logo
Study finds vaping leads to smoking for one in three teens

Study finds vaping leads to smoking for one in three teens

Miami Herald6 days ago
By Stephen Beech
Teenagers who vape are just as likely to start smoking cigarettes as young people 50 years ago, according to new research.
Despite a massive fall in the number of youngsters smoking over the past half-century, scientists found that UK teens who are current vapers are as likely to take up smoking now as 1970s teenagers.
The likelihood of starting to smoke cigarettes among teenagers who don't vape today is less than one in 50 (1.5%), suggests the long-term study.
But that figure soars to one in three (33%) among teens who do vape, according to the findings published in the BMJ journal Tobacco Control.
American researchers drew on data from three nationally representative groups of UK teens born in 1958, 1970 and 2001, respectively
The National Child Development Study (NCDS) follows people born in 1958 who were children when cigarette smoking was at its historic peak.
The British Cohort Study (BCS) follows children born in 1970, who were teens in the 1980s when cigarette smoking among young people was relatively widespread, and who were in their 40s before e-cigarettes were introduced.
The Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) follows teens who were born in 2000–01 and who were children when e-cigarettes were introduced.
The prevalence of teen smoking was assessed in 1974 among 11,969 NCDS participants, in 1986 among 6,222 BCS participants, and in 2018 among 9,733 MCS participants.
The odds of smoking among 16- and 17-year-olds were estimated, based on a common set of childhood risk and protective factors; teen vaping was included as a predictor in the MCS.
Factors included whether they had ever drunk alcohol by age 16 or 17; how engaged they were with education at school; and parental occupation, education, and smoking habits.
Analysis of the data revealed a "steep" decline in the prevalence of cigarette smoking among teenagers, falling from 33% in 1974 to 25% in 1986, and to just 12% in 2018.
Around half of the MCS participants hadn't vaped by the time they were 17, while 41% said they had previously vaped, and 11% reported current vaping.
The researchers suggest that the decline in prevalence of teen smoking is down to a mix of tobacco control legislation, better public understanding of the health consequences of smoking, and a shift away from the perception of smoking as socially acceptable.
They pointed out that risk factors also changed over time. For example, the percentage of teens who had started drinking by the age of 16 or 17 fell from 94% in the NCDS to 83% in the MCS.
The average age at which mothers left education also rose from 15.5 in the NCDS to 17 in the MCS.
The prevalence of parental smoking also fell from above 70% in the NCDS to 27% in the MCS; and fewer mothers continued smoking while pregnant in the MCS than in the two younger groups.
But many factors for teen smoking remained similar across the groups, including boozing before the age of 17.
To illustrate the likelihood of cigarette smoking for an "average" teenage 16 or 17 over time, the researchers worked out predicted probabilities of cigarette smoking with all risk factors included from the intergenerational data.
This probability was 30% in the NCDS and 22% in the BCS.
Among those who had never vaped in the MCS group, it was only around 1.5%, but 33% for the teens who reported current vaping.
Study author Dr. Jessica Mongilio, of the University of Michigan, said: "This probability is especially concerning given the recent increases in e-cigarette use prevalence among UK youth, despite some initial assurances that e-cigarettes would have little appeal to them."
The research team acknowledged that they were unable to account for some socio-demographic characteristics, including race and ethnicity.
But Dr. Mongilio said: "While our research shows that the historic decline in the likelihood of youth cigarette smoking has continued in this recent cohort of UK youth, overall, we find that this is not the case among e-cigarette users.
"Youth who had never used e-cigarettes had an estimated less than one in 50 chance of reporting weekly cigarette use at age 17, while those who had previously used e-cigarettes had over a one in 10 chance.
"Youth who reported current e-cigarette use had an almost one in three chance of also reporting current cigarette use.
"As such, the decline in the likelihood of cigarette smoking is waning for youth who have used e-cigarettes-about half of our sample -and has reversed for those currently using e-cigarettes."
She added: "Among contemporary youth, efforts to reduce cigarette smoking should focus both on those who are currently using e-cigarettes and on the prevention of e-cigarette use among youth, to maintain the promising declines in youth nicotine use in years to come."
The post Study finds vaping leads to smoking for one in three teens appeared first on Talker.
Copyright Talker News. All Rights Reserved.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Childhood verbal abuse can have similar mental health impact as physical abuse'
‘Childhood verbal abuse can have similar mental health impact as physical abuse'

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Childhood verbal abuse can have similar mental health impact as physical abuse'

Verbal abuse of children could be as damaging to their mental health in adulthood as physical abuse, according to researchers. A study of more than 20,000 adults in England and Wales found that people exposed to verbal abuse in childhood were likely to feel disconnected, pessimistic, and emotionally unwell in later life. Adults who were physically abused as children had a 52% higher chance of experiencing low mental wellbeing, and this stood at around 64% for those who had been subjected to solely verbal abuse. While verbal abuse did show as having a marginally higher impact in this study, the researchers said the difference was not statistically significant and that further studies would be needed perhaps with a larger sample size to confirm the validity of the difference. Being exposed to both types of abuse compounded the risk even further, at 115% higher, the study led by Liverpool John Moores University found. Lead author, Professor Mark Bellis, who is director of research and innovation at the university, said: 'Our research shows that verbal abuse in childhood may inflict mental health scars as deep and enduring as those caused by physical abuse. Important progress has been made in reducing physical abuse, but verbal abuse is often overlooked.' The study, published in the BMJ Open, also suggested the prevalence of verbal abuse has risen in recent decades 'eroding the long-term mental health benefits we should see from reducing physical abuse'. The authors worked alongside Bangor University and Public Health Wales to pool data from seven relevant studies, involving 20,687 adults from England and Wales and looking at birth cohorts from the 1950s onwards. They found that the prevalence of child physical abuse halved from around 20% among those born between 1950 and 1979 to 10% among those born in 2000 or later. But when it came to verbal abuse, the prevalence rose from 12% among those born before 1950 to around 20% among those born in 2000 or later. The researchers said an estimated one in six children endure physical abuse, primarily from family members and caregivers, but one in three are subjected to verbal abuse. Jessica Bondy, founder of Words Matter, an organisation focused on ending childhood verbal abuse by adults said: 'This study confirms what survivors and professionals have long known: words can wound deeply and have a lasting impact on a child's mental health and development. We all get overloaded sometimes, but too many adults are turning to harsh words without realising the lasting damage they cause to children. 'Any gains made in reducing physical abuse risk being undone by rising rates of verbal abuse. We must act now to confront the lasting harm caused by cruel, critical or controlling language. We need to build children up – not knock them down. The mental health of the next generation and our shared future depend on it.'

Livestream of deep-sea creatures transfixes Argentina
Livestream of deep-sea creatures transfixes Argentina

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Livestream of deep-sea creatures transfixes Argentina

The video feed has attracted more than 1.6 million views a day on YouTube, dominated TV news broadcasts, and even sparked a national conversation about the defunding of Argentine science under libertarian President Javier Milei. 'It was a huge surprise for us,' said expedition leader Daniel Lauretta. 'It's something that fills our hearts because we want to spread the word.' Advertisement Outfitted with high-definition cameras and state-of-the-art sensors, the roving robot captures the enigmatic organisms of Mar de Plata's submarine canyon with exceptional clarity and detail for the first time. The region, where the warm current from Brazil meets the cold current coming up from the Falkland Islands, is known for its little-studied biodiversity. In dives lasting around eight hours a day, the camera encounters an array of surprising creatures lurking in the inky depths off the coast of Buenos Aires: An orange starfish so bright it drew comparisons to Patrick of 'SpongeBob SquarePants' cartoon fame, a sea cucumber viewers nicknamed 'sweet potato,' a deep sea crab that looked like a hairy spider. 'The colors, the zoom capability — that really amazed me,' Lauretta said. 'I think that feeling reached the public too.' Advertisement Often peaking at some 50,000 simultaneous viewers, the livestream from the deep-sea research vessel kicked off last week and runs until Sunday. Argentine researchers and American experts from the nonprofit of former Google CEO Eric E. Schmidt, the Schmidt Ocean Institute Foundation, use the vehicle to map the underwater gorge, collect samples and identify scores of new species at a depth below the reach of sunlight, where scientists have only begun to scratch the surface when it comes to understanding marine life. Few viewers have been able to resist the impulse to anthropomorphize the featured life-forms, assigning zodiac stars to invertebrates and sharing social media quizzes along the lines of 'Which deep-sea creature are you based on how you handle stress?' If you ignore the world, you're a translucent squid; if you explode with anger, you're apparently a pistol shrimp. 'Argentines are very passionate about everything that happens in Argentina,' said Georgina Valanci, 40, her eyes fixed on floating translucent fish while crocheting on Monday. 'I think it represents a bit of the pride that something like this is being done in our country.' Most Argentine researchers on the expedition come from Conicet, Argentina's leading scientific funding and research body, shining a light on the institute's work at a moment when its funding is under attack. President Milei has taken his bureaucracy-slashing chainsaw to Argentine research projects and grants, curbing science spending as a part of a broader drive to eliminate Argentina's chronic fiscal deficit and bring down inflation. State-backed science organizations have lost 4,000 positions in the last year and a half — a combination of layoffs, frozen contracts, and resignations over poor working conditions and low pay. Advertisement Conicet suffered a 21 percent budget cut in real terms last year. Salaries for Conicet researchers have lost 35 percent of their value. Many warn that the measures are setting off a brain drain. Seizing on the surge of public excitement about Conicet, researchers have called for a 48-hour nationwide strike on Wednesday to draw attention to their plight. Although Milei has not commented on the livestream, his allies have expressed disdain. 'They should livestream an offshore drilling operation instead,' said Alejandro Álvarez, an official in Milei's government, referring to growing crude production in Argentina's Vaca Muerta shale formation — an oil boom that Milei hopes can help revive the nation's crisis-stricken economy. 'It's a beautiful process of wealth creation and natural resource exploitation that will make Argentina greater.' In the meantime, Argentines seem content to be mesmerized by orange starfish.

Drinking These Teas May Help Lower Blood Pressure, According to Experts
Drinking These Teas May Help Lower Blood Pressure, According to Experts

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Drinking These Teas May Help Lower Blood Pressure, According to Experts

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Nearly half of American adults have high blood pressure, according to the CDC. But, while it's common, living with hypertension is linked with a higher risk of heart attack and stroke. While there are medications doctors can prescribe to treat high blood pressure, some may suggest making lifestyle changes first. (Always talk to your own doctor for personalized advice!) And, even if you are prescribed a medication, doctors still stress the importance of lifestyle modifications, which might include tweaking your diet. 'Dietary changes are one part of helping regulate and maintain a healthy blood pressure,' says Cheng-Han Chen, M.D., interventional cardiologist and medical director of the Structural Heart Program at MemorialCare Saddleback Medical Center in Laguna Hills, CA. That may include drinking tea, he says. It seems random, but much like studies suggesting that eating more bananas may help lower your blood pressure, there is some research to suggest that drinking certain teas may help with blood pressure management. That doesn't mean that your blood pressure will magically come down if you start sipping Earl Grey every day. And, there are a few side effects and risks to be aware of. (More on this soon!) But, doctors say that adding a little tea to your life may help with your blood pressure. Here's why. Meet the experts: Cheng-Han Chen, M.D., interventional cardiologist and medical director of the Structural Heart Program at MemorialCare Saddleback Medical Center in Laguna Hills, CA; Tara Collingwood, R.D.N., C.P.T., a dietitian and certified personal trainer; Ragavendra Baliga, M.B.B.S., a cardiologist at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center; Keri Gans, R.D.N., dietitian and host of The Keri Report podcast Can tea lower your blood pressure? It's important to state this up front: Always talk to your doctor about any personal blood pressure concerns. Blood pressure is complicated, and it's tough to say that doing something as simple as adding tea to your life will automatically turn things around. But there is some data to suggest that drinking tea may help with blood pressure management. One meta-analysis published in the journal Medicine in 2020 analyzed data from 1,697 people across multiple studies and found that those who regularly drank green tea or green tea extract 'significantly reduced' their systolic (the top number) and diastolic (the bottom number) blood pressure. However, the authors note that additional high-quality trials with larger sample sizes, longer durations, and various catechin dosages are needed to confirm these effects. So, how might tea help? 'Tea, especially green and black varieties, contains polyphenols,' says Ragavendra Baliga, M.B.B.S., a cardiologist at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. These polyphenols improve the function of endothelial cells (the thin layer of cells that line the inside of blood vessels), lower oxidative stress that can lead to cell damage, and enhance the production of nitric oxide, a compound that relaxes and widens blood vessels, allowing for better blood flow and oxygen delivery around the body, he explains. 'These actions can support a modest reduction in blood pressure over time,' says Tara Collingwood, R.D.N., C.P.T. Still, that doesn't mean drinking tea will automatically help your blood pressure—it just may play a role in lowering it. Because of this, it's still important to talk to your healthcare provider for personalized advice, Dr. Chen reiterates. Dr. Baliga also notes that the effects are more noticeable in people who have slightly elevated blood pressure or mild hypertension. Potential risks and side effects There are a few potential risks and side effects to keep in mind before you start downing tea to manage your blood pressure. A big one experts flag is that the caffeine in tea may increase your blood pressure in the short term. 'People who don't have their blood pressure well-regulated may want to avoid it until they get a better range,' Dr. Chen says. There are also potential drug interactions to keep in mind. 'Green tea can affect warfarin, beta-blockers, and reduce folate or iron absorption,' Dr. Baliga says. He also recommends keeping this in mind: If you have more than five cups of tea a day, it can raise your risk of GI issues, iron deficiency, or insomnia. Something else to consider: A lot of the research around tea and blood pressure focuses on black and green tea. Other forms of tea may have different effects on your health. 'Herbal teas like licorice root can raise blood pressure or interact with medicines,' Collingwood says. What type of tea can help lower blood pressure? The research that's available suggests that green tea is the way to go. 'Green tea shows the strongest evidence, followed by hibiscus tea,' Dr. Baliga says. He also notes that black tea can have 'modest effects' on blood pressure. But unsweetened tea of any type can also have an indirect positive impact on blood pressure, points out Keri Gans, R.D.N., dietitian and host of The Keri Report podcast. 'Replacing sugary drinks with these teas can support overall heart health,' she says. How to use tea to lower your blood pressure There's no magic formula for using tea to lower your blood pressure, but Dr. Chen says that consistency may help. So long as you don't have any of the contraindications mentioned above, he recommends starting out by having one unsweetened hot or iced tea a day to see how you like it. After that, Dr. Baliga says you can work up to having two to three cups of green or hibiscus tea a day. 'Avoid sugar and full-fat milk—both may blunt benefits,' he says. Other ways to lower your blood pressure If you've been diagnosed with high blood pressure, it's important to go over your treatment options with your healthcare provider. But Dr. Chen says those may include following the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8. Those lifestyle tips include: Eat a diet that focuses on whole foods, fruits and vegetables, lean protein, nuts, and seeds. Aim for at least 2.5 hours of moderate-intensity exercise, or 75 minutes of vigorous physical activity a week. Avoid using cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Do your best to get seven to nine hours of sleep a night. Manage your weight. Manage your cholesterol by minimizing sugary foods and drinks, red or processed meats, salty food, refined carbohydrates, and highly-processed foods. Try to manage your blood sugar. Stay on top of your blood pressure. 'Life's Essential 8 helps with almost everything cardiovascular-related,' Dr. Chen says. Bottom line Ultimately, experts recommend keeping tea in mind as an additional treatment for blood pressure. However, it's not the only thing you should be doing to bring your numbers down. 'Tea [is] a pleasant bonus—not a cure-all,' Dr. Baliga says. You Might Also Like Can Apple Cider Vinegar Lead to Weight Loss? Bobbi Brown Shares Her Top Face-Transforming Makeup Tips for Women Over 50

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store