logo
For some voters in smaller Manitoba cities, housing is a top election priority

For some voters in smaller Manitoba cities, housing is a top election priority

Yahoo10-05-2025
Although housing is often seen as a big-city problem, some voters in smaller Manitoba cities say housing is their focus in this federal election — from affordability to the types of homes the next government should prioritize.
Jaired Heinrichs is hoping to buy his first home, budgeting monthly to save for a down payment.
He and his wife of nearly two years recently moved into a new but "small" apartment in Winkler, a rapidly growing city in the southern Manitoba riding of Portage-Lisgar. It had a population of nearly 14,000 in 2021, according to Statistics Canada.
At his kitchen table, Heinrichs pencils in dollar figures for gas, groceries, rent and more on a spreadsheet. After essentials, he says he barely has anything left over.
"When rent is as much, or if not more, than a mortgage payment, [it] makes it very hard for a young couple like me and my wife, Laura, to save up" for a house, Heinrichs said last week.
The 25-year-old construction worker and welder acknowledges he's made mistakes when it comes to his finances but says he's frustrated about being priced out of today's housing market.
He aims to continue training to become a certified heavy-duty diesel mechanic, but he's also looking to the next federal government to help make first-time homeownership more achievable — and help put his dreams of owning an acreage and a home like his parents within reach.
"That way it gives young Canadians like myself and my wife a chance to get forward in life," he said.
"I feel like I'm really spinning my tires."
Meanwhile, Valdine Alycia, 40, is also concerned about their future housing prospects.
Alycia lives with an episodic and progressive neurological disability in Thompson, a city with a population of around 13,000 in the northern Manitoba riding of Churchill-Keewatinook Aski.
Alycia, who uses they/them pronouns, made changes to their childhood home, including having a smart home system installed, to make it easier and safer to stay there.
In the future, they might need an elevator, grab bars in the bathroom and wider hallways to continue living independently as their disability progresses, Alycia said.
However, the accessible housing they'll one day need is scarce in Thompson, they said.
"I would love to see all of the parties committing to Indigenous housing and housing for people with disabilities," said Alycia, who is Métis.
About eight million Canadians aged 15 and older live with a disability, according to Statistics Canada. With this in mind, Alycia said they're alarmed there haven't been more specific pledges for accessible housing and people with disabilities during the campaign leading up to the April 28 election.
"I believe that Thompson is completely overlooked in all of the conversations when it comes to housing," they said.
All major federal parties have announced commitments for housing.
The Conservatives have pledged to cut GST on new homes up to $1.3 million and incentivize municipalities to boost home building by at least 15 per cent each year.
The Liberals say they'll eliminate GST for first-time homebuyers of properties under $1 million and launch an agency called Build Canada Homes that will act as a developer, overseeing affordable home building in Canada.
The NDP says it would fund a $16-billion strategy to construct affordable and rent-controlled homes, prevent large corporate landlords from buying up affordable homes, and require the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation to offer low-interest, public-backed mortgages.
University of Winnipeg urban and inner-city studies professor Shauna MacKinnon said she finds parts of the Liberal and New Democrat platforms appealing, but thinks details on social housing in the major party platforms are missing.
MacKinnon, who is also a member of the Right to Housing Coalition, says her organization is calling on the next federal government to build at least 50,000 subsidized rent-geared-to-income units each year for the next decade.
MacKinnon criticized the Liberals' national housing strategy, launched in 2017, for allocating too much to private sector housing and median market rentals.
"Housing has been built. It's just not the housing that is addressing the needs of the … lowest-income households, so we really need to shift the investment to ensure that that is the priority housing," MacKinnon said.
As for Heinrichs, he likes the Conservatives' plan and says would appreciate a GST cut on his first home, along with regulations on rent, but questions why the cost of homes are so high.
"Why are our homes costing over $1 million?" he said. "That's ludicrous."
He also questioned the helpfulness of a previous Liberal government announcement from last year that saw first-time homebuyers become eligible for 30-year mortgage amortization periods, up from the standard 25-year term.
Although the longer timeframe would reduce monthly payments, "the longer the loan, the more interest you pay," Heinrichs said.
Homes in the Pembina Valley, which includes Winkler, are going for an average $325,000, local real estate agent Dave Kasdorf told CBC News last month. New houses are selling for an average of roughly $400,000, with prices increasing three to five per cent annually, he said.
"First-time homebuyers are having a real hard time getting into the marketplace," said Kasdorf.
Heinrichs and his wife hope to purchase a below-average-priced home within five years, and he's asking for more help from Canada's next leader.
"Please just remember us bottom-of-the-barrel Canadians that are just … getting by, and just please make it affordable for us to live again — because it's not."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Manitoba Indigenous groups agree to work together on major infrastructure projects
Manitoba Indigenous groups agree to work together on major infrastructure projects

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Manitoba Indigenous groups agree to work together on major infrastructure projects

WINNIPEG — Two Indigenous groups in Manitoba have agreed to work together on major infrastructure and development projects. It comes as the federal government looks to fast-track projects across the country. The Southern Chiefs' Organization, which represents 32 Anishinaabe and Dakota First Nations in the province, and the Manitoba Métis Federation have signed a five-year agreement. It outlines their shared commitment to ensure First Nations and Red River Métis voices are included in the approval of any project proposed by the Manitoba government and supported by federal legislation. A new federal law gives Ottawa sweeping powers to speed up permits for what it calls "nation-building projects." The controversial legislation has faced pushback from Indigenous groups that argue elements of it could be used to undermine their rights. The Southern Chiefs' Organization and the Manitoba Métis Federation say they'll work together to pursue Indigenous-led developments in areas including forestry, harvesting and traditional economies. The Manitoba government is also exploring how it would create and operate a proposed Crown-Indigenous corporation. "This agreement sends a message to all governments, partners and industry that First Nations and the Red River Métis are working together to shape a future that is led by Indigenous nations," Grand Chief Jerry Daniels of the Southern Chiefs' Organization said Wednesday. "We are forging a path towards economic independence and sustainability, ensuring the voices of First Nations and Red River Métis are integral to the design, approval and implementation of nation-building projects across this province." Prime Minister Mark Carney has said the legislation is needed to shore up Canada's economy during the trade war with the United States. Ottawa has also promised to build up northern infrastructure, in part, to meet a NATO military alliance spending target for critical infrastructure. It's unknown which projects could be fast-tracked, but the government has pointed to ports, railways and pipelines. Carney recently met with First Nations, Inuit and Métis groups to discuss how best to build projects in partnership with Indigenous Peoples. The Manitoba Métis Federation turned down Carney's invitation to discuss the legislation, after Ottawa invited another Métis group the federation claims has no reason to exist. Other Métis groups and First Nations say communities represented by the Métis Nation of Ontario have no claim to Métis heritage and that Ottawa and Ontario have no right to recognize them. Manitoba Métis Federation president David Chartrand said the legislation must move forward, as Canada deals with ongoing threats from U.S. President Donald Trump. "There's not a doubt it must arrive, because the danger that Trump imposes on all of us is very scary ... this is an economic war, and people should not take it lightly," he said Wednesday. He added any nation-building projects approved in Manitoba must be done in collaboration with Indigenous Peoples in the province. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 13, 2025. Brittany Hobson, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Donald Trump Scores Migration Legal Win From Obama and Biden Judges
Donald Trump Scores Migration Legal Win From Obama and Biden Judges

Newsweek

time9 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Scores Migration Legal Win From Obama and Biden Judges

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A federal appeals court on Tuesday declined to halt the implementation of a national registry for noncitizens, delivering a procedural victory for the Trump administration in a case that has drawn sharp criticism from immigrant rights advocates. In a ruling issued in the name of the court as a whole (a "per curiam" order), rather than attributed to a specific judge, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected an emergency request from several advocacy groups to block the Alien Registration Requirement (ARR) while litigation continued. Judges Karen Henderson, Robert Wilkins, and Bradley Garcia—appointed by Presidents Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden, respectively—found that the plaintiffs had not met the "stringent" standard for an injunction, pending appeal. Why This Matters The D.C. Circuit's refusal to pause the ARR means the rule will remain in effect nationwide for months while the appeal plays out. For the Trump administration, the decision represents a step toward reinstating strict enforcement measures grounded in decades-old immigration laws. For immigrant rights groups, it signals an uphill legal battle against a policy they say will deter participation in public life and expose millions to heightened surveillance and potential prosecution. The ruling also underscores that the outcome is not being determined along partisan lines—judges appointed by presidents from both parties agreed the plaintiffs had not met the legal standard for an emergency injunction. People gather at the San Antonio City Hall in protest against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids on June 11, 2025, in San Antonio, Texas. People gather at the San Antonio City Hall in protest against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids on June 11, 2025, in San Antonio, Texas. AFP/Getty Images What To Know The regulation, which took effect April 11 after a lower court ruling, requires all noncitizens aged 14 and older to register their fingerprints and carry an identification card or face potential fines or imprisonment. Younger children must be registered by a parent or guardian and re-register upon turning 14. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) estimates the rule could affect between 2.2 million and 3.2 million people, primarily those who entered the country without documentation. Canadians staying longer than one month also fall under the requirement. The panel's decision on Tuesday leaves in place an April 10 ruling by U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump appointee, who determined that the plaintiffs—Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, United Farm Workers of America, Casa Inc. and Make the Road New York—had not demonstrated that the registry would "erode their core missions" and presented only speculative harm. As the plaintiffs didn't have the required standing, McFadden concluded the court could not decide the merits of the case. Broader 'Self-Deportation' Strategy The plaintiffs argue that the policy—which the Trump administration says aligns immigration enforcement with the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act—is part of a broader "self-deportation" strategy. Carl Berquist, general counsel for the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, told Courthouse News that the measure "melds into the administration's entire self-deportation plan of rolling out these [ICE] raids, repurposing the CBP One app into this CBP Home app with a self-deportation tool and trying to roll out some kinds of incentives for people to take action." The policy had a "severe chilling effect" on noncitizens, Berquist added, implicating "their Fifth Amendment right not to self-incriminate" and "their First Amendment right to assemble and to protest," He described the case as "a little bit below the radar" compared with higher-profile immigration disputes but maintained the harm is "substantial nonetheless." The National Immigration Law Center has also warned that enforcement could lead to increased racial profiling. In a statement, the group said: "While their stated targets are undocumented immigrants, the very mechanics of enforcing registration expand the target to anyone who looks or sounds foreign to law enforcement." Newsweek contacted Carl Berquist and the National Immigration Law Center for comment via email on Thursday outside of regular office hours. What People Are Saying DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said: "The Trump administration will enforce all our immigration laws—we will not pick and choose which laws we will enforce." An emailed statement carried by Courthouse News continued: "We must know who is in our country for the safety and security of our homeland and all Americans." What Happens Next According to DHS, certain categories of immigrants—including green card holders, individuals with removal orders, people holding Employment Authorization Documents, those admitted with visas, border crossing card holders, and others—are already considered registered under existing law. The D.C. Circuit has set an expedited schedule for the case, with the plaintiffs' brief due September 16, the government's response due October 16, and a reply from the plaintiffs due November 6. Oral arguments will follow, with a date to be determined. For now, the ARR remains in effect nationwide, and both sides are preparing for a legal confrontation in the fall that could test the scope of federal authority over noncitizen identification and tracking.

Trump wields funding card in fight with DC
Trump wields funding card in fight with DC

The Hill

time10 hours ago

  • The Hill

Trump wields funding card in fight with DC

Republicans are embracing President Trump's bare-knuckled fight with Washington, D.C., as a winning issue for the embattled president and say that Trump will use federal funding for the city as leverage to get Mayor Muriel Bowser and the City Council to crack down on local crime. Conservatives on Capitol Hill are calling for Congress to end the District of Columbia's era of home rule and federalize the city, something that has little chance of happening since legislation to do so would need 60 votes and the support of at least seven Democrats to pass the Senate. Trump and his Republican allies in Congress, however, could extract significant concessions from the mayor and City Council in return for critical funding, as a proposal to restore more than $1 billion in funding for Washington remains stalled in the GOP-controlled House. Republican aides say that one of Trump's top priorities would be to press D.C. to eliminate no-cash bail, a policy whereby individuals arrested on criminal charges do not need to post cash bonds to avoid pretrial detention. Other priorities would be to prosecute teenagers accused of serious crimes as adults and to implement stricter policies mandating pretrial detention of adults and teenagers accused of such crimes. Some Republicans on Capitol Hill, including Sen. Mike Lee (Utah) and Rep. Andy Ogles (Tenn.), are pushing for more drastic action. They are backing legislation to repeal the 1973 District of Columbia Home Rule Act, which gives the city the right to elect its own government and manage local affairs. Lee in an op-ed for The Spectator cited several high-profile attacks, including the fatal shooting of congressional intern Eric Tarpinian-Jachym in July and the 2023 knife attack that left a staffer for Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) with a punctured lung and penetrated skull. 'This isn't just a local issue — it's a national embarrassment, and the Constitution itself makes it a national issue. Federal oversight will restore order and make DC a model city again,' Lee posted on the social platform X. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) in an interview on Fox Business applauded Trump's takeover of D.C.'s police and predicted: 'If there's a significant law enforcement presence, these crimes are going to go down.' He said a car belonging to one of his staffers got shot up in a gang fight while it was parked six blocks from the Capitol. 'We spent one of our Steering Committee meetings talking about what we should get our employees to protect themselves when they're walking home. This is our nation's capital, for crying out loud. This is where you bring your family, and you become a patriot, and it's not safe to be here,' he said. 'I'm saluting President Trump. More power to him to do whatever it takes to secure our nation's capital.' Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), the chair of the Senate Steering Committee, told reporters Tuesday he hoped Democratic mayors from major cities would follow Trump's lead and increase law-enforcement activities. 'I'm optimistic this will show D.C. you can have safety,' he said. 'The first thing I say to everybody when they're coming to D.C. is, 'You better think about where you're staying, you've got to think about every street you're on, you've got to think about you can't be out at night.' Hopefully that will change.' Early polling is mixed on Trump's takeover of the capital's police department and plan to deploy 800 National Guard troops, along with dozens of FBI agents, to step up law enforcement activity around the city. An Aug. 11 YouGov survey of 3,180 U.S. adults found that 47 percent of respondents strongly or somewhat disapproved of Trump's actions, while 34 percent strongly or somewhat approved. But the poll also found that 67 of respondents said that crime in large American cities is a 'major problem' while 23 percent described it as a 'minor problem.' Focusing on crime in Democratic-run cities ​has been a successful political tactic for the president going back to his first term and comes at a time when his approval rating has sunk to 37 percent, according to a recent Gallup poll. Democratic lawmakers slammed Trump's action. Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) asserted 'there are currently no 'special conditions of an emergency nature' in D.C., which the president has to claim in order to take federal control of MPD under the Home Rule Act.' 'This is unprecedented,' he said. Jim McLaughlin, a Republican pollster who has done work for Trump, said that Trump's takeover of the police force and deployment of National Guard is a popular move but argued it's not motivated by politics. 'He's doing it because he thinks it's really important to keep people safe,' he said, noting that crime and law enforcement in major cities was an issue that Trump identified as a top priority when he was thinking about running years before the 2016 presidential election. 'I know there are a lot of people looking at the political angle here, but it's not politics, it's about doing what he thinks is right,' McLaughlin said. 'D.C. is a special place. We have people not just from all over the country but all over the world come to visit D.C., and they should be safe there. 'We've got members of Congress and their staff getting attacked there,' he said, referring to the assault on Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.) in 2023. Trump will have an opportunity to press his demands ahead of next month's government funding deadline, Sept. 30, when Democrats in Congress and advocates for the District will call for the restoration of the funding held back in the March funding deal. 'I can see that being an anomaly in a [continuing resolution],' said a Republican strategist, who suggested that Trump could also request more federal oversight of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) in exchange for funding to hire more police. 'You're working within the confines with what will probably be a' continuing resolution, the strategist said of the expectation that Congress will need to pass a stopgap funding measure to avoid a government shutdown. 'You could do it via a handshake agreement,' the strategist added, referring to concessions Bowser would make in exchange for more federal funding. Bowser 'already opened the door' to a potential deal with the White House, the strategist noted, by acknowledging in a recent statement that beefing up policing in some parts of the city could be a good idea. Bowser at a press conference Monday acknowledged that 'we experienced a crime spike post-COVID' but argued 'we worked quickly to put laws in place and tactics that got violent offenders off our streets and gave our police officers more tools, which is why we've seen a huge decrease in crime.' The mayor pointed out that crime is down compared with 2023 but pledged: 'We're not satisfied, we haven't taken our foot off the gas, and we continue to look for ways to make our city safer.' Bowser met with Attorney General Pam Bondi on Tuesday, a meeting that Bondi called 'productive.' 'I just concluded a productive meeting with DC Mayor Bowser at the Department of Justice. We agreed that there is nothing more important than keeping residents and tourists in Washington, DC, safe from deadly crime,' Bondi posted on social media. Trump on Monday vented his frustrations over no-cash bail and what he views as the lenient treatment of teenagers accused of felony crimes. 'Every place in the country where you have no-cash bail is a disaster,' Trump declared at a White House press conference where he announced a federal takeover of D.C.'s police department and the deployment of 800 National Guard troops to the city's streets. The president called for the District to change its laws to allow for teenagers 14 and older to be prosecuted as adults, complaining of juvenile offenders: 'They are not afraid of Law Enforcement because they know nothing ever happens to them, but it's going to happen now!'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store