Opponents of assisted dying vow to fight on as MPs back Bill
The Spen Valley MP declared 'thank goodness' after the result while Rebecca Wilcox, daughter of campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen, said it was 'wonderful' the result had come ahead of her mother's birthday.
But opponents vowed to fight on against what they called a 'deeply flawed Bill'.
A group of 27 Labour MPs who voted against the legislation said: 'We were elected to represent both of those groups and are still deeply concerned about the risks in this Bill of coercion of the old and discrimination against the disabled, people with anorexia and black, Asian and minority ethnic people, who we know do not receive equitable health care.
'As the Bill moves to the House of Lords it must receive the scrutiny that it needs. Not about the principles of assisted dying but its application in this deeply flawed Bill.'
But Ms Leadbeater told the PA news agency she hoped there would be no 'funny games' in the Lords, as her Bill faces further tough hurdles in the upper chamber.
She added: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.'
Meanwhile, one of the leading opponents of the Bill, Conservative Danny Kruger, described its supporters as 'enemies', saying he felt 'like Evelyn Waugh at the time of the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939'.
In a series of tweets on Friday night, the East Wiltshire MP accused assisted dying campaigners of being 'militant anti-Christians' who had failed to 'engage with the detail of the Bill'.
He added: 'It's the revenge of the middle-aged against their dependents.'
Ms Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill will now proceed to the House of Lords, where it will undergo further scrutiny before becoming law, should peers decide to back the legislation.
But some peers have already spoken out against the legislation, with the Bishop of London, Dame Sarah Mullally, saying they 'must oppose' the Bill as 'unworkable and unsafe'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
11 minutes ago
- Spectator
The Epping tipping point
Yesterday's injunction granted to Epping Forest council giving the government three weeks to stop using the Bell Hotel for asylum seekers on planning grounds is not quite the slam-dunk that it looks. It is theoretically open to appeal: furthermore, it is only an interim measure pending a full trial later this year. But the affair has seriously spooked the government, and rightly so. What worries the Home Office is that it's not only Epping. It seems a safe bet that the contagion will spread fast. As soon as the result was announced, Broxbourne, a nearby Tory council with a similar make-up to Epping, announced that it is contemplating following suit. Nigel Farage has now pledged that the dozen or so authorities under Reform control will all be taking legal advice. And given that we have had similar serious asylum protests in numerous other places up and down the kingdom, from Norfolk to Greater Manchester to Scotland, these authorities may well be joined by more. True, not all such claims will bear fruit. As a matter of boring technical law, the grant of an injunction is a remedy in the discretion of the court. Epping was a strong case. The hotel's owners had continued to block-book it for asylum seekers even after they knew perfectly well about the planning objections; there was at least some evidence that it was a centre of alleged crime; there was big damage to local amenity and a history of continuous protest. Where such arguments are lacking, injunctions may be harder to come by. Indeed, three years earlier authorities in Ipswich and in Hull's commuter belt notably failed to get orders in the face of more discreet, and largely unprotested, use of hotels as asylum hostels. Nevertheless, assuming (as seems likely) that using a hotel as a displaced persons' camp probably does break planning laws, it seems that a fair number of claims will succeed. Today the cases are likely to be strong. The trickle of irregular migrants has become a gushing flood; protest by the just-about-managing is getting more widespread and more understandable; and there are increasingly alarming accounts of crime surrounding places where these migrants are housed. And it only requires a few Epping-style injunctions to tip into crisis a government with thousands of migrants to deal with and nowhere to put them. What will now happen is unclear. A nuclear option would be emergency legislation to bulldoze through continued use of hotels for asylum seekers: but this would be a gift to Reform and destroy most of what popularity this administration has left. For the moment, one suspects that, as security minister Dan Jarvis said earlier this morning, the administration will wait and see while weighing its options. The difficulty is that these options are uncomfortably limited. Whatever happens on the injunction front, whether the government likes it or not, the events at Epping will have long-term and expansive political effects. For one thing, Labour can no longer plausibly ignore the fact that voters, including those who rather unwillingly voted it in last year, have a right to demand answers about immigration. These electors have strong and probably justified doubts about the bona fides of a good many so-called refugees. They see no reason why their resources should support them and they will in no case back any government seen to be weak on the issue. Secondly, Labour's present immigration policy, such as it is, is now untenable. To cut a long story short, Starmer's approach can best be best summed up as saying a great deal while doing very little. Words about 'smashing the gangs' and largely meaningless agreements with the French could be served up to Red Wall voters and White Van Man; private assurances that none of this really meant anything could be invoked to keep Labour left-wingers quiet. But this policy, when looked at closely, actually involved doing little apart from paying more and more public money to put up more and more dubious foreign entrants with neither any limit nor any serious attention to the nation's interests. Post-Epping, one thing is clear. The government must do something to bring migration under control. What? The possibilities are endless. Proper facilities for screening would-be asylum seekers – and measures making it less ridiculously easy for doubtful migrants to disappear into the grey economy and never be seen again – would be a start. Serious thought about doing something about the human rights regime and its effects on migration control, and possible offshoring of applications for asylum, would be even better. At least the Tories tried such things, however incompetently. Labour must now follow suit. If not, it risks a precipitate disappearance into unlamented irrelevance.
Daily Record
11 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Labour MSP arrested and charged in connection with possession of indecent images
Police Scotland have released a statement and Labour have suspended Smyth. A Labour MSP has been charged in connection with the possession of indecent images. Colin Smyth has also been suspended by his party. A Police Scotland spokesperson said: 'On Tuesday, August 5 officers executed a warrant at a property on Marchfield Avenue, Dumfries. 'A 52-year-old man was arrested and charged in connection with possession of indecent images. He is due to appear at Dumfries Sheriff Court at a later date.' Smyth is now listed as an independent on the Holyrood website. A former councillor in Dumfries, Smyth first entered Holyrood as an MSP at the 2016 election after being returned on the South Scotland regional list. He served as Scottish Labour transport spokesman from 2017 to 2021 under the leadership of Richard Leonard. Smyth was appointed the party's spokesman on the constitution and external affairs after Anas Sarwar replaced Leonard as leader. He is a former general secretary of Scottish Labour. This is a breaking news story - we'll bring you updates, pictures and video as it happens. Here you can get your must-see news, features, videos and pictures throughout the day from the Daily Record, Sunday Mail and Record Online. Get all the big headlines, pictures, analysis, opinion and video on the stories that matter to you. You can also check out our social media channels for live updates. Follow us on Twitter @Record_Politics for the latest news. Or you can catch all the action by following our team: @paulhutcheon, @andrewjquinn97 and @dennynews. We're on Facebook where you can join our Record Politics group for all our stories. We also have a weekly politics podcast, Planet Holyrood, which you can listen to Spotify or Apple music, or watch on the Daily Record YouTube channel.
Edinburgh Live
11 minutes ago
- Edinburgh Live
Edinburgh Council leader says sending Cammy Day to represent city 'made perfect sense'
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Sending former council leader Cammy Day to represent Edinburgh to an international delegation earlier this month 'made perfect sense, ' according to the city's leader. Along with fellow Labour councillor James Dalgleish and other city figures, Cllr Day met with 26 visiting councillors from Kaohsiung, Taiwan in Edinburgh. The news came at the city's Policy and Sustainability Committee on Tuesday, where council leader Jane Meagher said she put his name forward due to her being unable to attend. Cllr Day resigned his role as council leader in December last year over allegations he had sent sexual messages to Ukrainian refugees living in the Capital. He was also suspended by the Labour Party, but recently was readmitted to the party and their council group after he was cleared of any criminal behaviour by police in May. SNP councillor Kate Campbell raised questions over why Cllr Day was in attendance, given the 'widespread acknowledgement' that he had carried out inappropriate behaviour. Councillor Meagher said: 'I wasn't available for this, and it seemed to me to be a matter of common sense to include Councillor Day given his historical involvement and knowledge of our friendship agreement with [Kaohsiung]. 'For that reason, it made perfect sense for him to be there, to help smooth the path between Cllr Dalgleish and the delegation, which I gather was extremely powerful and helpful. 'It made perfect sense not to exclude somebody who had done a considerable amount of work in developing this friendship agreement with Taiwan.' Cllr Campbell had also asked about two Edinburgh University representatives in the delegation who had been unable to attend at the last minute due to ill health. She said that she did not doubt that they were unwell, but asked whether a policy of notifying city partners of what councillors may be present at an event would be wise. Council officer Chris Adams, who covers international relationships, said that the two representatives had been unwell, but that he did not have any more information about them. Cllr Meagher added: 'As far as Edinburgh University attendance is concerned, I don't think we can draw any conclusions around their motives for not being able to attend. 'If we think about global politics, it might be that you draw conclusions related to that, rather than to any individuals who might be present.' A large portion of Edinburgh University's student body is from China, which does not recognise Taiwan as an independent country. Mr Adams said Cllr Dalgleish was in attendance at the meeting in his civic duty as a Bailie, a representative of the Lord Provost. And standing in for the Lord Provost, who was unable to attend, was another Bailie, James Douglas. He said the university attendees had been set to discuss the research connections between Edinburgh University and universities in Asia. He also said James McVeigh from Festivals Edinburgh was also in attendance, and that much of the conversation in the meeting was around how Edinburgh handles the festivals. Cllr Meagher said she understood that the discussions were 'extremely powerful and helpful'. Edinburgh has a range of sister city and friendship agreements with cities around the globe, including Krakow, Dunedin, Kyiv and San Diego.
