Sentencing hearing set for ex-Kentucky officer convicted in Breonna Taylor raid
Brett Hankison fired his weapon the night of the March 2020 botched drug raid. His shots didn't hit or injure anyone, though they flew through Taylor's walls into a neighboring apartment.
The 26-year-old's death, along with the May 2020 police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, sparked racial injustice protests nationwide that year.
Though the sentence could amount to several years, if U.S. District Judge Grady Jennings heeds the Justice Department's request, it would mean none of the Louisville police officers involved in the raid would face prison time.
Last week, the U.S. Justice Department recommended no prison time for Hankison, an abrupt about-face by federal prosecutors that has angered critics after the department spent years prosecuting the former detective.
The Justice Department, which has changed leadership under President Donald Trump since Hankison's conviction, said in a sentencing memo last week that 'there is no need for a prison sentence to protect the public' from Hankison. Federal prosecutors suggested time already served, which amounts to one day, and three years of supervised probation.
Prosecutors at his previous federal trials aggressively pursued a conviction against Hankison, 49, arguing that he blindly fired 10 shots into Taylor's windows without identifying a target. Taylor was shot in her hallway by two other officers after her boyfriend fired from inside the apartment, striking an officer in the leg. Neither of the other officers was charged in state or federal court after prosecutors deemed they were justified in returning fire into the apartment. Louisville police used a drug warrant to enter the apartment, but found no drugs or cash inside.
A separate jury deadlocked on federal charges against Hankison in 2023, and he was acquitted on state charges of wanton endangerment in 2022.
In their recent sentencing memo, federal prosecutors wrote that though Hankison's 'response in these fraught circumstances was unreasonable given the benefit of hindsight, that unreasonable response did not kill or wound Breonna Taylor, her boyfriend, her neighbors, defendant's fellow officers, or anyone else.'
Civil rights attorney Ben Crump, who helped Taylor's family secure a $12 million wrongful death settlement against the city of Louisville, has called the Justice Department recommendation 'an insult to the life of Breonna Taylor and a blatant betrayal of the jury's decision' and said in a social media statement that it 'sends the unmistakable message that white officers can violate the civil rights of Black Americans with near-total impunity.'
A U.S. Probation Office presentencing report said Hankison should face a range of 135 to 168 months imprisonment on the excessive force conviction, according to the memo. But federal prosecutors said multiple factors — including that Hankison's two other trials ended with no convictions — should greatly reduce the potential punishment.
The memorandum was submitted by Harmeet Dhillon, chief of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division and a Trump political appointee who in May moved to cancel settlements with Louisville and Minneapolis that had called for overhauling their police departments.
In the Taylor case, three other ex-Louisville police officers have been charged with crafting a falsified warrant, but have not gone to trial. None were at the scene when Taylor was shot.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
8 minutes ago
- CBS News
Canonsburg Police cracking down against e-bike rider violations
As e-bikes are becoming more popular, riders are causing more problems in some communities, and that's forcing the Canonsburg Police Department to ramp up enforcement. The department posted a picture of someone popping a wheelie on Facebook -- saying after receiving multiple complaints; they've been forced to crack down on e-bike riders breaking the law, and several teens are going to receive citations for their reckless use. They said a few kids are causing some very serious reckless events, including weaving in and out of traffic, popping wheelies on state roads, and fleeing when requested to stop by a police officer. "I know that there are a lot more. I only think it' a problem if you start seeing a lot of them on the sidewalk and I haven't seen too many of them," said Chris Wilfong. "I see it every once in awhile, its not a problem," said Richard Watters. Police are urging riders to obey all traffic laws. They're also asking parents to review the laws and ordinances governing e-bike operations with their kids.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WKRG News 5 to host Mobile mayoral debate: How to watch and submit questions
MOBILE, Ala. (WKRG) — The four candidates running for mayor of Mobile have agreed to participate in a live, primetime debate on WKRG News 5. The debate will take place on Monday, Aug. 4, from 7-8 p.m. Viewers can watch the debate on WKRG-TV or the WKRG+ app, stream it on or watch on WKRG's Facebook page. Former District Judge Spiro Cheriogotis, State Rep. Barbara Drummond, County Commissioner Connie Hudson and former Police Chief Paul Prine are vying for the seat currently held by Sandy Stimpson. Stimpson is not running for a fourth term in office. will moderate the debate. Questions will be formulated by News 5 and submitted by viewers and the candidates themselves. Ask your question here: Submit a form. Interest in the mayor's race is intense, as this is the first election in 20 years without an incumbent running. Election Day is Aug. 26. If no candidate receives a majority of votes, the top two vote-getters will meet in a runoff election on Sept. 23. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump struggles with facts as Fed Chair Jerome Powell corrects him in real time
To an unprecedented degree, Donald Trump has lobbied his handpicked Federal Reserve chairman, Jerome Powell, to lower interest rates. The heavy-handed tactics, which have unfolded in recent months in public and private, haven't had much of an effect, which in turn has generated no shortage of frustration in the Oval Office. Indeed, the president has resorted to juvenile taunts and name-calling, publicly condemning Powell as, among many other things, a 'moron' for failing to follow Trump's misguided demands. Having exhausted his usual bullying tactics, the Republican and his team began exploring alternative ways to gain leverage over the largely independent Fed chair. Recently, this led the White House in an unexpected direction: Team Trump decided to focus on building renovations at the Federal Reserve, with the president suggesting that cost overruns might constitute grounds to fire Powell, who has ignored calls to resign. So on Thursday Trump made a historically unusual visit to the Fed's headquarters in Washington, D.C., presumably to add a fresh round of pressure. This did not go as well for the president as it could have. During the visit, for example, Trump flubbed basic details about developments at the European Central Bank, which he pretended to know something about. Around the same time, the Republican made specific boasts about the impact of a rate cut, which were quickly discredited. But those comments only set the stage for the pièce de résistance. As The New York Times reported: The chair of the Federal Reserve closed his eyes and shook his head. He was about to do something that few senior government officials ever do, at least in public: fact-check President Trump in real time. This is one of those stories in which watching the video is necessary to fully appreciate what transpired. During brief remarks with reporters, the president, with Powell standing just inches away, declared that cost overruns on the project have reached 'about $3.1 billion.' The Fed chair could be seen immediately and rapidly shaking his head, making clear to those in attendance that Trump was citing a number that wasn't true. 'I'm not aware of that,' Powell interrupted. The figure, the Republican responded, 'just came out.' Moments later, Trump tried to justify his claim, pulling a document from his jacket pocket and handing it to the Fed chair. Powell quickly reviewed the data and noticed an important flaw. 'You just added in a third building,' Powell said. 'It's a building that's being built,' Trump replied. 'No, it was built five years ago,' the Fed chair reminded him. 'It's not new.' Oops. It was not a flattering moment for a president who routinely makes up figures but who is rarely fact-checked by his own appointees on camera. Indeed, one of the more notable elements of the exchange was that Powell didn't seem to care at all about Trump's delicate ego or fear of public humiliation. As for the underlying issue, it's true that the renovation project is over budget, but as The Associated Press reported last week, it was Trump appointees, not Powell, who pushed for elements that raised costs. This article was originally published on