logo
Noem proposes major cut to tobacco prevention in South Dakota

Noem proposes major cut to tobacco prevention in South Dakota

Yahoo27-01-2025

If lawmakers approve Gov. Kristi Noem's proposal to cut the state tobacco prevention fund, anti-tobacco advocates say more children are likely to use tobacco and nicotine products, more adults will die early and the state will pay millions of dollars in new health care costs over the long run.
Since 2007, South Dakota has allocated $5 million annually to a fund that pays for programs to help tobacco users give up the habit and to prevent children and adults from ever starting.
The money pays for counseling services through the South Dakota Quitline, for medications to help people kick the addictive habit and for state and local tobacco-prevention programs.
South Dakota lawmakers: Lab-grown meat should be clearly labeled
The money comes from the state tax on annual sales of tobacco products, mainly cigarettes, and was part of Initiated Measure 2 that voters passed in 2006 to raise the tax on a pack of cigarettes by $1 and increase the taxes on other tobacco products.
The ballot measure also dictated that the first $30 million in tobacco taxes would go to the state general fund and the next $5 million would go to a new Tobacco Prevention and Reduction Trust Fund, which pays for the South Dakota Tobacco Control Program.
Tobacco tax revenues over the $35 million level would also flow into the general fund. IM 2 passed with almost 61% of the vote.
This year, Noem has proposed cutting the funding of the tobacco control program to $2 million a year, a 60% reduction. According to Senate Bill 54, the other $3 million would be sent to the state's general fund each year moving forward.
Aberdeen dining scene: Jersey Mike's opens new sub shop
A spokeswoman for the state Department of Health, which administers the tobacco prevention program, told News Watch that the program's success at preventing tobacco use is the reason the funding can now be cut.
"The program has a track record of success, and we have seen a downward trend in tobacco use," DOH spokeswoman Tia Kafka wrote in an email. "As a result, the governor's budget proposal right-sizes funding of tobacco prevention dollars.'
State records show that the state spent about $5.3 million on tobacco and nicotine prevention in fiscal year 2024, with $4.9 million in contracted services for the state program and about $382,000 on grants and subsidies to local prevention organizations.
The major expenditures, according to state contracts, were $1 million to Vilas Pharmacy of Pierre for tobacco cessation medications and $824,000 to Avera Health Plans to provide "telephone and other tobacco cessation counseling and support services for the SD Quitline."
Tobacco tax revenues have fallen steadily over time in South Dakota. In fiscal year 2014, the state collected $52 million in state cigarette taxes and another $7.4 million in other tobacco taxes, for a total of $59.4 million.
In fiscal 2024, state cigarette tax collections were $44 million and other tobacco tax collections were $11.8 million, for a total of $55.8 million, according to the Department of Revenue.
Colin Keeler of the state Bureau of Finance and Management, said the health department will use the remaining $2 million in tobacco tax money and about $1 million in tobacco prevention money the state already receives from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to fund tobacco programs at an annual rate of $3 million.
But at that level of funding, South Dakota will fall even further below the CDC's recommendation of $12 million in annual spending on tobacco prevention for the state.
Even though tobacco use is dramatically down in South Dakota, an average of 1,300 people die each year from smoking-related illnesses and the state spends an estimated $433 million annually on associated health costs, according to the American Cancer Society.
The number of adult cigarette smokers in the U.S. and South Dakota has declined sharply and steadily over the past several decades.
In South Dakota, 15% of adults were smokers in 2023, compared to 11% nationally, according to the lung association.
Smoking rates among Native Americans have also declined but not as much, and Native Americans smoke at roughly double the rate of non-Native adults in South Dakota and the U.S.
Youth tobacco use nationally has declined over the past few decades, especially when it comes to cigarette smoking, with 34.8% of high school students smoking at least once in the past 30 days in 1995 compared to 1.4% in 2024, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
In South Dakota, according to a 2022 statewide survey, 5.5% of high school students reported smoking cigarettes in the past 30 days and 15.8% reported using vaping devices in the past month.
Jodi Radke, South Dakota representative of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said her organization estimates that cutting tobacco prevention funding by 60% will increase youth smoking rates by 5%, lead 300 more children to become adult smokers, with 100 of those dying prematurely, and create $4.8 million in new health care costs due to smoking-related illnesses over the next few decades.
"Funding tobacco control is critical to impacting youth rates, so to cut funding from that really does impact outcomes in terms of kids becoming lifelong users," Radke said.
Ben Hanson, South Dakota policy director for the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, said the funding cut is a "rob Peter to pay Paul" maneuver the governor is using in a tight revenue year to fund other projects, such as $4 million in new spending on education savings accounts. Noem also has proposed cutting funding to the state library system and to South Dakota Public Broadcasting.
"This isn't a haircut, this is gutting the fund," he said. "We're going to talk to each legislator one by one, and let them know the history of this and hopefully create a positive outcome.'
This story was produced by South Dakota News Watch, an independent, nonprofit organization. Read more stories and donate at sdnewswatch.org and sign up for an email to get stories when they're published. Contact Bart Pfankuch at bart.pfankuch@sdnewswatch.org.
This article originally appeared on Watertown Public Opinion: Noem proposes to cut SD tobacco prevention program funding

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opioid settlement plan allows millions to be spent on purposes other than the public health crisis
Opioid settlement plan allows millions to be spent on purposes other than the public health crisis

Associated Press

time7 days ago

  • Associated Press

Opioid settlement plan allows millions to be spent on purposes other than the public health crisis

In the fallout of over 9,000 Mississippians dying of overdoses since 2000, lawyers and lawmakers have set up a plan to distribute the hundreds of millions of dollars from corporations that catalyzed the crisis. But public health advocates and Mississippians closest to the public health catastrophe worry the setup could enable these dollars to be spent on purposes other than ending the overdose epidemic. Mississippi is expected to receive $370 million from pharmaceutical companies that profited while people struggled with addiction. That payout is set to be split between the state and local governments, with 85%, or about $315 million, being controlled by the Legislature. For years after the state attorney general's office helped finalize the first settlements in 2021, it was unclear how the state would distribute its share and how much would be used to prevent the crisis from persisting. State senators and representatives took a major step toward answering these questions earlier this year. They nearly unanimously passed Senate Bill 2767, a law that outlines a general framework for how about $259 million of the funds will be distributed. A 15-person advisory council — made up of representatives for state government agencies, elected officials and law enforcement officials — will develop a grant application process for organizations focused on addressing the opioid addiction crisis. After evaluating the applications and making a list of which grants should be funded, the Legislature will decide whether to approve or deny each of the council's recommendations. The state lawmakers can spend the remaining $56 million they control for any purpose — related or unrelated to addressing addiction. House Speaker Jason White and Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann, who wield massive power over lawmakers and how state funds are spent, did not respond to questions from Mississippi Today about their priorities for the funds. Sen. Nicole Boyd, a Republican from Oxford and the bill's lead sponsor, said she and other senators borrowed some ideas from surrounding states to determine how these funds could best prevent more fallout from the opioid crisis. 'It involves everything, from child welfare services to the judicial system to medical care to mental health services,' she said. 'It is a crisis that has affected every aspect of society, and we needed a comprehensive group of people making those recommendations.' However, the bill leaves some questions unanswered, like how the application process will work, when it will open to the public and how grants will be evaluated. Public health advocates and Mississippians impacted by addiction expressed concern about the advisory council's makeup, the $56 million carveout for expenses unrelated to the opioid crisis and the Legislature's final decision-making power. They said those provisions could cause some of the corporate defendants' dollars to be spent on issues other than addressing and preventing overdoses. Jane Clair Tyner, a Hattiesburg resident, lost her 23-year-old son Asa Henderson in 2019 after he struggled for years with substance use disorder. Until last month, through her former job with the Mississippi overdose prevention nonprofit End It For Good, she worked to ensure that fewer parents have to go through the pain her family experienced. She said the only ways these state settlement dollars should be spent are on improving Mississippi public health and keeping people who are at risk of overdosing safe. 'That's what it should go towards, but not to the Legislature,' she said. 'This is not a rainy day slush fund.' An evolving plan It wasn't always the plan for the Legislature to control so much of the settlement dollars. In 2021, when Mississippi and other states were in the midst of negotiating settlements, State Attorney General Lynn Fitch published an agreement between the state and local governments that would send only 15% to the Legislature's general fund. The agreement said that the bulk of the money – 70% – would be sent to the University of Mississippi Medical Center to build a new addiction medicine institute. But Mississippi law says the Legislature is the ultimate decision maker for how this type of state settlement money gets spent, according to Fitch's Chief of Staff Michelle Williams. So lawmakers passed their bill to change the plan. The Legislature changed the arrangement to make sure the money goes to where the state's most pressing addiction needs are, said Boyd. The advisory council, which will be supplemented by at least 22 additional nonvoting members, is a good way to have those needs captured, she said. As for the Legislature having final approval power, Boyd said that and other provisions were put into the bill to keep some power with lawmakers if the council becomes ineffective or political. It's the highest percentage of any state's opioid settlement share that will be controlled by a Legislature, according to the Vital Strategies Overdose Prevention Program and state guides. Dr. Caleb Alexander, an epidemiology professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, served as one of the plaintiffs' expert witnesses for some of the opioid lawsuits. Alexander has also helped U.S. cities and counties develop blueprints for how to use the settlements to quell their opioid crises. He said using the money on a variety of prevention, treatment and recovery strategies, rather than one big project, is likely a better way to save lives and prevent more addiction. But having the Legislature, rather than an apolitical body of addiction experts, play such a large role is not the setup he would suggest. 'I would have some concerns that it may gum things up,' he said. Additionally, Alexander said creating ways for funds to not be used to address the opioid epidemic, as the 2025 bill does, is 'a shame.' While the settlement agreements say that 70% of the funds must be spent on addressing addiction, there is nothing that prevents all the money from being used for the crisis, and most statesare doing that. He said the settlements define a wide variety of uses as addressing the epidemic — from first responder training to medication research and development — and he doesn't see a scenario where it makes sense to spend the money on other uses. 'The costs of abatement far outweigh the available funds for every city or county that I've examined,' he said. Boyd said she believes her colleagues in the House and Senate are all motivated to use this money to address addiction as a mental health condition. She said the new bill categorizes some funds as 'nonabatement' to free them up for ways to address addiction that may not fit neatly into the settlements' list of uses. The attorney general's original plan was the first to categorize a percentage of the funds as not needing to be used to stop the opioid crisis. Williams said it was written that way to match the terms of the national settlement agreements, although the settlement for the largest payout says spending on purposes other than addressing the opioid crisis is 'disfavored by the parties.' She said Fitch would love to see all the funds be spent on addiction response and prevention, like the One Pill Can Kill campaign the office runs. 'But it's the Legislature's prerogative,' she said. 'Where are the people in recovery?' Jason McCarty, the Mississippi Harm Reduction Initiative's former executive director, said he's glad the plan is no longer to send such a large portion of the settlement funds to UMMC. Organizations like the Initiative, he said, also could use additional support to keep Mississippians from dying. And he's concerned that while a peer recovery specialist will serve as a nonvoting member, none of the committee's 15 voting members must be people who've experienced addiction. 'Where are the people in recovery?' he asked. 'We're the subject matter experts.' Boyd said many of the voting committee roles are representatives of state agencies that she expects will help administer the settlement grants, like the Department of Mental Health. And there were only so many people who the Legislature can assign spots. 'It was no slight to anybody,' she said. 'It's just, this is a completely complex issue.' The Mississippi governor, lieutenant governor and speaker of the house will each assign two people to the committee, and Boyd said it's possible they will choose people in recovery. The bill says council members need to be appointed by early June. However the process plays out, McCarty hopes all the state's funds go to reputable organizations focused on preventing more opioid-related harm. In Mississippi, he sees a lack of housing and treatment options, especially for new parents, as areas that this money can help address. And as hundreds of Mississippians continue to die from overdoses each year, he said the state government has to move quickly and responsibly to make these funds available. 'We don't have a year to wait. It needs to go out quicker.' ___ This story was originally published by Mississippi Today and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.

Override by lawmakers revives bill to stiffen DUI penalties
Override by lawmakers revives bill to stiffen DUI penalties

Yahoo

time03-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Override by lawmakers revives bill to stiffen DUI penalties

OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) – Oklahoma legislators used their final hours of the legislative session to override 47 of Governor Kevin Stitt's vetoes. One of the bills revived dealt with stiffer penalties for DUI offenders. Senate Bill 54 unanimously passed through the override process in the House but squeaked by in the Senate, gaining the necessary two-thirds majority. Jeff Murrow, executive director of Victims of Impaired Drivers (VOID OK) has been actively advocating for tougher DUI laws at the State Capitol since his daughter's death. 'Marissa was killed in October of 2020 by a man that was nearly three times the legal limit. Driving the wrong way on the Kilpatrick Turnpike,' said Murrow. Oklahoma lawmakers override record number of vetoes, remove Stitt appointee in dramatic end to legislative session He said the man behind the wheel had four previous DUIs.'You can't say it's a mistake when it's their second, third, fourth time to repeat,' said Murrow. He helped draft the bill which expanded penalties for aggravated DUI to include other crimes like causing an accident, eluding police, speeding in a school zone, and driving with someone under 18 in the car. Governor Stitt vetoed the bill saying that it was 'imposing one-size-fits-all penalties risks unjust outcomes and unnecessary incarceration.' But Murrow disagreed.'What we're trying to do is stop treating DUI as a one-size-fits-all,' said Murrow. According to the Oklahoma County Detention Center, the jail has dealt with 678 DUI charges since January 1, 2025. The jail saw 84 people facing DUI charges brought in during the month of May, with 17 of those as repeat offenders. It's a patter Murrow hopes to prevent with the new law.'We can't just put people right back on the street and let them continue to drink and drive or abuse drugs and drive,' said Murrow. The new law will go into effect November 1st. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Kristi Noem Cowed By Sheriffs Into Retreating From Latest Anti-Immigrant Broadside
Kristi Noem Cowed By Sheriffs Into Retreating From Latest Anti-Immigrant Broadside

Yahoo

time02-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Kristi Noem Cowed By Sheriffs Into Retreating From Latest Anti-Immigrant Broadside

Last week, the Department of Homeland Security announced that it didn't take too kindly to the immigration policies of hundreds of municipalities across the country. It posted a list of 'sanctuary cities,' jurisdictions that allegedly limit information-sharing and other forms of cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Unfortunately for the administration, the list, off the bat, sparked more confusion than fear. Several locations were in deeply Republican areas; some local officials disputed that they could meet any reasonable definition of 'sanctuary city.' But the death blow to the list came over the weekend, when the National Sheriffs' Association put out a jeremiad demanding that the list be removed and that Secretary Kristi Noem issue 'an apology to the Sheriffs and the American people.' The sheriffs knew how to ensure that the issue hit close to home for for the DHS secretary. Sure, the list 'violated the core principles of trust, cooperation, and partnership with fellow law enforcement.' But let's be serious about what really matters: 'DHS has done a terrible disservice to President Trump and the Sheriffs of this country,' the statement reads. By Sunday, the list was no longer active. Noem does not appear to have issued an apology. She did tell Fox News host Maria Bartiromo that 'some of the cities have pushed back' after Bartiromo asked why she could not see the list anymore. — Josh Kovensky We have been covering the ways in which the cuts to Medicaid included in the House-passed reconciliation package would kick millions off their health care coverage, leaving many completely uninsured. Many of the changes House Republicans shoved into the bill directly target the Medicaid expansion population — the group that received eligibility for health care coverage under the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion. Despite Republicans' well-worn rhetoric around addressing 'waste, fraud and abuse,' the changes add up to a back handed GOP effort to repeal Obamacare as we know it — a goal congressional Republicans loudly tried and failed at dozens of times before, including during the first Trump administration. Since then, the repeal efforts have been more quiet, and even though House Republicans are not saying they are repealing the ACA, the cuts they are implementing will deal a substantial blow to it. The Congressional Budget Office is estimating that if the House bill becomes law, 7.6 million fewer people would be enrolled in Medicaid and 3.1 million fewer would be enrolled in plans offered on the Obamacare marketplaces in the next decade. At the same time, private insurers and state officials are warning of chaos in the insurance markets due to changes and Medicaid cuts included in the House GOP bill, according to Politico. The changes could lead to higher premiums for people who shop for coverage in the marketplaces, and leave brokers and state officials with very little time between when the law could be enacted and when open enrollment starts in fall to adapt to the new regime. — Emine Yücel Also in Noem-related news, a victory for the Secretary of Homeland Security. A candidate with the MAGA stamp of approval, right-wing historian Karol Nawrocki, narrowly won a runoff in Poland's presidential election Sunday. Noem had visited Poland last month for the country's first CPAC and endorsed Nawrocki, a highly unusual move for a Cabinet official. (Noted 2020 election-theft co-architect John Eastman also spoke at the event.) The Polish president doesn't have many powers, but can veto legislation, setting him up to impede the agenda of the more pro-Europe and pro-Ukraine Prime Minister, Donald Tusk. — John Light 'The Federal Government Is Gone': Under Trump, The Fight Against Extremist Violence Is Left Up To The States Pro-Trump Candidate Wins Poland's Presidential Election—A Bad Omen For The EU, Ukraine And Women Appeals Court Tries To Get To The Bottom Of A 4th Wrongful Deportation Democrats' Hamlet Moment Isn't the Start of a Solution But the Heart of the Problem The Law Firms That Appeased Trump—and Angered Their Clients — Erin Mulvaney, Emily Glazer, C. Ryan Barber, Josh Dawsey, the Wall Street Journal Exclusive: US veterans agency orders scientists not to publish in journals without clearance — Aaron Glantz A 23-Year-Old Crypto Bro Is Now Vetoing NSF Grants While Staring At His Water Bottle — TechDirt, Mike Masnick

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store