UAE among top 10 in global soft power index
20 Feb 2025 13:00
A.SREENIVASA REDDY (ABU DHABI)The UAE ranks among the world's top 10 nations for soft power, driven by diplomatic influence, a favourable investment climate, and ongoing economic diversification, according to the latest Global Soft Power Index by Brand Finance.Brand Finance publishes the Global Soft Power Index based on a survey of more than 170,000 respondents from over 100 countries, gathering data on global perceptions of all 193 UN member states. The Index is regarded as the most comprehensive study on perceptions of nation brands.Soft power is defined as a nation's ability to influence others in the international arena through attraction and persuasion rather than coercion. Each country is scored across 55 different metrics, arriving at an overall score out of 100, and ranked accordingly from 1st to 193rd.The UAE has successfully retained its 10th position in the Index, bolstered by strong perceptions of Influence (8th), International Relations (9th), and Business & Trade (10th). This year, the UAE has risen to second position globally for being 'easy to do business in and with', and it continues to rank in the top 10 for future growth potential and maintaining a strong and stable economy. The UAE improved its overall score to 60.4 out of 100 in 2025 from 59.7 in the 2024 index. In recent years, Gulf nations have made significant strides in soft power, but some countries in the region are now experiencing a slowdown in momentum. The UAE stands as an exception to this trend. Saudi Arabia has dropped two positions to 20th, while Qatar has fallen one spot to 22nd. Kuwait has dropped to 40th place, falling three ranks this year, while Oman (49th) and Bahrain (51st) have seen no significant improvement.Andrew Campbell, Managing Director, Brand Finance Middle East, said in an interview with Aletihad that the UAE has retained its 10th position, largely due to its strong standing in Business & Trade, International Relations, and overall Influence. 'While the UAE's soft power remains dominant within the Middle East, nations below it such as Sweden (11th) and South Korea (12th) have both closed the gap in 2025 and will likely to offer vigorous competition for a top-ten position in the upcoming years,' Campbell said.The UAE's second-place ranking for ease of doing business is an indicator of how the country is perceived globally. According to Campbell, this ranking suggests that a significant portion of respondents associate the Emirates with a highly favourable business environment.Regarding the UAE's position in International Relations, Campbell highlighted that its 9th place ranking has remained steady in 2025, which can largely be attributed to its neutral stance and mediation efforts in global conflicts.The 2025 Index highlights a growing divergence in soft power potential between nations, with stronger ones advancing and weaker ones falling further behind. The United States continues to hold the top position, achieving its highest-ever Global Soft Power Index score of 79.5 out of 100. China has, for the first time, surpassed the United Kingdom, ranking second with 72.8 out of 100 — its highest-ever position. Since 2024, China has experienced significant growth across six of the eight soft power pillars, as well as in two-thirds of measured attributes. The United Kingdom's drop to third place reflects a period of stagnation in its nation brand perceptions.
Other nations ranking in the top 10 include Germany (4th), Japan (5th), France (6th), Canada (7th), Switzerland (8th), and Italy (9th).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
14 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Iran-Israel tensions: Analysts optimistic about stability of oil supplies
15 June 2025 16:56 A. SREENIVASA REDDY (ABU DHABI)Most analysts remain optimistic about the stability of crude prices and the continuity of global oil shipments, especially through the Strait of Hormuz, despite escalating tensions between Iran and the conflict has fuelled market speculation, most industry analysts and trade experts continue to express confidence in the resilience of global energy trade. Their view is anchored in historical precedent, economic pragmatism, and the deeply interwoven trade relationships that characterise the Arabian Gulf Strait of Hormuz — a narrow but critical maritime corridor at the mouth of the Arabian Gulf — handles close to 30% of the world's crude and refined petroleum exports and around 20% of global LNG flows. A complete closure would undoubtedly shake global energy markets. However, most observers consider such an outcome unlikely. "While we don't yet foresee a war escalating to a Hormuz blockade, its closure would severely impact global energy flows," a Chinese oil trader told S&P Global. But despite rising tensions and military strikes between Israel and Iran, there has been no significant disruption to commercial shipping so far. Historical confrontations between the two countries have also avoided this red a note issued on June 13, JP Morgan analysts assessed the risk of Iran closing the Strait as 'very low', citing Iran's reluctance to damage its economic lifeline — especially its vital trade relationship with to S&P Global Commodity Insights, Iran pumped 3.24 million barrels per day (b/d) in May, most of which is exported to China. Any move to restrict traffic through Hormuz would not only sever this economic artery but also affect its ability to send supplies to initially reacted with concern. ICE Brent crude futures spiked 8.97% on June 13 — the sharpest single-day gain in five years. But analysts at S&P Global and Goldman Sachs expect such price volatility to be temporary, barring direct attacks on energy infrastructure. 'We've seen these spikes before. Prices jump, then retreat when it's clear that oil flows are not actually impacted,' said Richard Joswick, Head of Near-Term Oil Analysis at S&P this outlook is the presence of alternative logistics. The UAE's Habshan–Fujairah pipeline, for instance, enables crude to bypass Hormuz altogether. Long-term LNG supply contracts between China and exporters like Qatar and the UAE also offer stability and reduce reliance on spot risk insurance premiums in the Arabian Gulf, which cover ships navigating high-risk zones, remain steady at 0.05%–0.07% of vessel hull value — unchanged for 18 months. Though freight charges could rise if hostilities deepen, there is no current indication of a shipping refiners are the largest buyers of Gulf crude. 'Extreme actions could provoke responses from Asian military powers. So both Iran and Israel are likely to exercise caution,' said a Tokyo-based feedstock manager. Refiners in South Korea, Japan, and Thailand have echoed similar sentiments, underscoring confidence that the Strait of Hormuz will stay Goldman Sachs, while adjusting its geopolitical risk premium, predicts Brent crude to fall back to the $60s in 2026, assuming no long-term infrastructure damage and a compensatory output from OPEC+.In a potential escalation scenario, Goldman estimates a temporary loss of 1.75 million b/d from Iran if its export infrastructure is damaged — but believes this shortfall could be partially offset by OPEC+ spare capacity. Under such conditions, Brent could peak over $90/b, before normalising as supply recovers.S&P Global concurs that the real inflection point would be a direct disruption to exports. 'Unless exports are impacted, the price upside will fade,' its analysts noted. Joswick reinforced this by citing 2024, when similar flare-ups triggered short-term price movements that quickly reversed once it became clear supply was Pollack, vice president for policy at the Middle East Institute, noted: 'If Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, the US would come in with all guns blazing.' Analysts warn that such a move would not only provoke military responses but would be viewed by Gulf neighbours as a direct economic threat.'There is no doubt the situation in the Arabian Gulf is very tense. We have reports that more shipowners are now exercising extra caution and are opting to stay away from the Red Sea and the Arabian Gulf,' said Jakob P Larsen, Chief Safety & Security Officer at BIMCO, the world's largest international shipping association.'There is currently no indication that Iran will seek to disrupt shipping in the Gulf, and no indication at this point that the Houthis will seek to disrupt shipping in the Red Sea. The tripwire will be the perception of the US' involvement. If the US is suddenly perceived to be involved in attacks, the risk of escalation increases significantly,' Larsen told Aletihad.'BIMCO encourages shipowners to follow developments closely and implement ship defence measures according to the industry guidance document,' he added. Meanwhile, broader OPEC+ dynamics are also at play. Eight OPEC+ member states are moving to restore 2.2 million b/d of curtailed output to regain their market share. 'We'll likely see more unwinding of voluntary cuts,' said Harry Tchiliguirian, Head of Research at Onyx Capital Advisory. This will likely have a mitigating impact on oil prices.
The National
18 hours ago
- The National
What Iran's next potential move will mean for energy security
The Israel-Iran confrontation has entered a perilous new phase. Reported Israeli military attacks on Iran's gas sites put energy targets in the crosshairs. Global energy markets might escape crisis this time, but the margin of safety is getting ever narrower. An onshore site of Phase 14 of the South Pars gasfield, Iran's largest, in the Gulf industrial city of Assaluyeh, was struck, causing an explosion and fire. Iranian news agency Tasnim reported that 12 million cubic metres of gas production a day was halted. The Fajr Jam gas processing plant, near Bushehr, suffered from apparent drone attacks. Phase 14 processes 18.3 billion cubic metres of gas a year and Fajr Jam 20 bcm; the reported damage to the two amounts to about a tenth of Iran's gas output. Israeli military attacks have also destroyed petrol depots near Tehran. Iran denied reports that the Tabriz refinery was damaged but the Shahr Rey oil refinery south of Tehran was reported to be on fire. In response, an Iranian missile was reported to have hit Israel's Bazan oil refinery in the port of Haifa. As already seen in the Russia-Ukraine war, any taboo about attacking civil infrastructure is long gone. Oil prices climbed by more than $7 per barrel on the initial news of the air strikes. European natural gas prices are up less than 5 per cent. No doubt they will rise again when markets re-open on Monday. But so far, this remains a moderate response. Crude prices are not yet back to the level on April 2, just before the announcement of US President Donald Trump's massive tariffs and the increase in production by Opec+. So far, Israel's energy targets appear to be those that serve the domestic market: gas, petrol terminals and oil refineries. It is early summer, and not the peak winter demand season. Still, Iran was already struggling with serious gas and electricity shortages. Exports to Turkey may be affected, but Ankara is already familiar with the unreliability of Iranian supplies, and can increase imports from Russia or buy more liquefied natural gas. Iraq relies on Iranian gas, but it was already facing a cut-off as the US tightened pressure on Baghdad. So far, Israel has stayed away from sites that directly serve the international market, notably the Kharg oil export terminal in the northern Gulf. This enables Israel to evade immediate responsibility for causing a worldwide energy crisis. Iran's oil exports, nearly all to China, are about 1.5 million barrels per day. If they were completely cut off, whether by a US blockade or direct Israeli strikes on Kharg and other oil sites, the volumes could quite easily be replaced by the spare capacity in Saudi Arabia, the UAE and elsewhere – assuming that Tehran does not retaliate, a risky assumption. The crucial question is where things go from here. The stated Israeli goal of eliminating Iran's nuclear programme appears unrealistic; it may be set back, but destruction is not feasible without American involvement. No doubt Israel hopes the US will be sucked in. Even then, the lesson of recent years – Ukraine and Libya contrasted to North Korea and Pakistan – is that those who give up their nuclear weapons are attacked with impunity by those who have them. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's other suggested goal, of toppling the Islamic Republic, is even less plausible. Yes, the regime of Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is repressive and unpopular. Its incompetence in one area where it should be capable has been unmasked by Israel's successes so far, first in severely mauling Hezbollah, then in striking the Iran homeland directly with impunity. But Iranians have deep memories, personal or learnt, of the resistance to Saddam Hussein's invasion, which also featured extensive bombing of urban areas. Neither democratic nor authoritarian regimes are overthrown by air campaigns alone. Even a new leadership, perhaps a secular nationalist one, would now seriously have to consider acquiring nuclear weapons. The former Shah, ousted in the 1979 Revolution, himself said, 'If small states began building them, Iran might have to reconsider its policy [of not acquiring nuclear weapons]'. American diplomacy has been exposed as duplicitous or ineffectual or both. With China wisely sitting out and Russia untrustworthy and stuck in its own war, there is no honest broker at hand. So, it is hard to imagine Iranian diplomats sitting down seriously again to negotiate a halt to their nuclear programme. That would look like a surrender under duress similar to the reviled treaties of Turkmenchay and Golestan that gave up much of Iran's territory to Russia in the early 19th century. It seems much less likely that Tehran can do as it did in April last year, launching a few face-saving retaliations against Israel and then reaching a ceasefire. Top regime individuals have been killed, military and nuclear sites have suffered damage. Israel will not want to give a respite to Iran to rebuild air defences and harden crucial sites. Iran does not seem to have the ability to launch a really devastating attack on Israel either, and if it did, it would be met with further reprisal and probably draw in the US. But Tehran also seems unwilling to sit idly by while it is pummelled. This draws attention to energy targets elsewhere. Mr Trump is acutely sensitive to higher oil prices and inflation. About 20 million barrels of oil and products per day goes through the famous Strait of Hormuz. This includes virtually all the spare production capacity in the Opec+ countries, other than Russia. Saudi Arabia can divert up to 5 million bpd to the Red Sea, though that brings its own problems. More than half of the UAE's exports, or about 1.8 million bpd, go through a pipeline to Fujairah, outside the strait but still potentially vulnerable. Iraq is mostly friendly to Iran, but its 3.3 million barrels of exports through the Gulf could easily be interrupted by 'accidents'. Europe, having lost most Russian gas supplies, would be acutely worried about another interruption. About 82 million tonnes of liquefied natural gas, a fifth of global supply, came from the Gulf last year, mostly from Qatar. For Russian President Vladimir Putin, this crisis could bail out his troubled war economy, and bring political gains. Simply-equipped Houthi troops have been able to shut down most shipping through the southern Red Sea, and have not been prevented by US naval escorts and missile strikes. Iran's planned responses have probably been severely disrupted by the killing of so many of the top brass, but as war so often demonstrates, it is an error to underestimate your enemy forever. Attacking energy sites or shipments could be one point of leverage for Tehran. It would be very risky. It would cut off its own oil exports, assuming they have not already been disrupted. It would anger China, which brokered the Iran-Saudi rapprochement in March 2023 with a major aim of safeguarding energy supplies. But the remaining Iranian regime may conclude that caution and restraint have not paid off for them so far, despite the calls for calm.
Zawya
21 hours ago
- Zawya
K-Soft and F5 host executive tech event to strengthen cybersecurity and digital resilience across the Gulf
Manama, Bahrain - K-Soft, a YBA Kanoo Enterprise and leading provider of enterprise technology solutions, hosted an executive-level technology event in partnership with F5, a global leader in application security and delivery. The event took place at the Four Seasons Hotel Bahrain Bay and welcomed senior representatives from Bahrain's financial services, government, and aviation sectors. The gathering underscored the critical role of public-private collaboration in advancing Bahrain's national digital transformation and cybersecurity strategies. It focused on the future of secure application delivery in increasingly complex, multi-cloud environments, with discussions centered on real-world challenges and evolving best practices. 'This event reflects our commitment to supporting our clients with future-ready solutions and trusted advisory,' said Anas Kamaluddin, CEO of K-Soft. 'We are grateful for the trust our clients place in us and deeply value the collaboration with F5 in delivering real impact across key sectors.' The strategic partnership between K-Soft and F5, established in Bahrain in 2009, continues to drive innovation and resilience across the Gulf. With over four decades of IT expertise and the support of the Yusuf Bin Ahmed Kanoo Group's 135-year legacy, K-Soft remains a trusted partner to organizations navigating digital transformation across Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. As Bahrain accelerates its investment in secure digital infrastructure, the role of advanced cybersecurity solutions has never been more vital. K-Soft and F5 reaffirmed their shared commitment to empowering clients with scalable, secure, and cost-effective technologies that support national ambitions for a resilient digital economy. The event concluded with a strong message around the importance of collaboration, knowledge sharing, and ongoing innovation in building a secure digital ecosystem. As digitalization continues to serve as a cornerstone of Bahrain's Vision 2030, cybersecurity remains essential to unlocking its full potential and ensuring sustainable, inclusive growth.
