All J&K Panchayat Conference delegation meets Rajnath, submits memo for compensation of land
The delegation was led by its president Anil Sharma.
During the meeting, as per the handout issued here, Sharma said the local populace had selflessly parted with their agricultural land for the establishment of defence facilities such as FAD 15 at Jindrah and 4 ASD at Ban Nagrota, with the assurance that local youth would be given preference in employment in the Indian Army, MES, FAD and related services.
'Initially, the practice of recruiting local youth was followed, and several young men were inducted into the Army and related defence services. However, for the past 15 to 18 years, this has been discontinued without any formal communication,' Sharma informed the Defence Minister.
He said that despite the villagers' unwavering support and pride in contributing to national security, their expectations for employment and recognition have remained unfulfilled.
'Many educated and deserving youth residing within a 20 to 25 km radius of these ammunition depots in Jindrah and Nagrota are willing to serve with dedication. We request that the earlier practice of offering them preference in recruitment be revived,' he said.
The AJKPC leader also raised concerns over the meagre and irregular rent being paid to the landowners for the land acquired for defence purposes and requested the Defence Ministry to consider a one-time compensation or settlement for the families, citing the emotional and economic value attached to the ancestral land.
The AJKPC delegation also lauded the Indian Army's Operation Sindoor, saying that it has further deepened the bond between civilians and the armed forces.
'The people of Jammu and Kashmir have always stood with the Army and take great pride in the sacrifices made by our soldiers,' he said in the memorandum.
The AJKPC leader also expressed full faith in the leadership of Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and hoped the Ministry would act with compassion to redress the grievances of the local population that has historically supported the Army's presence in the region.
Rakesh Sharma, AJKPC Secretary, said local youth of Nagrota constituency were concerned over lack of preference in job opportunities in Indian army, MES and FAD despite the fact that their families have donated their precious ancestral lands for army establishments.
'Our AJKPC president has taken up the matter with the Defence Minister and we are hopeful of early resolution to all pending issues,' he added.
UNI VBH SS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump says no imminent plans to penalise China for buying Russian oil
US President Donald Trump said on Friday he did not immediately need to consider retaliatory tariffs on countries such as China for buying Russian oil but might have to "in two or three weeks." Trump has threatened sanctions on Moscow and secondary sanctions on countries that buy its oil if no moves are made to end the war in Ukraine. China and India are the top two buyers of Russian oil. The president last week imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, citing its continued imports of Russian oil. However, Trump has not taken similar action against China. He was asked by Fox News' Sean Hannity if he was now considering such action against Beijing after he and Russian President Vladimir Putin failed to produce an agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine. "Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that," Trump said after his summit with Putin in Alaska. "Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well." Chinese President Xi Jinping's slowing economy will suffer if Trump follows through on a promise to ramp up Russia-related sanctions and tariffs. Xi and Trump are working on a trade deal that could lower tensions - and import taxes - between the world's two biggest economies. But China could be the biggest remaining target, outside of Russia, if Trump ramps up punitive measures.
Hans India
2 minutes ago
- Hans India
US-India Trade Talks Face Setback As American Delegation Postpones New Delhi Visit
The upcoming round of negotiations for the India-US bilateral trade agreement faces an uncertain timeline as the American delegation is expected to postpone its planned visit to New Delhi scheduled for later this month. According to an unnamed official speaking to PTI, the sixth round of discussions, originally set for August 25-29, will likely be rescheduled due to mounting trade tensions between the two nations. This development occurs against the backdrop of deteriorating trade relations, with Washington implementing punitive tariff measures on Indian exports. Since August 7, the United States has maintained a 25 percent duty on Indian goods, and an additional 25 percent penalty is scheduled to take effect from August 27. This second tariff serves as punishment for India's continued purchases of crude oil and military equipment from Russia, despite ongoing international sanctions. The combined impact of these tariffs will result in a substantial 50 percent duty on Indian exports entering the American market, creating significant challenges for Indian exporters and potentially disrupting established trade patterns. The timing of these measures coincides with America's sustained pressure on New Delhi to liberalize access to politically sensitive sectors, particularly agriculture and dairy markets. India has maintained a firm stance against such demands, categorically refusing to make concessions that could jeopardize the economic well-being of small-scale farmers and cattle rearers. The Indian government views these sectors as crucial for rural livelihoods and food security, making them non-negotiable areas in trade discussions. Despite the current diplomatic friction and trade disputes, commercial relationships between the two countries continue to demonstrate resilience and growth. Official commerce ministry statistics reveal that India's exports to the United States experienced robust growth of 21.64 percent, reaching USD 33.53 billion during the April-July 2025 period. Simultaneously, imports from America increased by 12.33 percent to USD 17.41 billion during the same timeframe. The United States has emerged as India's most significant trading partner during this period, with total bilateral trade volume reaching USD 12.56 billion. This figure underscores the substantial economic interdependence between the two nations, despite ongoing political and policy disagreements. Both governments have previously committed to completing the initial phase of the bilateral trade agreement by fall 2025, with ambitious long-term objectives of expanding bilateral trade from the current USD 191 billion to USD 500 billion by 2030. These targets reflect the enormous potential for economic cooperation between the world's largest democracy and its most powerful economy. Following President Donald Trump's announcement of additional tariffs on Indian exports, Prime Minister Narendra Modi used his Independence Day address to advocate for increased domestic production and consumption of Indian-made products. The Prime Minister emphasized his government's unwavering commitment to protecting the interests of India's agricultural community. Modi declared his resolute opposition to any policies that could harm Indian farmers, fishermen, and cattle rearers, stating that his administration would serve as a protective barrier against detrimental foreign trade demands. He reinforced India's position of refusing to compromise on policies affecting these vulnerable economic sectors. Recent diplomatic developments may influence the trajectory of trade relations between the two countries. A significant meeting between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin took place in Alaska over the weekend, raising speculation about potential improvements in Washington-Moscow relations that could indirectly benefit India. During discussions about the Ukraine conflict, Trump adopted a more measured approach toward sanctions, suggesting he might reconsider additional punitive measures in the coming weeks. His statement that immediate secondary sanctions were unnecessary and could be "devastating" for the targeted countries has generated hope that the additional 25 percent tariff on Indian goods might be reconsidered. The postponement of trade negotiations reflects the complex interplay of geopolitical considerations, domestic political pressures, and economic interests that characterize modern international trade relationships. Both nations must navigate these challenges while maintaining their strategic partnership and shared democratic values. The delay also highlights the difficulties inherent in negotiating comprehensive trade agreements between major economies with different development priorities and political constraints. As India continues to protect its agricultural sector and rural communities, and the United States pursues its own trade and foreign policy objectives, finding mutually acceptable solutions becomes increasingly challenging. The rescheduling of the American delegation's visit represents a temporary setback rather than a permanent breakdown in negotiations, with both countries likely to resume discussions once immediate tensions subside and diplomatic conditions become more favorable for productive dialogue.
Hans India
2 minutes ago
- Hans India
BJP Veterans Resist Calls For Renewed Alliance with Shiromani Akali Dal In Punjab
The recent suggestion by Sunil Jakhar for the Bharatiya Janata Party to reestablish its partnership with the Shiromani Akali Dal has triggered significant resistance from within the party's Punjab unit, with veteran leaders and the national leadership expressing strong reservations about revisiting what they consider a politically limiting arrangement from the past. Jakhar's public declaration advocating for renewed cooperation between the two parties, which he positioned as necessary for maintaining communal harmony in Punjab, has been met with skepticism from long-serving BJP members who spent years operating under what they describe as the restrictive framework of Akali dominance. These seasoned politicians, along with Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh activists and ideological workers, view the proposal as a regression to a period they believed had been definitively left behind. The party's recent organizational changes signal a clear direction away from Jakhar's approach. On July 7, BJP national president J.P. Nadda appointed Pathankot MLA Ashwani Sharma as the state unit's working president, marking a return to trusted cadre leadership. Punjab, along with Manipur, had been unable to complete organizational elections for mandals and districts, necessitating Sharma's appointment initially as working president rather than full president. However, the party high command subsequently instructed Sharma to complete the electoral process, representing what many interpret as the party's return to its established organizational structure. The appointment of Sharma, who had previously served as state chief twice during the earlier BJP-SAD alliance, represents a significant shift from the experimental leadership approach that brought Jakhar to prominence two years ago. Party insiders suggest that Jakhar's tenure revealed his inability to understand the concerns of long-term party members and his misalignment with core BJP and Sangh ideological principles. Veterans within the Punjab BJP argue that the previous alliance arrangement primarily benefited the Badal-led Akali Dal rather than creating genuine partnership. During those years, the BJP found itself confined to urban constituencies while the Akalis dominated rural areas and dictated the terms of political engagement. This arrangement forced BJP leaders to moderate their positions on various issues, from religious matters to rural politics, effectively limiting their ability to articulate an independent political identity. The dissolution of the BJP-SAD alliance in 2020, triggered by disagreements over central farm legislation, provided what many party members describe as liberation from these constraints. For the first time in decades, the BJP could assess its authentic strength in Punjab without being filtered through Akali priorities or limited by coalition compromises. Recent electoral performance has provided encouragement for those favoring independent growth. While the BJP did not secure any Lok Sabha seats in the 2024 general elections, the party demonstrated significant improvement by leading in 23 assembly segments and finishing as a close second in approximately 10 additional constituencies. The party captured around 19 percent of the total vote share, substantially outperforming the SAD, which saw its support decline below 12 percent. In 65 assembly segments, BJP candidates received more votes than their SAD counterparts, achievements that occurred despite ongoing farmer protests and anti-BJP sentiment in rural areas. These results have convinced many party leaders that the BJP can build sustainable political influence without relying on Akali partnerships. Senior leaders from the Doaba region, who have been associated with the party since the Atal Bihari Vajpayee era, argue that direct engagement with Sikh voters without SAD intermediaries represents a more promising long-term strategy than returning to restrictive alliance arrangements. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has also developed comprehensive outreach programs targeting Sikh communities, scholars, and institutions both within Punjab and internationally. These efforts focus on ideological dialogue rather than transactional political relationships, creating spaces for Sikh voices that embrace both religious devotion and nationalist perspectives without requiring SAD endorsement. Recent RSS initiatives include consultations led by sarkaryavah Dattatreya Hosabale and other senior leaders with Punjab-based Sangh activists, ideologues, and academics to deepen understanding of border state dynamics and Sikh community concerns. These efforts represent systematic attempts to build authentic relationships rather than depend on traditional political intermediaries. Party leaders highlight various achievements of the Modi government that directly benefited Sikh communities, including the removal of blacklisted Sikhs from entry restrictions, the opening of the Kartarpur Sahib corridor through negotiations with Pakistan, and policies accommodating Sikh religious practices such as allowing Amritdhari Sikhs to carry kirpans on domestic flights. During the alliance years, SAD often claimed credit for such initiatives, but the party's credibility crisis has limited its ability to effectively communicate these achievements to Sikh constituents. Current SAD leader Sukhbir Badal has responded to alliance discussions by stating that his party would only align with those genuinely supporting Punjab's interests, while listing demands including the release of convicted Sikh militants. However, BJP leaders note that the Modi government had already released some Sikh militants during its first term without receiving political credit from SAD. The broader political landscape in Punjab appears to support the BJP's independent approach. The decline of radical elements, exemplified by figures like Amritpal Singh, the poor performance of Khalistan-aligned candidates in Canada's 2024 elections, and reduced interest in separatist narratives among Punjab's youth suggest that de-radicalization processes are gradually taking effect. This changing environment creates opportunities for parties that can communicate respectfully and directly with Sikh communities without relying on traditional alliance structures. BJP's evolving approach is evident in specific situations such as the party's support for actor-singer Diljit Dosanjh during controversies surrounding his movie Sardaar Ji 3, which featured a Pakistani actress. Rather than allowing radical groups to exploit the issue for anti-government sentiment, the BJP effectively defused tensions by backing Dosanjh, demonstrating a more nuanced understanding of contemporary Sikh concerns. Many party leaders view Jakhar's alliance proposal as applying outdated solutions to current challenges. They argue that Punjab's political dynamics have fundamentally changed since the 1990s, requiring fresh approaches rather than revival of previous arrangements. Some leaders suggest that Jakhar's perspective may be influenced by his Congress background, where broad coalitions were standard practice, rather than reflecting the BJP's emphasis on ideological consistency and long-term vision. The party is instead focusing on developing independent political strategies tailored to Punjab's diverse constituencies. This includes engaging with backward classes, ex-servicemen, traders, and communities in regions where neither Congress nor the Aam Aadmi Party maintains strong presence. In the Majha region, the BJP sees potential among border villages and mixed Hindu-Sikh constituencies, while in Doaba, non-resident Indians and Dalit voters appear increasingly receptive to nationalist messaging independent of Akali influence. Senior BJP leadership has chosen not to publicly confront Jakhar over his alliance suggestions, but their strategic direction clearly emphasizes building direct relationships with Sikh communities rather than outsourcing such engagement to SAD. The party's future in Punjab appears to depend on patient, systematic outreach efforts conducted village by village, institution by institution, rather than broad political deals with declining coalition partners. This approach reflects the BJP's broader organizational philosophy of sustainable growth through ideological engagement rather than electoral convenience, suggesting that calls for renewed SAD alliance are unlikely to gain traction among decision-makers who have invested years in building independent political infrastructure in Punjab.
