logo
Revealed: Home Office pays migrants £53m to leave UK

Revealed: Home Office pays migrants £53m to leave UK

Independent5 hours ago

The UK has paid migrants £53 million to leave the country over the past four years, The Independent can reveal.
Under a voluntary return scheme run by the government, migrants can receive up to £3,000 as an incentive to return to their home country, as part of what are known as 'assisted returns'. They also have their flights paid for as part of the deal.
Assisted returns have been on the rise in recent years, with 2,179 people travelling home this way in 2022 compared to 6,799 people in 2024. Between 2021 and 2024, 13,637 people have taken an assisted return, according to Home Office data.
In the UK, a person can qualify for this money if they are returning to a developing country, are a failed asylum seeker, are a confirmed victim of modern slavery, are sleeping rough or have a medical condition.
In 2024, over half of the foreign nationals who accepted assisted returns were from Brazil, with 3,573 taking up the offer. The second highest nationality was India, with 915 people returning in 2024, and then 271 going back to Honduras.
The Home Office insists the voluntary return scheme is a 'much more cost-effective alternative for the taxpayer' than paying for accommodation and support for those facing deportation from the UK.
Charity Asylum Matters also said a properly-run system can be much cheaper than the 'expensive cruelty of forced removals', but can also result in 'immeasurable better outcomes' for the asylum seekers.
But it called for bespoke support for migrants, with independent bodies funded to provide advice and tailored help to those returning to countries. In 2015, the government cancelled funding for independent advice for those considering return.
Asylum Matters executive director Louise Calvey told The Independent: 'When a supportive, dignified system is provably more cost effective than the alternative, it becomes clear we need to have honest conversations about the amount of money we're prepared to waste on cruelty and hostility.
'Such a system shouldn't just mean handing someone a plane ticket and a cash card. Without bespoke support, rooted in non-governmental bodies able to give independent advice and tailored help, both in the UK and in the country of return, people are effectively abandoned back into the difficult circumstances they had fled.'
Sir Keir Starmer boasted in March that migrant returns had reached the highest rate in eight years, under Labour. He claimed to have 'removed more than 24,000 people with no right to be here', but was criticised for not making clear that this included people who had left the UK voluntarily.
Invoices analysed by government procurement experts Tussell.com show the Home Office paid Prepaid Payment Solutions Ltd £53,894,226 from 2021 to February 2025 for voluntary assisted returns.
Prepaid Payment Solutions Ltd offer 'versatile payment solutions including virtual and physical cards…for businesses and government entities'.
Under the scheme, up to £3,000 is provided as a single payment on a card, which can only be used in the country of return, according to advice from the No Recourse to Public Fund network.
Similar schemes are in place in EU countries. In Italy, migrants are offered €615 before their departure or immediately on arrival in the country of origin, and then given €2,000 plus €1000 for each family member.
Families with a child under 18 also qualify for support of up to £3,000. If someone accepts this offer, they will then be subject to a 're-entry ban', which is meant to stop them returning to the UK for a specific time period.
How long the ban is depends on the person's immigration record and on how much support they had from the Home Office when they left.
Meanwhile, Dolores Modern, from the Latin American Women's Rights Service, said they have heard about Brazilian community Facebook groups sharing information about voluntary returns.
Ms Modern said that her organisation doesn't encourage voluntary returns because it is hard for people to fully consent to the process. She said: 'You can never be sure that there is real informed consent. Sometimes they might be feeling pressured.
'Many Brazilians come here not knowing that they are not allowed to work, and learning that once they are here. If they do get in an exploitative work situation, their visa often runs out when they are in that exploitation and they don't know who to turn to, they don't know that they can go to the police. They find themselves trapped, and once they are out, they might consider voluntary return.
'People also come here escaping violence and then once they are here they find their situation very difficult, and they might consider returning as one of their options.
'We had one recent case of a woman who was in the domestic servitude of another woman, she was brought to the UK specifically from Brazil for that job. She found herself in a really precarious and exploitative situation, and when she managed to escape that situation she knew she wanted to go back to Brazil. The consulate spoke to her about voluntary return, and she went back.'
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'Since coming to office, this government has taken immediate action to ensure immigration rules are respected and enforced. We have returned nearly 30,000 failed asylum seekers, foreign criminals and other immigration offenders with no right to be in the UK, a 12 per cent increase compared to the same period 12 months ago.
'Under successive governments, the facilitation of voluntary returns has been considered a much more cost-effective alternative for the taxpayer than paying for the accommodation and support of individuals awaiting enforced deportation from the UK. To put this total in perspective, around £54 million was being spent every six days on asylum hotels alone under the previous administration, at the peak of their use in Autumn 2023.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Social media time limits for children considered by government
Social media time limits for children considered by government

BBC News

time39 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Social media time limits for children considered by government

The government is considering introducing tougher online safety measures to limit the amount of time children can spend on social media, the BBC include a two-hour cap on the use of individual social media apps and a 22:00 curfew, as first reported by the Sunday People and the on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme, Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said he was looking at the "addictive nature of some of the apps and smartphones", when asked whether time limits would be considered. But an online safety campaigner has accused the government of delaying bringing in new laws to protect children. Ian Russell, whose daughter, Molly, took her own life at 14 after seeing harmful content online, said: "Every day the government has delayed bringing in tougher online safety laws we've seen more young lives lost and damaged because of weak regulation and inaction by big tech."Mr Russell, who backed the previous government's Online Safety Act, said only "stronger and more effective" legislation would "finally change the dial on fundamentally unsafe products and business models that prioritise engagement over safety.""Parents up and down the country would be delighted to see the prime minister act decisively to quell the tsunami of harm children face online, but sticking plasters will not do the job."Kyle told the BBC he had not been able to speak publicly about the government's plans to toughen online safety laws because legislation passed by the previous Conservative government in 2023 had yet to be enacted."This year we've had illegal content that needs to be taken down, but in July, age-appropriate material must be supplied by platforms, otherwise there'll be criminal sanctions against them," he told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg said that he had been looking carefully at what government needed to do next to "nail down harder" on safety, "understand what a healthy online life for children" looked like and "stop the barriers" towards achieving that. In January, Kyle told the BBC that laws on internet safety were "very uneven" and "unsatisfactory", following calls from campaigners to tighten the minister expressed his "frustration" with the Online Safety Act but did not commit to making changes to the legislation.A Whitehall source later told the BBC there were no plans to repeal the act.

Pope criticises nationalism and prays for reconciliation
Pope criticises nationalism and prays for reconciliation

BreakingNews.ie

time39 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Pope criticises nationalism and prays for reconciliation

Pope Leo has criticised the surge of nationalist political movements in the world as he prayed for reconciliation and dialogue – a message in line with his pledges to make the Catholic Church a symbol of peace. The Pope celebrated Sunday Mass in St Peter's Square in front of tens of thousands of faithful, and asked the Holy Spirit to 'break down barriers and tear down the walls of indifference and hatred'. Advertisement He declared: 'Where there is love, there is no room for prejudice, for 'security' zones separating us from our neighbours, for the exclusionary mindset that, tragically, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms.' He did not name any specific country or politician. The Pope greeted a young girl as he arrived to celebrate Mass on Sunday (Andrew Medichini/AP) Leo also recalled the words of late Pope Francis, who – on the feast of Pentecost in May 2023 – observed that in our world 'we are all connected, yet find ourselves disconnected from one another, anaesthetised by indifference and overwhelmed by solitude'. The Pope also condemned wars which 'are plaguing our world', and asked the Holy Spirit for 'the gift of peace'. Advertisement He told the faithful: 'First of all, peace in our hearts, for only a peaceful heart can spread peace in the family, society and international relations.' He then prayed for reconciliation and dialogue wherever there is war in the world. Soon after becoming Pope, Leo pledged to work for unity and peace. His first message: 'Peace be with you all,' set the importance of peace as a pillar of his papacy. He has also appealed for a genuine and just peace in Ukraine and a ceasefire in Gaza. Advertisement

How Palace are fighting to keep European dream alive
How Palace are fighting to keep European dream alive

BBC News

time44 minutes ago

  • BBC News

How Palace are fighting to keep European dream alive

Crystal Palace are anxiously waiting to hear whether their European dream is over before it even begins. Winning the FA Cup - the Eagles' first major trophy triumph - resulted in the south London club qualifying for the Europa League, the club's only qualification into continental football in their 164-year whether Palace can start planning for European football is in the hands of governing body Uefa, who must decide whether the Eagles have breached its rules on teams under one multi-club ownership structure competing in the same European final ruling will centre on American businessman John Textor, owner of Eagle Football - which holds a 43% stake in Football also owns a 77% stake in French side Lyon, who - like Palace - have qualified for next season's Europa BBC Sport outlines the details of Palace's defence as they fight for their European lives. Palace deny operating multi-club model Uefa's regulations are in place to prevent collusion between clubs. At the heart of Palace's argument is that their historic FA Cup win and consequential European qualification was an achievement accomplished entirely on their own are insisting they are an entity that operates entirely independently, and not within the structures of a multi-club with knowledge of the situation have told BBC Sport that Textor's personal share in the Selhurst Park side does not meet the 30% threshold - which is key in Uefa determining decisive influence - and that he has just 25% of the voting rules state that "no individual or legal entity" can hold a majority of shareholder voting rights at two clubs in the same European it is understood Palace have made clear they had no assistance in winning the FA Cup, in that they have not collaborated with Lyon since Textor's original investment into the club in August 2021 and will have no connection with the French side during next year's Europa Premier League side are believed to have pointed out that there have been no transfers between the clubs since Jake O'Brien, now at Everton, left Palace for Lyon in August also say there has been no employee, backroom staff or coach sharing, no dialogue, no collaborative strategy, no combined partnerships, sponsorships or commercial deals and no collective scouting, analysis or software is accepted, and been widely reported, that chairman Steve Parish and his leadership team make all final decisions in relation to the management and operations at working structure has existed for a decade and is supported by fellow shareholders Josh Harris and David Textor, who only has one vote, has publicly spoken about his lack of influence at Selhurst Park."As proud as we are to have been a part of the resurgence of Crystal Palace, it remains true that Crystal Palace is an independent club, run by a man with a steady hand, who has achieved a level of sustainability that is incredibly uncommon in today's Premier League," said Textor in May 2024."An integrated sporting model, such as ours at Eagle, is simply not a perfect fit for Crystal Palace."It has been pointed out to Uefa that Textor is an individual and minority shareholder and, when he first invested into Crystal Palace in 2021, he owned no other clubs and his investment into other teams followed takeover over Lyon was confirmed in 2022, 16 months after he secured a stake in Palace. Textor could resign as Palace director Under Article 5 of Uefa's rulebook, which relates to the integrity of the "competition/multi-club ownership", a club is required from March 1 2025 to have complied with the requirements necessary to prove they are not "simultaneously involved in any capacity whatsoever in the management, administration, and/or sporting performance of more than one club participating in a Uefa club competition".In the past clubs have sought to divest the stakes of key shareholders with a view to complying with Uefa's example, the City Group, Ineos, Red Bull group and most recently Nottingham Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis have adapted their shareholdings in clubs accordingly to ensure their teams can compete in the same European year Ineos, which owns Manchester United, put its shares in French club Nice into a blind trust to ensure both clubs could compete in the Europa League last made a similar move earlier this season by placing its ownership of Swiss club Lausanne-Sport into a blind trust, before a potential conflict in the 2025-26 rules regarding the March 1 deadline are clear - and clubs have sought to comply with the regulations and cut-offs. A template for Palace to follow is in Palace are understood to have made clear that Textor's position means he cannot be enforced by the club to place his shares into a blind trust, owing to a lack of legal authority, unlike previous precedents where a single entity owns multiple as has been well documented, effectively holds the deciding vote at Palace with the backing of Harris and Blitzer, so existing shareholder agreements would need to be altered to enforce a blind trust scenario - which is not within the club's power and infringes on Textor's property is also a sense that the chain of events that have left Palace's position in European football in jeopardy were unforeseen and is a factor towards why they failed to meet the deadline for ownership faced Millwall in the FA Cup fifth round on March 1. Since then they beat Champions League clubs Aston Villa and Manchester City en route to winning the side Strasbourg conceded a 90th-minute goal on the final day of the season to hand Lyon the final Europa Conference League spot, before Paris St-Germain later won the French Cup to elevate Lyon into the Europa Uefa rules that Lyon and Palace cannot both compete in the Europa League, regulations state that the French side will play in the competition because of their higher league that scenario Palace could play in the Europa Conference League, but even then there is the added complication that Danish club Brondby, who have qualified for the Conference League, are owned by Harris and missed the deadline, Palace have expressed to Uefa that they are prepared to take immediate steps to comply with their with knowledge of the situation have told BBC Sport that one of those measures includes the resignation of Textor as a director of Palace, which would mean he will have no influence in any capacity. 'Europa League ban is disproportionate' It is understood Palace are arguing that banning them from the Europa League would result in a disproportionate sanction and unfairly punish the club, players, staff, fans and local thoughts are that preventing the club from competing in the Europa League next season would result in an injustice, particularly given their breach is technical and that no competitive harm has is believed Palace also feel that refusing them a place would contradict the promotion of football's development that ensure that "sporting values always prevail", as per Article 2 of Uefa's sources are indicating that Palace believe a fine or temporary oversight measures - for example the monitoring of transfers - would appropriately punish a breach, without harming stakeholders who have no involvement in the ownership is expected to confirm its decision in the coming weeks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store