logo
Help! A Pickpocket Used My A.T.M. Card, and Citi Won't Cover It.

Help! A Pickpocket Used My A.T.M. Card, and Citi Won't Cover It.

New York Times17-07-2025
Arriving at the Barcelona airport last Sept. 18, I tried to buy a transit card using my Citi business debit Mastercard, keying in my PIN on the machine. But the purchase did not go through, so I used cash. When I arrived at my accommodations, I realized my wallet was missing. So I logged on to my credit card accounts and reported those cards stolen and several recent purchases as fraudulent. That money was eventually refunded. I called Citi to cancel my debit card, alerting the representative that the thief had made two A.T.M. withdrawals of the equivalent of $586.40 each. Citi canceled the card and temporarily credited my account, but the withdrawals later reappeared. In a letter posted to my account, Citi claimed they were valid because 'there was no cash discrepancy for that location on the date in question.' I called Citi multiple times to clear things up, to no avail. Can you help? Michelle, Berkeley, Calif.
It's pretty clear from the documentation you sent along that Citi incorrectly categorized your complaint as a cash-dispensing error rather than a stolen card.
Alas, the A.T.M. in question seemed to dispense cash perfectly for the pickpocket on Sept. 18, so your misunderstood claim was rejected.
After I got in touch with the company, Citi opened an appeal on your case and reversed its decision. You have now been reimbursed $1,172.80.
'We understand how upsetting it is to be the victim of fraud,' said Colin Wright, a Citi spokesman, in an email. 'We have resolved this matter with our client and are using this experience to strengthen how we handle similar cases going forward.'
In what is an ongoing theme in 21st-century life, some human being in some call center somewhere screwed something up. And it's quite frustrating that even after what you say were multiple calls, it took my intervention to correct the error.
There are three broader issues here.
First of all, not all cards are protected equally. Mastercard indeed promises 'zero liability protection' from fraud — but not for corporate cards and certain other categories of business cards. It's also worth noting that in general, prepaid cards often have the weakest protections. Yours was a small-business card, so it was covered.
Second, even a promise of 'zero liability,' a phrase Visa also uses, is not quite zero. You may still be responsible in some cases — say, if your nephew swipes your credit card off the kitchen counter and uses it to order pizza.
Issuers typically require you to exercise a minimum of caution with your physical card, your PIN and your online accounts.
For example, as American Express puts it: 'If you have taken reasonable care to protect your account details, PIN and biometric authentication such as fingerprint, facial and iris recognition, you will not be held responsible for any fraudulent charges.'
Though perhaps you should have been more careful that no one was looking over your shoulder when typing in your PIN in the airport, card companies don't often press that issue. But in past Tripped Up cases, we've seen travelers held accountable for things like not checking to make sure a taxi driver in Paris charged the correct amount.
Although your case went awry, let's step back for a moment to think about how amazing it is that so much protection exists. Anyone who remembers the days when the primary defense against credit card fraud involved a merchant comparing a purchaser's signature with the one on the card should be thankful, even if that means you occasionally have to respond to a text message from your bank after a transaction.
Which brings us to the third issue: what travelers can do to avoid all this hassle in the first place. First, set your alerts so that you get one every time your card is used. Yes, those notifications buzzing in your pocket are a pain, and yes, every time I tap to ride the New York City subway, I check to see if a friend has sent me a vital message or hilarious meme, only to be disappointed when it's just Capital One saying I spent $2.90.
But it's worth it. You need to report fraud within a certain period — it varies depending on the card and type of transaction — so if you wait to comb through a monthly statement, that may be too late. You should also check your credit card apps or websites every few days for fraudulent transactions. It also can't hurt to check what exchange rate you're getting as well.
And when you pay, you should always confirm the total on the payment screen and ask for a receipt, saving those scraps of paper (or emails) at least until your trip is over or you've checked your accounts.
You should also be sure to activate two-step verification, which usually means receiving a code on your phone to confirm you are you, on all your accounts and that when you use public computers for anything personal, you log out fully.
A.T.M. withdrawals call for special precautions. Stick to machines at reputable banks, and avoid any janky-looking devices in convenience stores. I speak from experience here, having battled my bank for months to convince them someone had skimmed my card information and withdrawn over $500.
But again, protections can be surprisingly robust, as long as you do your part and don't get unlucky (as Michelle did). It even turns out that 'in some instances' American Express covers fraudulent card use by family members, as long as the cardholder provides a declaration, an affidavit, and/or a copy of an official police report.' Don't give those sneaky nephews any ideas.
If you need advice about a best-laid travel plan that went awry, send an email to TrippedUp@nytimes.com.
Follow New York Times Travel on Instagram and sign up for our Travel Dispatch newsletter to get expert tips on traveling smarter and inspiration for your next vacation. Dreaming up a future getaway or just armchair traveling? Check out our 52 Places to Go in 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Net Lease Office Properties Declares Special Cash Distribution of $3.10 Per Share
Net Lease Office Properties Declares Special Cash Distribution of $3.10 Per Share

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Net Lease Office Properties Declares Special Cash Distribution of $3.10 Per Share

NEW YORK, Aug. 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Net Lease Office Properties (NYSE: NLOP) reported today that its Board of Trustees has declared a special cash distribution of $3.10 per common share, totaling approximately $45.9 million. The distribution is payable on September 3, 2025 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 18, 2025. For additional information on NLOP — including an investor presentation outlining its strategy and progress to date, its latest quarterly report on Form 10-Q and related filings — please visit the company's website. Net Lease Office Properties Net Lease Office Properties (NYSE: NLOP) is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that owns a portfolio of high-quality office properties primarily leased to corporate tenants on a single-tenant net lease basis. Tenants operate across a variety of industries and the vast majority of properties are located in the U.S., with one property located in Europe. Institutional Investors: 1-212-492-1140institutionalir@ Individual Investors: 1-844-NLO REIT (656-7348)ir@ Press Contact:Anna McGrath1-212-492-1166 View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Net Lease Office Properties Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Lyft misses quarterly revenue estimates on competition, weak US travel demand
Lyft misses quarterly revenue estimates on competition, weak US travel demand

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Lyft misses quarterly revenue estimates on competition, weak US travel demand

(Reuters) -Lyft missed second-quarter revenue estimates on Wednesday, weighed down by intensifying competition with Uber and weakening U.S. travel demand, sending its shares down about 9% in trading after the bell. Larger rival Uber Technologies, which offers ride-hailing, food and grocery delivery business globally, issued an upbeat forecast for the third-quarter earlier in the day, thanks to its efforts to boost engagement across its unified platform. Lyft's revenue of $1.59 billion in the second quarter missed estimates of $1.61 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. The company recently completed its nearly $200 million acquisition of European mobility platform FreeNow and has signed a deal with China's Baidu to introduce the search engine giant's robotaxis in the region. Lyft on Wednesday also announced a partnership, set to launch later this year, with United Airlines that will allow the carrier's customers to earn rewards on all Lyft rides. With partnerships including DoorDash and Chase already in place, Lyft's entry into Europe positions the company to extend such collaborations into international markets. Lyft said it expects gross bookings to be between $4.65 billion and $4.80 billion for the third quarter, well above estimates of $4.59 billion. With growth stagnating in major U.S. metros, ride-hailing companies are shifting their focus to medium and smaller car-dependent cities to tap into new markets and drive revenue. Lyft recorded an adjusted core earnings of $129.4 million in the second quarter, above the average estimate of $124.5 million. It forecast current-quarter core earnings of $125 million to $145 million, largely in line with Wall Street estimates.

Liverpool set to bank €100m for star forward
Liverpool set to bank €100m for star forward

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Liverpool set to bank €100m for star forward

Liverpool always try to get the best deal they can and Richard Hughes is a tough negotiator. Arne Slot has told us in the past about how strategic Liverpool were in their pursuit of him to become their new head coach and all of the right questions were asked to tempt the Dutchman to move. Shop the LFC Store 🚨2025/26 LFC x adidas range🚨 LFC x adidas Shop the home range today! LFC x adidas Shop the goalkeeper range today LFC x adidas Shop the new adidas range today! When it comes to bringing in players, Slot is now one of the main negotiators, showcasing his project for the club and giving players a clear idea of what their involvement would be to bring success. 🔴 Shop the LFC 2025/26 adidas away range In terms of player sales, however, Hughes is still heavily involved and tiny little details in agreements such as sell-on clauses and buy-back clauses are massive for us to keep the upper hand in deals. Luis Diaz to Bayern was a better deal than we thought The Colombian's departure to Bayern Munich was polarising for some fans, given how important he was to the team last season and in general his 22 goal contributions were a reasonable return. But since he was 28 years old and nearing the end of his contract, with Liverpool unwilling to offer him a new deal, the opportunity to sell was not something the Reds could turn down, especially not for the £65m (€75m) package that the Germans offered. It's was an extraordinary deal to agree. Cody Gakpo and up and coming talent Rio Ngumoha will be able to lock-down the left-hand side of the attack this season in his absence and the club's net transfer spend fell massively as a result. Furthermore, new signing Hugo Ekitike has also proved that he can play on the left-wing occasionally, although his main role will be playing as a striker, potentially alongside Alexander Isak.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store