logo
Civil servants lose 3,000 phones and laptops in less than a year

Civil servants lose 3,000 phones and laptops in less than a year

Telegraph01-05-2025

Thousands of government phones and laptops have been lost or stolen under Labour's watch, The Telegraph can reveal.
In just 10 months, more than 3,000 devices have been mislaid or lost to theft, equivalent to 10 per day, raising concerns over sensitive information 'falling into the wrong hands'.
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) was responsible for most of the losses, misplacing nearly 1,000 items, followed by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the Home Office.
The MoD also had 15 USB sticks and 12 computers lost or stolen, while the Department for Transport mislaid four body-worn cameras, The Telegraph's analysis shows.
The latest data suggest the problem is getting worse under Labour, with losses at a higher rate than those recorded in the year to November 2023.
It prompted warnings over possible security breaches as well as a waste of taxpayer money.
The Tories said the figures were 'deeply concerning', while the Lib Dems urged ministers to 'get a grip' on the issue.
A total of 3,166 devices
The Telegraph's findings, based on parliamentary questions submitted by the Tories, show that a total of 3,166 devices have been lost or stolen since Labour took power in July 2024.
That includes 1,687 phones, 1,099 laptops and 380 other items such as iPads, USB sticks and cameras, with a third mislaid by the MoJ alone.
There were 501 devices lost or stolen from the MoD, including 379 phones, 95 laptops, 12 computers and 15 USBs, while the Home Office misplaced 481 items.
The total number could be even higher, with four government departments still not providing figures one week after the deadline for a response.
It equates to roughly 10 losses per day or 315 per month, which suggests an increase in the rate under Labour.
The Telegraph has been unable to find comparable figures for the previous nine months under the Tories.
However, a similar analysis published in November 2023, when the Conservatives were in power, found just over 2,000 devices had been misplaced in 12 months, equivalent to roughly six per day or 170 per month.
Charlie Dewhirst, the shadow Cabinet Office minister, said: 'It's deeply concerning that under Labour's watch, thousands of government-issued electronic devices have gone missing – including the Home Office, a department ironically charge of security – and are all having to be replaced on the taxpayer's dime
'The public deserves assurances from Labour that their money is being managed appropriately, not squandered on civil service negligence.'
Sarah Olney, the Lib Dems' Cabinet Office spokeswoman, said: 'These phones and laptops cost the taxpayer money and may hold sensitive security information and private details that we wouldn't want falling into the wrong hands.
'It's worrying writing on the wall for the Government's resource security higher up the procurement chain, too.
'The Government must urgently get a grip on this rise in phone losses.'
Some departments provided data only for 'lost' items, as requested by the Tories, while others specified that they had included stolen devices. In some cases, the figures included items that have since been recovered.
Devices 'might be found later'
In its response, the MoD said: 'It is important to note that not all of the above incidents have resulted in actual losses or thefts. On some occasions where devices could not be accounted for, they would be reported but may have subsequently been found.
'January and February figures are high due to two incidents submitted by one part of Defence regarding the mustering of assets. Although it appears likely that the cause is poor accounting, the phones are still recorded as losses as this has not been confirmed.
'The discrepancy came to light following the strengthening of accounting processes within that organisation. This new audit process will ensure record keeping and utilisation are carefully managed in future, minimising associated costs and wastage.'
A government spokesman said: 'We take the security of government devices extremely seriously, which is why items such as laptops and mobile phones are always encrypted so any loss does not compromise security.
'As is the case in all organisations, a very small proportion of such devices can be reported lost or stolen every year, with all instances investigated.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opponents of assisted dying vow to fight on as MPs back Bill
Opponents of assisted dying vow to fight on as MPs back Bill

North Wales Chronicle

time3 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Opponents of assisted dying vow to fight on as MPs back Bill

Ms Leadbeater's Bill passed what could be its final Commons hurdle by 23 votes, down from the majority of 55 it secured when MPs first voted on it in November. The Spen Valley MP declared 'thank goodness' after the result while Rebecca Wilcox, daughter of campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen, said it was 'wonderful' the result had come ahead of her mother's birthday. But opponents vowed to fight on against what they called a 'deeply flawed Bill'. A group of 27 Labour MPs who voted against the legislation said: 'We were elected to represent both of those groups and are still deeply concerned about the risks in this Bill of coercion of the old and discrimination against the disabled, people with anorexia and black, Asian and minority ethnic people, who we know do not receive equitable health care. 'As the Bill moves to the House of Lords it must receive the scrutiny that it needs. Not about the principles of assisted dying but its application in this deeply flawed Bill.' But Ms Leadbeater told the PA news agency she hoped there would be no 'funny games' in the Lords, as her Bill faces further tough hurdles in the upper chamber. She added: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.' Meanwhile, one of the leading opponents of the Bill, Conservative Danny Kruger, described its supporters as 'enemies', saying he felt 'like Evelyn Waugh at the time of the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939'. In a series of tweets on Friday night, the East Wiltshire MP accused assisted dying campaigners of being 'militant anti-Christians' who had failed to 'engage with the detail of the Bill'. He added: 'It's the revenge of the middle-aged against their dependents.' Ms Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill will now proceed to the House of Lords, where it will undergo further scrutiny before becoming law, should peers decide to back the legislation. But some peers have already spoken out against the legislation, with the Bishop of London, Dame Sarah Mullally, saying they 'must oppose' the Bill as 'unworkable and unsafe'.

Opponents of assisted dying vow to fight on as MPs back Bill
Opponents of assisted dying vow to fight on as MPs back Bill

Leader Live

time3 hours ago

  • Leader Live

Opponents of assisted dying vow to fight on as MPs back Bill

Ms Leadbeater's Bill passed what could be its final Commons hurdle by 23 votes, down from the majority of 55 it secured when MPs first voted on it in November. The Spen Valley MP declared 'thank goodness' after the result while Rebecca Wilcox, daughter of campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen, said it was 'wonderful' the result had come ahead of her mother's birthday. But opponents vowed to fight on against what they called a 'deeply flawed Bill'. A group of 27 Labour MPs who voted against the legislation said: 'We were elected to represent both of those groups and are still deeply concerned about the risks in this Bill of coercion of the old and discrimination against the disabled, people with anorexia and black, Asian and minority ethnic people, who we know do not receive equitable health care. 'As the Bill moves to the House of Lords it must receive the scrutiny that it needs. Not about the principles of assisted dying but its application in this deeply flawed Bill.' But Ms Leadbeater told the PA news agency she hoped there would be no 'funny games' in the Lords, as her Bill faces further tough hurdles in the upper chamber. She added: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.' Meanwhile, one of the leading opponents of the Bill, Conservative Danny Kruger, described its supporters as 'enemies', saying he felt 'like Evelyn Waugh at the time of the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939'. In a series of tweets on Friday night, the East Wiltshire MP accused assisted dying campaigners of being 'militant anti-Christians' who had failed to 'engage with the detail of the Bill'. He added: 'It's the revenge of the middle-aged against their dependents.' Ms Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill will now proceed to the House of Lords, where it will undergo further scrutiny before becoming law, should peers decide to back the legislation. But some peers have already spoken out against the legislation, with the Bishop of London, Dame Sarah Mullally, saying they 'must oppose' the Bill as 'unworkable and unsafe'.

Opponents of assisted dying vow to fight on as MPs back Bill
Opponents of assisted dying vow to fight on as MPs back Bill

South Wales Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Opponents of assisted dying vow to fight on as MPs back Bill

Ms Leadbeater's Bill passed what could be its final Commons hurdle by 23 votes, down from the majority of 55 it secured when MPs first voted on it in November. The Spen Valley MP declared 'thank goodness' after the result while Rebecca Wilcox, daughter of campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen, said it was 'wonderful' the result had come ahead of her mother's birthday. But opponents vowed to fight on against what they called a 'deeply flawed Bill'. A group of 27 Labour MPs who voted against the legislation said: 'We were elected to represent both of those groups and are still deeply concerned about the risks in this Bill of coercion of the old and discrimination against the disabled, people with anorexia and black, Asian and minority ethnic people, who we know do not receive equitable health care. 'As the Bill moves to the House of Lords it must receive the scrutiny that it needs. Not about the principles of assisted dying but its application in this deeply flawed Bill.' But Ms Leadbeater told the PA news agency she hoped there would be no 'funny games' in the Lords, as her Bill faces further tough hurdles in the upper chamber. She added: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.' Meanwhile, one of the leading opponents of the Bill, Conservative Danny Kruger, described its supporters as 'enemies', saying he felt 'like Evelyn Waugh at the time of the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939'. In a series of tweets on Friday night, the East Wiltshire MP accused assisted dying campaigners of being 'militant anti-Christians' who had failed to 'engage with the detail of the Bill'. He added: 'It's the revenge of the middle-aged against their dependents.' Ms Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill will now proceed to the House of Lords, where it will undergo further scrutiny before becoming law, should peers decide to back the legislation. But some peers have already spoken out against the legislation, with the Bishop of London, Dame Sarah Mullally, saying they 'must oppose' the Bill as 'unworkable and unsafe'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store