points a path forward for the left and for advocates of social justice and liberatory politics. Donald Trump's most shocking and profound gains in 2024 came among young voters, particularly men, Latino voters, Asian voters, and urban voters in general. These are the exact demographics that came out in droves for Mamdani. The left has long shirked its responsibility to fight the far right, leaving it to the center as if the political spectrum were a rigorously enforced line rather than a fluid concept. But the center failed. And they sacrificed these demographics to Trump because these masses were fed up with the status quo. The center could never win them back. But the radical left actually could, through a targeted, economic, anti-establishment message. Mamdani's campaign did it, and brought people back from the far right on a massive scale, more than any anti-Trump rally could. In this way, campaigns like Mamdani's are actively practicing anti-fascism in a real way, by winning the targets of the Right back to the left. The left needs to study this shocking election and take thorough notes. The first is that Mamdani was a product of real, organic, working-class organization in DSA. The kind that has been dying out in this country for half a century and is disregarded by most. This lack of organization is the defining feature of our political time. The only way to the future is more people in DSA, more people in unions, more people in civic organizations, and the rebuilding of working class community. Our institutions are hollow, but Mamdani and his 50,000 youthful volunteers are proof that they can be rebuilt, and that people yearn to do so. In 2017, a DSA organizer and philosopher named Michael Kinnucan said: 'US civic culture is so hollowed out at the grassroots level that in any city in the US if your organization can get 40-50 committed people in a room occasionally you're probably operating one of the five or six most potentially powerful grassroots organizations in your city.' This idea was foundational to DSA, especially in New York City, and shaped Mamdani. For many, it seemed a fantasy. Five hundred thousand votes later, across nearly every language and nationality in the world, it's a warning. To defeat the right, the left must learn from Mamdani and DSA and rebuild mass working class organization. Sure, charisma helps, but at its core, this win was an eight-year project that must be replicated everywhere if we are to defeat fascism and stop the worst horrors of climate change. Mamdani is an Obama-level political talent, but most of all he is a call to return to real working class organization. This is something the hollow entities of the Democratic or Republican parties could never defeat, and something they learned Tuesday night. Ben Davis works in political data in Washington DC. He worked on the data team for the Bernie Sanders 2020 campaign
BreakingNews.ie
28 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Taoiseach says ‘nobody wins' if EU-US tariff dispute ensues
'Nobody wins' if the US-EU tariff dispute continues, the Taoiseach has said, as he said the bloc is focused on arriving at a 'negotiated settlement' with Donald Trump's administration. Micheál Martin said it is 'extremely important' to be able to provide certainty to the market and investors. Advertisement The EU is seeking a trade deal with the US before July 9th. Speaking to reporters in Brussels, Mr Martin said: 'Every effort has to be made to get a landing zone that we can live with. 'It's not ideal. It's not optimal. Europe doesn't want tariffs, but we have to deal with the situation that is before us.' He added: 'If a tariff dispute ensues, nobody wins. There is no painless tariff war.' Advertisement US President Donald Trump placed tariffs on the EU (Suzanne Plunkett/PA) Mr Martin, who stressed that the EU had to be united in its negotiations, said he detects an 'atmosphere' that is focused on getting a deal. The Taoiseach's comments come against the backdrop of the latest report from the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), which said the strength of the economy will be tested by domestic challenges and a period of global uncertainty. While the Irish domestic economy appears to be in a relatively robust state, the ESRI said 'notable international and domestic risks are clouding the outlook'. It said global uncertainty has risen to 'very elevated levels' given the fallout from changing US trade policy and other geopolitical developments. Advertisement It added: 'This increase in uncertainty is likely to weigh on investment and consumer spending.' The body noted that Ireland has been somewhat insulated from tariffs so far because of the exclusion of pharmaceutical goods. It added that the relative importance of services in total Irish exports provides 'short-term protection from tariff impacts but raises concerns about non-tariff barriers to services trade being imposed in future US-EU negotiations'. The ESRI said it expects GDP to grow by 4.6 per cent in 2025 and 2.9 per cent in 2026, with exports growing by 5.4 per cent and 3.3 per cent respectively. Advertisement However, this would be revised downwards if trade wars with the US intensify. It said it expects the domestic economy to grow at a relatively slower pace than in previous reports. The baseline forecast is for Modified Domestic Demand growth of 2.3 per cent in 2025 and 2.8 per cent in 2026. Inflation is projected to average 2.0 per cent in 2025 and 2.1 per cent in 2026. The ESRI said there are two main challenges to the public finances – that they are heavily dependent on windfall corporation tax receipts and residential construction is not accelerating sufficiently quickly to meet housing need. Advertisement Mr Martin said the economic growth projects reflect the challenges of the trade and tariff dispute. 'That has caused ripples all over the world – and that's why we favour an agreement by July 9th.' He said that could change the trajectory of the economic forecasts. The ESRI has lowered its forecast for housing completions (PA) The ESRI also lowered its forecast for housing completions to 33,000 in 2025 and 37,000 in 2026, citing ongoing structural challenges, including production costs, supporting infrastructure, financing, and labour shortages, as contributing factors in its decision. These are significantly below the Government's own targets to deliver 303,000 homes by the end of 2030, scaling up from 41,000 this year to 43,000 in 2026, reaching 60,000 in 2030. Asked about the ESRI forecast, Mr Martin said Government is putting 'fundamental changes and measures' in train to deliver a sustained increase in housing over the 'next number of years'. 'That is the objective on housing. It is the number one issue facing us, and it is the big social and economic priority of government and of the country.'
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
White House posts cringe-worthy ‘Daddy's Home' video after NATO chief clarifies comments
The White House has welcomed President Donald Trump back from Wednesday's NATO summit in the Netherlands with a cringe-inducing social media video set to the 2010 song 'Hey Daddy (Daddy's Home)' by Usher. The clip, a montage of Trump stepping out of Air Force One back on American soil followed by choice scenes from the summit, is a reference to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte jokingly nicknaming the president 'daddy' during their sitdown yesterday. The pair had been discussing the Israel - Iran conflict and the swift collapse of the ceasefire Trump had hailed as marking the end of the '12 Day War' after the two sides accused each other of violating its terms. 'They've had it,' Trump said. 'They've got a big fight, like two kids in a schoolyard. You know, they fight like hell. You can't stop them, let them fight for two, three minutes, then it's easier to stop them…' Rutte interjected: 'And then daddy has to, sometimes, use strong language.' The Dutchman was referring to the president's comments on the White House South Lawn a day earlier, when he had angrily told the press that neither Israel nor Iran 'knows what the f*** they're doing.' Trump responded by chuckling and adding: 'Strong language, yeah, every once and a while.' The president was later asked about the nickname and whether it implied he saw other countries as 'children,' causing Secretary of State Marco Rubio, standing behind him, to crack up uncontrollably. 'He likes me. If he doesn't, I'll let you know, I'll come back, and I'll hit him hard,' Trump responded. 'He did it very affectionately. 'Daddy, you're my daddy.'' Rutte later clarified that he was trying to compare the president's relationship with Europe to that of a father with his family. 'What I said is that sometimes, in Europe, I hear sometimes countries saying, 'Hey, Mark, will the U.S. stay with us?' And I said that sounds a little bit like a small child asking his daddy, 'Hey, are you still staying with the family?'' This is not the first time the billionaire real estate tycoon and father of five has been referred to as 'daddy'. In the final weeks of last year's presidential race, conservative pundit Tucker Carlson, with whom Trump has recently fallen out over the Iran intervention, gave an incredibly disturbing address on the Republican's behalf at a rally in Duluth, Georgia, in which he likened the United States to a 'bad little girl' in need of a 'vigorous spanking.' 'There has to be a point at which dad comes home,' Carlson told his audience, referring to Trump. 'Yeah, that's right. Dad comes home. And he's p***ed. Dad is p***ed. And when dad gets home, you know what he says? 'You've been a bad girl. You've been a bad little girl and you're getting a vigorous spanking right now. You're getting a vigorous spanking because you've been a bad girl. And it has to be this way.'' MSNBC analyst Chris Hayes reacted to Carlson's creepy analogy by observing: 'The Republican Party is now very much explicitly running on a campaign of male dominion. Trump's your daddy.'
