US Ally Reveals Chinese Military Activity Near American Base
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
China has reportedly dispatched naval vessels to waters near a United States air base in South Korea, as the East Asian power continues to expand its military presence in the contested region.
Newsweek has contacted the Chinese defense and foreign ministries for comment by email.
Why It Matters
South Korea—a U.S. ally that hosts American forces—created the Provisional Measures Zone (PMZ) in the Yellow Sea, where Seoul and Beijing's 230-mile-wide Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) overlap, as the two countries have yet to establish permanent maritime boundaries.
China has recently expanded its military presence in the disputed waters of the Yellow Sea, including repeated deployment of warships and the declaration of "no-sail zones" for war games, raising South Korea's concerns that its neighbor is attempting to alter the status quo.
What To Know
Citing South Korean military data provided to a lawmaker on Tuesday, newspaper Korea JoongAng Daily reported that the Chinese navy deployed ships to "South Korean-controlled waters" in the Yellow Sea approximately 170 times between January and May.
Chinese vessels—equipped with surveillance systems—reportedly sailed within 37 miles of South Korea's territorial waters west of Eocheong Island several times. Waters extending up to 13.8 miles from the coast are considered under South Korean sovereignty.
The Yellow Sea island lies approximately 37 miles from Kunsan Air Base—the home station of the U.S. Air Force's Eighth Fighter Wing—on South Korea's west coast. This places the distance between the base and the Chinese navy's operating location at 88 miles.
"The presence of these sensor-equipped ships suggests that China is likely engaged in some level of intelligence-gathering," a South Korean defense official said, according to the report.
This was the first time South Korea's military has confirmed that Chinese ships operating in the area were equipped with "sea surveillance radars and other reconnaissance technology."
United States fighter jets taxi at Kunsan Air Base in South Korea on December 3, 2017.
United States fighter jets taxi at Kunsan Air Base in South Korea on December 3, 2017.
Senior Airman Colby L. Hardin/U.S. Air Force via Getty Images
The Chinese vessels operating near South Korea are reportedly capable of spying from "hundreds of miles" away, enabling them to monitor flight operations, signal transmissions, and electronic communications at Kunsan Air Base.
What People Are Saying
A South Korean defense official said, according to Korea JoongAng Daily: "While it is difficult to officially assess the intent of another country's military activities, it is presumed that China is seeking to expand its regional influence."
Shin Beom-chul, senior researcher at the Sejong Institute in South Korea, told Korea JoongAng Daily: "It's possible that China is using this as an opportunity to test its expanded naval power, strengthened through its Belt and Road Initiative, and may be targeting U.S. military bases near the Yellow Sea."
What Happens Next
It remains to be seen how South Korea and the U.S. will respond to China's growing naval presence in the Yellow Sea, as they remain preoccupied with countering North Korea's threats.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
30 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Donald Trump Replaced Hillary Clinton's Portrait With Some Questionable "Art" Of Himself
Donald Trump unveiled his extremely large American flag pole on Wednesday. There it is: He also unveiled some new wall art: Reuters White House correspondent Jeff Mason posted that Trump replaced a portrait of former first lady Hillary Clinton with this picture/meme of himself: "That looks really good," this person said. I'm about 100% sure they were kidding lol. Another person compared it to something you'd buy at Spencer's Gifts. This person said it was like the "art" you buy at HomeGoods. And this person joked, "Cornier than my Italian grandma's velvet painting of a crying clown.' The comments don't stop there! This person asked: "They couldn't even go to Framebridge first?" Another person likened it to, "Your dorm when you and your roommate have different styles." And this person said, "They're putting Wildwood T-shirts up at the white house." Snooki's impact. Thoughts on the new art?!
42 minutes ago
After opening success, Israel, US consider endgame in Iran
LONDON -- The repercussions of Israel's surprise campaign against Iran's nuclear program and military leadership launched last Friday were evident within hours. "We are racking up achievements," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said after the opening salvo, which appeared to have devastated Iran's anti-aircraft defense network and decapitated its military, killing many among the top brass, according to Israeli officials. Netanyahu, his top officials and the Israel Defense Forces have made clear some of their war goals -- the destruction of Iran's nuclear program plus the erasure of the country's ballistic missile arsenal. But, as in Israel's operations in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, there are already signs of "rapid mission creep" in Iran, Julie Norman, a senior associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute think tank in the U.K., told ABC News. Iran's weakened defense has prompted fresh questions about "regime change" -- long a priority for Iran hawks in Israel and the U.S. seeking to topple Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the theocratic system he heads. Critics of such a policy, though, warn that government collapse in Iran could unleash regional chaos. "The record of regime change is not great, to say the least," Yossi Mekelberg of the Chatham House think tank in the U.K. told ABC News, warning that the regime's collapse would more likely produce a dangerous power vacuum in Iran than a coherent and pliant successor. "You want to experiment with chaos? Well, good luck," Mekelberg said. The nuclear front Netanyahu faces significant challenges to achieve his two expressed goals -- an end to Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile threats. On the nuclear front, Israel has inflicted damage at several of Iran's key sites. The International Atomic Energy Agency has reported damage to surface facilities at the Natanz and Isfahan enrichment sites. On Tuesday, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said the body "identified additional elements that indicate direct impacts on the underground enrichment halls at Natanz." But Israel does not have the capabilities needed to destroy the Fordow enrichment plant -- where the IAEA says no damage has been reported -- which is built deep inside a mountain outside the city of Qom. Only American strategic bombers could deliver a payload capable of punching through up to 300 feet of mountain to reach the underground facility. Netanyahu is trying to press the White House into intervention. "Today, it's Tel Aviv, tomorrow, it's New York," the prime minister told ABC News Chief Washington Correspondent Jonathan Karl on Monday. Trump responded to Israel's opening attacks by calling for Iran to return to negotiations over its nuclear program. He has since dismissed talk of a ceasefire, said he wants a "real end" to the Iran nuclear issue and warned residents of Tehran -- of whom there are around 17 million in the wider metropolitan area -- to evacuate. On Tuesday, Trump raised the prospect of killing Khamenei and wrote on his social media platform that "we now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran," while lauding the impact of U.S. weaponry. The president has also demanded "unconditional surrender," a concept Iran's supreme leader rejected. Despite Trump's rhetoric, the U.S. has not joined Israel in attacking Iran offensively. Last year the U.S. twice assisted Israel in helping to shoot down Iranian drones and ballistic missiles Iran had launched in retaliation for Israeli attacks in Syria and Tehran. This marked the first time the U.S. actively participated in Israel's defense, which has historically taken the form of weapons sales, transfers and intelligence sharing support. As the conflict escalated this week, the U.S. deployed additional fighter jets and refueling tankers to the Middle East. The USS Nimitz aircraft carrier has also been diverted to the region, to join the USS Carl Vinson carrier which was already deployed there. The deployments, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said, are "intended to enhance our defensive posture in the region." President Trump told top advisers Tuesday that he approved attack plans for Iran that were presented to him, but said he was waiting to see if Iran would be willing to discuss ending their nuclear program and has not made a final decision on US involvement in the conflict, sources familiar with the matter said. The news of the attack plan approval was first reported by the Wall Street Journal. "As President Trump said himself today, all options remain on the table," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday. Without destroying Fordow, Mekelberg said, the job of neutralizing Tehran's nuclear program will be incomplete. "If you want to set it three years back, that is not a good enough reason to go for a war of such scale," he said. "If the idea was to push Iran to the negotiation table and to scare them -- the Iranians are not easily scared. They fought eight years with Iraq in a much inferior situation, and they prevailed. This is not Hezbollah, this is not Hamas, this is not Islamic Jihad." Sina Toossi, a senior non-resident fellow at the Center for International Policy think tank, told ABC News that Israel and the U.S. -- if Trump opts to engage militarily against Iran -- could face a "quagmire." "To verifiably destroy what they've said they want to destroy, they need boots on the ground eventually," Toossi said, referring to Iran's nuclear facilities. Ballistic missiles Erasing Iran's ballistic missile threat is another key goal, Netanyahu has said. The IDF claims to have destroyed at least one-third of Iran's launch vehicles, along with an unknown number of stockpiled missiles. The IDF estimated that Tehran started the conflict with 2,000 missiles and as of Tuesday had fired around 400 toward Israel. The number will have been further eroded by ongoing IDF strikes across the country. "That capacity is going to be weakened," Norman said, though added that Iran has "a pretty deep arsenal, and I think those will keep coming for some time." Toossi noted that American involvement would raise the stakes for Tehran, which still has the capacity to hit American and allied targets in Iraq, across the Persian Gulf and elsewhere. If faced with an existential conflict, "they can inflict a lot of damage in their periphery," Toossi said. As time wears on, the burden on Israeli and U.S. anti-missile systems will grow, Toossi said. Interceptor missiles are finite and expensive, plus their production takes time. "There's an economics to this warfare right now that's not necessarily in the favor of Israel and the U.S.." Toossi said. "I think there's sometimes an overestimation as to how quickly other groups will surrender, or in this case other states will surrender," Norman said of Netanyahu and his government. While Israel sees its conflicts as existential, so do its enemies, Norman added. Regime change Pushing for regime change -- a goal the IDF has explicitly denied and Netanyahu has dodged questions on -- might prove the biggest gamble of Israel's attack, experts told ABC News. Such a policy makes two assumptions, Mekelberg said. "First, that you can bring down the regime, and second, that you'll get the people that you want." Indeed, the 1979 revolution that birthed the Islamic Republic "started with the liberals, not with the religious," Mekelberg said. "Look how it ended." "In any such episode, there is the best case scenario -- which usually doesn't happen -- and there is the worst-case scenario," he said. "And in between, there is the war with its own dynamics and momentum." Even if the regime is at risk of collapse, it would be hard to say when. Israel, Mekelberg said, will need to be prepared for an open-ended war of attrition with levels of destruction inside the country that "people are not used to seeing." Netanyahu has repeatedly appealed to the people of Iran to act against the government in Tehran. "This is your opportunity to stand up," he said over the weekend. But a population under fire may have different priorities. "People are going to be focusing on surviving and getting out, not on starting a revolution," Norman said. Continued attacks may also produce a rallying effect. "Many people do not like the Islamic Republic, the theocracy. But Iranians, despite their disgruntlement with the government, when it comes to Iran, its sovereignty, its stability, its territorial integrity, there's a strong sense of nationalism across the board from secular to religious, to young to old," Toossi said. "And that is really being stirred right now." Skylar Thomson of the Human Rights Activists in Iran NGO -- which is based in the U.S. -- told ABC News there is a "real atmosphere of fear" among Iranians she is in contact with. "In the initial days, people were seeing the assassinations of these Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commanders that were notoriously cruel" and considered "the leading oppressors in their world," Thomson said. But fear and uncertainty have spread as hospitals, residential areas, infrastructure and other non-military targets have been attacked, she added. "You're talking about a population of people that are already struggling because of external matters," Thomson said. "And this is just another layer of that."
Newsweek
43 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Nuclear Attack 'Doomsday Plane' Arrives In Washington
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A U.S. Air Force "Doomsday Plane" arrived at Joint Base Andrews Tuesday night, fueling speculation of a potential U.S. role in the escalating Israel-Iran crisis. The E-4B Nightwatch aircraft landed at the military facility in suburban Washington, D.C., as speculation grows over potential U.S. military action in Iran. Newsweek has contacted the Pentagon for comment by email. Members of the U.S. Air Combat Command Security Forces guard the E-4B Nightwatch plane on September 28, 2013 at Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland. Members of the U.S. Air Combat Command Security Forces guard the E-4B Nightwatch plane on September 28, 2013 at Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland. Jacquelyn Martin-Pool/Getty Images Why It Matters The timing of the E-4B's deployment comes amid heightened tensions as President Donald Trump is reported to be inching closer to ordering military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. While the White House hasn't commented on the aircraft's latest movement, social media users are speculating it signals potential military readiness from the United States. What To Know The E-4B "Nightwatch,"dubbed the "Doomsday Plane" is a militarized Boeing 747. It serves as the National Airborne Operations Center and is a key component of the National Military Command System for the president, the secretary of defense and the joint chiefs of staff. In a national emergency or loss of ground command, the aircraft "provides a highly survivable command, control and communications center to direct U.S. forces, execute emergency war orders, and coordinate actions by civil authorities," the U.S. Air Force said. It was used during the September 11, 2001 attacks. The use of an atypical callsign—"ORDER01" instead of the usual "ORDER6"—fueled speculation about the nature of its current mission. It's unclear whether it latest flight from Barksdale Air Force Base near Bossier City, Louisiana, to Joint Base Andrews was a routine operation, or a precautionary move, but Newsweek previously reported that it is most likely no more than a show of force. The E-4B Nightwatch can remain airborne for extended periods, capable of refueling mid-air. Protected against electromagnetic pulse attacks, and capable of surviving a nuclear blast, the plane is equipped with advanced satellite communications, shielding technologies, and can accomodate more than 100 people "In case of national emergency or destruction of ground command and control centers, the aircraft provides a highly survivable command, control and communications center to direct U.S. forces, execute emergency war orders, and coordinate actions by civil authorities," the U.S. Air Force said. The aircraft's arrival coincided with reports that Trump is considering military action against Iran's nuclear facilities. The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that the president privately approved operational attack plans while stopping short of authorizing an attack. Multiple sources said Trump remains undecided about launching strikes, amid doubts over whether American Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bombs could destroy Iran's deeply buried and heavily fortified Fordow nuclear plant near the city of Qom. Meanwhile, Israel and Iran are exchanging air and missile strikes, intensifying already-severe regional tensions. Senior officials told numerous outlets, including CNN, that Trump is less convinced by diplomatic options and increasingly open to military intervention. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump told reporters on Wednesday: "I'm not looking to fight. But if it's a choice between fighting and [Iran] having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do, and maybe we won't have to fight." Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Iran, said in a public address: "The Americans should know that any U.S. military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage. The U.S. entering in this matter is 100 percent to its own detriment. The damage it will suffer will be far greater than any harm that Iran may encounter." What Happens Next The foreign ministers of Germany, France and Britain have scheduled nuclear talks in Geneva on Friday with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, according to Reuters.
