logo
House narrowly passes GOP-backed bill to eliminate New Hampshire Vaccine Association

House narrowly passes GOP-backed bill to eliminate New Hampshire Vaccine Association

Yahoo06-03-2025

Dover Democratic Rep. Seth Miller, right, consults with a colleague during a voting day for the New Hampshire House of Representatives on Thursday, March 6, 2025. Earlier in the day, the House voted to eliminate the New Hampshire Vaccine Association. (Photo by William Skipworth/New Hampshire Bulletin)
A Republican-backed proposal to eliminate New Hampshire's mechanism for purchasing vaccines was approved by the state House of Representatives Thursday.
The House voted, 189-181, in favor of House Bill 524, which seeks to terminate the New Hampshire Vaccine Association.
The New Hampshire Vaccine Association is a nonprofit established by the Legislature in 2002 that serves as a universal purchasing program with the goal of providing universal access to vaccines for children. It does not set or recommend policies, but rather it buys vaccines in bulk and distributes them to doctors and providers, combining money from all insurers in the state to get a 30% discount on vaccines.
The Republicans backing this bill argued the private sector could better fill this function.
HB 524 would repeal the New Hampshire Vaccine Association. But what does the NHVA actually do?
Rep. Michael Granger, a Milton Republican and the bill's sponsor, said while introducing the bill that its goal is 'to save a large amount of money.' He argued the association wasn't actually saving anyone any money, but still costing the state money to operate.
Granger brought Laura Condon, a volunteer with the controversial nonprofit National Vaccine Information Center and a vocal vaccine conspiracy theorist, to make the case for the bill.
'It is best to remove government from involvement in the purchase of medical products when private business does quite well and cost-effectively for vaccines for adults,' said Condon, who recently publicly questioned whether vaccines might cause cancer and falsely asserted online that vaccines cause autism. She described the assertion that the government is able to do these duties cheaper than private industry as 'a false premise.'
Opponents say the bill wouldn't save any money, as the funds that pass through it come from insurers, not the state itself. Without the New Hampshire Vaccine Association, medical offices would have to purchase vaccines themselves, would incur the administrative costs to do so, wouldn't get the discount, and would bill insurers at full price. This, opponents said, would threaten vaccine access and make it more difficult for parents to find vaccination clinics for their children. The bill would actually increase costs for the state, they argued, as it would have to assume the costs of managing a vaccine inventory to be prepared for disease outbreaks, a role the association currently fills in New Hampshire.
'For 20 years this is an arrangement that has worked beautifully for everybody,' Rep. Lucy Weber, a Walpole Democrat who serves on the Health, Human Services, and Elderly Affairs Committee, said. 'It's a win-win-win-win. It's good for kids. It's good for parents. It's good for the practices. And it's good for costs.'
Weber said the bill would result in fewer vaccinations. Still, she argued the New Hampshire Vaccine Association 'is not pro-vaccine or pushing vaccines.'
'It is making them available to parents who want their children to be vaccinated,' she continued. 'And in that respect, it is a parental rights, parental decision organization. And parents can do what parents want to do. There is nothing in the vaccine organization as it stands that's requiring parents to get vaccines.'
Deputy House Democratic Leader Laura Telerski, who represents Nashua, added that this will disproportionately impact rural communities where there are fewer providers and parents have to travel farther for pediatrician visits.
'Opponents of this bill believe that government has a role in public health and providing that access,' Telerski said. 'And the people who are supporting the bill believe that small government is taking precedence over public health.'
The bill has been widely panned by doctors, nurses, and medical organizations.
'We already have a very, very good system in place,' said Dr. Patrick Ho, president of the New Hampshire Medical Association and a psychiatrist in Lebanon.
Ho disagrees with proponents of the bill who say the private sector would be able to complete this function at the same cost.
'I think what that argument really disregards is the power of the program overall to leverage essentially the lower costs of purchasing the vaccines and negotiating for significantly lower priced vaccines for everybody across the state, insured or not,' he said. 'It also disregards the very significant administrative resources that would need to be deployed for each practice, each health system to procure these vaccines themselves.'
Ho pointed out the bill is opposed by providers and insurers alike.
'Everyone involved in obtaining vaccines for our state and for the children of our state is aligned in thinking this is a really good program,' he said. 'There's no reason to do away with it.'
Ho said the New Hampshire Vaccine Association is 'really just a big win for the children of the state' and that it 'reduces burdens to vaccines.'
'When the state is able to purchase vaccines at the lowest possible price, this ensures that the children of the state can get free vaccines,' he said. 'Because the health care provider offices, the clinics, and the insurance carriers don't have as much administrative burden.'
The opposition to the bill, while ultimately unsuccessful, was bipartisan. In addition to Democrats, some Republicans voted against it Thursday.
Rep. David Nagel, a Gilmanton Republican, called it 'a horrible bill.'
'I gotta live with myself,' he said, explaining why he voted against it.
Outside of his work in the State House, Nagel is a doctor, known nationally for his work on pain management. He served on the House Health, Human Services, and Elderly Affairs Committee until he was removed last month ahead of the committee vote on whether to recommend this bill for approval, as reported by WMUR.
The bill will now be considered by the Ways and Means Committee.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's favorability among Republicans dropped 16 points since March, Quinnipiac says
Elon Musk's favorability among Republicans dropped 16 points since March, Quinnipiac says

CNBC

time26 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Elon Musk's favorability among Republicans dropped 16 points since March, Quinnipiac says

Elon Musk's official role in the Trump administration recently came to an end. Many Republicans won't be sad to see less of him, according to the results of Quinnipiac University's latest public opinion survey. While a majority of Republicans still hold a favorable view of Musk, the number fell to 62% in the poll out Wednesday, down from 78% in March, Quinnipiac said. Overall, the Quinnipiac poll found that 30% of self-identified voters surveyed in the U.S. hold a favorable opinion of Musk, according to polling from June 5 to June 9. Republican and Democratic voters remain deeply divided in their views of the world's richest man, who contributed nearly $300 million to propel President Donald Trump back to the White House. Only 3% of Democrats surveyed said they held a favorable of view of the Tesla CEO, who was once seen as an environmental leader appealing to liberal values. Musk didn't respond to a request for comment. Musk and Trump had a very public falling out last week that started with Musk's disapproval of the president's spending bill and escalated into an all-out war of words that played out on social media. Musk said on Wednesday that he regretted some of the posts he made about Trump last week, adding that "they went too far." Even with a slide in his favorability, Musk is still popular among Republicans after his time running the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an effort to dramatically slash the size of the federal government. Among the Republican respondents to the early June poll, 80% rated Musk and DOGE's work as either excellent or good, while 13% said it was either not so good or poor. In the March poll, 82% of Republicans surveyed said they thought Musk and DOGE were helping the country. Read the full survey results here.

David Hogg won't try to keep his DNC role amid dispute over Democratic primaries
David Hogg won't try to keep his DNC role amid dispute over Democratic primaries

Boston Globe

time34 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

David Hogg won't try to keep his DNC role amid dispute over Democratic primaries

Related : Advertisement He says the party Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Hogg on Wednesday decried 'a serious lack of vision from Democratic leaders, too many of them asleep at the wheel,' noting three Democratic House members have died this year after being reelected in November, leaving the party shorthanded in Washington. The culture on Capitol Hill rewards seniority and protects complacency, he said in a statement announcing his decision to walk away from his DNC role. 'If there is anything activism or history teaches us it's that comfortable people, especially comfortable people with power, do not change,' Hogg said. 'In this moment of crisis, comfort is not an option.' Related : Advertisement In April, DNC Chair Ken Martin proposed bylaw changes to require party officers to remain neutral in all Democratic primaries. Party neutrality is crucial to maintaining the confidence of voters, he argued, pointing to the bitter feud that emerged after supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders' 2016 campaign believed he was stymied by party insiders putting their thumb on the scale in favor of Hillary Rodham Clinton, who won the nomination but went on to lose the general election to Donald Trump. Hogg rose to prominence as a gun-control advocate after surviving the 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

State leaders react to President Trump's Fort Novosel name change
State leaders react to President Trump's Fort Novosel name change

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

State leaders react to President Trump's Fort Novosel name change

DALE COUNTY, Ala. (WIAT) — President Joe Biden changed the name of Fort Rucker in southeast Alabama to Fort Novosel during his administration. That's because Gen. Edmund W. Rucker, for whom it was originally named, served as a Confederate Officer. Now, President Donald Trump is restoring that name in honor of a different veteran, also named Rucker. The name of Fort Novosel is changing back to Fort Rucker, now after Capt. Edward Rucker, a WWI pilot. Rep. Rick Rehm (R-Dothan) said the change is a good thing. 'That doesn't mean that we need to be erasing history or forgetting,' he said. 'We need more history in the schools. We need to talk about the past. How we came to today and keep working on all working together.' But Congressman Shomari Figures (D-AL) said in a statement, in part quote, 'This is really a middle finger to black people in Alabama, and the black soldiers who have to serve at this base.' Democratic leaders on the state level had similar convictions. 'People of color, such as myself, are reminded of what black people had to go through just to get to the freedoms that we have now,' said Rep. Juandalynn Givan (D-Birmingham). 'Wars that were fought to keep people like me enslaved.' Walker County Sheriff Nick Smith accuses district attorney of lying about severity of charges against him 'We should be past this,' said Rep. Kenyatte Hassell (D-Montgomery). 'I think this is undermining to the Biden Administration, which is the whole purpose of this.' 'Unless the Lord intervenes, we're gonna suffer,' said Rep. Thomas Jackson (D-Thomasville). 'Some difficult days, some very difficult days ahead for our nation,' he said of the current state of affairs. But, Rep. Rehm said this is not a step backward- it's a reset. 'For veterans, and army aviators, and the soldiers that serve today, it's always been known as Fort Rucker,' said Rehm. 'And so, I think it just kind of puts that controversy back, ends that controversy. It's no longer named after a Confederate general.' In a statement, the Army said they will 'take all necessary actions to change the names of seven Army installations in honor of heroic Soldiers who served.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store