logo
‘Latest Sham Election': US Criticizes Maduro Government for Holding Essequibo Election

‘Latest Sham Election': US Criticizes Maduro Government for Holding Essequibo Election

Epoch Times3 days ago

The U.S. government criticized the Maduro government on May 25 for attempting to elect for the first time a governor for Essequibo, a disputed region claimed by Venezuela and controlled by neighboring Guyana.
'The United States rejects all attempts by Nicolas Maduro and his illegitimate regime to undermine Guyana's territorial integrity, including this latest sham election in the Essequibo region,'
the State Department's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs on Sunday on X.
This occurred one day before Guyana, a former British colony, celebrated the 59th anniversary of its independence, which the Trump administration commemorated through its embassy in the South American country.
'As we celebrate this milestone with all Guyanese, we look forward to continuing our strong partnership grounded in shared goals and values,'
the embassy on X on May 26.
Since the 19th century, Venezuela and Guyana have both claimed the Essequibo region, an area in western Guyana of about 160,000 square kilom
eters (61,800 square miles) located west of the Essequibo River, which the Caracas government has considered the state of Guayana Esequiba since 2024.
The Essequibo region has a wealth of natural resources, with fertile land suitable for rice, sugar, and other agricultural products; attractive tourist destinations; and significant mineral deposits, including gold, diamonds, and bauxite.
Related Stories
2/7/2025
1/10/2025
On Sunday, the Venezuelan government organized elections within Venezuelan territory to elect 16 officials for the Essequibo region, including a governor, eight deputies to the National Assembly, and seven members of the regional legislative council, EFE reported.
In addition to the Bureau of Western Hemisphe
re Affairs, some members of Congress described Sunday's elections in Venezuela as a 'farce' and 'a total failure,' due to low voter turnout.
'The Venezuelan people spoke clearly: NO to the farce, NO to the dictatorship! May 25 was a total failure. Venezuela disobeyed with empty polling stations and silent streets,'
Rep. María Elvira Salazar (R-Fla.) on X.
'Maduro's electoral show was useless—the world saw the firm rejection [of the election] by a brave people. All my support goes to the people and the iron lady,' referring to Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado.
Meanwhile, Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro
the May 25 elections as his '30th electoral victory,' referring to the number of elections Venezuela has held during his term, noting that it was a 'quick and easy electoral process,'
on Instagram.
The vice president of Venezuela's National Electoral Council, Carlos Quintero, said on the night of May 25 that voter turnout was 42.6 percent of the electorate.
In contrast, the opposition said there was low civic participation in Sunday's elections, with a 12.6 percent turnout and most polling stations empty,
Corina Machado's campaign.
'Today, more than 85% of Venezuelans disobeyed this regime and said no,' Corina Machado said on May 25 in a video posted on X.
Venezuelan opposition leader in exile Antonio Ledezma
: 'The truth cannot be hidden: more than 86% of Venezuelan voters took part in a historic act of civil disobedience,' on his personal blog on May 26.
'They turned their backs on an illegitimate call to vote, organized to fabricate a result riddled with mathematical inconsistencies and logistical contradictions,' added the former mayor of Caracas. 'The images of empty polling stations, silent streets, and a country that simply said 'enough' speak louder than any manipulated figures. Maduro does not win elections; he steals them. He does not call elections; he stages farces.'
The Epoch Times was unable to independently verify the results of the May 25 elections.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Boy, 16, arrested after two teens stabbed
Boy, 16, arrested after two teens stabbed

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Boy, 16, arrested after two teens stabbed

A 16-year-old boy has been arrested after two 18-year-old men were stabbed in East Sussex, police say. At 21:55 BST on Friday, officers in Hove Lawns were made aware of the two injured men who were taken to hospital with injuries not believed to be life-threatening. The teenage boy from Crawley was arrested on suspicion of grievous bodily harm with intent and remained in custody, police said. The incident happened on a day where police had increased their patrols in Brighton city centre due to concerns about potential youth disorder. At about 19:30 BST on Friday, police were also called to the lower promenade, near Shelter Hall, to reports of a large group of youths gathering. Officers dispersed the group, but a 16-year-old boy from Brighton was arrested at the scene on suspicion of assaulting an emergency worker and remained in custody, police said. Ch Insp Vicky Dias said: "Last night's incidents show how quickly anti-social behaviour can escalate into violence, with potentially tragic consequences. "We and our partners will continue to work hard to address any issues as early as possible, but I would also appeal to parents to be aware of their children's behaviour and whereabouts to help keep them safe from harm." She said there would be an increased police presence in the city centre across the weekend. Follow BBC Sussex on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@ or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250. Sussex Police

DAVID MARCUS: Why do elite universities take in students tied to foreign foes? Money, of course
DAVID MARCUS: Why do elite universities take in students tied to foreign foes? Money, of course

Fox News

time2 hours ago

  • Fox News

DAVID MARCUS: Why do elite universities take in students tied to foreign foes? Money, of course

For centuries, the traditional role of elite universities like Harvard has been to train the next generation of leaders in every field of endeavor, to hold before them an open door to power and influence. So why on Earth are we holding that door open to communist Chinese nationals? I had a good friend in high school, sharp as a tack, double legacy at Yale, graduated Harvard Law and by 30 she was at the State Department. The joke was, "Don't piss off Becca, she can pick up the phone and have you killed." The point here is that, for better or worse, and it's often the latter, graduates of top schools are meant to create a class of people who lead the country, who lead its industries and sciences, who stay at the Princeton Club in midtown, and wear their college ties. A top American degree opens up a world of the powerful that most Americans don't even know exists, much less ever interact with. Yet thousands and thousands of communist Chinese nationals are invited to this table every year. Why? There may have been a time when this influx of foreign students could be seen as exerting informational power around the globe, the idea being these students will go home and spread the gospel of democracy, free markets, and blue jeans. But let's not kid ourselves, these scions of Chinese Communist Party members who pay their way at Harvard aren't going home and creating movements for democracy in Beijing, not if they want to make it to grad school alive and well. In fact, we are the decided losers in this informational power exchange, as not just the Chinese, but Qataris, and 10,000 Iranian students for good measure, bring ideas and attitudes that undermine American foreign policy to the doorstep of the very people who will implement it. This brings us back to the question: Why are we doing this? Why are we training our foes and giving them access to the inner corridors of American power, and I'm sure nobody will be shocked that the answer is money. Foreign interests lavish our top universities with gifts like a rich guy who got caught cheating on his wife. In just the last five years, the Harvard Crimson reports $151 million from foreign governments and over a billion from foreign donors flowed to Cambridge. For hundreds of years, Harvard had educated the nation's great industrialists, financiers, and business magnates who kept the coffers of its endowment, still at a robust $52 billion, overflowing. But the blue-blood spigot is running dry. No, the non-binary womyns studies majors at the Harvard Divinity School are not going to be donating a new football stadium anytime soon. For that, these institutions have learned to rely on foreign money, and we all know that money ain't free. The money buys influence, it buys some say in how our nation conducts itself. During COVID, with a few notable exceptions, our country's entire healthcare apparatus just nodded along slavishly to every lie China and its mouthpiece the World Health Organization uttered. Why do you think that happened? It happened because China pays for research. It happened because China infiltrates the highest levels of our society, and sadly, they have become quite expert at it. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is obviously right to insist that we vigorously investigate any student from any nation that is a political or ideological foe of the United States, and frankly, any association with the Chinese Communist Party should be a dealbreaker. The first Harvard graduate to become the president of the United States was John Adams, who once famously wrote of his revolutionary adventures, "I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy." But today, it is our sons and daughters losing opportunities to study mathematics and philosophy to people from countries that hate America, and it is also those countries which stand the most to gain in terms of politics and war. American universities need to be American universities, not cosmopolitan, non-affiliated islands of corrupt foreign influence, and if the Harvards of the world can't be that, then places like conservative Hillsdale College or the University of Austin may well need to replace them. If Harvard and other storied elite universities want to return to serving the mission of helping America to be great, it would be welcome. But in the meantime, we don't have to give them taxpayer money, and we don't have to let them invite our enemies into the inner circle of American power.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store