logo
Alarm as Donald Trump 'throws a grenade' at crucial defence deal with UK

Alarm as Donald Trump 'throws a grenade' at crucial defence deal with UK

Daily Mirror21 hours ago

The future of the crucial AUKUS deal - which sees the UK work with the US and Australia on nuclear submarines - has been thrown into doubt by the White House
Donald Trump has sparked fears he could pull out of a crucial defence deal with the UK and Australia.
The unpredictable US President is understood to have ordered a review into an agreement to build a new generation of nuclear-powered attack submarines. It will be headed by defence official Elbridge Colby, who has previously described himself as "sceptical" of the AUKUS partnership.

The trio of nations reached the agreement in 2021, saying they would work together on advanced defence technology.

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds branded it a "first class" partnership. He told a press gallery lunch in Westminster: "The US is reviewing a lot of its international relationships, whether those are with multilateral bodies or agreements like that.
"AUKUS is, on both the defence and industrial level, a genuinely first class agreement of how we treat each other's suppliers and the supply chain, and what outcome we're seeking to do and the level of collaboration.
"So I would have a lot of confidence in anyone looking at the various bits of that agreement and saying that it is an incredibly strong and important agreement for the future.
"So US colleagues want to look at it? Okay, that's their right to do so.
"I think it is an incredibly compelling and strong agreement. When they look at it, I'm pretty certain they'll be in agreement."

A No10 spokesman played down the likelihood of US withdrawal, branding AUKUS "one of the most strategically important partnerships in decades". He added: "It is understandable that a new administration would want to review its approach to such a major partnership, just as the UK did last year.
"The UK will continue to work closely with the US and Australia at all levels to maximise the benefits and opportunities which AUKUS presents for our three nations."
The Liberal Democrats said the US' decision to launch a review had "thrown another grenade into our security partnership" and urged the PM to "develop contingency plans".
Helen Maguire, the party's defence spokeswoman, said: "Even in the face of an imperial Putin and the rising threat posed by China, this White House simply can't be relied upon to support our collective defence. Our national security demands that we ramp up talks with our Commonwealth friends and work to plug the gap that the US is threatening to leave in European and global security."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump demands a ‘Thank You' from Newsom after appeals court delays bid to boot military from Los Angeles
Trump demands a ‘Thank You' from Newsom after appeals court delays bid to boot military from Los Angeles

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump demands a ‘Thank You' from Newsom after appeals court delays bid to boot military from Los Angeles

President Donald Trump said California Governor Gavin Newsom should be 'thanking' him for calling in the National Guard in Los Angeles after an appeals court ruling delayed the military being used to help stop anti-ICE protests. A U.S. District Judge ruled Trump's deployment of National Guard troops in LA was 'illegal' and violated the Tenth Amendment, and that troops had to leave. But a late-night decision by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dealt a blow to Newsom and delayed the implementation of the lower court order. 'Incompetent Gavin Newscum should have been THANKING me for the job we did in Los Angeles, rather than making sad excuses for the poor job he has done,' Trump raged on Truth Social Thursday evening. 'If it weren't for me getting the National Guard into Los Angeles, it would be burning to the ground right now!' For now, Trump will maintain control of the National Guard in LA after the court rulings. Before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals intervened, Newsom had touted the district judge's decision as a win. 'The court just confirmed what we all know — the military belongs on the battlefield, not on our city streets,' Newsom wrote in a statement on X. 'This win is not just for California, but the nation. It's a check on a man whose authoritarian tendencies are increasing by the day.' Newsom and Trump have been trading barbs all week. The governor raised concerns about Trump's mental acuity Thursday, saying the president fabricated details of a conversation about federalizing the state's National Guard. The military said that by Friday evening, a battalion of 700 Marines is expected to join the National Guard in Los Angeles to protect ICE agents conducting immigration raids. After a week of unrest, more protests against the Trump administration's ongoing workplace raids erupted in Southern California and across the nation, which are expected to continue through the weekend, aligning with the president's birthday parade.

Liverpool agree potential British record deal for Florian Wirtz
Liverpool agree potential British record deal for Florian Wirtz

North Wales Chronicle

time44 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Liverpool agree potential British record deal for Florian Wirtz

The Reds had two bids rejected, the last one of £113m which would have seen £100m paid up front with performance-related add-ons, but have finally got the deal over the line. Liverpool will still pay an initial £100m – comfortably surpassing their own record outlay – but the performance-related add-ons, if achieved, would make it a potential British record. Leverkusen had valued the 22-year-old Germany international around £125m but regardless, Liverpool's overall outlay could surpass the £115m Chelsea paid Brighton in 2023 for Moises Caicedo – who turned down Anfield after the Seagulls had accepted an offer which was subsequently matched by their Premier League rivals. Striker Darwin Nunez was their previous record signing in 2022, although they have not paid the full £85m as he has not met all the requirements for certain add-ons to be due. Liverpool, like a number of top European clubs, had been watching Wirtz for some time but did not consider themselves front-runners for his signature. However, after Manchester City pulled out, reportedly due to the spiralling costs of the whole package, and Wirtz expressed a preference for Merseyside over Bayern Munich, sporting director Richard Hughes changed gear. Talks were already ongoing with Leverkusen over Jeremie Frimpong, who became the first new addition to Arne Slot's squad in a £30m deal late last month, which made the line of communication easier. Hughes' connections with his former club Bournemouth mean he was also well-placed to progress talks with the Cherries over the signing of left-back Milos Kerkez, a player he originally brought to the Premier League. The full extent of Wirtz's fee will only be paid if Liverpool enjoy a sustained level of elite success and the club's view is that should that be the case, the considerable cost will have been recouped on the pitch. With Kerkez next on the list their summer spending could edge close to £200m, made possible by financial discipline in the last two windows which saw only Federico Chiesa brought in for a cut-price £10m last August. That approach was justified when Slot's team won the title but with their rivals strengthening it was apparent additions were required in certain areas. It is likely to be their biggest summer window since 2018 when Naby Keita, Fabinho, Xherdan Shaqiri and Alisson Becker were recruited for around £170m, with Virgil van Dijk having signed for £75m the previous January. Owners Fenway Sports Group have, despite their 'Moneyball' reputation, not been afraid to splash out big fees for transformative players like Van Dijk and Alisson – and Wirtz, one of the hottest prospects in Europe, falls into that category. The fact the forward, who only turned 22 a month ago, opted for Anfield over more lucrative offers from other European clubs is also seen as validation of the work Slot has done and the squad he already has at his disposal.

Israel strike puts all eyes on Hormuz and $100 oil
Israel strike puts all eyes on Hormuz and $100 oil

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Israel strike puts all eyes on Hormuz and $100 oil

LONDON, June 13 - Israel's strikes on Iran on Friday have raised the prospect of global oil prices hitting $100 a barrel. If Tehran seeks to escalate the conflict by retaliating beyond Israeli borders, it could seek to choke off the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important gateway for oil shipping. Israel launched a wave of strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders, prompting Iran to launch drones against Israel. It is likely the two archenemies will continue to exchange blows in the coming days. Oil prices soared by more than 8% to $75 a barrel on Friday on the news. The United States has sought to distance itself from the Israeli strikes while President Donald Trump urged Iran to return to their bilateral nuclear talks. While Tehran may strike Israel with additional drones or ballistic missiles, it could also opt to target the Middle East military facilities or strategic infrastructure of the United States and its allies such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. This could include oil and gas fields and ports. Of course, the most sensitive point Tehran could target is the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow shipping lane between Iran and Oman. About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait, or roughly 20 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil, condensate and fuel. If that scenario played out, it would likely push oil prices sharply higher, very possibly into triple-digit territory, as OPEC members Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq export most of their crude via the strait, mainly to Asia. To be sure, an Iranian strike in the Gulf risks drawing a response from the United States and its regional allies, dramatically escalating the conflict and stretching Iran's military capabilities. But Iran has been heavily weakened over the past year, particularly following Israel's successful campaign against Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militants in Lebanon. With its back to the wall, Tehran could see an attack now as a deterrent. The U.S. military and its regional allies will obviously seek to protect the Strait of Hormuz against an Iranian attack. But Iran could use small speed boats to block or seize tankers and other vessels going through the narrow shipping lane. Iran's Revolutionary Guards have seized several western tankers in that area in recent years, including a British-flagged oil tanker in July 2024. However, any Iranian efforts to block the strait, or even delay transport through it, could spook energy markets and lead to disruptions in global oil and gas supply. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have sought in the past to find ways to bypass the Strait of Hormuz, including by building more oil pipelines. Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil exporter, sends some of its crude through the Red Sea pipeline that runs from the Abqaiq oilfield in the east into the Red Sea port city of Yanbu in the west. The Saudi Aramco-operated pipeline has a capacity of 5 million bpd and was able to temporarily expand its capacity by another 2 million bpd in 2019. It is used mostly to supply Aramco's west coast refineries. Saudi Arabia also exported 1.5 million bpd of oil from its west coast ports in 2024, including 839,000 bpd of crude, according to data from analytics firm Kpler. The UAE, which produced 3.3 million bpd of crude oil in April, has a 1.5 million bpd pipeline linking its onshore oilfields to the Fujairah oil terminal that is east of the Strait of Hormuz. But even the western route could be exposed to attacks from the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, who have severely disrupted shipping through the Suez Canal in recent years. Diverting oil away from the Strait of Hormuz would be more difficult for Iraq and Kuwait, which only have coastlines on the Gulf. One factor that could keep a lid on crude prices, however, is that these heightened Middle East tensions come at a time of ample global oil supply. Rising production in the United States, Brazil, Canada, Argentina and other non-OPEC countries has reduced the global market share of the Middle East in recent years. This could help mitigate if not fully offset any supply disruption. Additionally, any serious disruption to oil supplies in the Middle East would also likely prompt the International Energy Agency to trigger the release of strategic reserves. Investors have often shrugged off Middle East tensions in recent years, believing that the potential for a truly regional clash is limited. They may do so again, particularly if this strike pushes Iran back to the negotiating table with the U.S. over Tehran's nuclear program. But crude prices are apt to be volatile in the coming days as traders seek to get a handle on where this conflict is heading. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X., opens new tab

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store