AI chatbots using reason emit more carbon than those responding concisely, study finds
"The environmental impact of questioning trained (large-language models) is strongly determined by their reasoning approach, with explicit reasoning processes significantly driving up energy consumption and carbon emissions," first author Maximilian Dauner, a researcher at Hochschule Munchen University of Applied Sciences, Germany, said.
"We found that reasoning-enabled models produced up to 50 times more (carbon dioxide) emissions than concise response models," Dauner added.The study, published in the journal Frontiers in Communication, evaluated how 14 large-language models (which power chatbots), including DeepSeek and Cogito, process information before responding to 1,000 benchmark questions -- 500 multiple-choice and 500 subjective.Each model responded to 100 questions on each of the five subjects chosen for the analysis -- philosophy, high school world history, international law, abstract algebra, and high school mathematics.
"Zero-token reasoning traces appear when no intermediate text is needed (e.g. Cogito 70B reasoning on certain history items), whereas the maximum reasoning burden (6.716 tokens) is observed for the Deepseek R1 7B model on an abstract algebra prompt," the authors wrote.
Tokens are virtual objects created by conversational AI when processing a user's prompt in natural language. More tokens lead to increased carbon dioxide emissions.Chatbots equipped with an ability to reason, or 'reasoning models', produced 543.5 'thinking' tokens per question, whereas concise models -- producing one-word answers -- required just 37.7 tokens per question, the researchers found.Thinking tokens are additional ones that reasoning models generate before producing an answer, they explained.However, more thinking tokens do not necessarily guarantee correct responses, as the team said, elaborate detail is not always essential for correctness.Dauner said, "None of the models that kept emissions below 500 grams of CO₂ equivalent achieved higher than 80 per cent accuracy on answering the 1,000 questions correctly." "Currently, we see a clear accuracy-sustainability trade-off inherent in (large-language model) technologies," the author added.The most accurate performance was seen in the reasoning model Cogito, with a nearly 85 per cent accuracy in responses, whilst producing three times more carbon dioxide emissions than similar-sized models generating concise answers."In conclusion, while larger and reasoning-enhanced models significantly outperform smaller counterparts in terms of accuracy, this improvement comes with steep increases in emissions and computational demand," the authors wrote.
"Optimising reasoning efficiency and response brevity, particularly for challenging subjects like abstract algebra, is crucial for advancing more sustainable and environmentally conscious artificial intelligence technologies," they wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 hours ago
- Time of India
Seven months after stunning the world, China's DeepSeek AI leans on US technology for critical upgrade
China's Revolutionary DeepSeek Turns to American Hardware for Upgrade- China's much-hyped DeepSeek project, once touted as a breakthrough in homegrown AI independence, has quietly circled back to American hardware after its gamble on Huawei's Ascend chips fell short. Engineers found the Chinese processors too unstable for large-scale training of the company's new R2 model, forcing DeepSeek to rely again on Nvidia GPUs — the very technology U.S. export rules were meant to keep out of Beijing's reach. The move underscores a hard truth: while China can innovate at the software and algorithmic level, its AI future still hinges on semiconductors designed in California. This reliance not only exposes the fragility of China's self-reliance narrative but also raises pressing questions about how far Washington's export curbs can really go in controlling the global AI race. DeepSeek's Huawei gamble falters When DeepSeek announced it would train its next-generation R2 model on Huawei's Ascend GPUs , the move was hailed in Beijing as proof that China could shed its reliance on American semiconductors. The plan didn't last long. By June 2025, engineers inside DeepSeek privately acknowledged that Ascend chips failed to deliver the consistency required for massive-scale training. Sources familiar with the project told the Financial Times (July 2025) that the Ascend processors suffered from unstable performance, weaker interconnect bandwidth, and a lack of mature software tools — all critical weaknesses in an era when model training can consume tens of thousands of GPUs simultaneously. Live Events The result: Huawei's silicon is still being used, but only for inference workloads (running the trained model), while training has quietly shifted back to Nvidia hardware, the very dependency China's AI sector was under political pressure to escape. Why Nvidia still dominates China's AI race Despite U.S. export controls, Nvidia's grip remains unshaken. Even China's most sophisticated AI companies struggle to replicate the CUDA software ecosystem that Nvidia has spent nearly two decades refining. Training a model like DeepSeek's R2 — rumored to involve over 700 billion parameters — is less about raw chip speed and more about orchestration, driver support, and optimization libraries. In practice, Chinese engineers describe Huawei's platform as 'running a marathon in sandals while Nvidia wears carbon-fiber spikes.' That blunt analogy, shared by one engineer who worked on both setups, captures the gap. Hardware is only half the battle; software maturity is the other half, and Nvidia still leads. How DeepSeek got its Nvidia chips Here's the thorny part. U.S. rules technically bar Nvidia from selling its most advanced chips, such as the A100 and H100, directly to China. Yet congressional investigators revealed in April 2025 that DeepSeek somehow amassed tens of thousands of Nvidia GPUs through shell distributors in Singapore and the Middle East. Lawmakers on Capitol Hill now accuse DeepSeek of sidestepping export rules, with several Republicans calling for tighter scrutiny. Nvidia, for its part, points to its H20 line of 'downgraded' GPUs — designed to meet U.S. restrictions — which it can legally export. But multiple industry insiders note that DeepSeek's scale suggests it also tapped into backchannels to acquire restricted units. This dual reality highlights Washington's dilemma: export bans slow China, but they don't stop it. What this means for China's AI ambitions DeepSeek's return to Nvidia exposes the contradiction at the heart of Beijing's technology push. On one hand, China is pouring billions into domestic chip design and production. On the other, its most visible AI breakthrough still leans on American silicon . For policymakers in Washington, this is both reassurance and alarm. Reassurance, because it confirms that U.S. technology remains indispensable. Alarm, because despite layers of export controls, Chinese companies are still finding ways to secure the hardware. For Chinese AI startups, the lesson is more pragmatic: innovation at the algorithmic level — as DeepSeek demonstrated with its mixture-of-experts architecture that slashed training costs — can stretch limited resources, but it cannot fully replace cutting-edge chips. The bigger picture: an AI arms race with supply chain chokepoints The DeepSeek saga isn't just about one company's hardware choices. It underscores a larger geopolitical reality: the global AI race hinges not only on data and talent but on who controls the chip supply chain . China's vulnerability: Without access to advanced lithography tools (still dominated by ASML in the Netherlands), domestic fabs cannot produce chips on par with Nvidia's. U.S. leverage: Washington's chip restrictions remain the single most effective lever in slowing Chinese AI ambitions. Market implications: Nvidia stock surged past a $3 trillion market cap in June 2025 , driven in part by relentless demand from both Western hyperscalers and Chinese firms willing to pay premiums through gray channels. As one Beijing-based venture capitalist told: 'Every AI startup pitch deck begins with the same line — how many Nvidia GPUs they can get. Nothing else matters until that question is answered.' China's DeepSeek may represent cutting-edge algorithmic ingenuity, but its reliance on American hardware reveals the fragile foundation of the country's AI push. For now, the future of Chinese AI still runs, quite literally, on Nvidia. The critical question going forward: can Beijing close the gap before Washington tightens controls further? Or will the world's most ambitious AI firms continue to operate in a paradox — building revolutionary software on hardware they cannot officially buy? Either way, the story of DeepSeek's pivot back to U.S. chips is a reminder that in the AI arms race, semiconductors remain the real battlefield. FAQs: Q1. Why is China's DeepSeek using American Nvidia hardware instead of Huawei chips? Because Huawei's Ascend chips were unstable for large-scale AI training, forcing DeepSeek to return to Nvidia GPUs. Q2. What does DeepSeek's reliance on Nvidia mean for China's AI future? It shows China's AI breakthroughs still depend heavily on U.S. semiconductors despite domestic innovation efforts.
Hindustan Times
3 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Apple responds to Musk's antitrust violation charges: ‘We feature thousands of apps'
Apple found itself in the middle of a controversy earlier this week when xAI and Tesla chief Elon Musk accused the technology company's App Store of favoring Sam Altman's OpenAI. Now, Apple has responded to the claims in a statement, as per a Fortune report. Apple has hit back at Musk's claims, stating that its App Store 'is designed to be fair and free of bias.' Apple said its App Store was designed to be unbiased. Also read: Elon Musk likely to sue Apple for favouring OpenAI in App Store rankings Apple involved in Sam Altman-Elon Musk's war of words The controversy began on Tuesday, when Musk accused Apple's App Store of using unfair means to promote OpenAI's ChatGPT ahead of rival Grok. He also threatened to take legal action against Apple, accusing it of 'unequivocal antitrust violation.' The Grok chatbot and other X users were quick to point out that other apps like DeepSeek and Perplexity had reached the top spot on the App Store. Altman, for his part, accused Elon Musk of manipulating X to benefit his own companies at the expense of his rivals. Also read: Elon Musk's Grok backs Sam Altman. ChatGPT responds with a jibe: 'Very truth-seeking' What has Apple said on the matter? In its statement shared with news outlets, Apple defended the App Store, calling it 'free of bias' and 'fair.' "We feature thousands of apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations, and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria. Our goal is to offer safe discovery for users and valuable opportunities for developers, collaborating with many to increase app visibility in rapidly evolving categories,' the statement added. According to a Fortune report, Musk's accusations against Apple may stem from the tech giant's ongoing partnership with OpenAI's ChatGPT. As per a 2024 deal, ChatGPT is built into Siri as well as system-wide writing tools on an opt-in basis. No OpenAI account is required. Apple has stated that it plans to support additional AI providers in the future. Past accusations against Apple In the US, Apple's App Store has been at the center of several cases related to antitrust violations. In 2020, the company was sued by Epic Games after Apple removed Fortnite from its App Store for bypassing its payment system, the Globe and Mail reported. The Justice Department, last year, filed a landmark antitrust lawsuit against Apple, accusing it of monopolizing the smartphone market. The lawsuit alleged that Apple's App Store policies stifle innovation and block new developers. FAQs What did Elon Musk accuse Apple of? He claimed Apple was engaging in 'unequivocal antitrust violation' and accused it of favoring ChatGPT over Grok. Has Apple responded to the matter? Yes, in a statement, the company claimed that its App Store is 'free of bias.' Has Apple faced accusations of antitrust violations before? Yes, the company has faced accusations earlier. Prominent instances include a case by Epic Games and a lawsuit filed by the Justice Department.
Indian Express
3 days ago
- Indian Express
Top 10 AI companies in the world: See who's winning the race between Sam Altman, Elon Musk and other tech giants
Top 10 AI companies in the world Forbes: Artificial intelligence isn't slowing down, it is only growing bigger, bolder, and more embedded in the way modern businesses operate. More than two years after ChatGPT took the world by storm, AI remains a top priority for venture capitalists and tech leaders. But the conversation has shifted: instead of only racing to build the most powerful AI models, many startups are focusing on real-world applications—tools that save time, cut repetitive work, and make tasks easier across sectors like engineering, healthcare, legal services, and sales. This shift is reflected in Forbes' seventh annual AI 50 list, created in partnership with Sequoia and Meritech Capital, which spotlights the most promising privately-owned AI companies worldwide—from established giants to rising newcomers.. Newcomers to the list include Anysphere—better known as Cursor—a three-year-old AI coding assistant valued at $2.5 billion and generating over $100 million in annual revenue. Speak, an AI-powered language tutoring app worth $1 billion, serves around 10 million learners of English and Spanish. Massachusetts-based OpenEvidence, another unicorn, offers an AI-driven medical search tool that distils complex information into concise summaries for doctors. While rising startups are making waves, AI model-building heavyweights still dominate the top tier. OpenAI and Anthropic—two of the sector's most well-funded players—have raised a combined $81 billion, more than half of the total $142.45 billion secured by this year's AI 50 companies. But the race is intensifying: Elon Musk's xAI has raised $12.1 billion; former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati is launching Thinking Machine Labs, aiming for $1 billion at a $9 billion valuation; and AI pioneer Fei-Fei Li, dubbed the 'godmother of AI,' has entered the fray with World Labs, backed by $291.5 million to build systems that interpret physical spaces. On the enterprise side, Writer has secured $326 million to develop proprietary AI models for corporate tasks like drafting marketing blogs or combing through large document archives. Powering all of these AI dreams are the often-overlooked infrastructure providers. AI companies need huge amounts of computing power, expensive chips, and energy-intensive data centers to train and run their systems. That demand has boosted companies like Crusoe ($2.8 billion valuation), Lambda ($2.5 billion), and Together AI ($3.3 billion), all working to supply the raw computing power AI development requires. Some startups are proving that AI model training doesn't have to burn through endless amounts of money. Chinese company DeepSeek is an example, it's shown that building powerful models can be done more cost-efficiently. While it isn't on the AI 50 list this year due to unclear details about its funding, revenue, and operations, DeepSeek represents a growing group of Chinese AI companies that are becoming serious contenders in the global AI race. From billion-dollar app startups to massive model-makers and the infrastructure that powers them, AI's ecosystem has never been more varied, or more competitive. And if this year's AI 50 list is anything to go by, the race is shifting from who can build the biggest model to who can build the most useful AI for real-world needs. Source: Forbes
