Military parade, big protests will fuel clashing visions of America
Across the country, demonstrators will flood hundreds of cities and towns, making speeches and holding 'No Kings' signs to denounce what they see as President Donald Trump's authoritarian tactics and disregard for the Constitution.
This Saturday will see one of the starkest displays of America's divisions since Trump took office, as contrasting visions of America unfold in vivid colors on the country's streets. The confrontation now playing out in Los Angeles is certain to fuel both sides, as some Americans cheer Trump's strong hand in quashing purported chaos and others decry what they see as his growing embrace of authoritarian tactics.
Trump's critics are especially inflamed by the notion that the president would host a military parade on his birthday, which they say carries an unmistakable whiff of authoritarianism.
'Americans, in particular veterans, see this as a vanity endeavor for Donald Trump,' said Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colorado), a former Army ranger who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. 'You have massive cuts to [veterans'] health care, troops away from their families for years over the last decade fighting wars on terror, barracks falling apart in many posts — and we will spend over $50 million to roll tanks through the streets of D.C.? It doesn't add up.'
Trump has long made clear his desire for a dramatic military parade to showcase America's military might, a display that has traditionally been more common in other countries. June 14 is Flag Day as well as the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army's founding, and the White House says the fact that it is also Trump's 79th birthday is a coincidence.
Sean Spicer, an officer in the Navy reserve who served as White House spokesman in Trump's first term, noted that the president seized on the idea of a military parade years ago, after seeing one as part of France's observation of Bastille Day. The juxtaposition with Trump's birthday is plainly happenstance, he said.
'This idea of 'kings' and his birthday — that is manufactured. He has not brought this up,' Spicer said. 'The only people mentioning his birthday are people in the media and the left. It's sad when the president of the United States, the commander in chief, is trying to recognize the sacrifice of so many, and haters want to tear it down.'
As the confrontation in Los Angeles drags on, shaping up as a pivotal moment in Trump's second presidency, it is becoming increasingly conflated with Saturday's events. Trump sent the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles to confront protests against his immigration policies, and on Tuesday he suggested a similar dynamic could play out on Saturday.
'For those people that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, making no distinction between violent and peaceful demonstrators. 'And I haven't even heard about a protest, but you know, this is people that hate our country. But they will be met with very heavy force.'
In an address denouncing Trump's intervention in his state, California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) cited the parade as part of the president's lurch toward authoritarianism. 'We all know that this Saturday he's ordering our American heroes, the United States military, and forcing them to put on a vulgar display to celebrate his birthday, just as other failed dictators have done in the past,' Newsom said Tuesday.
Mike Madrid, a longtime Republican consultant who is critical of Trump, said the president's goal is the same in the L.A. confrontation and the D.C. parade: to warn opponents he is willing to use the military in unorthodox ways. 'The reason he is doing the military parade is not for flexing, it is to show he is willing to break norms with the military,' Madrid said, adding that the clash in California 'fits into that narrative.'
Organizers say their plans for a Saturday No Kings protest in Los Angeles are moving forward and that the recent immigration-focused protests only confirm the need for it. They add that they are stressing nonviolence in all their planning.
But the parade was a volatile subject long before the Los Angeles protests, with Trump's adversaries seizing on it as the epitome of his crude self-regard. Still, not everyone who supports the parade is an unequivocal Trump fan.
Ty Seidule, a military historian at Hamilton College who retired as a brigadier general after 36 years in the Army, said he initially had mixed feelings about the parade but came to view it as a rare chance to highlight the U.S. Army, a storied and underappreciated organization.
'Is it the same day as his birthday? Yes, but it is also the Army's birthday,' Seidule said. 'The Army band is not playing 'Happy Birthday.' There isn't going to be a Marilyn Monroe moment, I hope. I think there are plenty of other things to criticize the president for, but to me, if you focus on that, you are taking away the opportunity to celebrate something we don't often do in this country.'
Saturday's display could be a moment to highlight facts that Trump downplays, Seidule suggested, including the Army's historic reliance on immigrants and minorities. The Army's story is not all positive, he added; it helped end slavery and liberate the Nazi death camps, acts of undeniable heroism, but fell woefully short when it came to civil rights.
'It's an opportunity to tell Americans that we reflect the society, for better and worse,' he said.
Trump's habit of seizing on traditional patriotic symbols, such as the American flag, Mount Rushmore and the Declaration of Independence, while using forceful tactics that his opponents see as un-American, has prompted a renewed discussion of the meaning of patriotism since he returned to office in January.
Trump's adversaries say he routinely seeks to whitewash U.S. history, ignoring episodes of injustice and racial division in favor of a mythical unblemished past. The president and his supporters respond that he is pushing back against progressives' bitter obsession with magnifying the country's flaws and downplaying its greatness.
The clash will get a full airing on July 4, 2026, when the country celebrates its 250th anniversary with enormous pomp. Trump is signaling his intent to use that occasion to promote his vision of patriotism, including the creation of a 'Garden of American Heroes,' a sculpture garden that the White House says 'will memorialize our American heroes for generations to come.' Which heroes to include is likely to be the subject of fierce argument.
Saturday's parade and protest are the immediate flash points.
At a recent hearing of the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-California) suggested the parade's $45 million to $50 million price tag makes little sense at a time of cuts in military programs. 'If Congress wrote the Army a $45 million blank check, do you think the Army could find a better way to spend that money than a parade?' Carbajal asked.
Army Secretary Daniel P. Driscoll responded that the 250th birthday celebration will spur a 'recruiting boom that will fill up our pipeline for the coming years,' so the money will be well-spent. Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wisconsin) added that 'you cannot put a price tag on patriotism. You cannot. And celebrating arguably — not even arguably — the best army that has ever existed in the history of the planet deserves attention.'
At the celebration in Washington, 150 vehicles, dozens of helicopters, various planes and 6,700 soldiers are expected to take part, the Army has said. The Army's parachute team, the Golden Knights, will drop into the event, delivering an American flag to Trump, who will be watching the proceedings from a reviewing stand. The president will also enlist and reenlist 250 civilians and soldiers, and beyond the parade itself, the day will include a fireworks display, military demonstrations and country music performances.
At the same time, activist groups such as Indivisible, 50501, the American Federation of Teachers and Black Voters Matter are planning to turn out thousands of protesters for the ''No Kings' nationwide day of defiance' that they say will include marches and rallies in about 2,000 locations. In some places, activists will spell out 'No Kings' on a beach or use cards to spell it out on a field.
'Trump is trying to claim that he owns this country, that he is the ruler of this country,' said Ezra Levin, co-founder of Indivisible. 'By holding a military parade, it's his attempt to equate the American government with himself. … In these protests, we'll see a lot of patriotism, a lot of flags, a lot of veterans on stages talking about their service. We are not ceding the ground of patriotism.'
Last Friday, thousands of veterans rallied against Trump's proposed cuts to the Department of Veterans Affairs and his overhaul of the federal workforce, at a Unite for Veterans protest on the National Mall.
Crow agreed that many veterans will take part in Saturday's protests, adding that the troops taking part in the parade are probably not happy about it, given how unpopular parade duty is in the military.
'On my three combat tours, we were focused on fighting, being physically fit and getting better at the mission, and if we had any time we wanted to be with our families,' the congressman said. 'I guarantee you those 6,000 troops preparing to engage in this parade would rather be doing something else.'
Trump this week framed the event partly as a response to the fact that unlike other nations, the United States had not been planning a commemoration of victory in World War II, even though 'we're the ones that won the war.'
He was equally blunt on NBC's 'Meet the Press' last month. 'We have the greatest missiles in the world,' Trump said. 'We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it.'
Seidule said that it is appropriate to celebrate the accomplishments of the U.S. Army — but also appropriate for Americans to protest if they wish.
'With our 340 million people, we will see it in all ways, and I welcome that. That is the American way,' he said. 'We should have this event, and there should be people protesting. What more American event could you have than to have people protesting as well?'
Olivia George contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Japan says $550 billion package in trade deal could finance Taiwanese chipmaker in US
By Makiko Yamazaki TOKYO (Reuters) -Japan's $550 billion investment package agreed in this week's U.S. tariff deal could help finance a Taiwanese firm building semiconductor plants in the U.S., Japan's top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said on Saturday. Japan agreed to the sweeping U.S.-bound investment initiative, which includes equity, loans and guarantees, in exchange for lower tariffs on its exports to the U.S. However, the structure of the scheme remains unclear. "Japan, the United States, and like-minded countries are working together to build supply chains in sectors critical to economic security," Akazawa told public broadcaster NHK. To that end, he said projects eligible for financing under the package are not limited to U.S. or Japanese firms. "For example, if a Taiwanese chipmaker builds a plant in the U.S. and uses Japanese components or tailors its products to meet Japanese needs, that's fine too," he said, without specifying companies. The U.S. is significantly reliant on Taiwan's TSMC for advanced chip manufacturing, raising economic security concerns due to geographic proximity to China. TSMC announced plans for a $100 billion U.S. investment with U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House in March, on top of $65 billion pledged for three plants in the state of Arizona, one of which is up and running. Japan will use state-owned Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) and Nippon Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI) for the investments. A recent law revision has enabled JBIC to finance foreign companies deemed critical to Japan's supply chains. Akazawa told NHK that equity investment would account for just about 1-2% of the $550 billion, suggesting that the bulk will come in the form of loans and guarantees. When asked about the White House statement that the U.S. would retain 90% of the profits from the package, he clarified that the figure refers only to returns on equity investment, which would represent a small fraction of the total. While Japan initially hoped to secure half of the returns, a loss from the concession on the profit-sharing would be marginal compared to the roughly 10 trillion yen ($67.72 billion) in tariff costs that could be avoided under the deal, he said. He added that Japan aims to deploy the $550 billion investments during Trump's current term. ($1 = 147.6600 yen) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
UPI
11 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump delivers immigration message on Scotland visit
1 of 3 | President Donald Trump played golf in Scotland Saturday morning, teeing it up at his Trump Turnberry golf resort ahead of meetings with European lawmakers and delivering a message after leaving the White House on Friday (pictured). Photo by Will Oliver/UPI | License Photo July 26 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump played golf in Scotland Saturday morning, teeing it up at his Trump Turnberry golf resort ahead of meetings with European lawmakers and delivering a message. "I say two things to Europe: Stop the windmills. You're ruining your countries. I really mean it, it's so sad. You fly over and you see these windmills all over the place, ruining your beautiful fields and valleys and killing your birds," Trump told reporters after arriving on Friday. "On immigration, you better get your act together. You're not going to have Europe any more," he said. Trump is scheduled to discuss trade during a Monday meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Scottish First Minister John Swinney. He is also expected to meet with European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen during the four-day visit to Scotland. The delegation will start arriving Saturday and include European trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic, as well as von der Leyen, who Trump referred to as a "highly respected woman." U.S. officials and their EU counterparts are continuing attempts to reach a deal before an Aug. 1 deadline that will see 30% reciprocal tariffs take effect on all EU member states. The United States and Britain reached a deal in June on tariffs between the two countries, although Trump and Starmer were expected to iron out details during their meeting. Protestors demonstrated against Trump's visit in both Edinburgh and Aberdeen Saturday morning, including outside the Trump-owned golf course. He will also visit another of his privately-owned courses, Trump International Scotland in Aberdeenshire, during the trip. "We are really excited, across this whole weekend, there's so many campaign groups turning out in the streets, taking in action in their communities or at rallies like this. It's kind of like a carnival of resistance," demonstrator Anita Bhadani told the BBC outside of the U.S. Consulate General's office in Edinburgh Saturday, after helping to organize the Stop Trump Coalition. The coalition said its purpose is to "defeat the politics of Trumpism, and to promote an alternative, democratic vision of the world based on peace, social justice and international cooperation."
Chicago Tribune
12 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
How redistricting in Texas and other states could change the game for US House elections
WASHINGTON — Redistricting usually happens after the once-a-decade population count by the U.S. Census Bureau or in response to a court ruling. Now, Texas Republicans want to break that tradition — and other states could follow suit. President Trump has asked the Texas Legislature to create districts, in time for next year's midterm elections, that will send five more Republicans to Washington and make it harder for Democrats to regain the majority and blunt his agenda. The state has 38 seats in the House. Republicans now hold 25 and Democrats 12, with one seat vacant after the death of a Democrat. 'There's been a lot more efforts by the parties and political actors to push the boundaries – literally and figuratively – to reconfigure what the game is,' said Doug Spencer, Rothgerber Jr. Chair in Constitutional Law at the University of Colorado. Other states are waiting to see what Texas does and whether to follow suit. The rules of redistricting can be vague and variable; each state has its own set of rules and procedures. Politicians are gauging what voters will tolerate when it comes to politically motivated mapmaking. Here's what to know about the rules of congressional redistricting: Every decade, the Census Bureau collects population data used to divide the 435 House seats among the 50 states based on the updated head count. It's a process known as reapportionment. States that grew relative to others might gain a seat at the expense of those whose populations stagnated or declined. States use their own procedures to draw lines for the assigned number of districts. The smallest states receive just one representative, which means the entire state is a single congressional district. Some state constitutions require independent commissions to devise the political boundaries or to advise the legislature. When legislatures take the lead, lawmakers can risk drawing lines that end up challenged in court, usually for violating the Voting Rights Act. Mapmakers can get another chance to resubmit new maps. Sometimes, judges draw the maps on their own. By the first midterm elections after the latest population count, each state is ready with its maps, but those districts do not always stick. Courts can find that the political lines are unconstitutional. There is no national impediment to a state trying to redraw districts in the middle of the decade and to do it for political reasons, such as increasing representation by the party in power. 'The laws about redistricting just say you have to redistrict after every census,' Spencer said. 'And then some state legislatures got a little clever and said, well it doesn't say we can't do it more.' Some states do have laws that would prevent midcycle redistricting or make it difficult to do so in a way that benefits one party. Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., has threatened to retaliate against the GOP push in Texas by drawing more favorable Democratic seats in his state. That goal, however, is complicated by a constitutional amendment that requires an independent commission to lead the process. Texas has done it before. When the Legislature failed to agree on a redistricting plan after the 2000 census, a federal court stepped in with its own map. Republican Tom DeLay of Texas, who was then the U.S. House majority leader, thought his state should have five more districts friendly to his party. 'I'm the majority leader and we want more seats,′′ he said at the time. Statehouse Democrats protested by fleeing to Oklahoma, depriving the Legislature of enough votes to officially conduct any business. But DeLay eventually got his way, and Republicans replaced Democrats in five seats in 2004. In 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts should not get involved in debates over political gerrymandering, the practice of drawing districts for partisan gain. In that decision, Chief Justice John Roberts said redistricting is 'highly partisan by any measure.' But courts may demand new maps if they believe the congressional boundaries dilute the votes of a racial minority group, in violation of the Voting Rights Act. Washington Rep. Suzan DelBene, who leads House Democrats' campaign arm, indicated at a Christian Science Monitor event that if Texas follows through on passing new maps, Democratic-led states would look at their own political lines. 'If they go down this path, absolutely folks are going to respond across the country,' DelBene said. 'We're not going to be sitting back with one hand tied behind our back while Republicans try to undermine voices of the American people.' In New York, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul recently joined Newsom in expressing openness to taking up mid-decade redistricting. But state laws mandating independent commissions or blunting the ability to gerrymander would come into play. Among Republican-led states, Ohio could try to further expand the 10-5 edge that the GOP holds in the House delegation; a quirk in state law requires Ohio to redraw its maps before the 2026 midterms. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said he was considering early redistricting and 'working through what that would look like.'
