logo
Egg prices in Honolulu continue to rise, state report says

Egg prices in Honolulu continue to rise, state report says

Yahoo02-04-2025

JAMM AQUINO / FEB. 5 Waikele resident Janelle Mayeshiro, left, and Kalihi resident Angelino Cariaga carry their purchased eggs from Eggs Hawaii in Honolulu in February.
JAMM AQUINO / FEB. 5 Waikele resident Janelle Mayeshiro, left, and Kalihi resident Angelino Cariaga carry their purchased eggs from Eggs Hawaii in Honolulu in February.
Honolulu egg prices continued to rise in March, according to the latest market analysis report from the Hawaii Department of Agriculture.
HDOA said the benchmark price for a dozen large, locally produced eggs rose by 20 % to $9.51 during the first quarter of this year, while the price of a dozen U.S. mainland eggs rose by 30 % to $9.46.
The average price differential between local and mainland eggs narrowed further from 66 cents to a marginal 5 cents a dozen, according to report, which noted the selection of brands available to consumers in Hawaii has become more limited due to an egg shortage on the mainland U.S.
'Hawaii still pays significantly higher prices than the rest of the U.S., which averages at $4.90 per dozen, ' department officials said Monday in a news release. 'The increase in the price of mainland eggs can be mainly attributed to the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI ) which has impacted egg production across the continental U.S.'
The price of organic eggs increased by just 4.2 %, considerably lower than the rise of conventional egg prices during the first quarter of 2025.
In the Honolulu retail market, the price of a dozen local eggs ranged from $6.49 to $11.79, while the price of a dozen mainland U.S. eggs ranged from $6.49 to $10.99 the first quarter of this year.
Don 't miss out on what 's happening !
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It 's FREE !
Email 28141 Sign Up By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser 's and Google 's and. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
A dozen local, organic eggs ranged between about $8 to $12 while a dozen, organic, mainland U.S. eggs ranged from about $9.50 to $10.
'While the increasing price of all eggs is a concern for everyone, it is good to see that local eggs are able to be very competitive in the marketplace, ' said Sharon Hurd, chairperson of the Hawaii Board of Agriculture, in the release. 'Of course, the added benefit of locally produced eggs is that they are fresher and we hope that everyone will choose local when available and support our local producers.'
Hawaii became the last U.S. state to detect the H5N1 virus or HPAI, in a backyard flock of birds in November.
The first avian influenza outbreak was confirmed mid-November in a flock of rescued ducks and geese at Susie's Duck Sanctuary in Wahiawa. That same month, avian influenza was also confirmed in a wild duck from the James Campbell National Wildlife Refuge on Oahu's North Shore.
But HPAI has not, to date, been detected in any commercial poultry or egg production facilities in the state, HDOA said. HDOA continues to work with Hawaii's poultry industry to keep from infecting local flocks.
41 Comments By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our.
Having trouble with comments ? .

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are egg prices falling in Texas? Here's how much a dozen costs in June 2025
Are egg prices falling in Texas? Here's how much a dozen costs in June 2025

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Are egg prices falling in Texas? Here's how much a dozen costs in June 2025

Your wallet might get a little break at the grocery store. According to the average price of a dozen eggs is $4.26. The average has been the lowest it has been since its March peak of $6.23, according to a report published on June 3 by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service. According to the USDA, retail prices tend to follow wholesale prices with a delay due to several factors. 'Retail egg prices are influenced by wholesale egg prices, but additional factors such as pricing strategies and contracts can mute the impact of short-term fluctuations,' the USDA report said. 'As a result, retail price movements tend to lag directional changes made by wholesale prices. When wholesale prices spike, retailers occasionally and temporarily have sold eggs at a loss. As wholesale prices retreat, retail prices are slower to decline and often remain elevated for a longer period." Here's what to know about egg prices in Texas. Last time we reported on egg prices in Texas, the average price for a dozen was $5.43. Today, those prices remain largely unchanged, according to the World Population Review. The decline in national egg prices comes as the USDA reported fewer cases of bird flu last month. Bird flu cases declined significantly to 2.1 million cases in March, according to the USDA, compared to 12.64 million in February and 23.19 million in January. Yes, bird flu is still spreading, particularly the H5N1 strain. While the risk to the general public remains low, experts emphasize the need for continued surveillance and precautions. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there are 70 total national cases. However, in Texas, no reports have been made of poultry farms or other animals being affected. -USA Today Network reporter Betty Lin-Fisher contributed to this report. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Egg prices are down in the US. How much does a dozen cost in Texas?

Cal-Maine Foods Stock Soars 67% in a Year: Can It Sustain the Rally?
Cal-Maine Foods Stock Soars 67% in a Year: Can It Sustain the Rally?

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Cal-Maine Foods Stock Soars 67% in a Year: Can It Sustain the Rally?

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. CALM has soared 66.6% over the past year against the industry's 15.8% decline. The Basic Materials sector has slipped 3.5% while the S&P 500 has gained 11.6% in the same timeframe. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Cal-Maine Foods has outperformed poultry-related stocks like Post Holdings, Inc. POST, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation PPC and Vital Farms, Inc. VITL, as shown in the chart below. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research CALM is currently trading at a forward 12-month price/earnings (P/E) ratio of 17.08X compared with the industry's 10.19X. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Vital Farms is trading higher at 23.15X, considering its premium brand. Post Holdings and Pilgrim's Pride are cheaper options than Cal-Maine, trading at 15.21X and 8.92X, respectively. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Earnings estimates for Cal-Maine Foods for both 2025 and 2026 have moved down over the past 60 days. (Find the latest earnings estimates and surprises on Zacks Earnings Calendar.) Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Cal-Maine Foods' fiscal 2025 earnings is $22.73 per share, indicating a year-over-year upsurge of 299.5%. However, the estimate for fiscal 2026 of $5.71 suggests a 74.9% decline. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreaks in U.S. poultry led to the depopulation of 40.2 million birds in 2024 and another 36.3 million this year. This created a supply crunch, catapulting egg prices to record highs. Riding on these elevated egg prices and robust sales volumes, Cal-Maine Foods has registered increases in its top and bottom-line results over the past few quarters. In the last reported quarter, CALM's sales skyrocketed 102% year over year to $1.42 billion. Though the demand for eggs remains strong, supply disruptions from HPAI have been easing lately. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' latest report, the price of a dozen conventional large white eggs was $3.34 as of June 6, 2025, down from the record high of $6.23 in March 2025 and $5.12 in $1-billion comprehensive strategy to curb HPAI and fewer outbreaks suggests that price correction may continue, which can bring Cal-Maine Food's results back to normal levels. With customer demand shifting toward cage-free eggs and increasing legislation requiring cage-free compliance, Cal-Maine Foods is investing heavily in its cage-free capacity. Its planned $60 million in capital projects remain on track to add production capacity for 1.1 million cage-free layer hens and 250,000 pullets. Acquisition of ISE America's commercial shell egg production and processing assets last year boosted cage-free capacity by 1 million cage-free laying hens. The acquisition of feed mills, storage facilities, usable grain, vehicles, related equipment and retail feed sales business of Deal-Rite Feeds, Inc., was a strategic move to lower production costs and drive efficiencies. Cal-Maine has recently upped its focus to grow its product portfolio to include value-added egg products. This is evident in its investment in Meadowcreek Foods (hard-cooked eggs) and Crepini Foods (egg products and prepared foods). It recently acquired Echo Lake Foods, which produces, packages, markets and distributes ready-to-eat egg products and breakfast foods. Cal-Maine Foods' return on equity — a profitability measure of how prudently the company is utilizing its shareholders' funds — is 48.72%, way higher than the industry's 11.96%. It also outpaced the sector's average of 10.34% and the S&P 500's 32.01%. CALM's ROE is also higher than those of Vital Farms (19.53%), Pilgrim's Pride (36.95%) and Post Holdings' 10.25%. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research CALM continues to execute expansion and product diversification efforts well. However, considering the moderating egg prices, CALM's premium valuation and downward estimate revision activity, selling the stock will be prudent at present. The company currently carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) : Free Stock Analysis Report Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) : Free Stock Analysis Report Post Holdings, Inc. (POST) : Free Stock Analysis Report Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research

Contributor: As the feds abdicate responsibilities, states should band together
Contributor: As the feds abdicate responsibilities, states should band together

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Contributor: As the feds abdicate responsibilities, states should band together

Until January, the federal government and the states had a mutually beneficial and straightforward deal: The federal government prioritized challenges requiring national solutions — e.g., national security, natural and public-health disaster relief, managing the American economy. For their part, the states delivered primarily local goods and services — Medicaid and Medicare, much of our transportation infrastructure, public education. Money, specifically taxpayer money, underpinned this deal. In 2023, the federal government collected about $4.7 trillion in taxes, sending back about $4.6 trillion to the states, mainly via social service programs. (The remainder of that year's roughly $6 trillion in federal spending was mostly financed by debt.) Now, this deal between Washington and the states is unraveling to tragic effect. In May, tornados ravaged communities in Kentucky and Missouri, killing 27 people. Because of cuts to the federal government in recent months, the National Weather Service is now stretched too thin to alert rural communities in the heartland about such deadly weather. Ordinarily, after such disasters, the feds could be counted on to provide relief. That too is far from a certainty. When natural disaster strikes — as it did in Arkansas this year in the form of severe storms and tornadoes — federal aid was initially denied and ultimately arrived weeks late. Similar aid was denied to those in West Virginia, Washington state and North Carolina. Meanwhile, normal and emergency disbursements to states and localities are being withheld or threatened explicitly because the administration dislikes a state's LGBTQ+-friendly policies or immigrant healthcare. We are just a little over four months into a four-year presidency, with seemingly more cuts to come. In late May, the federal government canceled a contract to develop a new vaccine to protect against flu strains with pandemic potential (including the H5N1 bird flu), alarming state public health officials across the nation. Some decisions by the feds have been successfully challenged in the courts. Realistically though, there is only so much the judges can and will do to force federal agencies to spend, especially when Congress endorses spending cuts. Meanwhile, states have duties and obligations to their residents. But making up for the massive federal shortfall is no easy feat. No state, acting alone, could come close to replicating the goods and services that the feds are no longer supplying. Each lacks economies of scale; the cost per person is prohibitively high without the bargaining power and efficiency of the federal government. The answer, quite simply, is for the states to pool their resources, thereby spreading the costs over a far wider number of taxpayers. Here are some examples of what clusters of like-minded states could do: set up interstate academic programs that pool students and faculty cut off from federal funds into large regional research consortia; re-create public-health and meteorology forecasting centers servicing member states; and finance pandemic planning and countermeasures, precisely what was lacking — and sorely needed — early in the COVID-19 crisis. Though some may assume these arrangements require congressional authorization, the courts have said otherwise, insisting such approval is necessary only when states threaten federal supremacy. (The converse would be true here. The states would be teaming up only because the feds have absented themselves.) Additional arrangements can be even looser understandings. Consider the vacuum created now that the Justice Department has disbanded the team that focused on corruption among officials and fraud by government employees. States can mobilize interstate criminal task forces to track and prosecute corruption by politicians, lobbyists and government contractors (who invariably, when violating federal laws, run afoul of myriad state laws, too). The Trump administration is also tabling consumer protection and environmental investigations and prosecutions. Here too states can pool their resources, extend their jurisdictional reach and protect their citizens, while possibly recouping some expenses. Successful litigation often carries with it awards of legal fees and sometimes damages or monetary bounties: Lawsuits brought by states could force polluters to pay for the damage they do. Of course, not all states will jump into action, at least not at first. But this is a feature, not a bug, of the coming clustering of like-minded states. The Trump administration has created an opportunity for beneficial 'races to the top' in regulatory matters. Here's how that works: As Washington abdicates its long-relied-upon responsibilities, those states that commit to making up for the federal shortfalls will retain residents and businesses. They'll also attract new ones, particularly those frustrated that their home states aren't taking similar compensatory measures. High-tax states are often at a competitive disadvantage, as evidenced by what the Wall Street Journal has repeatedly referred to as a 'Blue state exodus.' But we think that's less likely to happen going forward. Precisely because the feds are no longer promising to fund basic education, infrastructure and social services — and are no longer viewed as a reliable regulator — it's suddenly too risky to chance living or operating a business in a state that doesn't take basic health and safety seriously. Interstate collaboration isn't a cure-all, but it's a start on rebuilding a new national compact without the political strings that have been attached to federal funding in recent months, one that may endure for the foreseeable future. It's a chance to demonstrate resourceful, resilient and good-faith public service at a time when the risk of being worn down into complacency is perilously high. Aziz Z. Huq and Jon D. Michaels are professors of law at the University of Chicago and UCLA, respectively. If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store