logo
Michigan immigrant rights advocates gear up to combat Trump's ICE policies

Michigan immigrant rights advocates gear up to combat Trump's ICE policies

Yahoo05-02-2025

Pro-immigration protest outside the second Democratic debate in Detroit in 2019 | Ken Coleman
Michigan is already seeing attendance issues at schools after the Trump administration repealed long-standing rules barring immigration agents from making immigration-related arrests at schools and churches last month, Elly Jordan, an attorney for the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center (MIRC), said on a Wednesday media call with education professionals and immigrant rights advocates.
No one should be afraid to go to school, Jordan and other advocates said, but the reality is kids and their families in Michigan are scared to separate from their families during the school day.
In addition to promises to spread out Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents across the country to local communities that have protective policies in place for immigrant residents, the Trump administration in January eliminated protections from migrant arrests in 'sensitive' areas such as schools, churches and hospitals.
'We know that the simple act of rescinding the sensitive locations policy, regardless of whether immigration enforcement actions are actually carried out in such locations, creates a chilling effect, so much that even some U.S. citizen children are afraid to go to school and participate in sports after school activities and nutritional programs that promote their well-being,' Jordan said.
Although they are not identifying any geographic areas of concern for safety reasons, Jordan said MIRC has heard from clients and communities across the state who are reporting that families are afraid to send their kids to school. Jordan added that in the days following the Trump order revoking protection for schools as sensitive areas, one Michigan school reported that only half their students attended classes.
When kids go to school, the biggest problem they should have is to worry about is how they'll do on their math test, not that immigration agents will show up to take them away from their family, said Miriam Aukerman, senior staff attorney for the ACLU of Michigan.
When announcing the policy change, Acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Benjamine Huffman said the revocation of exemption would help agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) enforcement better keep law and order in the U.S.
'This action empowers the brave men and women in CBP and ICE to enforce our immigration laws and catch criminal aliens — including murders and rapists — who have illegally come into our country,' Huffman said. 'Criminals will no longer be able to hide in America's schools and churches to avoid arrest. The Trump Administration will not tie the hands of our brave law enforcement, and instead trusts them to use common sense.'
But kids are legally entitled to an education under the U.S. Constitution and the Michigan Constitution, regardless of immigration status, Aukerman said. In fact, schools have a legal responsibility to respect students' rights and protect their confidential information.
Aukerman and others said there's so much on the line for Michigan families who want the best for their children. For members of the education community who share that concern, there are things they can do.
As schools navigate what to do if immigration agents come to their schools, the ACLU of Michigan and MIRC sent a letter at the end of January outlining what school employees and families can do to protect students in Michigan schools.
One of the first steps the letter recommends is school districts create plans and procedures in consultation with legal counsel to prepare for immigration enforcement officials showing up in the vicinity of schools, bus stops and school functions.
The letter also argues that administrative warrants, which ICE commonly utilizes, do not allow ICE the authority to enter non-public property at schools. Schools are advised to consult legal resources to address any requests for access agents may ask for and to only narrowly provide information and access that is required by law.
And ultimately as the new administration creates policies and orders that create fear, Aukerman said it's crucial to remember that there is power and safety in sticking together and looking out for one another.
'These are not our values. Targeting kids and families is un-American,' Aukerman said. 'Many people have asked me, 'What can we do in this moment?' Here's one thing anyone in any community in Michigan can do right now: Go to your school board and ask them to adopt the best practices in this letter, because that's what Michigan kids deserve.'
aclu-mirc-letter-to-schools-12725
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says
Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says

USA Today

time25 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says

Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says Show Caption Hide Caption Anti-ICE raid demonstrators protest into fourth night Anti-immigration raid protests are continuing into the fourth night as the Pentagon deployed active-duty U.S. Marines. President Donald Trump mulled invoking the Insurrection Act, which would give him more leeway to use the military for domestic purposes, as he deploys troops to Los Angeles in response to protests prompted by ICE raids in the region. "If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it,' Trump said June 10 during an event in the White House. 'We'll see. But I can tell you, last night was terrible. The night before that was terrible." Trump deployed the California National Guard to Los Angeles over the objection of Gov. Gavin Newsom, sparking a lawsuit from the state. Marines were also sent to help the guard after protests erupted over his immigration enforcement efforts. The troops are limited to protecting federal property and law enforcement officers. The Insurrection Act would give Trump authority to use them more broadly. More: 'High-stakes game': Trump-Newsom clash pits two political heavyweights Trump said there were parts of Los Angeles on June 9 where "you could have called it an insurrection. It was terrible." Newsom described Trump's actions as "the acts of a dictator" and accused the president of 'inciting and provoking violence,' 'creating mass chaos,' and 'militarizing cities.' Legal experts say invoking the Insurrection Act is an extreme step. It has been done 30 times in U.S. history. "The invocation of it would be viewed as a pretty dramatic act," said Duke Law Professor H. Jefferson Powell. Powell said the law is "dangerously broad." The last time the Insurrection Act was invoked was in May 1992, by President George H.W. Bush at the request of California's governor, to quell rioting in Los Angeles after four White police officers were acquitted for beating Black motorist Rodney King.

What the 'Big, Beautiful' tax bill means for municipal bonds
What the 'Big, Beautiful' tax bill means for municipal bonds

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What the 'Big, Beautiful' tax bill means for municipal bonds

JPMorgan raised its forecast for municipal bond sales in 2025 to $560 billion as US lawmakers deliberate over President Trump's "big, beautiful" tax and spending bill in the Senate. Goldman Sachs Asset Management co-head of municipal fixed income Sylvia Yeh weighs in on what policy changes to the US tax code could mean for municipal bond investors, as well as valuation catalysts in comparison to Treasury yields (^TYX, ^TNX, ^FVX). Goldman Sachs manages several municipal bond ETFs (GMUB, GCAL, GMNY, GUMI). To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

LA protests far different from '92 Rodney King riots
LA protests far different from '92 Rodney King riots

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

LA protests far different from '92 Rodney King riots

The images of cars set ablaze, protesters tossing rocks at police and officers firing nonlethal rounds and tear gas at protesters hearkens back to the last time a president sent the National Guard to respond to violence on Los Angeles streets. But the unrest during several days of protests over immigration enforcement is far different in scale from the 1992 riots that followed the acquittal of white police officers who were videotaped beating Black motorist Rodney King. President George H.W. Bush used the Insurrection Act to call in the National Guard after requests from Mayor Tom Bradley and Gov. Pete Wilson. After the current protests began Friday over Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of 4,100 National Guard troops and 700 Marines despite strident opposition from Mayor Karen Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom. Trump cited a legal provision to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit Monday saying Trump had overstepped his authority. Outrage over the verdicts on April 29, 1992 led to nearly a week of widespread violence that was one of the deadliest riots in American history. Hundreds of businesses were looted. Entire blocks of homes and stores were torched. More than 60 people died in shootings and other violence, mostly in South Los Angeles, an area with a heavily Black population at the time. Unlike the 1992 riots, protests have mainly been peaceful and been confined to a roughly five-block stretch of downtown LA, a tiny patch in the sprawling city of nearly 4 million people. No one has died. There's been vandalism and some cars set on fire but no homes or buildings have burned. At least 50 people have been arrested for everything from failing to follow orders to leave to looting, assault on a police officer and attempted murder for tossing a Molotov cocktail. Several officers have had minor injuries and protesters and some journalists have been struck by some of the more than 600 rubber bullets and other 'less-lethal' munitions fired by police. The 1992 uprising took many by surprise, including the Los Angeles Police Department, but the King verdict was a catalyst for racial tensions that had been building in the city for years. In addition to frustration with their treatment by police, some directed their anger at Korean merchants who owned many of the local stores. Black residents felt the owners treated them more like shoplifters than shoppers. As looting and fires spread toward Koreatown, some merchants protected their stores with shotguns and rifles.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store