logo
‘Strictest head' warns Government ‘about to totally destroy academies'

‘Strictest head' warns Government ‘about to totally destroy academies'

Independent18-02-2025

Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson is about to 'totally destroy academies' and has failed to 'listen' to school leaders, Katharine Birbalsingh has claimed.
Sometimes described as Britain's strictest headteacher, Ms Birbalsingh suggested a proposed cap on the amount of different branded uniform items a school can demand could hamper teachers' efforts to improve behaviour.
The headteacher of Michaela Community School in Brent, London, met with Ms Phillipson earlier this month, when they had a heated exchange about the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, which the Commons is yet to sign off on.
I think she would do well to listen to school leaders and she's not listening to them, and that's a worry - that an Education Secretary would simply say, 'no, I don't need to listen to you, I already know better than you do
Katharine Birbalsingh
According to meeting minutes prepared by the Department for Education and obtained by the magazine Schools Week after a freedom of information request, the Education Secretary urged Ms Birbalsingh to 'lower her tone and asked they remove the heat from the discussion'.
Asked about the exchange, the headteacher said on Tuesday she thinks Ms Phillipson 'believes that because she's gone to school in Sunderland, that means she's now an expert on how to teach and how to run a school'.
She told the PA news agency: 'I have to say, I was asking her lots of questions, I wasn't lecturing her.
'But I think she would do well to listen to school leaders and she's not listening to them, and that's a worry – that an Education Secretary would simply say, 'no, I don't need to listen to you, I already know better than you do'.
'That's the biggest concern, because she is about to totally destroy academies and I know she believes that she's going to be helping poor children by doing this.
'She's actually going to ruin their chances in life, and we won't see it right away.
'The thing about education is that it takes many years before those changes embed and I am desperately worried.
'There are other school leaders who have spoken out, and lots of them don't feel they can speak out, even though privately they are very worried about this Bill.'
The Bill, if agreed to, would set a limit on mandatory branded school uniform items.
Primary schools would only be allowed to demand parents buy a maximum of three different types of branded items of uniform each year, rising to four items at secondary school.
Attending the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (Arc) conference in east London, Ms Birbalsingh said: 'To give you an example – uniform.
'Bridget Phillipson is going to reduce the number of branded items that a school can have to three, and that's to include sport as well as the normal school uniform.
'Whenever anyone comes to visit us and they say 'our school's in difficulty, what can we do to make it better?', I explain about broken windows theory, I explain that you need to begin with uniform, I explain how to do it.
'We need uniform way less. Those schools are desperate for those branded items in order to turn those schools around.
'Bridget Phillipson is not a school leader, so she doesn't know about broken windows theory, and about uniform, and how when you want to improve behaviour you need to begin with uniform.'
The headteacher also said she was 'very much against' using artificial intelligence (AI) in the classroom, a day after royal family member and actor Sophie Winkleman, styled as Lady Frederick Windsor, said 'schools should be backing away from the neurological junk food of digital learning'.
Ms Birbalsingh said: 'Your brain remembers stuff if you write it down, if you read it.
The fact that AI will soon outperform humans in many areas means schools should be backing away from the neurological junk food of digital learning
Sophie Winkleman
'The reason why our children are so literate and so articulate is because they do loads of reading and writing in the classroom.
'If you're on a screen, you're just not going to learn as much and the business of being on a screen actually dumbs you down, so that is devastating for kids that come from more challenging backgrounds.
'We strongly advise our families not to give them smartphones at all, so obviously smartphones aren't allowed in school, but we actually advise them just not to give them smartphones at all.'
Winkleman, known for playing Big Suze in Channel 4 comedy Peep Show, spoke on Monday at the Arc conference, when she told activists: 'Why is digitally transporting a child to the Egyptian pyramids better than that child imagining it?
'This kind of jazz-hands immersion as an engagement tool doesn't work.
'It negates the need to imagine, rendering the pupil a passive rather than an active learner.'
The actor said: 'The fact that AI will soon outperform humans in many areas means schools should be backing away from the neurological junk food of digital learning, alert to the fact that it's counterproductive to learn anyway from an instantly ageing system, and teaching their pupils the deeply human skills, which AI will have a harder time replacing.'#
A Department for Education spokesperson said: 'We would not comment on what was a private meeting, held in good faith.
'As the Education Secretary said in her speech at the CSJ, debate around education policy is welcome, and ministers will always meet with a wide range of stakeholders, with a range of different views.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour to force academies to take thousands of violent and disruptive pupils permanently excluded from other schools
Labour to force academies to take thousands of violent and disruptive pupils permanently excluded from other schools

Daily Mail​

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour to force academies to take thousands of violent and disruptive pupils permanently excluded from other schools

Ministers are pushing through new laws to fast-track the admission of violent and disruptive pupils into academy schools. In the latest attempt by Labour to clip the wings of academies, which are designed to be free of local authority control, schools would be directed by councils to take thousands of pupils permanently excluded for physical violence or threatening to use an offensive weapon. Currently, they have the power to do so only if the Education Secretary rules on their behalf. The attacks on the academies by Left-wing Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has dismayed moderates within the party, who believe schools are more likely to flourish if headteachers are given the freedom to run them. The School Bill would force academies to follow the national curriculum and constrain their autonomy. Until now, the academies have had the freedom to refuse a pupil assigned by a local authority if they think it would undermine the safety or learning of other children at the school. In the latest attempt by Labour to clip the wings of academies, which are designed to be free of local authority control, schools would be directed by councils to take thousands of pupils permanently excluded for physical violence or threatening to use an offensive weapon. Pictured: File photo But under the Bill, councils would be given the power to force admission directly for the 5,000 children excluded for violence every year. Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott said: 'There have to be consequences for bad behaviour – that's real life. Labour are weak on discipline. 'They've axed behaviour hubs and voted against reporting violence against teachers to the police. 'An inclusion charter puts the needs of one disruptive child above the other 29 who want to learn. It's misguided.' The Department for Education said: 'An academy can already be directed to accept a vulnerable pupil who has been excluded. 'The proposals would simplify this process... The purpose of the measure is to ensure vulnerable children have access to a school place in the rare instances when normal admission processes fail.'

Keir Starmer plots equality law 'to penalise middle class and privately educated', Tories claim
Keir Starmer plots equality law 'to penalise middle class and privately educated', Tories claim

Daily Mail​

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Keir Starmer plots equality law 'to penalise middle class and privately educated', Tories claim

Sir Keir Starmer is preparing to put 'class war' on the statute book by introducing an equality law which will discriminate against the middle classes and privately educated, the Tories claim. A consultation document published by Equalities Minister Bridget Phillipson reveals that the Office for Equality and Opportunity is seeking evidence on how to 'commence the socio-economic duty in the Equality Act 2010'. This requires public authorities to give 'due regard' to disparities of income and socio-economic status when making decisions. Tories argue this will lead to more cases like that highlighted in last week's The Mail on Sunday, revealing a mother's fury at 'shocking discrimination' by the NHS, denying her son vital treatment because he goes to a west London private school. The Government has already introduced a punishing 20 per cent VAT hike on private school fees. The Equality Act was pushed through by the last Labour Government but the crucial section on socio-economic duty was vetoed by the Tories when they took power after the 2010 election. Labour pledged in its 2024 manifesto to revive the provision to extend equality laws covering race, age, gender, disability and sexuality to include 'the inequality of social class'. It would entitle public bodies to make spending decisions that penalise middle class areas by diverting funds and opportunities to those deemed less privileged. It has raised the prospect of fewer bin collections, library closures and council tax hikes in richer areas. The Office for Equality and Opportunity paper reads: 'The socio-economic duty requires specified public authorities, when making strategic decisions such as deciding priorities and objectives, to give due regard to how their decisions might help to reduce inequalities associated with socio-economic disadvantage.' A Tory source said: 'In independent education, children will be permanently discriminated against by the wider policy of using socio-economic background to allocate public services, as their choice of school will be used against them by state bodies long into the future.' Shadow Education Secretary Neil O'Brien said: 'Labour's class war law will divide middle England and punish families who work hard and aren't on benefits. 'By enshrining woke identity politics in law, children will be discriminated against based on their postcode and their parents' occupation. 'Families will be marked down when children apply for school or university and face worse public services if they dare to send their children to independent schools. It will create a chilling culture in the public sector that will divide society and undermine equality of opportunity.' But a Labour source said: 'This is more desperate stuff from a Tory party sliding into irrelevance. It's more than a bit rich for the Conservatives to complain about socio- economic duty when Tory councils across the country have voluntarily applied it. 'Tories used to care about levelling up the neglected parts of this country and their public services that the socio-economic duty is designed to improve – they have nothing to offer.'

'My daughter's murder was preventable - ridiculous loophole needs closing'
'My daughter's murder was preventable - ridiculous loophole needs closing'

Daily Mirror

time15 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

'My daughter's murder was preventable - ridiculous loophole needs closing'

Libby Squire's mum, Lisa Squire, she was horrified to learn men who commit indecent exposure often avoid being put on the sex offenders register because of a legal loophole The mum of a 21-year-old student murdered by a prolific sex offender says lives will be saved when a "ridiculous" legal loophole is finally closed. Lisa Squire, whose daughter Libby was killed in 2019, said she was horrified to learn men who commit indecent exposure often avoid being put on the sex offenders register - meaning they dodge monitoring by police. Ministers voiced their outrage at the outdated legislation amid growing evidence those responsible for such acts can go on to commit violent offences including rape and murder. Libby's killer Pawel Relowicz had a history of indecent exposure, as did evil cop Wayne Couzins, who murdered Sarah Everard in 2021. This week a landmark Bill making sure offenders do not slip through the net will return to the Commons. Lisa, who branded the change 'Libby's Law part one', said: 'It's a perfect legacy for Libby. Her death was so preventable, it shouldn't have happened, but she's making a difference. If we can learn from her death that's perfect, it makes it a bit less senseless." Under current law, prosecutors need to prove someone aimed to cause "alarm or distress" to get a conviction for exposure. As a result, offenders may instead be charged with outraging public decency - which requires at least two potential witnesses and does not result in being added to the register. Lisa said: "I never even imagined that they wouldn't be. When I found out they weren't I thought it was ridiculous. These are people that we should be watching." Announcing the Government will change the law, Justice Minister Alex Davies-Jones said: 'Exposure is a degrading and cowardly crime, which can often escalate into serious offending. We're strengthening the law to bolster protection for victims, meaning offenders with a broader range of motivations, such as the intention to cause humiliation or for the purpose of sexual gratification, can be prosecuted - and added to the sex offender register where necessary. 'I am grateful to Libby's family, and other victims and survivors, who have bravely campaigned for change in this area.' Lisa has called for jail terms for those convicted of non-contact sex offences like exposure and voyeurism. She has also demanded compulsory treatment programmes to stop their behaviour escalating. She believes her daughter's death could have been prevented if tougher action was taken against her killer at an earlier stage. Since the horrific tragedy in Hull, Lisa has campaigned for victims to report all non-contact sex offences to police. Doing so will prevent more cases like Libby's, she said. Figures uncovered by The Mirror reveal the number of indecent exposure cases reported to police has soared since 2019. Data from 37 of the 43 police forces in England and Wales show a 15% rise in five years, while arrests have gone up by around 35%. "It's certainly better than it was, the previous figures were appalling," said Lisa, who is now training as a counsellor to help survivors of sex offences. I'm really pleased that people are reporting it and they're being taken seriously." Soon after Relowicz was arrested, Lisa was told he had a history of committing sexual offences. He went on to plead guilty to nine sexual offences unrelated to Libby's murder, including voyeurism and outraging public decency. "If more people had come forward and reported their experiences, and if police had been able to join the dots there might have been a different situation," Lisa said. Last year Dame Diana Johnson, now Labour's Policing Minister, told MPs that in five years almost 250 men found guilty of indecent exposure were subsequently found guilty of rape. She told the Commons: "Indecent exposure and non-contact sexual offences are gateway crimes that are still not taken seriously enough." Figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act revealed that there were 8,878 indecent exposure cases reported to police in 2024, resulting in 1,894 arrests. In 2019 there were 7,696 from the same forces, with 1,405 arrests. Andrea Simon, Director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition (EVAW) said the rise in reports could indicate "growing awareness" after being "historically under-reported and trivialised". She said: "Indecent exposure is deeply harmful in its own right, but can also be part of a pattern of offending that can include rape and murder. It must be taken seriously by the justice system." The Home Office has commissioned research into the link between non-contact sex offences and violent crimes. This was a key recommendation of the Angiolini Inquiry, which focused on Ms Everard's murder. In the first part of her report published last year, Dame Elish Angiolini found investigations into indecent exposure were "poor" and treated as "low-level". She called for improvements in the way police pursue reports, as well as study into the link between non-contact offences and violent attacks. A National Police Chiefs' Council spokesman said: 'Sexual exposure is an incredibly serious crime which can be invasive and distressing for victims. We have been working hard to improve our response to sexual exposure and other non-contact sexual offences." He said victims must know that cases are taken "extremely seriously", with enhanced training rolled out to officers. A Home Office spokeswoman said: "This government is committed to halving violence against women and girls in the next decade. We recognise the devastating impact non-contact sexual offences can have on victims and that there is further to go to ensure people have the confidence to report these offences. "That's why we are fundamentally reviewing the police's response to offences such as exposure and have committed to strengthening their training on violence against women and girls. We have also supported the development of a new training programme on non-contact sexual offences to ensure victims trust they will be taken seriously when they report these offences."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store