
In a first, UNSC panel report mentions Lashkar front TRF, links it to Pahalgam attack
This is the first time that TRF, a wing of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), has been named in a United Nations (UN) document, despite hectic efforts by Pakistan to block any such move. The TRF masterminded the terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam on 22 April that left 26 people dead, according to the government of India.
New Delhi: In a significant diplomatic setback for Islamabad, Pakistan-based terrorist outfit The Resistance Front (TRF) has been named in the Monitoring Team (MT) report of the 1267 Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council released Wednesday.
For India, the diplomatic significance lies in the fact that the MT reports are adopted by consensus by UNSC members. India is not a member of the international body, while Pakistan is currently a member and holds the rotating presidency. Islamabad's tenure as the rotating president of the UNSC ends on 31 July.
'On 22 April, five terrorists attacked a tourist spot in Pahalgam, in Jammu and Kashmir. Twenty-six civilians were killed. The attack was claimed that same day by The Resistance Front (TRF), who in parallel published a photograph of the attack site. The claim of responsibility was repeated the following day. On 26 April, however, TRF retracted their claim. There was no further communication from TRF, and no other group claimed responsibility,' the MT report said.
Days after the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, the UNSC put out a statement condemning the terrorist attack, but did not name the TRF due to Islamabad's diplomatic efforts. However, only one member of the UNSC rejected the views of the MT in the report, claiming that the LeT was defunct. Two other members of the council agreed with the linkage of the outfit with the LeT.
'One Member State said the attack could not have happened without Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT, QDe.118) support, and that there was a relationship between LeT and TRF. Another Member State said that the attack was carried out by TRF, who was synonymous with LeT. One Member State rejected these views and said LeT was defunct,' said the report.
Pakistani Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Daq claimed credit for keeping TRF out of the UNSC statement during a speech to the National Assembly in April. Pakistan has maintained that no such organisation exists and that the LeT is defunct within its borders.
The inclusion of TRF in the MT report also acknowledges New Delhi's position that Pakistan has started creating proxy organisations using secular or modern names to maintain plausible deniability with regard to cross-border terrorism.
Organisations like TRF or the People Against Fascist Front, a front for the Jaish-e-Mohammad, are seen as an attempt by Islamabad to give an indigenous appearance to its terrorist activities in Jammu and Kashmir.
Despite Islamabad's diplomatic efforts, the US earlier this month designated TRF as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation and Specially Designated Global Terrorist, in a move seen as a major diplomatic victory for India. A designation by the US could impact access to foreign financing and prevent travel by group members.
TRF twice claimed responsibility for the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, before withdrawing its claim on 26 April.
On Monday, a joint operation codenamed 'Mahadev' by the Indian forces eliminated three terrorists—Suleiman, Afghan and Jibran—in the Valley. The three were behind the Pahalgam terrorist attack revealed Amit Shah, India's Minister for Home Affairs, during a speech to the Lok Sabha Tuesday.
(Edited by Sugita Katyal)
Also Read: As Op Sindoor targets its bases, a look at LeT's terror hierarchy, from Hafiz Saeed to Sajid Gul

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
For Pakistan & US, it is back to doing business
There is a discernible sense of satisfaction within Pakistan's strategic fraternity at the undeniable uptick in the US-Pakistan interface over the past few months. Some may dispute the extent, but given how the relationship had eroded in the past decade-and-a-half, any improvement represents a big change. Given the transactional nature that dominates the US, there is the temptation to find direct factors for the upswing in US-Pakistan relations. (AP) The principal milestones of the US-Pakistan downturn are well known. For Pakistan, the US detection and killing of Osama bin Laden in 2011 in Abbottabad was a betrayal and a public humiliation. For many Pakistanis, that the US acted clandestinely deep inside Pakistan superseded the enormity of the fact that Osama had been living there all the time under the very noses of the Pakistan military. The free fall continued with mounting US frustrations over Pakistan's double game in Afghanistan. President Trump's 2018 New Year Day tweet exemplified this view. The tweet underlined US foolishness in giving Pakistan billions of dollars in aid in return for deceit and lies! This was consistent with emergent US narratives about Pakistan, but that it was from the President himself made it doubly significant. Through the Biden tenure matters crystallised at a low plateau of bad blood and mutual recriminations. The US's final withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 in disorder and disarray added another layer to the deep strategic mistrust and suspicion that now characterised the relationship. President Biden did not have even a telecon with Imran Khan during the time he was PM and Imran Khan in turn blamed the US for his premature ouster from power. In the meantime, most US military and security assistance was suspended. What perhaps hurt Pakistan the most was the impact this had on training programmes for Pakistan military officers in the US. All this happened also when the India-US relationship seemed effortlessly to go from strength to strength. This further highlighted the distance between Washington and Islamabad. The past few months appear quite different. The change was animated quite dramatically by Field Marshal Asim Munir being hosted by President Trump in June 2025 in the immediate aftermath of Operation Sindoor. It is most unusual — perhaps even unprecedented — for a US president to host a chief of a foreign military who is not a head of State or government. This shift also coincides with new ambiguities in the US-India interface — perhaps triggered by President Trump's constant reiteration of having prevented further escalation in the India-Pakistan conflict during Operation Sindoor. To many in Pakistan, this has 'internationalised' Kashmir and highlighted the importance of third-party intervention as equally that even the US was skeptical about India's claims and demands. There had been earlier indicators of change beginning with President Trump's acknowledgement of Pakistan's counter-terrorism assistance in his State of the Union Address in March 2025. The allocation of a significant financial package as assistance to Pakistan for maintaining its F16 aircraft despite an otherwise stringent foreign aid cutback, was another. Alongside, more even-handed references to the India-Pakistan dynamic, meetings and telephone conversations between the US secretary of State and senior Pakistan leaders further underlined this shift. The announcement of a US-Pakistan Trade Agreement, albeit with a 19% tariff on imports from Pakistan, and Trump's enthusiastic references to hydrocarbon exploration and investment, are but the latest in this trend. The trade agreement may not be the best deal Pakistan could have got, but it is not as bad as could have been, and in any case some deal was better than no deal as far as the government of Pakistan was concerned. It may well be argued that there is nothing particularly significant in these transitions, but for most Pakistanis they suggest a return of their country to the US's radar after a long period of being out in the cold. What explains this shift? Given the transactional frame of mind that dominates the US, there is always the temptation to look for a direct and material factor. Numerous reasons are, therefore, assigned for this shift in US policy. Pakistan's counter-terrorism potential and the assistance it can offer is one. That the US is keen to have some relationship with Pakistan given the growing spread of China in the region is another. There is also the view that recommendations of the US Central Command on Pakistan's military potential vis-à-vis Iran in terms of its geographical location and the value of its air bases may have registered on the Presidency amid the current situation in West and South West Asia. Some argue that this shift in policy was also pushed along by crypto currency deals, and by US interest in potential Pakistani reserves of rare earth minerals. Each of these explanations may have some merit but perhaps the weight of any or all of these should not be exaggerated. Instead, it is useful to refocus on some basics. Pakistan is the fifth largest country in the world in terms of population with some 250 million people. It is riven by instability. It has nuclear weapons. It is situated in a sensitive geo-political location, almost in a global fault line. Given these attributes it was always only a matter of time that the long downturn in US Pakistan relations would reverse and US interest in Pakistan would reignite. We are at that stage now. All major powers decide on policies based on an appreciation of their own interests and their own understandings of evolving situations. To think that the long downturn in US Pakistan relations would have simply continued or that the US would see developments from our perspective alone is, and never was, a realistic assessment. We should take this shift in our stride. If some in India feel betrayed or dismayed at this turn of events, they have only themselves to blame. TCA Raghavan is a former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan. The views expressed are personal.


Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Pakistan violates ceasefire in J&K's Poonch sector, Indian Army responds
Pakistan on Tuesday violated ceasefire along the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir, indulging in unprovoked firing in Poonch sector, official sources said. File photo: Security personnel conducting a search operation in Poonch(PTI) Indian Army retaliated to Pakistan ceasefire violation, with the firing exchange having continued for 15 minutes, the above-mentioned sources said, adding that there were no report of any casualty. More details are awaited. This marks the first ceasefire violation since Operation Sindoor was launched by the Indian armed forces on May 7. The previous breach of ceasefire happened in May amid military conflict between India and Pakistan. Pakistan Rangers initiated unprovoked firing on Border Security Force (BSF) posts on May 9 along the International Border in the Jammu sector late Friday night. The May 10 incident prompted a swift and firm response from the BSF, India's border guarding force mandated to guard the 3,323 km India-Pakistan border. In a statement, the BSF's Jammu division had confirmed that Indian forces responded in a "commensurate manner", causing significant damage to Pakistani posts and assets across the border. "On 09 May 2025, from about 2100 hrs, Pakistan opened fire on BSF posts in the Jammu sector without any provocation. BSF is responding in commensurate manner causing widespread damage to posts and assets of Pakistan Rangers along the International Boundary. Our resolve to protect India's sovereignty is unshaken," BSF said in a statement.


Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- Indian Express
The weapon and ammunition were allegedly seized from accused Zeeshan Ali's house in Noida, they said, adding that an ATS team, acting on information revealed by him, had taken him to his residence in Noida.
The Gujarat Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) on Tuesday said that it has recovered a pistol and three live cartridges from the house of one of the five persons it earlier arrested for allegedly being associated with banned terrorist group Al Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS). The weapon and ammunition were allegedly seized from accused Zeeshan Ali's house in Noida, they said, adding that an ATS team, acting on information revealed by him, had taken him to his residence in Noida. On July 22, the Gujarat ATS had apprehended four persons — Fardin Sheikh, Saifulla Qureshi, Mohammad Faiq and Zeeshan Ali — for their involvement in advancing the agenda of the AQIS through social media platforms by allegedly undertaking Ghazwa-e-Hind, provoking India's Muslim community to engage in violent acts against non-Muslims, advocating armed revolt against the elected government, and pushing for an Islamic Sharia-based regime. Legal action was initiated under Sections 13, 18, 38, and 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967, and Sections 113, 152, 196, and 61 of the BNS. Then on July 27, Shama Parveen, the alleged key accused of this module, was arrested from Karnataka's Bengaluru. On Tuesday, a statement from the ATS said, 'During preliminary verification of information related to the said offense, surveillance of social media accounts had revealed that the accused Zeeshan Ali is in possession of a semi-automatic pistol. Based on the facts revealed during the intensive interrogation of the accused Zeeshan Ali by the Investigating Officer, DySP Virjeetsinh Parmar and his team, accused voluntarily disclosed the facts that he was indeed in possession of an illegal semi-automatic pistol.'