Israeli embassy gunman Elias Rodriguez faces death penalty after ‘firing 21 shots & reloading as victims crawled away'
Elias Rodriguez, 31,
9
The chilling moment suspected Israeli embassy shooter Elias Rodriguez screams 'free Palestine' after gunning down a young couple
Credit: X/PhoenixTV
9
Israeli embassy victimsYaron Lischinsky Sarah Milgrim
Credit: Family Handout
9
Mourners lights candles during a vigil outside of the White House to remember the pair
Credit: Getty
9
The Chicago native was caught on camera unloading several rounds into Yaron Lischinsky, 28, and Sarah Milgrim, 26, after pacing outside the Capital Jewish Museum, according to the arrest affidavit.
The pair collapsed after being shot but the gunman continued his onslaught, the document says.
Footage shows him looming over the couple, already ragged by bullets, and firing at them again, charging documents show.
Rodriguez allegedly then pursued Milgrim as she tried to escape and finished her off.
read more on the shooting
He was seen reloading his weapon before again opening fire at the desperate woman.
Rodriguez unloaded at least 21 shots during the cold-blooded slaughter, according to
police
sources, using a high-end German-design H&K 9mm pistol, reports
It's unclear how many times each victim was shot.
Most read in The US Sun
He had been ushered inside alongside civilians in the confusion following the shooting.
The suspect
Washington
on Thursday facing charges of murder of foreign officials - while prosecutors say additional charges are likely.
Israeli embassy worker couple shot dead outside Jewish museum in Washington DC by gunman chanting 'Free Palestine'
He was not handcuffed and nodded along while the judge read him the charges, the MailOnline has reported.
Interim US Attorney for the District of
Washington
Jeanine Pirro, who is leading the prosecution, has said it is "far too early" to say if the death penalty will be sought.
However, she added that this is a "death penalty eligible case".
Heartbreaking details about the victims have emerged in the wake of the tragedy.
9
The couple were about to visit Jerusalem, where Lischinsky planned to propose
Credit: AP
9
A court sketch of Rodriguez appearing to hear his charges
Credit: Reuters
9
Emergency workers outside the museum just after the shooting
Credit: EPA
The pair were reportedly madly in love, and Lischinsky had secretly bought an engagement ring just days earlier.
He had planned to propose on a vacation to Jerusalem, where they planned to travel on Sunday to see Lischinsky's
family
who live there.
She never found out that her boyfriend of a year and a half was planning to propose.
Milgrim and Lischinsky, who were both Jewish, were working for the Israeli Embassy when they were killed.
He helped plan missions for Jewish people in America, and Lischinsky was a research assistant.
Milgrim's heartbroken parents have opened up about their love for Lischinsky as they described him as an "incredible" man who was devoted to their daughter.
9
Another view of the candlelight vigil outside the White House
Credit: AFP
9
Messages of grief laid to remember the couple
Credit: Alamy
"He was very much like Sarah: passionate, extremely intelligent, dedicated to what he does, always on the cause of what's right," her dad Robert told the
Tal Naim Cohen, a spokesperson for the Israeli Embassy, mourned the loss of the couple and described seeing their affection for one another just hours before their deaths.
"Yaron and Sarah, words cannot begin to describe the heartbreak and sorrow," she wrote on X.
"Just
this morning
, we were still laughing together by the coffee corner - and now, all that remains is a picture.
"Instead of walking you down the aisle, we are walking with you to your graves. What an unbearable loss."
In a statement released by the Embassy, the two were described as being in the "prime of their lives."
"The entire embassy staff is heartbroken and devastated by their murder," the statement said.
"No words can express the depth of our grief and horror at this devastating loss. Our
hearts
are with their families, and the embassy will be by their side during this terrible time."
Who is Elias Rodriguez?
ELIAS Rodriguez is the man accused of killing the two Israeli embassy staff in Washington outside the Capital Jewish Museum.
He is understood to have been a far-left activist who was fairly well-known in Washington's protest scene.
Resurfaced images appear to show Rodriguez at pro-Gaza demonstrations in the past.
Social media posts also claim he is affiliated with the Party for Socialism & Liberation in the US which is seen as far-left.
The group confirmed in a post on X that Rodriguez had a "brief association" with them.
The group added that Rodriguez was not a member and that his activism with them ended in 2017.
A spokesperson said: 'We reject any attempt to associate the PSL with the DC shooting. Elias Rodriguez is not a member of the PSL. We have nothing to do with this shooting and do not support it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Naoise Dolan: Four Gaza protests in six days prove to me that the Government is hopelessly out of step with the people
If we don't act against Israel, we are aiding and abetting its war crimes Today at 00:30 I went to four Palestine protests in the past six days. Each confirmed that the Irish State and the national broadcaster are wildly out of touch with the public. Since virtually everyone now agrees that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians — thank you, Micheál Martin, for first saying it 19 months in — we must follow the Genocide Convention. If we don't, we are breaking international law by aiding and abetting war crimes.
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Caoilfhionn Gallagher and Jodie Ginsberg: Why Ireland must lead the way in protecting Gaza's journalists
Three years ago, just weeks after an Israeli soldier shot and killed Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, the Taoiseach made clear Ireland's unequivocal commitment to upholding press freedom and the safety of journalists. Speaking in the Dáil, Micheál Martin said: 'It is quite a shocking killing, without question… we have called for a swift, thorough and independent investigation and will pursue this through all forums at our disposal as a government.'
Irish Examiner
6 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Barry Malone: When Israel decides to silence the 'voice' of Palestinians
Anas al-Sharif was a born storyteller with an innate sense of the dramatic. I'll never forget watching him live on air from Gaza just after a ceasefire, which wasn't to last, was announced in January 2024 after more than a year of relentless horror. A crowd had gathered as he stood in front of the camera, preparing to talk to tens of millions of Al Jazeera viewers across the Arab world, ready to convey the mixture of happiness, relief, and very cautious optimism people were feeling now that the bombs would stop raining down on Gaza. Another journalist stood weeping to his right. 'There is great joy among these residents, finally, after these hard days,' he said. And then, without missing a beat as he continued speaking to camera, he slowly removed his helmet and flak jacket, people cheering him on. They hoisted him on their shoulders and held their phones up to capture the moment. It was a moment to be recorded because, if Anas felt briefly safe, they all did. That was one of the things that made him a special journalist. People saw themselves reflected in him. He wasn't afraid to show his fellow Palestinians that he was suffering with them, that the terror Israel was unleashing on Gaza affected him too, that he sometimes struggled. That's not to say he didn't convey strength. His backbone was apparent every time he appeared on air, and it was apparent when he refused to bow to threats. On another occasion, just weeks ago, Anas broke down during a broadcast and began to cry after a day of watching Palestinians being brought to hospital, some wounded, some weakened by starvation. As he wept, shouts from the crowd began to ring out. 'Keep going, Anas. Keep going. You are our voice,' they called. And they knew he would keep going. Because he always did. This week, though, a decision was made to silence that voice in the most ruthless manner possible when the Israeli military targeted and killed not only Anas but the entire Al Jazeera team in Gaza City. It was an act of censorship so extreme, so brutal — and so blatant — that it shocked people all over the world and plunged Palestinians into despair. Mourners sit around the grave of Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif following his burial at the Sheikh Radwan cemetery in Gaza City on August 11. Picture: AFP via Getty Images But the killing of Anas, alongside his colleagues Mohammed Qreiqeh, Ibrahim Zaher, and Mohammed Noufal, shouldn't have been a shock at all. The UN says that at least 242 journalists and media workers have been killed by Israel since the war on Gaza began. The UN and the Committee to Protect Journalists say that, in many of these cases, journalists were likely deliberately targeted. Israel itself has often admitted to killing journalists, usually accusing them of being Hamas members with either no proof at all or only the flimsiest veneer of it. Such was the case with Anas. He was a member of Hamas, Israel said. Not only a member but a leader of a cell responsible for 'advancing rocket attacks'. Again, as is now standard, no real evidence was offered to back up the accusations. No claims were made against the rest of the Al Jazeera crew. Perhaps Israel felt it only had to justify the killing of such a famous face. Lesser-known Palestinians can be snuffed out with no excuse needed, as they have been daily for 22 months. Where Anas, who seemed to spend every waking moment standing in front of a camera, would have found the time to organise rocket attacks on the side is unclear. Here's the thing: If Anas really was a target because of Hamas activity, the Israeli military could have killed him any time it wanted. They wouldn't have needed any sophisticated intelligence to locate him. All they had to do was switch on the TV. Members of the NUJ and fellow journalists take part in a protest organised by the NUJ at The Spire in O'Connell St, Dublin, to condemn the killing of journalists due to Israeli attacks. Picture: Niall Carson/PA So why now? Many observers believe the answer is clear. Israel's cabinet last week approved prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's plan for a full military occupation of Gaza City. And just two days later, Anas and the Al Jazeera crew — the most prominent witnesses left in the city, the only people with the ability to broadcast to the entire world what is about to happen — were executed. That theory, though, was smothered by the endless repetition of Israel's version of events in the coverage of almost every prominent Western news organisation. Headlines began with the words, 'Israel says'. TV bulletins were scripted similarly. Israel's accusations were rarely followed up with the context that no real proof had been provided. Anchors asked question after question about the alleged Hamas affiliation. This credulous reporting of Israel's accusations persists despite it being proven to have lied repeatedly throughout the conflict. There is no other source as unreliable as the Israeli government given such a free pass by the world's media. Imagine if Russia killed a Ukrainian journalist, accusing him of being a member of an armed group. Would its claims be treated seriously? Would they lead the headlines? Of course not. None of this is lost on Palestinian journalists, who have felt let down by the way Israel's relentless targeting of their comrades and friends has been reported and by a lack of solidarity from some of the most prominent journalists in the West, many of whom have stayed conspicuously silent as the bodies of brave reporters in Gaza pile up. 'I will not speak to foreign media about the killing of Palestinian journalists. I will not sit on your global channels to be part of a segment you'll forget by tomorrow,' Al Jazeera's Hind Khoudary, another fierce journalist who has reported ceaselessly from Gaza throughout the war and continues to, said on X after her colleagues were killed. 'We are being hunted and killed in Gaza while you watch in silence. For two years, your fellow journalists here have been slaughtered. What did you do? Nothing.' Hind added her belief that many Western journalists don't consider Palestinian journalists colleagues at all. She's right and, though that had been apparent even before October 7, the last two years have confirmed it beyond any doubt. It's why Palestinian journalists are not trusted, it's why they are dehumanised, it's why the dirt that Israel throws sticks and, ultimately, it's why they can be killed with impunity. Mask-drop moment There was a mask-drop moment on BBC this week when an anchor seemed confused that Al Jazeera used what she called 'local people' to report from Gaza. 'Are they able to operate truly independently?' she asked her guest. There's an implication there. It's an implication that these 'local people' cannot be trusted, that Palestinians are too close to the story to report it accurately. It's not an implication we ever hear about, say, British journalists reporting on Britain. The fact that Palestinian journalists are reporting on a genocide while also living through it has made their reporting stronger. How can knowledge of every street corner, a wide network of sources, deep subject expertise, and the familiarity that comes with living in a place be a problem? The answer is it's not. Unless the reporters are from Gaza. I worked at Al Jazeera for almost a decade and none of this was unusual to us. The network doesn't employ Palestinian journalists because it is forced to. They work for Al Jazeera and always have because they are excellent at their jobs. They are the most qualified journalists available to cover the story. It's as simple as that. The fact that a prominent and experienced BBC anchor and many other top Western journalists can't get that through their heads is a problem and says more about their own bias than it does about anyone else's. International journalists are now pushing for Israel to give them access to Gaza, having been barred for the duration of the conflict so far. They should be given that access. But the Western press corps, decked out in khaki chic, shouldn't go to Gaza thinking it is their job to verify the devastation. It's already been verified by the best and bravest journalists we have. The foreign correspondents must acknowledge they are standing on those shoulders, and that Palestinians will always be the authors of their own story. A vigil outside the Fox News and NBC News headquarters in Washington, DC, honouring journalists killed in Gaza. Picture: AFP via Getty Images The evening of that ceasefire announcement, after Anas removed his flak jacket and helmet, he paid tribute to colleagues who had already been killed by Israel: Ismail Al-Ghoul, Rami Al-Rifi, Samir Abu Daqqa, and Hamza Dahdouh. Al-Ghoul, he said, would have been standing in his place reporting this historic moment had he lived. Anas didn't want his friend, or his reporting, to be forgotten. As he stood in Ismail's place, someone will soon stand in his, because Palestinian journalists refuse to be broken and giants like Anas, through their bravery and dedication, provide the blueprint for those who come behind them. That new generation of journalists will remember Anas, Ismail, the Al Jazeera Gaza City crew, and the more than 200 other Palestinian journalists killed by Israel. Without them, we would have been blind. Barry Malone is an independent journalist and former Al Jazeera executive producer. He writes 'Proximities', a newsletter focused on under-reported stories.
