US judge halts plan to transfer Oak Flat land for contested Arizona copper mine
PHOENIX (AP) — A U.S. district judge on Friday temporarily halted the federal government's plans to transfer land in eastern Arizona for a massive copper mining project amid protest by Native American groups that consider the area sacred.
Apache Stronghold and its supporters have been fighting for years to stop the transfer of Tonto National Forest land known as Oak Flat to Resolution Copper. Meanwhile, the company has touted the economic benefits for the region and says it's worked with Native American tribes and others to shape the project.
U.S. District Judge Steven Logan said halting the land transfer would merely delay the production of copper and jobs and revenue to Arizona if it's ultimately upheld. On the other hand, he said Apaches would lose legal access to an ancestral, sacred site if the transfer proceeded.
He said the balance of equities 'tips sharply' in favor of Apache Stronghold. He granted an injunction that will be in place until the U.S. Supreme Court resolves an appeal to reconsider a decision from a panel of judges that refused to block the land transfer for the mine.
Logan, however, denied Apache Stronghold's request to have the injunction extend beyond the Supreme Court's resolution of the case.
'We are grateful the judge stopped this land grab in its tracks so that the Supreme Court has time to protect Oak Flat from destruction,' Wendsler Nosie Sr. of Apache Stronghold said in a statement Friday.
Winnipeg Jets Game Days
On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop.
A statement from Resolution Cooper said the ruling simply maintains the status quo and anticipates the U.S. Supreme Court will decide soon whether to take up the case.
The fight over Oak Flat dates back about 20 years, when legislation proposing the land transfer was first introduced. It failed repeatedly in Congress before being included in a must-pass national defense spending bill in 2014.
President Donald Trump in his first administration released an environmental review that would trigger the land transfer. Former President Joe Biden pulled it back so the federal government could consult further with tribes.
Then, the U.S. Forest Service in April announced it would forge ahead with the land transfer, prompting Apache Stronghold's emergency appeal.
Apache Stronghold sued the U.S. government in 2021 under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to protect the place tribal members call Chi'chil Bildagoteel, an area dotted with ancient oak groves and traditional plants the Apaches consider essential to their religion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
8 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Catholic cemetery bookkeeper sued by Vancouver archdiocese for $575,000
The bookkeeper for the Gardens of Gethsemani Catholic Cemetery in Surrey is being sued for the return of $575,000 after her employer discovered years of unauthorized payments, according to a lawsuit filed in B.C. Supreme Court. The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Vancouver filed a notice of civil claim alleging that Marcia Terlaak wrote cheques to herself totalling at least that amount over the nine years she was operations manager for the largest Catholic cemetery in B.C., which covers 16 hectares in Surrey. Her husband, Dustin Terlaak, is named as co-defendant for his 'full knowledge and participation,' the case alleges. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Marcia Terlaak, whose online LinkedIn account as recently as a month ago listed her as Coquitlam's cemetery supervisor, was fired from the Gardens of Gethsemani in July 2021 and received a severance. She had worked there in charge of all finances since 2009. Her role included keeping books for a second Catholic cemetery, St. Peter's in New Westminster, where she had sole signing authority. The lawsuit alleges money is also missing from its accounts. The lawsuit claims that in 2018, three years before she was let go, Terlaak stopped reconciling the bank account for St. Peter's, and in July of that year stopped recording transactions in the St. Peter's bank account. The Roman Catholic Cemeteries of the Archdiocese of Vancouver, which operated both cemeteries, alleged that in August 2023 it discovered that between mid-2012 and up to May 2021, Terlaak had issued cheques from the cemetery accounts to herself, to personal credit card accounts in her name, and to other names. And it alleges she also withdrew 'unconventionally large amounts' from petty cash, and that all the unauthorized payments were for the 'personal benefit, gain and profit of herself and/or Dustin Terlaak.' The lawsuit alleges her husband's participation included 'receiving, converting, hiding and otherwise benefiting from the funds misappropriated' by her. The lawsuit claims they used the money in 2019 to purchase a Surrey property in Panorama Ridge, selling it, and then buying a White Rock condo on North Bluff Road, where they still live. The four-bedroom, 3,550-sq.-ft. Panorama Ridge property was listed on a realtor's website this week for $1.3 million. The two-bedroom, 1,710-sq.-ft. White Rock condo was purchased for $775,000, according to an online real estate website. The lawsuit said the cemeteries have suffered damages, losses and expenses because of the fraud, including loss of use of the funds and the cost of investigating. They are seeking an order that the Terlaaks pay all the money back to them, plus aggravated and punitive damages. The lawsuit asked the court to place a certificate of pending litigation against the White Rock condo and place all of the couple's other personal property, including proceeds from the sale of the Surrey property, furniture, household items, jewelry, any vehicles and any other real estate into a 'substantive constructive trust.' The Terlaaks 'do not have the ability to personally pay an award of damages equal to the funds' lost by the cemeteries, it said. None of the allegations have been proven in court. Messages left with the Terlaaks were not returned on Tuesday. The cemeteries' lawyer declined to comment. It's not surprising fraud can continue for years at not-for-profits where there are not usually enough employees to ensure separation of duties, such as having the same person responsible for recording, custody and authorizing of funds, said Michael Favere-Marchesi, associate accounting professor at Simon Fraser University's Beedie School of Business. Favere-Marchesi, commenting previously on a case of an employee being accused of stealing from the City of Surrey and not on the cemeteries lawsuit, said this type of individual-worker fraud is also more common in the public than the private sector, where owners have to answer to shareholders where there are internal control systems. 'When there are weaknesses in those systems, it is not unusual for fraud to happen for long periods of time before they're discovered,' he said. And fraud is easier if one person is responsible for all finances because with two or more people, 'to commit a crime, you would need collusion,' he said. Also, employees who handle finances need to be properly assessed for the 'triangle of fraud' characteristics — that is, did they have motivation, opportunity and rationalization to be able to steal funds, he said. Motivation would include anyone who lived beyond their means, for instance, and should be flagged, he said. slazaruk@
Calgary Herald
9 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Fairy Tales: Filmmaker revisits Delwin Vriend case in new documentary
There is anger in Darrin Hagen's voice when he talks about the Delwin Vriend case in Alberta. Article content The landmark decision, which came down from the Supreme Court of Canada in 1998 and extended human-rights protections to queer Albertans, was certainly groundbreaking. Hagen calls it 'one of those dominoes' that led to change that impacted LGBTQ+ rights in Alberta, Canada and even the world. When the Alberta government was forced by the courts to treat queer people equally, it eventually lead to progress in other areas such as same-sex marriage and queer adoptions. Article content Article content The story about how Vriend's case, which began after he was fired in 1991 from his job as a laboratory instructor at King's College for being gay, went all the way to the Supreme Court is inspiring, of course. But it is also infuriating, Hagen says. The hostility of the Alberta government, which continued to fight even after realizing it had no legal standing to do so, is a major part of the story and one that seems particularly timely today as ugly divisions re-emerge in the province and around the world regarding LGBTQ+ rights. Article content Article content 'The government kept paying (lawyers) to push this thing forward even though they knew that they would lose,' says Hagen. 'I think that is something we all need to recognize about the provincial government that we lived through. They used our money to fight our rights. I'm a taxpayer, right? It's my money, and they are using my money to fund a battle to withhold me from full participation in Alberta society. Every queer in Alberta should be (expletive) pissed off about that.' 'You can tell I'm not neutral about this,' he adds. Article content Hagen, an award-winning playwright, drag performer and queer historian, spent years studying the case as director of the documentary Pride vs. Prejudice: The Delwin Vriend Story. He was aware of the case as it was happening. Everybody in the community was, even if they were watching from afar. One of the biggest misconceptions of the case was that it pitted Vriend and his supporters against King's College. The college wasn't being sued; Alberta was. After being fired, Vriend attempted to file a discrimination complaint with the Alberta Human Rights Commission but was told sexual orientation was not protected under the Human Rights Code in Alberta. So the case was not against the college, but the Government of Alberta and its Human Rights Commission. The Alberta government lost. That would have been the end of it had the Alberta government not appealed, which is how the case went to the Supreme Court of Canada. The government had used queer rights and queer equality as a wedge issue, a 'divisive tool in their arsenal,' Hagen says. 'So this was about taking that tool away from them.
Winnipeg Free Press
9 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
The Latest: Federal appeals court to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase hush money conviction
Federal appellate judges will hear President Donald Trump's quest to erase his criminal conviction on Wednesday — one of the ways he's trying to get last year's hush money verdict overturned. A three-judge panel is set to consider Trump's efforts to get the New York case moved from state court to federal court, where he could then try to have the verdict thrown out on presidential immunity grounds. Billionaire Elon Musk stepped back from his explosive feud with Trump, writing on X that he regrets that some of his posts went 'too far.' An appeals court is allowing Trump tariffs to continue pending court challenges, extending a similar ruling made after another federal court ruled that he overstepped his presidential authority. And the Justice Department says Trump he has the authority to abolish national monuments meant to protect historical and archaeological sites across broad landscapes, including two in California created by his predecessor at the request of Native American tribes. Here's the latest: Trump hails appeals court ruling in favor of his tariffs as a 'great' win for the US Trump commented on the ruling on Wednesday on his social media site, saying, 'A Federal Appeals Court has just ruled that the United States can use TARIFFS to protect itself against other countries. A great and important win for the U.S.,' he wrote. Veterans are divided over the Army's big parade, being held on Trump's birthday Until recently, the Army's long-planned birthday celebration did not include a big parade. Trump's addition, featuring hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers, has divided veterans. Some liken it to the military chest-pounding commonly seen in North Korea, a step toward authoritarianism or a perverse birthday party for Trump. Others see it as a once-in-a-lifetime accounting of the Army's achievements and the military service of millions of soldiers over centuries. The parade is not about Trump, they say, but the public seeing the faces of soldiers when so few Americans serve. The Army expects up to 200,000 people could attend and says the parade will cost an estimated $25 million to $45 million. Trump, speaking at Fort Bragg this week, said Saturday would be 'a big day' and noted 'we want to show off a little bit.' Appeals court lets Trump administration keep collecting tariffs while challenges continue The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit extends a similar ruling it made after another federal court struck down the tariffs May 28, saying Trump had overstepped his authority. The case involves 10% tariffs the president imposed on almost every country in April and bigger ones he imposed and then suspended on countries with which the United States runs trade deficits. It also involves tariffs Trump plastered on imports from China, Canada and Mexico to pressure them to do more to stop the illegal flow of immigrants and synthetic opioids across the U.S. border. In declaring the tariffs, Trump had invoked emergency powers under a 1977 law. But a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled he had exceeded his power. The tariffs upended global trade, paralyzed businesses and spooked financial markets. Elon Musk backs off from feud with Trump, saying he regrets social media posts that 'went too far' Early Wednesday morning, he posted 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.' Musk's break with a president whom he spent hundreds of millions of dollars to elect appeared to put an end to his influence in the White House and prompted concerns about effects on his companies. As a major government contractor, Musk's businesses could be particularly vulnerable to retribution, and Trump has already threatened to cut Musk's contracts. Musk earlier deleted a post in which he claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the president's association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Meanwhile, other posts that irritated Trump, including ones in which Musk called the spending bill an 'abomination' and claimed credit for Trump's election victory, remained live. On Sunday, Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker that he has no desire to repair their relationship and warned that Musk could face ' serious consequences ' if he tries to help Democrats in upcoming elections. A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction Trump's quest to erase his criminal conviction heads to a federal appeals court Wednesday. It's one way he's trying to get last year's hush money verdict overturned. A three-judge panel is set to hear arguments in Trump's long-running fight to get the New York case moved from state court to federal court, where he could then try to have the verdict thrown out on presidential immunity grounds. The Republican is asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene after a lower-court judge twice rejected the move. As part of the request, Trump wants the federal appeals court to seize control of the criminal case and then ultimately decide his appeal of the verdict, which is now pending in a state appellate court. The Manhattan district attorney's office, which prosecuted Trump's case, wants it to stay in state court.
