Taoiseach says ‘nobody wins' if EU-US tariff dispute ensues
'Nobody wins' if the US-EU tariff dispute continues, the Taoiseach has said, as he said the bloc is focused on arriving at a 'negotiated settlement' with Donald Trump's administration.
Micheál Martin said it is 'extremely important' to be able to provide certainty to the market and investors.
Advertisement
The EU is seeking a trade deal with the US before July 9th.
Speaking to reporters in Brussels, Mr Martin said: 'Every effort has to be made to get a landing zone that we can live with.
'It's not ideal. It's not optimal. Europe doesn't want tariffs, but we have to deal with the situation that is before us.'
He added: 'If a tariff dispute ensues, nobody wins. There is no painless tariff war.'
Advertisement
US President Donald Trump placed tariffs on the EU (Suzanne Plunkett/PA)
Mr Martin, who stressed that the EU had to be united in its negotiations, said he detects an 'atmosphere' that is focused on getting a deal.
The Taoiseach's comments come against the backdrop of the latest report from the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), which said the strength of the economy will be tested by domestic challenges and a period of global uncertainty.
While the Irish domestic economy appears to be in a relatively robust state, the ESRI said 'notable international and domestic risks are clouding the outlook'.
It said global uncertainty has risen to 'very elevated levels' given the fallout from changing US trade policy and other geopolitical developments.
Advertisement
It added: 'This increase in uncertainty is likely to weigh on investment and consumer spending.'
The body noted that Ireland has been somewhat insulated from tariffs so far because of the exclusion of pharmaceutical goods.
It added that the relative importance of services in total Irish exports provides 'short-term protection from tariff impacts but raises concerns about non-tariff barriers to services trade being imposed in future US-EU negotiations'.
The ESRI said it expects GDP to grow by 4.6 per cent in 2025 and 2.9 per cent in 2026, with exports growing by 5.4 per cent and 3.3 per cent respectively.
Advertisement
However, this would be revised downwards if trade wars with the US intensify.
It said it expects the domestic economy to grow at a relatively slower pace than in previous reports.
The baseline forecast is for Modified Domestic Demand growth of 2.3 per cent in 2025 and 2.8 per cent in 2026. Inflation is projected to average 2.0 per cent in 2025 and 2.1 per cent in 2026.
The ESRI said there are two main challenges to the public finances – that they are heavily dependent on windfall corporation tax receipts and residential construction is not accelerating sufficiently quickly to meet housing need.
Advertisement
Mr Martin said the economic growth projects reflect the challenges of the trade and tariff dispute.
'That has caused ripples all over the world – and that's why we favour an agreement by July 9th.'
He said that could change the trajectory of the economic forecasts.
The ESRI has lowered its forecast for housing completions (PA)
The ESRI also lowered its forecast for housing completions to 33,000 in 2025 and 37,000 in 2026, citing ongoing structural challenges, including production costs, supporting infrastructure, financing, and labour shortages, as contributing factors in its decision.
These are significantly below the Government's own targets to deliver 303,000 homes by the end of 2030, scaling up from 41,000 this year to 43,000 in 2026, reaching 60,000 in 2030.
Asked about the ESRI forecast, Mr Martin said Government is putting 'fundamental changes and measures' in train to deliver a sustained increase in housing over the 'next number of years'.
'That is the objective on housing. It is the number one issue facing us, and it is the big social and economic priority of government and of the country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
8 minutes ago
- Metro
I've lived in fear of nuclear war all my life - this is how I'm prepping
The world has gone to bed each night lately wondering whether World War Three will break out by the time we wake up. The fighting over Iran's nuclear ambitions made people feel awfully unsafe, particularly with all the bloodcurdling rhetoric from leaders in Israel, Iran, and the US. Then when President Donald Trump announced strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, global fears escalated. I know that worry well because I first felt it as a child. I've been living under a (mushroom) cloud ever since. Now, after a lifetime of prepping, I'm doing so again – but this time I'm not putting aside bottles of water, wind up radios and loo roll. I'm mentally prepping – for the fact I might die. And after 40 years of living in fear, I finally feel a sense of peace. As an 11-year-old in 1984, I settled down one September evening to watch a BBC film called Threads about a nuclear attack on Sheffield. I can't remember what I was expecting to see but I'll never forget it: 112 minutes of the most graphic, grim, and horrifying television imaginable. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In the agonisingly tense first half of the film, it shows the build-up to nuclear war in the background of the lives of ordinary families. Then the bombs drop and the film shows the mushroom clouds, the firestorm, and what these monstrous demons do to Sheffield, its people, and its pets. Threads then follows the bleak horror of the nuclear winter and beyond, showing the brutality of what's left of life over more than a decade after the attack. Watching this film was quite an experience for a boy of 11. It blew my mind with all the grace and clemency of a nuclear bomb. I went to bed terrified that night and the boy who emerged the next morning was changed forever. That next day, I tried to unscrew the living room door to build a nuclear shelter in our cellar. I then marched to the library to try and find information about gas masks, bunkers, and any medicine that might help with radiation sickness. In the days after, I remembered that we had friends who lived in an isolated house in Cornwall and I asked my parents to ask them whether we could go and stay there when it looked like the bomb might drop. When we were moving house and it came down to a choice between two options, I begged my parents to put every other factor aside and choose the one that had a bunker in its back garden. We didn't move to that house, but for a lot of my teenage years I had that bunker mentality in mind. I was mistrustful, angry and terrified. Wherever I was, I looked out for places to duck and cover. I'd become a nuclear paranoiac overnight and the metaphorical mushroom cloud that Threads cast over my life would hang in the sky for decades. Are you scared of nuclear war? No, I've made peace like Chas I have a secret bunker so I'll be fine Ever since, I've been convinced that the outbreak of nuclear war was nigh. I even joined the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) and marched for the cause. And if I heard about any global tensions on the news, I'd remember how Threads showed the characters ignoring reports about growing global tensions at first. 'You won't catch me looking the other way,' I'd think. The nuclear war in Threads broke out because of international tensions over a conflict in Iran. So if you'd asked me as a kid how I would feel if there was a real-life flare-up over a nuclear arms programme in Iran in 2025, I'd have said two things. One, I can't believe the world hasn't nuked itself to pieces by 2025, and two, this is where World War Three is about to start. But actually, over the past few weeks I've probably been less worried than a lot of people. Having spent so much of my life fretting about nuclear war, I've ended up finding a sense of peace. I've already done all my trembling about the bomb and I've concluded that if there were a nuclear war, the best outcome for me would also be the most likely one: Instant death. Having come to terms with how dramatically Threads changed my life, I've also resolved to try and not be swayed again by propaganda. So when the Government warned this week that Britain needs to prepare for the possibility of being attacked on its own soil, and when Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, warned recently that without a major increase in defence spending, British people 'better learn to speak Russian', I declined the invitation to return to the dread of my teenage years. I've concluded that if there were a nuclear war, the best outcome for me would also be the most likely one: Instant death. I now know that worrying gets me nowhere. I've accepted that this may end in my death and so freaking about what could happen next is pointless. You won't catch me prepping. I won't be taking doors off their hinges for shelter. I won't fantasise about that bunker. More Trending I've lived with this fear for too long. I feel compassion for people who are still worried about the bomb, but I want them to take it from me: After over 40 years of nuclear war anxiety, fretting about it won't make it go away – and neither will marching about it. We can't uninvent nuclear weapons, we have to purge mankind of the consciousness that made us want them in the first place, and that's a deeper, longer battle that can only be fought in each of our hearts. For now, we have to find a way to live with the threat they pose to us – and seek the peace that comes with accepting that they may destroy us. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: I was punished for not telling my boss about my disability MORE: Denis Villeneuve threatens to overshadow the new James Bond – whoever he is MORE: Trump and his defence boss have created a 'cult of personality'
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nato was a victory for Starmer on the global stage, but now he's at war with his own MPs
Sir Keir Starmer seemed chipper as he boarded the plane home from the Nato summit on Wednesday evening. He cheerily thanked hacks in the travelling press delegation for what he said had been a great two-day trip to The Hague. And looking at Nato alone, it had been a success. Across the board, allies signed up to a historic increase in defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP. After briefly wavering on his commitment to Article 5, even Donald Trump fell in line. And following a public love-in with Nato secretary general Mark Rutte – who unnervingly, dubbed him the 'daddy' between the two warring nations of Iran and Israel – the US president conceded that the alliance was no longer a 'rip off', saying he is with is his European friends 'all the way'. Meanwhile, Starmer was able to pitch Britain as a leader on the world stage by cosying up to Mr Trump and purchasing 12 new F-35A fighter jets, massively ramping up Britain's nuclear capabilities. But what was left unsaid when the PM briefly greeted the media sharing the plane with him was that he was flying back into the most significant rebellion of his premiership – a revolt which threatens to shake the foundations of the historic majority he won just 11 months ago. Speaking at a press conference about Britain's contribution to defence spending at the Nato summit just hours earlier, the prime minister was forced to deny suggestions that he might be forced out of office before the next election. 'Many people predicted before the election that we 'couldn't read the room' we 'hadn't got the politics right' we 'wouldn't win an election after 2019' because we lost so badly. "We got a landslide victory. So I'm comfortable with reading the room and delivering the change the country needs', Sir Keir insisted. But at home, his MPs are much less convinced. More than 120 Labour MPs have signed an amendment which would kill off the government's flagship £5bn welfare reforms entirely. And there is a growing feeling that the prime minister has failed to listen to them, after he used part of his Nato presser to dismiss the rebellion as 'noises off'. 'No 10 sees MPs as irritants and fodder', one Labour MP with her name on the amendment said. 'We're all working hard and this is how they treat us. It goes back to the point about how arrogant and out of touch they are.' The prime minister's comments at the Nato press conference displayed a real lack of empathy for his own MPs, and ironically, a distinct failure to read the room. It would be hard to argue the prime minister is a wholly unempathetic person. An in-depth profile of the prime minister in the New Statesman published earlier this month showed how deeply he feels the weight of sacrifices made by individuals putting their lives on the line to serve their country. But in his first year in office, it has become increasingly clear that the prime minister is much more comfortable navigating foreign diplomacy than he is with dealing with angry backbenchers. It is in this area that Sir Keir seems entirely unable to empathise. He is known for being pragmatic rather than ideological, and appears to be bored by political manoeuvring. At times, this can provide a refreshing break from the Westminster bubble. But, taken too far, it can be the opposite. Starmer seems to have lost sight of the fact that in some scenarios, political manoeuvring is more than just self-serving posturing. Sometimes, it's a fight for hundreds of thousands of disabled people who are scared of losing vital financial support. The prime minister is now frantically meeting with leading MPs involved in the amendment to try to secure their backing by offering concessions. But the fact that it was allowed to get this far in the first place has angered those who would naturally be inclined to back the prime minister. Many are now threatening to dig their heels in until the bill is dead in the water. As Starmer returns from what was a strong showing at Nato, he must now display some of the empathy and political nous that he so effectively shows on the global stage. If he is unable to do so, he may well lose the domestic battle – and it could be catastrophic for his authority.
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Israel closes the most direct route for aid to Palestinians in Gaza
Israel has closed crossings into northern Gaza, cutting the most direct route for aid to reach hundreds of thousands of people at risk of famine, as airstrikes and shelling killed dozens more people in the devastated Palestinian territory. The move to close the crossings on Thursday will increase diplomatic pressure on Israel as attention shifts from its brief conflict with Iran, back to the violence and grave humanitarian crisis in Gaza. During the 12 days Israel was fighting Iran, more than 800 Palestinians were killed in Gaza – either shot as they desperately sought aid in increasingly chaotic circumstances or in successive waves of Israeli strikes and shelling. Pedro Sánchez, Spain's prime minister, on Thursday became the most prominent European leader to describe the situation in Gaza as a 'genocide'. Sánchez, an outspoken critic of Israel's offensive, is one of the first European leaders, and the most senior, to use the term 'genocide' to describe the situation in Gaza. Speaking ahead of an EU summit in Brussels, Sánchez mentioned an EU report which found 'indications' Israel was breaching its human rights obligations under the cooperation deal, which forms the basis for trade ties. The text cited Israel's blockade of humanitarian aid for the Palestinian territory, the high number of civilian casualties, attacks on journalists and the massive displacement and destruction caused by the war. Israel vehemently denies the allegation of war crimes and genocide, which it says is based in anti-Israeli bias and antisemitism. The spokesperson for Gaza's civil defence agency, Mahmud Bassal, said Israeli forces killed 56 people on Thursday, including six who were waiting for aid in two separate locations. There was no independent confirmation of the claim, but medical records of field hospitals run by the International Committee of the Red Cross and other NGOs seen by the Guardian detail hundreds of injuries from bullets among civilians seeking aid in the last two weeks. Witnesses have also described lethal fire from Israeli troops. The Israeli military said soldiers had 'fired warning shots' in order to prevent 'suspects from approaching them' near the Netzarim corridor in central Gaza, where Palestinians gather each night, often in the hope of stopping aid trucks. Food has become extremely scarce in Gaza since a tight blockade on all supplies was imposed by Israel throughout March and April, threatening many of the 2.3 million people who live there with a 'critical risk of famine'. Since the blockade was partially lifted last month, the UN has tried to bring in aid but has faced major obstacles, including rubble-choked roads, Israeli military restrictions, continuing airstrikes and growing anarchy. Reaching the north, where the need is greatest, has been hardest but became much easier when Israel opened the Zikim crossing, allowing wheat and other basics to be transported there directly. Aid officials in the territory described Thursday's closure of Zikim, which Israel said was necessary to stop Hamas seizing aid, was 'very problematic' and would directly impact aid distribution. New aid distribution points set up by a secretive US- and Israel-backed private organisation called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation are located in central and south Gaza, out of reach of most of the million people estimated to be in the north. The Israeli government ordered the closure of the northern crossing points after footage surfaced on social media showing armed men guarding a shipment of aid. Israeli right-wing rivals to Netanyahu claimed they were Hamas, but aid workers and others in Gaza said the guards were loyal to a council of local community leaders who had organised protection for a convoy of much-needed supplies. The Higher Commission for Tribal Affairs, which represents influential clans in the territory, said the guards had been organised 'solely through tribal efforts' and that that no Palestinian faction – a reference to militant groups in Gaza including Hamas – was involved. 'The clans came … to form a stance to prevent the aggressors and the thieves from stealing the food that belongs to our people,' Abu Salman Al Moghani, a representative of the Commission, said. On Monday, 79 trucks from aid organizations and the international community containing food for children, medical supplies and medications were transferred into Gaza after undergoing thorough security inspections, Israeli authorities said. On Tuesday, the total was 71. The World Health Organization said Thursday that it had delivered its first medical shipment into Gaza since 2 March, adding however that the nine truckloads were 'a drop in the ocean'. Last week the WHO said only 17 of Gaza's 36 hospitals were minimally to partially functional, with the rest unable to function at all. Israel launched its campaign aiming to destroy Hamas after the group's 7 October 2023 attack on southern Israel, in which militants killed about 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took another 251 hostage. The militants still hold 49 hostages, fewer than half of them alive. The overall death toll in Gaza in the 20-month conflict has now reached 56,259, mostly civilians. Hopes of a third ceasefire were raised on Wednesday when President Trump told reporters he believed 'great progress is being made on Gaza'. But both Hamas and Israeli officials have since suggested no agreement is close. Taher al-Nunu, a Hamas official, said on Wednesday that talks with mediators had 'intensified' but that the group had 'not yet received any new proposals' to end the war. Israeli officials said only that efforts to return the hostages were ongoing 'on the battlefield and via negotiations'. Seven Israeli soldiers were killed in a single attack in southern Gaza on Tuesday, the military's deadliest day in the territory since it broke a ceasefire with Hamas in March. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, faces growing calls from opposition politicians, relatives of hostages in Gaza and much of the Israeli public to bring an end to the fighting.
