logo
It's OpenAI's Biggest Acquisition To Date – But What Does Windsurf Do?

It's OpenAI's Biggest Acquisition To Date – But What Does Windsurf Do?

Forbes06-05-2025

The Open AI logo NurPhoto via Getty Images
OpenAI's acquisition of Windsurf is making big headlines in the tech media world. It's the biggest such activity by the household-name model company responsible for ChatGPT, and it has big ramifications for AI development in general. It's a $3 billion deal, too.
However, a lot of the reporting stops at a very surface level.
If you're trying to figure out what Windsurf is all about, you might or might not get what you want from the syndicated content that shows up at the top of the Google SERP feed.
So let's break down two elements of what Windsurf does. As an alternative, you can also click through to this video where I interviewed Windsurf-nee-Coedium co-founder Anshul Ramachandran about everything, including how they decided to change their name. Here's one of Ramachandran's thoughts on the AI revolution, for context:
'The only thing that has ever invariably happened is (that) we've had more developers every single time the nature of what a developer is has changed.'
As for the company's major contributions to AI, read on. Vibe Coding and Windsurf
First of all, most of those reporting on Windsurf describe it as a company that has its own coding tool.
Windsurf Editor is a standalone IDE incorporating AI agents to help with automation of coding. It's an AI-native design that leverages the new capabilities of LLMs to let humans, in a sense, take a backseat.
Not too many months ago, prominent tech person Andrej Karpathy talked about the practice of vibe coding, where you just give the machine some orders, and sit back and let AI manage the details.
'It's not really coding,' he famously said, 'I just see stuff, say stuff, run stuff, and copy-paste stuff, and it mostly works.'
In other words, you don't have to hand-code anymore – you just catch the vibe of what the machine is doing.
I've written a number of articles about this where we talk about whether or not you need actual coding experience to do this kind of vibe coding, or whether it helps.
In any case, Windsurf Editor, as well as a cascade AI agent inside it, helps with the bugging, refracturing and other code operations, as an alternative to something like Cursor, which is also another popular option for vibe coding.
For its part, Windsurf Editor is very popular in some quarters, as in this notable quote from Y Combinator's Garry Tan:
'Every single one of these engineers has to spend literally just one day making projects with Windsurf and it will be like they strapped on rocket boosters.'
That's a pretty glowing endorsement. The Hardware Picture
Now, if you click into some of the major reporting on the OpenAI-Windsurf deal, you're not going to hear anything about strategic hardware investment. As mentioned, quite a few of these articles just say that Windsurf offers the vibe coding tool, and leave it at that.
However, others are suggesting the OpenAI is interested in Windsurf partly for its hardware approach, where the company is also focused, according to some sources, on 'custom AI chips and high performance server clusters.' (see this short.)
How does this work?
Well, if you look at internal documentation, it turns out that the server approach used by windsurf is built for something called MCP or model context protocol. The tools send activity to the appropriate servers as part of the overall workflow.
As for the chips, you can catch the rest of that interview or hear about how Windsurf and its new stakeholder are going to pursue microprocessor development.
My point is that Windsurf does both of these things – it offers vibe coding tools, and it builds hardware context for those systems. Is OpenAI a Non-Profit?
In correlative articles in contemporary news, we see that OpenAI Sam Altman is noting the company will maintain both for-profit and non-profit status.
'Our for-profit LLC, which has been under the non-profit (status) since 2019, will transition to a Public Benefit Corporation (PBC)–a purpose-driven company structure that has to consider the interests of both shareholders and the mission.' OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said recently, according to reporting. 'Instead of our current complex capped-profit structure—which made sense when it looked like there might be one dominant AGI effort but doesn't in a world of many great AGI companies—we are moving to a normal capital structure where everyone has stock. This is not a sale, but a change of structure to something simpler.'
When this plan was initially announced, there was some confusion over whether the company would become non-profit or not.
This seems to suggest that both components will be maintained going into the future, and that a non-profit arm of the company will have a substantial impact.
As for OpenAI and Windsurf, this is big news. We want to see how this partnership works, and what it does for one of the biggest AI environments on the market.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns
Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns

The High Court of England and Wales says lawyers need to take stronger steps to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence in their work. In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT 'are not capable of conducting reliable legal research." 'Such tools can produce apparently coherent and plausible responses to prompts, but those coherent and plausible responses may turn out to be entirely incorrect,' Judge Sharp wrote. 'The responses may make confident assertions that are simply untrue.' That doesn't mean lawyers cannot use AI in their research, but she said they have a professional duty 'to check the accuracy of such research by reference to authoritative sources, before using it in the course of their professional work.' Judge Sharp suggested that the growing number of cases where lawyers (including, on the U.S. side, lawyers representing major AI platforms) have cited what appear to be AI-generated falsehoods suggests that 'more needs to be done to ensure that the guidance is followed and lawyers comply with their duties to the court,' and she said her ruling will be forwarded to professional bodies including the Bar Council and the Law Society. In one of the cases in question, a lawyer representing a man seeking damages against two banks submitted a filing with 45 citations — 18 of those cases did not exist, while many others 'did not contain the quotations that were attributed to them, did not support the propositions for which they were cited, and did not have any relevance to the subject matter of the application,' Judge Sharp said. In the other, a lawyer representing a man who had been evicted from his London home wrote a court filing citing five cases that did not appear to exist. (The lawyer denied using AI, though she said the citations may have come from AI-generated summaries that appeared in 'Google or Safari.') Judge Sharp said that while the court decided not to initiate contempt proceedings, that is 'not a precedent.' 'Lawyers who do not comply with their professional obligations in this respect risk severe sanction,' she added. Both lawyers were either referred or referred themselves to professional regulators. Judge Sharp noted that when lawyers do not meet their duties to the court, the court's powers range from 'public admonition' to the imposition of costs, contempt proceedings, or even 'referral to the police.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data

United Airlines Turns Off Starlink Access Amid Interference Concerns
United Airlines Turns Off Starlink Access Amid Interference Concerns

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

United Airlines Turns Off Starlink Access Amid Interference Concerns

PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. United Airlines' plans to retrofit its entire regional fleet with Starlink connectivity have hit a roadblock, at least temporarily. United first started rolling out Starlink access using a free-with-ads model in May, becoming one of a select club—including Hawaiian Airlines and the boutique air carrier JSX—to offer flyers access to SpaceX's satellite broadband service. Its speed and performance proved a hit with PCMag when it debuted, and United announced plans to install Starlink in its entire two-cabin regional fleet by the end of 2025. However, Starlink has been turned off on almost two dozen Embraer E175 regional jets, according to air industry publication The Points Guy. The issue stems from static interference between the antennas that pilots use to communicate with air traffic controllers and Starlink's antennas. United confirmed the reports in a statement, saying that this type of radio interference is 'fairly common with any new airline Wi-Fi provider' and that the issues are not a flight safety risk. 'We expect the service to be back up and running on these aircraft soon,' a spokesperson said. According to The Points Guy, roughly a third of the impacted planes have already had a fix applied. United doesn't expect to cancel any flights as a result of the issue and will instead wait until each aircraft's scheduled maintenance to fix the interference issue. Though Starlink may be off the table for many domestic fliers, at least in the short term, United has introduced new ways for travelers to distract themselves in recent weeks. The Chicago-based carrier announced earlier this week that it's bringing the streaming-audio service Spotify to the on-demand entertainment displays of over 680 of its aircraft, offering 'specially curated versions of Spotify's most popular playlists.' The new Spotify integration will replace the 'Audio' option on the home-screen menu of those displays.

Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns
Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns

TechCrunch

time39 minutes ago

  • TechCrunch

Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns

The High Court of England and Wales says lawyers need to take stronger steps to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence in their work. In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT 'are not capable of conducting reliable legal research.' 'Such tools can produce apparently coherent and plausible responses to prompts, but those coherent and plausible responses may turn out to be entirely incorrect,' Judge Sharp wrote. 'The responses may make confident assertions that are simply untrue.' That doesn't mean lawyers cannot use AI in their research, but she said they have a professional duty 'to check the accuracy of such research by reference to authoritative sources, before using it in the course of their professional work.' Judge Sharp suggested that the growing number of cases where lawyers (including, on the U.S. side, lawyers representing major AI platforms) have cited what appear to be AI-generated falsehoods suggests that 'more needs to be done to ensure that the guidance is followed and lawyers comply with their duties to the court,' and she said her ruling will be forwarded to professional bodies including the Bar Council and the Law Society. In one of the cases in question, a lawyer representing a man seeking damages against two banks submitted a filing with 45 citations — 18 of those cases did not exist, while many others 'did not contain the quotations that were attributed to them, did not support the propositions for which they were cited, and did not have any relevance to the subject matter of the application,' Judge Sharp said. In the other, a lawyer representing a man who had been evicted from his London home wrote a court filing citing five cases that did not appear to exist. (The lawyer denied using AI, though she said the citations may have come from AI-generated summaries that appeared in 'Google or Safari.') Judge Sharp said that while the court decided not to initiate contempt proceedings, that is 'not a precedent.' Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW 'Lawyers who do not comply with their professional obligations in this respect risk severe sanction,' she added. Both lawyers were either referred or referred themselves to professional regulators. Judge Sharp noted that when lawyers do not meet their duties to the court, the court's powers range from 'public admonition' to the imposition of costs, contempt proceedings, or even 'referral to the police.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store