Northampton homeless charity fears closure over funding dispute
Charlie Hastie, the cabinet member for housing, said: "The council has been working over a long period to try to address anomalies in the housing benefits claims made for NAASH properties and the tenants that live there."Housing benefit is governed by nationally set regulations, and where evidence cannot be provided to support claims that have been put in then we are not able to pay benefit."This is also true of historic payments which if, upon review, are not supported by the required evidence also have to be recovered as overpayments."The council has no choice in this matter as the government both sets the regulations and will not pay the council to meet these costs if they do not comply with the regulations."The charity, which has been supporting homeless people since 2000, does not own its housing and mostly rents rooms in houses of multiple occupation (HMOs).
'Time critical'
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), which administers housing benefit, said it could not comment on the case.It said: "We support over a million people through housing benefit every year, which is managed and administered by local authorities."Local authorities decide if a customer is eligible for the benefit, applying DWP rules to ensure the right support is going to the right place."In a statement, the trustees of NAASH said: "All those supported [by the charity] are people who need accommodation assistance and support, and have been recommended by West Northants Council and formerly Northampton Borough Council."Negotiations continue with [the council] but the timing is now critical. Unless resolved immediately, NAASH will have to close."
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
Rutland County Council leader survives no confidence vote
The leader of Rutland County Council has survived a confidence vote held during a special meeting of the Waller, a Liberal Democrat who has led the council since elections in 2023, was the subject of a vote of no confidence brought by the Conservative vote came amid an uncertain future for the authority, with upcoming local government changes potentially threatening its existence.A total of eight councillors voted in favour of the motion of no confidence at Tuesday's meeting, while 14 voted against and two members abstained. 'Continuity and stability' An overhaul of local government proposed by Labour could see smaller district councils merged with county councils to create single bodies, known as unitary authorities, representing populations of about 500, only has a population of about 40,000, meaning it could lose its independent status if the changes are issue has been the subject of a number of public meetings, some arranged by Rutland and Stamford's Conservative MP Alicia told the meeting she is in "further discussions" with neighbouring councils about what their plans are and how it would affect Rutland. County councillor Lucy Stephenson, who brought the no-confidence motion, said she and her colleagues were "using our constitutional rights to speak out".She said Waller "has persisted in her position" without consulting constituents, and called for Rutland residents to have a say in the county's future."Local government reorganisation will impact how our services are designed and delivered," she said."The independence of Rutland could be lost - it must not be confused with devolution."As well as discussing the future of the county, councillors clashed over how they felt the leader was running denied ignoring residents, but said the decision on the county's future was out of their hands, and said she had to base her actions on advice from council defended her record, claiming her Lib Dem-led administration had improved the authority's finances to a point where they may be able to freeze council tax for the first time in a told the meeting residents would be best served by her remaining in position."Negotiations with our neighbours are continuing, and so at this delicate time it would be an advantage for Rutland to have continuity and stability," she said."Make no mistake, the white paper and subsequent bill gives neither Rutland councillors nor Rutland residents any say as to what happens to us."The decision and the power lies with ministers - all any of us can do is to try and influence that decision."
Telegraph
4 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Prince no more? How William could strip Andrew of his title
The mechanisms open to a future King William to go further are more extensive than is generally reported. He has the option to decline to invite his uncle to his future Coronation. It would be headline news, but there is a precedent: the Duke of Windsor was excluded from both George VI and Elizabeth II's in the rather different circumstances of living in exile after abdication. A king can, in certain circumstances, remove the Order of the Garter, which is in the monarch's personal gift. Parliament has greater powers – it can remove the Dukedom via legislation. A private members' bill to 'give the Monarch powers to remove titles', mooted in 2022 after the people of York argued they did not want to be associated with the Duke, fell flat. But a government bill to do the same job would doubtless fare much better. Should another attempt, with the heft of the government behind it, be more successful, Prince Andrew's name could eventually be struck off the Roll of the Peerage where it is currently listed under 'York'. In any case, the disgrace now associated with Prince Andrew makes it all but certain that his Dukedom will fall into abeyance when he dies. Upon his death, the title the Duke of York will revert to the Crown. It would customarily be bestowed on the monarch's second son, where the time is right. But a grown-up Prince Louis is far more likely to become Duke of Edinburgh. In agreement with the Palace, Prince Andrew has already stopped using the style of His Royal Highness. But that can be removed via Letters Patent – an ornate but relatively straightforward document issued on the advice of ministers and signed by the king. One such Letters Patent, issued by George V in 1917, decreed that 'the children of any Sovereign of the United Kingdom and the children of the sons of any such Sovereign and the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales' shall be called Prince or Princess, with the HRH style. Thus Prince Andrew, the son of a monarch when he was born, is a Prince. But, should it be considered necessary, a new Letters Patent could change that, too. But, says a source, such a 'big deal' would best happen through legislation. 'If there was a serious move to take [a title] away, particularly at that level, you do it through both houses [of Parliament],' they added. None of this, one source emphasises, can be done at the whim of a king; the government is required to take action. But whether it is King Charles acting out of necessity in the near future or his son deciding to lance the boil in years to come, the combined brains of Buckingham Palace and Downing Street could find a way. 'Is it likely at this point?' one source says. 'No. But is it possible? Yes.' One way for this to come to a head now, suggests Wilson, would be if MPs raise questions about Prince Andrew's time as a trade ambassador, in the context of examining potential misuse of public funds. Any serious findings would mean 'Charles could act in the best interests of preserving the monarchy'. 'The Royal family is in a fragile state,' he adds. 'Arguably in worse shape than during the Abdication when at least the problem got solved fast. 'Here we have seen a terrible shredding process going on, which downgrades our principal institution and sooner or later will render it an international laughing-stock unless something is done, quickly.' For a Royal family on their summer holidays, renewed headlines about the Duke of York could not be less welcome. The conversations over the Balmoral breakfast table could get interesting.
Sky News
29 minutes ago
- Sky News
Delay biometric visa checks for 80 Gaza students, dozens of MPs urge UK government
More than 70 MPs have signed a letter asking the government to delay biometric checks for 80 students from Gaza so they can study in Britain, Sky News can reveal. Labour MPs Abtisam Mohamed and Barry Gardiner are leading the charge, asking Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to defer the requirement, so the students can take up their university places in September. However, shadow home secretary Chris Philp says the biometric checks should not be deferred, arguing they are "an essential part of our security arrangements". In order to obtain a UK visa, applicants must provide a photo of their face, as well as their fingerprints. The Home Office guidance says these data points "play a significant role in delivering security and facilitation in the border and immigration system". In the letter, the MPs raise the case of a Haia Mohamed, who they describe as a "young poet in Gaza", who has won a scholarship to Goldsmiths College in London. But neither she nor 79 other successful applicants to UK universities are able to travel to the UK because providing the required biometric data is "all but impossible". They write: "Even before the war, leaving Gaza to pursue higher education was a complex process. The ongoing siege and restrictions made travel extremely difficult, but in the current state of constant bombardment, shootings at aid sites, and an IPC-declared famine, this process has become all but impossible." In an email to MPs asking them to sign the letter, Mohamed and Gardiner are far more blunt, saying: "Unless the government makes rapid progress with offering visas and coordinating evacuations over the next week, students who should be starting university next month in the UK will be among those who are being shot dead at aid sites, bombed in displacement camps, or starving as famine spreads deeper in Gaza." The UK did have an authorised centre in Gaza that was able to process biometric data, but it was closed in October 2023 after the 7 October Hamas attack, and as Israel's war in response to the atrocity got under way, according to The Guardian. As result, they are asking the home secretary to "defer biometric data screening for student visa applicants based in Gaza and open a safe passage to enable these young people to fulfil their academic dreams", pointing out that other countries in Europe "have taken proactive steps to ensure safe evacuation routes for students bound for their countries". 3:05 Students are 'the future of Palestine' Speaking to Sky News on Tuesday, one of the writers of the letter, Barry Gardiner MP, pointed out that the government has been able to find a way for injured children from Gaza to receive care in the UK, and exemptions have been made in the past, and so the same should be done in this case, and "quickly" because the academic year starts next month. The Brent West MP also said that this is about "giving the state of Palestine the possibility of a future". 2:00 "These young people are the future of Palestine. They are the young talent, and it doesn't matter whether they're constructing a road network, or a sewage system, or they're town planners or, as in the case of Haia Mohamed, astonishingly profound poets - the state of Palestine will need everything from classical musicians right the way through to town planners," he said. "And these youngsters are coming over here with that full range of study potential, with the express intention of going back and building their nation." He added that the fact they have been able to win scholarships to, in many cases, the UK's top universities "shows extraordinary resilience, extraordinary courage, extraordinary ability, and we should facilitate that". 2:44 Checks 'essential part of security arrangements' But Conservative MP and shadow home secretary Chris Philp told Sky News in a statement: "We should not be deferring biometric checks. These are an essential part of our security arrangements, and they should not be waived or delayed until arrival in the UK - by which time it is too late." Earlier this month, a student from Gaza reportedly left France after being ordered to leave following the discovery of alleged antisemitic social media posts. Her lawyer said she "firmly denies the accusations made against her", according to France24. Mr Gardiner told Sky News: "Anyone who breaks the law in that way must be dealt with as the law requires. But what you don't do is you don't say, 'somebody might break the law, so we're not going to allow anybody to come'." The UK requires that biometric data be submitted in advance of the visa being approved in order to: • Establish a person's identity by joining the applicant's biographical data with their biometric data; • Verify an individual "accurately against an established identity"; • Check they are not on a watchlist, for example, to ensure they are eligible to come to the UK. Exemptions from the requirement to provide biometric data have been given in rare circumstances. It was waived for Ukrainians fleeing to the UK following Russia's invasion in January 2022. However, it was not waived for Afghans fleeing the Taliban in August 2021. But a judge later ruled that a family in hiding in the country did not have to provide the data in order to join British family members in the UK, which was thought to also apply to around 100 other families.
