German parties' election pledges on defence
BERLIN, Feb 13 (Reuters) - Germany holds elections on February 23, with its army's battle-readiness less than when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022 - a precarious position as Europe faces a new geopolitical era under U.S. President Donald Trump read more .
The conservative Christian Democrats (CDU) led by Friedrich Merz are expected to win, but there are wide divisions between some parties on defence. Here is a summary of parties' plans for the armed forces and for German policy on the conflict in Ukraine.
CDU/CSU
* Help Europe defend itself but anchor it firmly in the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO)
* Defence spending at least 2% of gross domestic product (GDP), the current NATO target
* Re-introduce military service, which was suspended under a previous CDU government in 2011
* Create an internal market in the European Union for defence goods with common export rules
* Streamline defence procurement processes
* Merz conditionally supports equipping Ukraine with longer-range Taurus missiles, a step the current government has not taken, but there is no explicit commitment in the manifesto
SPD
* Defence spending at minimum 2% of GDP
* Modernise the armed forces
* Leader Olaf Scholz in 2022 launched the European Sky Shield Initiative (ESSI) of joint procurement for air defence. It was opposed by France
* Station U.S. medium-range weapons in Germany, a move strongly opposed by Russia
* Develop Germany further as a hub for NATO logistics
* Station a German brigade permanently on NATO's eastern flank in Lithuania
* Introduce voluntary military service
* Maintain diplomatic, military, financial and humanitarian support for Ukraine, and support a bilateral security agreement signed in 2024
* Send military aid to Ukraine with a policy of "prudence and judgment" but make sure Germany does not become a party to conflict with Russia
* Do not equip Ukraine with Taurus missiles
* Establish a European defence union, with joint procurement, manoeuvres and standardised training
GREENS
* Germany and Europe to take greater responsibility for their own security
* Lift military spending beyond 2% of GDP through more state borrowing. Leader Robert Habeck has suggested 3.5%
* Voluntary military service
* Streamline European defence through joint development, production and procurement
* Equip Ukraine with Taurus missiles, though the manifesto does not make an explicit commitment
FDP
* Germany and Europe to take greater responsibility for their own security
* Defence spending at least 2% of GDP but raise it if NATO lifts its target
* Explicit manifesto equipment for immediate delivery of Taurus missiles to Ukraine
* Make Germany's military the strongest conventional armed forces in Europe
* Improve funding and equipment for the military, with attractive salaries and benefits
* Reject re-introduction of general conscription but maintain a professional volunteer army
* Keep a national database of men and women fit for military service
AFD
* Prioritise national sovereignty over EU centralisation
* Re-introduce compulsory military service
* German military be run on traditions and "German values"
* Immediately lift sanctions on Russia
* Halt arms deliveries to Ukraine
* Keep Ukraine a neutral state outside of the EU and NATO
* Reject the eastern expansion of the EU and NATO
BSW
* Against Germany meeting NATO's 2% spending target or higher
* No use of special funds or more state borrowing to fund the army
* No re-introduction of conscription
* Go for immediate ceasefire in Ukraine without pre-conditions
* No more taxpayer money for weapons to Ukraine
* Reject the use of military force to solve conflicts
* Create a European security structure that includes Russia
* Stop stationing nuclear weapons in Germany
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Hope is not a strategy': Why Nato is calling for Cold War levels of defence spending
Nato chief Mark Rutte has called for a 400 per cent boost to air and missile capabilities and his demand to raise defence spending across the alliance to five per cent has raised the voices of doom to a scream. A return to Cold War levels of defence spending is not, however an hysterical plea from a lackey of the military-industrial complex. It is a sad acknowledgement that the peace dividend that came with the collapse of the Soviet Union has been squandered by the West in a pointless war in Afghanistan and a criminal conflict in Iraq which expanded the lists of peoples with a good reason to hate democracy. But there were plenty around already. Vladimir Putin is one of them, Xi Jinping is another – Donald Trump is rushing to their ranks. Autocracy is on the rise around the world while democracies have been consumed by complacency. 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe,' said Rutte, who called for Nato to become a 'stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance'. 'The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defence. The fact is, we must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full. 'The fact is, danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends.' He's right, of course. But he is the secretary general of a military alliance. He is banging the drum for more money because he wants to see the return to the days when MAD, Mutually Assured Destruction, was the sword that hung over every head on the planet. In the bad old days, nuclear war was the horror that kept the peace between the superpowers. They pursued their rivalries through proxies – often in Africa. Marxist Mozambique, Angola, and Ethiopia endured civil wars for decades while western-backed rebels battled the Moscow-backed governments from the 60s to the 80s. Sometimes, as in Vietnam and Korea, the west sent its forces into war – but overwhelmingly the suffering for the ideological schism that split the world was in what was then known as the Third World. In South America, CIA-baked coups removed leaders who were deemed too 'commie-inclined' by Washington where republicans and democrats were terrified of reds getting under beds in their back yards. Kennedy's clash with Khrushchev came close to WW3 during the Cuban Missile Crisis. But it was the ability of the West to outspend the Soviet Union that brought the Iron Curtain down on the Soviet Empire. The Soviets spent between 10 and 20 per cent of GDP on the military while Nato was spending half that. Moscow depended on high oil process for its economic wellbeing while its collectivisation of farming and industrial policies stifled innovation. When oil crashed from $120/barrel to the mid $20s/barrel in the 1980s, the social and political necessity for reform became overwhelming. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Russia is estimated to spend at least 7.2 per cent of its GDP on the military, but this does not account for social welfare payments or the costs of administering the occupied territories in Ukraine. A cheap option for Putin in splitting the attention of the West has been to encourage semi-autonomous private military companies to operate in north Africa – like the proxies of the Cold War. Groups like Wagner have expanded their operations in Mali, Niger, from the Sahel to Khartoum, drawing resources and focus away from Ukraine. But in Europe, Rutte said, Nato seems to be no match for Russia. 'Our militaries also need thousands more armoured vehicles and tanks, millions more artillery shells, and we must double our enabling capabilities, such as logistics, supply, transportation and medical support,' he said. Cuts in military spending after the Cold War ended were based on the assumption that a western-style way of life would be adopted in Russia. But the country largely fell into gangsterism and is seen by many there to have been rescued by Putin's more organized oligarchic kleptocracy underpinned by vigorous Soviet-style fear and denunciation of 'The West'. It may be a Moscow myth that Nato covets the Russian Federation but it is one that is believed widely in Putin's realm. That the West is somehow always going to be safe for democracy is an equally dangerous delusion, Rutte suggested. 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. We cannot dream away the danger… Hope is not a strategy. So Nato has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.' In the UK, Sir Keir Starmer has committed to spend 2.5 per cent of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3 per cent over the next parliament, a timetable which could stretch to 2034. But this is well short of what is needed, according to the Nato chief. Mr Rutte's visit to the UK comes after he proposed members of the bloc spend 5 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) on defence as part of a strengthened investment plan for the alliance. The target would require nations to raise core defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, while the remaining 1.5 per cent to be made up of "defence-related expenditure". Nato leaders will meet in The Hague later this month, when the 5 per cent spending target by 2035 will be discussed. The leaders gathered in the Hague will all agree that more must be spent. Few, if any, will know how to sell that idea to their voters.
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Democrats have a dirty secret - they actually like some of the tax cuts in Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
Some of the sweeping tax cuts proposed in President Donald Trump 's massive spending package have found support among Democrats — even as they are expected to oppose the legislation over proposed cuts to Medicaid and other government services when it comes up for debate in the Senate later this month, according to a new report. The gargantuan budget package, which House Republicans and the White House have dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed the House by a single vote last month and is now drawing heat from fiscal hawks in both chambers as well as Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who was fresh off his months-long stint as a special government employee when he began threatening to back challengers to any legislator who votes for the bill. Still, there are facets of the proposal that have appeal for some Democrats, the New York Times reports. Virginia Rep. Don Beyer, a Democrat who is also a wealthy car dealership owner, told the Times his party is 'in general very much in favor of reducing taxes on working people and the working poor' when asked about Trump's plan to end taxes on service workers' tips. 'Those people are living on tips,' he added. Trump's tip tax cut plan has also attracted attention from Sen. Jacky Rosen of Nevada, a state where service workers make up a large and powerful voting bloc that has traditionally supported Democrats but shifted to Trump in large numbers during the 2024 presidential election, handing him the Silver State's electoral votes. Rosen, a Democrat, took to the Senate floor last month to advance a bill approving Trump's 'no tax on tips' plan. It passed unanimously even though the measure was largely symbolic because the U.S. constitution requires tax laws to originate in the House 'I am not afraid to embrace a good idea, wherever it comes from,'. she said at the time in remarks on the Senate floor. Yet despite the support for some of the individual tax provisions in the plan, it's highly unlikely that it will be able to muster enough if any Democrats to ease the way to Trump's desk, even under a Senate procedure known as budget reconciliation, which fast-tracks some types of spending legislation without subjecting it to the upper chamber's de facto 60-vote threshold for passage. Democrats are expected to unanimously vote against the legislation in the upper chamber, where it has also attracted opposition from some Republicans who've complained that the cuts to spending in the package don't go far enough to offset the reduced revenue caused by provisions meant to enact Trump campaign promises to end taxes on tips for service workers, as well as taxes on overtime pay for hourly workers and on social security benefits for seniors. Nonpartisan experts such as those at the Congressional Budget Office have warned that the reduced tax receipts would blow a massive hole in the federal budget and jeopardize America's long-term fiscal outlook, but that hasn't stopped some prominent Democrats from getting behind the individuals tax cuts. Trump and his allies hope the prominent tax cut proposals will blunt Democrats' efforts to paint the One Big Beautiful Bill Act as a giveaway to wealthy GOP donors that will gut government services while only providing limited relief for working-class voters. To that end, the president and others in his camp have routinely taken to social media to argue that anyone who votes against the bill is effectively voting for tax increases because the legislation makes permanent a number of temporary tax cuts enacted in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which Trump signed into law during his first term. Democrats, meanwhile, remain opposed to the bill's massive cuts to Medicare and other measures that make it harder for people to claim tax credits meant to boost lower-income Americans' bottom lines. Rep. Brad Schneider, an Illnois Democrat, told the Times that the whole bill had to be considered rather than any individual provision or provisiosn. 'Any one thing — a tax credit or a tax cut — might make sense, but you've got to take a look at the whole picture,' he said.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Newsom mocked for posting 'war room' photo during LA protests
California Governor Gavin Newsom is under fire after posting a 'war room' style photo of officials meeting while Los Angeles was being torched by rioters. Thousands of demonstrators took to the streets of LA for a third day on Sunday to protest President Donald Trump 's crackdown on illegal immigration. Rioters looted downtown businesses, blocked off a major freeway, set self-driving cars on fire and wreaked havoc on the city. Newsom, however, was meeting with state emergency officials, LA police and the LA County Sheriff's Department as the chaos unfolded. Sharing a photo of the meeting on social media, he said authorities had gathered to 'respond to protests provoked by chaos from Washington'. The Democrat further blamed the president for the riots, saying: 'We're here to keep the peace - not play into Trump's political games.' But his remark was quickly met with backlash as outraged citizens branded him a 'clown' and begged him to 'stop escalating the situation'. But social media users blasted Newsom and his war room crew for seemingly doing nothing while the city descended into chaos. 'Looks like you're there for the photo op,' one posted to X. 'This clown thought it was a good idea to show him in his control room with two televisions broadcasting his streets on fire,' echoed another. 'You probably have no idea what to do so "let's take a photo and release it",' added another. Newsom was also slammed for placing blame on Trump when state and local officials were 'absolutely failing at keeping the peace'. 'Blaming ICE for the riots for simply doing their job? You're a disgrace,' one X user wrote. Another echoed: 'People choose to commit crimes. DC didn't make them do it. That's the problem with Democrats. You never accept responsibility for your actions.' 'You are trash. This isn't the result of "Washington." This is the result of your failed leadership and failed policies. You have destroyed California!' added another. 'If you're not here to play political games, why the bit about "protests provoked by chaos from Washington"? Sounds like you're playing political games,' one said. Others urged Newsom to 'resign immediately', with some even going as far as calling for his arrest. 'Says he's not here to play political games, plays political games,' on X user wrote. 'Gavin you should be in jail.' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass also blamed the Trump administration for inciting tension by sending in the National Guard and condemned protesters who became violent. 'I don't want people to fall into the chaos that I believe is being created by the administration completely unnecessarily,' she told a press conference Sunday. Trump has demanded that both Newsom andBass apologize for the riots, insisting that those involved were not 'peaceful protesters' as the duo had claimed. Newsom said he requested the Trump administration to withdraw its order to deploy 2,000 troops in Los Angeles County, calling it unlawful. He said in an interview with MSNBC that Trump 'has created the conditions' around the protests and accused the president of trying to manufacture a crisis and of violating California's state sovereignty. He called Trump's order 'serious breach of state sovereignty' and demanded the president to rescind the order and 'return control to California'. He urged protesters to stay peaceful and warned that those who instigate violence will be arrested, saying on social media: 'Don't take Trump's bait.' Newsom also accused Trump of 'putting fuel on this fire' and vowed to to sue his administration over the deployment. 'Commandeering a state's National Guard without consulting the Governor of that state is illegal and immoral,' he said on X. 'California will be taking him to court .' Earlier on Sunday, about a dozen National Guard members, along with Department of Homeland Security personnel, pushed back a group of demonstrators outside a federal building in downtown Los Angeles, video showed. The US Northern Command said 300 members of the California National Guard had been deployed to three spots in the Los Angeles area. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told CBS program 'Face the Nation' that the National Guard would provide safety around buildings to people engaged in peaceful protest and to law enforcement. Police declared all of downtown Los Angeles to be an unlawful assembly area Sunday night and ordered protesters to go home after a third day of violence. The unrest in Los Angeles has become a major flashpoint in Trump's signature effort to clamp down on illegal immigration. He calls the protesters insurrectionists. The president has pledged to deport record numbers of people who are in the country illegally and to lock down the US-Mexico border, setting the border enforcement agency ICE a daily goal of arresting at least 3,000 migrants. Several self-driving cars from Alphabet's Waymo were set ablaze on a downtown street on Sunday evening. Los Angeles police said some protesters had thrown concrete projectiles, bottles and other items at police. Police declared several rallies to be unlawful assemblies and later extended that to include the whole downtown area. Officers on horseback tried to control the crowds, but demonstrators shouted 'shame on you!' and appeared to throw objects at the officers, footage showed. One group even blocked the 101 Freeway, a major downtown thoroughfare. McDonnell said Sunday evening that people had a right to protest peacefully but the violence he had seen by some was 'disgusting' and the protests were getting out of control. Police said they had arrested 10 people on Sunday and 29 the previous night, adding arrests were continuing. In a social media post on Sunday, Trump called the demonstrators 'violent, insurrectionist mobs' and said he was directing his cabinet officers 'to take all such action necessary' to stop what he called riots. Despite Trump's language, he has not invoked the Insurrection Act, an 1807 law that empowers a president to deploy the US military to suppress events like civil disorder. Asked on Sunday whether he was considering doing so, he said, 'It depends on whether or not there's an insurrection.' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Saturday the Pentagon is prepared to mobilize active-duty troops 'if violence continues' in LA, saying Marines at nearby Camp Pendleton were on high alert.
