Opinion - Trump picked a fight against Harvard and he's already losing
Our institutions of higher learning are not perfect, and the public doesn't see them as faultless, but most Americans recognize their immense value and oppose Trump's attacks on them.
In an AP/NORC poll earlier this month, 14 points more disapproved than approved of Trump's performance on 'issues related to colleges and universities.' Most Americans dislike what Trump is doing to these institutions.
The rest of the data in that poll makes clear why: College costs are a real issue for the public, with 58 percent at least very concerned about tuition prices. In contrast, 'liberal bias' is not particularly salient. Just 36 percent claim to be concerned about ideological prejudice in colleges. A similar number, 32 percent, professes a complete lack of concern around liberal bias.
Conservatives have been lambasting the liberalism of colleges and universities at least since William F. Buckley skyrocketed to fame for publishing 'God and Man at Yale' in 1951.
It was less true when Buckley wrote and less true 20 years later when Seymour Martin Lipset and Everett Carl Ladd first surveyed the nation's professoriate, uncovering a liberal plurality, but not quite a majority — 46 percent described themselves as liberal, 27 percent as moderate, and 28 percent as conservative.
In this century, the 2024 FIRE Faculty Survey interviewed 6,269 faculty across 55 four-year U.S. colleges and universities and found 64 percent identified as liberals, 19 percent moderate and 18 percent conservative.
Different schools present somewhat different profiles, ranging from Harvard among the most liberal (73 percent), to Bringham Young University and University of Texas, Dallas where conservatives slightly outnumber liberals.
A survey of Harvard faculty by the student newspaper found a similar 77 percent calling themselves liberal or very liberal, 20 percent moderate and just 3 percent conservative. At Duke, a Chronicle of Higher Education poll revealed 62 percent of the faculty to be liberals, 24 percent moderate and 14 percent conservatives.
Such liberal unanimity understandably makes some people uncomfortable. Just 27 percent of Americans think universities in general do a good job of providing 'a respectful and inclusive environment'for conservatives.
Interestingly, students themselves are less clear. According to a Gallup survey of students then enrolled in a four-year college, 74 percent of Democrats and 73 percent of Republicans believe their school did a good job promoting free speech.
Nonetheless, in a country where liberals constitute a distinct minority, the professoriate does not reflect our ideological diversity and apparently never has.
Politically though, it's key that voters don't really care so much about liberal bias, oppose the Trump approach in principle and see enormous value in these institutions.
An earlier AP/NORC poll found that only 30 percent would allow state governments to restrict what is taught at state universities funded by those same governments. Sixty-eight percent would prohibit state government from exercising that level of control over their own universities. Allowing the federal government to interfere with private universities is likely to be even less popular.
At the same time, voters do perceive socially redeeming value from colleges and universities.
Seventy percent of adults without a college degree told Gallup they regarded a four-year degree as at least 'very valuable,' while 92 percent of college students felt confident a degree would help them get the kind of job they want.
Benefits go beyond personal economic advancement. Nearly two-thirds of American adults believe universities make a positive contribution to scientific and medical research, while 63 percent believe they contribute 'new ideas and innovative technology.'
So, it is no surprise that 62 percent favor 'maintaining federal funding for scientific and medical research' at universities, while a mere 11 percent are opposed. Only 27 percent favor Trump's policy of 'Withholding federal funding unless [universities] comply with requirements related to the president's goals.'
A plurality oppose removing tax exemptions from colleges and universities. This issue may be a bit esoteric as a third have no opinion.
Trump apparently perceives Harvard as an object of particular antipathy given his focus on that institution. But in a Washington Post poll, just 32 percent of Americans took Trump's side in 'trying to take a greater role in Harvard University's hiring of faculty, admission of students, and operation of its academic programs.' Sixty-six percent sided with Harvard which 'says this intrudes on its freedom as a private university.'
Further evidence comes from a YouGov poll which found just 35 percent approve of the 'the Trump administration…trying to take a greater role in Harvard University's hiring of faculty, admission of students, and operation of its academic programs.' Half disapprove.
Historically, Trump has proven politically adept in choosing his antagonists. Perhaps not this time.
Mellman is president of The Mellman Group a consultancy that has helped elect 30 U.S. senators, 12 governors and dozens of House members. Mellman served as pollster to Senate Democratic leaders for over 30 years and is a member of the American Association of Political Consultants' Hall of Fame. He holds degrees from Princeton and Yale.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Israel announces West Bank settlement that rights groups say could imperil Palestinian state
MAALE ADUMIM, West Bank (AP) — Israel's far-right finance minister announced a contentious new settlement construction in the Israeli-occupied West Bank on Thursday which Palestinians and rights groups worry will scuttle plans for a future Palestinian state by effectively cutting the West Bank into two separate parts. The announcement comes as many countries said they would recognize a Palestinian state in September. 'This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognize and no one to recognize,' said Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. 'Anyone in the world who tries today to recognize a Palestinian state – will receive an answer from us on the ground,' he said. Development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades, but was frozen due to U.S. pressure during previous administrations. On Thursday, Smotrich praised President Donald Trump and U.S. ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee as 'true friends of Israel as we have never had before.' The E1 plan has not yet received its final approval, which is expected next week. The plan includes around 3,500 apartments to expand the settlement of Maale Adumim, Smotrich said. While some bureaucratic steps remain, if the process moves quickly, infrastructure work could begin in the next few months and construction of homes could start in around a year. Rights groups swiftly condemned the plan. Peace Now called it 'deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution' which is 'guaranteeing many more years of bloodshed.' The announcement comes as the Palestinian Authority and Arab countries condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's statement in an interview on Tuesday that he was 'very' attached to the vision of a Greater Israel. He did not elaborate, but supporters of the idea believe that Israel should control not only the occupied West Bank but parts of Arab countries.


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Aid groups call on Israel to end ‘weaponization' of aid in Gaza
JERUSALEM (AP) — More than 100 nonprofit groups warned Thursday that Israel's rules for aid groups working in the Gaza Strip and occupied West Bank will block much-needed relief and replace independent organizations with those that serve Israel's political and military agenda — charges that Israel denied. A letter signed by organizations including Oxfam, Doctors Without Borders and CARE accused Israel of 'weaponizing aid' as people starve in war-torn Gaza and using it as a tool to entrench control. The groups were responding to registration rules announced by Israel in March that require organizations to hand over full lists of their donors and Palestinian staff for vetting. The groups contend that doing so could endanger their staff and give Israel broad grounds to block aid if groups are deemed to be 'delegitimizing' the country or supporting boycotts or divestment. The registration measures were 'designed to control independent organizations, silence advocacy, and censor humanitarian reporting,' they said. The letter added that the rules violate European data privacy regulations, noting that in some cases aid groups have been given only seven days to comply. COGAT, the Israeli military body in charge of humanitarian aid to Gaza, denied the letter's claims. It alleged the groups were being used as cover by Hamas to 'exploit the aid to strengthen its military capabilities and consolidate its control' in Gaza. 'The refusal of some international organizations to provide the information and cooperate with the registration process raises serious concerns about their true intention,' it said in a statement on Thursday. 'The alleged delay in aid entry … occurs only when organizations choose not to meet the basic security requirements intended to prevent Hamas's involvement.' Israel has long claimed that aid groups and United Nations agencies issue biased assessments. The aid groups stressed on Thursday that most of them haven't been able to deliver 'a single truck' of life-saving assistance since Israel implemented a blockade in March. A vast majority of aid isn't reaching civilians in Gaza, where tens of thousands have been killed, most of the population has been displaced and famine looms. U.N. agencies and a small number of aid groups have resumed delivering assistance, but say the number of trucks allowed in remains far from sufficient. Meanwhile, tensions have flared over Israel and the United States backing the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to serve as the main distributor of aid in the besieged territory. The American contractor, meant to replace the traditional U.N.-led aid distribution system in Gaza, has faced international condemnation after hundreds of Palestinians were killed while trying to get food near its distribution sites. Israel has pressed U.N. agencies to accept military escorts to deliver goods into Gaza, a demand the agencies have largely rejected, citing their commitment to neutrality. The standoff has been the source of competing claims: Israel maintains it allows aid into Gaza that adheres to its rules, while aid groups that have long operated in Gaza decry the amount of life-saving supplies stuck at border crossings. 'Oxfam has over $2.5 million worth of goods that have been rejected from entering Gaza by Israel, especially WASH (water, sanitation and hygiene) items as well as food,' said Bushra Khalidi, an aid official with Oxfam in Gaza. Aid groups' 'ability to operate may come at the cost of their independence and ability to speak out,' she added.


San Francisco Chronicle
15 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
China targets 2 Lithuanian banks in response to new EU sanctions
BEIJING (AP) — China imposed sanctions on two Lithuanian banks in what it said was retaliation for the European Union including two Chinese financial institutions in its latest round of sanctions against Russia. Lithuania's UAB Urbo Bankas and Mano Bankas AB are prohibited from having any cooperation with individuals or institutions in China, according to a statement Wednesday from the Ministry of Commerce. The European Union adopted a new round of sanctions against individuals and companies supporting Russia in its war with Ukraine in July, which went into effect August 9. Among them were multiple Chinese companies, although China's Ministry of Commerce did not name which financial institutions were affected. 'The EU, disregarding China's solemn position, insisted on adding two Chinese financial institutions to its sanctions list for alleged involvement in Russia, and formally implemented the sanctions on August 9," said the statement. It added the move "severely damages the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies, and has a serious negative impact on China-EU economic and trade relations and financial cooperation." NATO has in the past called China a 'decisive enabler' of Russia's war effort as its companies sold tools, equipment and microelectronics.