logo
The US said it had no choice but to deport them to a third country. Then it sent them home

The US said it had no choice but to deport them to a third country. Then it sent them home

Hindustan Times5 days ago
* The US said it had no choice but to deport them to a third country. Then it sent them home
Trump administration seeks to deport more migrants to third countries
*
Critics ask why migrants can't be deported home instead
*
Trump tactic stokes fear amid push for mass deportations
By Kristina Cooke and Ted Hesson
WASHINGTON, - The Trump administration says that some serious criminals need to be deported to third countries because even their home countries won't accept them. But a review of recent cases shows that at least five men threatened with such a fate were sent to their native countries within weeks. President Donald Trump aims to deport millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally and his administration has sought to ramp up removals to third countries, including sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland, two sub-Saharan African nations.
Immigrants convicted of crimes typically first serve their U.S. sentences before being deported. This appeared to be the case with the eight men deported to South Sudan and five to Eswatini, although some had been released years earlier.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security said in June that third-country deportations allow them to deport people 'so uniquely barbaric that their own countries won't take them back.' Critics have countered that it's not clear the U.S. tried to return the men deported to South Sudan and Eswatini to their home countries and that the deportations were unnecessarily cruel.
Reuters found that at least five men threatened with deportation to Libya in May were sent to their home countries weeks later, according to interviews with two of the men, a family member and attorneys. After a U.S. judge blocked the Trump administration from sending them to Libya, two men from Vietnam, two men from Laos and a man from Mexico were all deported to their home nations. The deportations have not previously been reported.
DHS did not comment on the removals. Reuters could not determine if their home countries initially refused to take them or why the U.S. tried to send them to Libya.
DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin contested that the home countries of criminals deported to third countries were willing to take them back, but did not provide details on any attempts to return the five men home before they were threatened with deportation to Libya.
'If you come to our country illegally and break our laws, you could end up in CECOT, , Guantanamo Bay, or South Sudan or another third country,' McLaughlin said in a statement, referencing and a detention center in the subtropical Florida Everglades.
FAR FROM HOME DHS did not respond to a request for the number of third-country deportations since Trump took office on January 20, although there have been thousands to Mexico and hundreds to other countries. The eight men sent to South Sudan were from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, South Sudan and Vietnam, according to DHS. The man DHS said was from South Sudan had a deportation order to Sudan, according to a court filing. The five men sent to Eswatini were from Cuba, Jamaica, Laos, Vietnam and Yemen, according to DHS.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said the men deported to South Sudan and Eswatini were 'the worst of the worst' and included people convicted in the United States of child sex abuse and murder. 'American communities are safer with these heinous illegal criminals gone,' Jackson said in a statement.
The Laos government did not respond to requests for comment regarding the men threatened with deportation to Libya and those deported to South Sudan and Eswatini. Vietnam's foreign ministry spokesperson said on July 17 that the government was verifying information regarding the South Sudan deportation but did not provide additional comment to Reuters.
The government of Mexico did not comment.
The Trump administration acknowledged in a May 22 court filing that the man from Myanmar had valid travel documents to return to his home country but he was deported to South Sudan anyway. DHS said the man had been convicted of sexual assault involving a victim mentally and physically incapable of resisting. Eswatini's government said on Tuesday that it was still holding the five migrants sent there in isolated prison units under the deal with the Trump administration.
'A VERY RANDOM OUTCOME' The Supreme Court in June allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries without giving them a chance to show they could be harmed. But the legality of the removals is still being contested in a federal lawsuit in Boston, a case that could potentially wind its way back to the conservative-leaning high court.
Critics say the removals aim to stoke fear among migrants and encourage them to 'self deport' to their home countries rather than be sent to distant countries they have no connection with.
'This is a message that you may end up with a very random outcome that you're going to like a lot less than if you elect to leave under your own steam,' said Michelle Mittelstadt, communications director for the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute. Internal U.S. immigration enforcement guidance issued in July said migrants could be deported to countries that had not provided diplomatic assurances of their safety in as little as six hours.
While the administration has highlighted the deportations of convicted criminals to African countries, it has also sent asylum-seeking Afghans, Russians and others to Panama and Costa Rica. The Trump administration deported more than 200 Venezuelans accused of being gang members to El Salvador in March, where they were held in the country's CECOT prison without access to attorneys until they were released in a prisoner swap last month. More than 5,700 non-Mexican migrants have been deported to Mexico since Trump took office, according to Mexican government data, continuing a policy that began under former President Joe Biden.
The fact that one Mexican man was deported to South Sudan and another threatened with deportation to Libya suggests that the Trump administration did not try to send them to their home countries, according to Trina Realmuto, executive director at the pro-immigrant National Immigration Litigation Alliance.
'Mexico historically accepts back its own citizens,' said Realmuto, one of the attorneys representing migrants in the lawsuit contesting third-country deportations. The eight men deported to South Sudan included Mexican national Jesus Munoz Gutierrez, who had served a sentence in the U.S. for second-degree murder and was directly taken into federal immigration custody afterward, according to Realmuto. Court records show Munoz stabbed and killed a roommate during a fight in 2004.
When the Trump administration first initiated the deportation in late May, Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum said her government had not been informed.
'If he does want to be repatriated, then the United States would have to bring him to Mexico,' Sheinbaum said at the time. His sister, Guadalupe Gutierrez, said in an interview that she didn't understand why he was sent to South Sudan, where he is currently in custody. She said Mexico is trying to get her brother home.
'Mexico never rejected my brother,' Gutierrez said.
'USING US AS A PAWN'
Immigration hardliners see the third-country removals as a way to deal with immigration offenders who can't easily be deported and could pose a threat to the U.S. public.
"The Trump administration is prioritizing the safety of American communities over the comfort of these deportees,' said Jessica Vaughan, policy director at the Center for Immigration Studies, which supports lower levels of immigration.
The Trump administration in July to take migrants and the Pacific Islands nation of Palau, among others.
Under U.S. law, federal immigration officials can deport someone to a country other than their place of citizenship when all other efforts are 'impracticable, inadvisable or impossible.'
Immigration officials must first try to send an immigrant back to their home country, and if they fail, then to a country with which they have a connection, such as where they lived or were born.
For a Lao man who was almost deported to Libya in early May, hearing about the renewed third-country deportations took him back to his own close call. In an interview from Laos granted on condition of anonymity because of fears for his safety, he asked why the U.S. was 'using us as a pawn?'
His attorney said the man had served a prison sentence for a felony. Reuters could not establish what he was convicted of.
He recalled officials telling him to sign his deportation order to Libya, which he refused, telling them he wanted to be sent to Laos instead. They told him he would be deported to Libya regardless of whether he signed or not, he said. DHS did not comment on the allegations.
The man, who came to the United States in the early 1980s as a refugee when he was four years old, said he was now trying to learn the Lao language and adapt to his new life, 'taking it day by day.'
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putin likely to visit India in late August, says NSA Doval
Putin likely to visit India in late August, says NSA Doval

New Indian Express

time30 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Putin likely to visit India in late August, says NSA Doval

Russian President Vladimir Putin is likely to visit India soon, National Security Adviser Ajit Doval said on Thursday during his visit to Moscow, adding that the dates are nearly finalised, however the Russian news agancy Interfax reported that the visit is likely to be in late August. 'We were pleased to learn about President Putin's visit to our country at the end of August,' Doval said during a meeting with Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu, as quoted by Sputnik India. The development comes amid growing tensions between New Delhi and Washington over India's ongoing trade ties with Moscow. On Wednesday, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 25% tariff on imports from India, citing New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian oil. The United States has also warned of potential secondary sanctions on countries buying Russian oil unless Moscow agrees to halt its war in Ukraine, which is now in its fourth year. The deadline for compliance has been set for Friday. Meanwhile, the Kremlin confirmed on Thursday that President Putin is also preparing for a meeting with US President Trump. Russian Presidential Adviser Yuri Ushakov stated that both sides are working on finalising the meeting, with a venue already agreed upon and to be announced soon. Earlier, the Kremlin criticised President Trump's stance, and reiterated support for India's autonomy in trade decisions. 'Sovereign countries have the right to choose their own trading partners,' Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said, calling attempts to pressure nations into cutting trade ties with Russia 'illegitimate.'

We should impose 50% levy on US goods: Shashi Tharoor on Trump tariffs
We should impose 50% levy on US goods: Shashi Tharoor on Trump tariffs

Business Standard

time30 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

We should impose 50% levy on US goods: Shashi Tharoor on Trump tariffs

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Thursday said that India should also increase tariffs on US-made goods to 50 per cent after the first tranche of Donald Trump administration's 25 per cent tariffs came into effect. Tharoor's remarks were in response to the additional 25 per cent tariffs imposed by Trump on account of India's oil imports from Russia. Speaking to reporters, the Thiruvananthapuram MP questioned India's decision to levy a 17 per cent tariff, adding that New Delhi should not be intimidated by such actions. "It will definitely have an impact because we have a trade of $90 billion with them, and if everything becomes 50% more expensive, buyers will also think why should they buy Indian things? If they do this, we should also impose a 50% tariff on American exports... It is not that any country can threaten us like this," Tharoor was quoted as saying by news agency ANI. "Our average tariffs on American goods are 17 per cent. Why should we stop at 17 per cent? We should also raise it to 50 per cent... We need to ask them, do they not value our relationship? If India doesn't matter to them, they should also not matter to us," Tharoor noted. Trump imposes 50 per cent tariffs on India On Wednesday, Trump signed an executive order, announcing an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, bringing the country's total to 50 per cent. The executive order issued by the White House cited India's continuous imports of Russian oil as an 'unusual and extraordinary threat' to the United States. India calls the increased tariff move "unjustified" Responding to the increased tariff rate, India on Wednesday released a statement, calling the move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable". "The United States has in recent days targeted India's oil imports from Russia,' the MEA said. 'We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India", the statement added.

Will Israel fully reoccupy Gaza? Netanyahu to chair key security cabinet meet today
Will Israel fully reoccupy Gaza? Netanyahu to chair key security cabinet meet today

Hindustan Times

time30 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Will Israel fully reoccupy Gaza? Netanyahu to chair key security cabinet meet today

Israel's security cabinet was expected hold a key meet later Thursday to discuss future military plans in Gaza, according to Israeli media reports, amid buzz over possibility of the Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu-led dispensation decided a full takeover of the Gaza, the besieged Palestinian territory. File photo: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends a discussion at the plenum in the Knesset, Israel's parliament.(REUTERS) The planned meeting comes amid global outrage over the grim humanitarian situation in Gaza, with UN agencies warning of famine in the ravaged territory where aide sites have been subject to attacks repeatedly. According to the Times of Israel, the meeting was set to commence around 6:00 pm local time (around 8:30 pm IST). For days now, Israeli media have reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is mulling ordering the full reoccupation of Gaza for the first time since Israel withdrew soldiers and settlers two decades ago. The security Cabinet late Thursday could possibly be to make a decision. On Wednesday, the military announced a fresh evacuation call for portions of Gaza City in the north, and Khan Yunis in the south, where a spokesman said ground forces were set to "expand the scope of combat operations". A full reoccupation would mean sending ground troops into the few areas of Gaza that haven't been totally destroyed, the roughly 25 per cent of the territory where much of its two million people have sought refuge, according to Associated Press news agency. While Netanyahu is reportedly planning a full reoccupation, the Israeli military has been pushing back on expanding the campaign. Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said on Wednesday that the military would have to ultimately carry out the government's decisions until all war objectives were achieved. US President Donald Trump is also involved in the efforts of ending the war in Gaza. He has said he wants to end the war and bring the remaining hostages home, but has not put public pressure on Israel. Asked on Tuesday whether he would support Israel reoccupying Gaza, Trump said, 'It's going to be pretty much up to Israel.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store