logo
Incorrect speed record card caused 2024 Nepal plane crash, panel says

Incorrect speed record card caused 2024 Nepal plane crash, panel says

Reuters18-07-2025
KATHMANDU, July 18 (Reuters) - A passenger plane crash in Nepal last year that killed 18 people was caused by faulty information about the aircraft's takeoff speed in the flight documentation, a report issued on Friday by a government-appointed investigation panel said.
A CRJ-200LR aircraft, owned by Nepal's Saurya Airlines, crashed shortly after taking off from the capital Kathmandu in July last year, killing all 17 passengers and the co-pilot. Only the captain survived.
The crash was caused by a "deep stall during take-off because of abnormally rapid pitch rate commanded at a lower-than-optimal rotation speed", the report submitted to the government said.
Aviation expert Nagendra Prasad Ghimire told Reuters the aircraft made a premature takeoff before gaining the necessary speed.
The report said errors in a speed card - a document that provides important airspeed information for a specific aircraft, particularly during takeoff, climb and landing - had gone unnoticed and the airline had failed to address previous cases of a high pitch rate - the rate at which an aircraft's nose rotates up or down - during take-off.
It said there had been gross negligence and non-compliance by the operator during the entire process of cargo and baggage handling.
It recommended all operators review their speed cards and comply with the requirements of cargo and baggage handling.
The panel also asked the Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal (CAAN) to review the procedure for permitting non-scheduled flights.
CAAN spokesman Babu Ram Paudel declined comment, saying he had not seen the report.
Saurya Airlines will do "everything necessary" to implement the recommendations, operation manager Bivechan Khanal said.
The crash focused attention on the poor air safety record of landlocked Nepal, which is heavily dependent on air connectivity.
In 2013 the European Union, citing safety concerns, banned air carriers certified in Nepal from flying the European sky.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Titan submersible implosion that killed all five on board was 'preventable', says report
Titan submersible implosion that killed all five on board was 'preventable', says report

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Titan submersible implosion that killed all five on board was 'preventable', says report

The US Coast Guard has determined the implosion of OceanGate's Titan submersible that killed all five people on board was "preventable", citing the company's "critically flawed" safety practices.A damning 335-page report from Coast Guard investigators states that OceanGate, the company that owned and operated the Titan, failed to follow maintenance and inspection protocols for the deep-sea vessel."There is a need for stronger oversight and clear options for operators who are exploring new concepts outside of the existing regulatory framework," Jason Neubauer, the chair of the Coast Guard Marine Board, said in a Titan submersible disappeared in the Atlantic Ocean while descending to the wreckage of the Titanic on 18 June 2023. OceanGate has extended its condolences to the families of the victims and stated that it "directed its resources fully toward cooperating with the Coast Guard's inquiry".Here are five key takeaways from the two-year investigation. OceanGate had 'critically flawed' safety practices and a 'toxic' workplace culture The report condemns OceanGate's safety practices as fundamentally inadequate. It says the primary causal factor for the implosion was the firm's failure to follow "established engineering protocols" for safety and were "glaring disparities between their written safety protocols and their actual practices", the report states. "This marine casualty and the loss of five lives was preventable," said Jason Neubauer, the chairman of the Coast Guard Marine Board of Investigation that was charged with investigating the Titan company continued to use the Titan sub despite a series of previous incidents that compromised the craft without properly assessing its suitability, the investigation found. Loss of sub's structural integrity caused implosion The sub imploded 90 minutes into the dive after its carbon-fibre hull suffered a catastrophic loss of structural integrity, the investigation report says the crew died instantly, subjected to nearly 5,000 pounds per square inch of water fibre has not been used for a deep diving sub is known to be unreliable under pressure, and its layers are known to come apart in a process called submersible did complete 13 dives to the Titanic in the two years preceding the tragedy. But the coastguard criticised the company's continued use of the submersible without checking its hull, after a number of safety issues were picked up its McCallum, from EYOS expeditions, a specialist in deep water operations, who advised Oceangate between 2009 and 2016, told the BBC that carbon fibre is an unpredictable material."When you listen to the sounds of that hull under stress, and the cracking and the popping, that's the sign of damage in the hull, that means the hull is getting weaker," Mr McCallum said."So you can't expect to take a vehicle to the same depth every time knowing that it's weaker than the dive before, and expect it not to fail at some stage, It is a mathematical certainty that it will fail," he said. "The tragedy is, you don't know when it's going to fail." OceanGate used 'intimidation tactics' to avoid scrutiny The report accuses OceanGate of intentionally avoiding regulatory scrutiny through intimidation and strategic the years leading up to the incident, the company "leveraged intimidation tactics, allowances for scientific operations, and the company's favorable reputation to evade regulatory scrutiny", the report said."By strategically creating and exploiting regulatory confusion and oversight challenges, OceanGate was ultimately able to operate Titan completely outside of the established deep-sea protocols," it added. OceanGate founder and Titan pilot Stockton Rush's 'negligence' contributed to deaths The report also blames Stockton Rush, OceanGate's founder and the pilot of the Titan sub during its fatal voyage, for contributing to the "exhibited negligence that contributed to the deaths of four individuals" (apart from his own), investigators said. Had he survived, investigators said they would have recommended referring him to the US Department of Justice for potential "criminal offences".Coast Guard Marine Board of Investigation Chair Jason Neubauer told the BBC that the structure of the organisation was "deeply flawed"."One of the biggest standouts that I think that any company could take away is, if your CEO, was also filling the role of safety officer, and lead engineer at the end, it's just too many," he said. "It's a consolidation of power that leads to no checks and balances." Recommendations to prevent future incidents To prevent similar disasters in future, the Marine Board issued 14 safety recommendations to the US Coast Guard and the wider submersible among them:US Coast Guard (USCG) pursue "proper regulatory oversight" of submersiblesRevoking ORV (Oceanographic Research Vessel) designations for submersibles, requiring them to meet certification standards under new passenger vessel requirementsDedicated USCG resources "providing field support for vessels of novel design" In a statement, Oceangate offered condolences to the families of those who died in the deadly disaster, and to all "those impacted by the tragedy"."After the tragedy occurred, the company permanently wound down operations and directed its resources fully towards cooperating with the Coast Guard's inquiry through its completion," it said.

Report: OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush was to blame for Titan sub disaster
Report: OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush was to blame for Titan sub disaster

Daily Mail​

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Report: OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush was to blame for Titan sub disaster

The company behind the fatal Titan submersible voyage had 'critically flawed' safety practices and a toxic workplace culture, a new report into the disaster has claimed as the family of two victims called for 'meaningful reform' to industry standards. Jason Neubauer, chair of the Coast Guard Marine Board, said in light of a report released Tuesday after two years of investigation that the 'marine casualty and the loss of five lives was preventable'. The board found that the 'primary contributing factors' in the Titan's implosion were 'inadequate design, certification, maintenance and inspection process'. OceanGate's Titan submersible imploded during a June 2023 dive to the Titanic, killing five people, including CEO Stockton Rush. More than two years on, a report spanning 335-pages concluded that the company 'failed to properly investigate and address' known issues, and pointed to worrying trends behind the scenes. The board found that OceanGate failed to properly investigate and address 'known hull anomalies' identified in 2022. It said the Titan's real time monitoring system produced data that 'should have on' a year before the tragedy. The Coast Guard determined that the Titan's implosion was ultimately caused by the loss of structural integrity of its hull, resulting in the 'instantaneous' death of everyone on board. 'The lack of both third-party oversight and experienced OceanGate employees on staff during their 2023 Titan operations allowed OceanGate's Chief Executive Officer to completely ignore vital inspections, data analyses, and preventative maintenance procedures, culminating in a catastrophic event,' the report concluded. The board also cited 'a toxic workplace culture at OceanGate, an inadequate domestic and international regulatory framework for submersible operations and vessels of novel design, and an ineffective whistleblower process'. The Coast Guard convened its highest level of investigation in the aftermath of the 2023 implosion off Canada. The disappearance of the Titan led to a search that garbed worldwide attention. The submersible disaster has led to lawsuits and calls for tighter regulation of the developing private deep sea expedition industry. In its report, the board of investigation made 17 safety recommendations 'aimed at strengthening oversight of submersible operations, improving coordination among federal agencies and closing gaps in international maritime policy'. Its conclusions focused on how OceanGate had failed to address the 'fundamental engineering principles' needed to dive in an 'inherently hazardous environment'. The submersible was designed to be able to reach some 4,000 meters below sea level - two hundred deeper than the wreck of the Titanic. The U.S. Navy detected sounds 'consistent with an implosion' shortly after the sub lost contact at around 3,500 meters below sea level. The submersible was designed to withstand the enormous pressure put on it at such depths. But according to the Coastguard's assessment, the Titan's carbon fibre construction led to flaws testing its integrity. 'Vital' inspections and data analyses were also then overlooked and 'completely ignored', it found. The report goes on to take aim at perceived failures of company culture, lambasting a 'toxic workplace environment' at OceanGate. It claimed the company used the firing of staff to dissuade them from whistleblowing safety concerns. The report cites 'an experienced underwater explorer and submersible pilot' hired to pilot OceanGate's ANTIPODES, who suggested that 'the culture of OceanGate was one of "safety is not important"'. On one dive years prior, Mr Rush was alleged to have told the experienced pilot to 'sit the dive out so he could take his "rich friends" on the dive', the report says. During the project, OceanGate had an incident that damaged the ANTIPODES, causing approximately $10,000 worth of damage to the vessel. During another dive in 2015, the CYCLOPS I experienced a malfunction. A Near Miss Report flagged how the starboard hatch latch mechanism became stuck and unable to fully engage while still at the dock. The mission nonetheless went ahead 'without 100% consensus from the group as to the safety of the partially latched starboard hatch.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store