Graduated driving licences for young people 'could have saved my daughter', says bereaved mother
Speaking on The UK Tonight With Sarah-Jane Mee, Sharon Huddleston called on the government to bring in new laws to "help save young lives [and] give teenagers a future".
Caitlin Huddleston, 18, was a passenger in a vehicle which collided with a van in July 2017. The crash killed both Caitlin and the driver, her friend Skye Mitchell, also 18. A backseat passenger and the van driver were left with severe injuries.
Skye had passed her test just four months before the crash, which occurred after she "entered a bend slightly too fast for her experience and lost control", Ms Huddleston said.
The car then spun on to the opposite carriageway and in front of a van travelling in the opposite direction.
Ms Huddleston later "found out about a law called a graduated driving licence which could have saved my daughter's life".
In 2023, around a fifth of people killed or seriously injured in Great Britain in car collisions involved a young driver.
Graduated Driving Licences (GDLs) have been introduced in a number of other countries including Canada, where it takes at least 20 months for a new driver to gain a full driving licence by earning in stages.
Young drivers working towards their full licence face extra rules such as not being allowed on the roads between midnight and 5am, and a limit on the number of under 19-year-old passengers.
2:18
As reported by Sky News' Dan Whitehead, evidence shows deaths among 16 to 19-year-old drivers in Canada have fallen by 83%.
But the government has previously stated it has no plans to introduce GDLs, saying they could "unfairly" penalise young drivers.
"Our children have been penalised from living their lives," Ms Huddleston said in response.
"We want this implemented to help save young lives, to give teenagers a future. Our children's futures were taken from them.
"These children who are killed on the roads, they're being penalised from living their lives, we shouldn't have to bury our children," she continued.
Ms Huddleston was joined on The UK Tonight by Dr Ian Greenwood, whose daughter Alice died at the age of 12 after a speeding, young driver crashed into a car she was travelling in with her mother and sister.
Dr Greenwood said: "They were speeding, they were distracted, it's a rural road.
"It's almost like doing a bingo for the risk factors of a graduated driving licence - other than alcohol, they were all present in that crash."
The driver of the car and his passenger also died, he said.
1:57
A Department for Transport spokesperson told Sky News: "Every death on our roads is a tragedy and our thoughts remain with the families of everyone who has lost a loved one in this way.
"Whilst we are not considering Graduated Driving Licences, we absolutely recognise that young people are disproportionately victims of tragic incidents on our roads, and we are exploring options to tackle the root causes of this without unfairly penalising young drivers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
A father criticised the use of airdrops in Gaza. Five days later, he was killed by a falling pallet
Why you can trust Sky News Five days before he was killed by a falling aid package, father-of-two Uday al Qaraan called on world leaders to open Gaza's borders to food - and criticised the use of airdrops. "This isn't aid delivery," said the 32-year-old medic as a crowd of children rummaged through the remains of an airdrop behind him. "This is humiliation." Using footage from social media, satellite imagery, eyewitness testimony and flight tracking data, Sky News has examined the dangers posed by airdrops - and just how little difference they are making to Gaza's hunger crisis. A tangled parachute and a crowd in chaos Based on six videos of the airdrop that killed Uday, we were able to locate the incident to a tent camp on the coast of central Gaza. We determined that the drop occurred at approximately 11.50am on 4 August, based on metadata from these videos shared by three eyewitnesses. Flight tracking data shows that only one aid plane, a UAE Armed Forces C-130 Hercules, was in the area at that time. Footage from the ground shows 12 pallets falling from the plane. The four lowest parachutes soon become tangled, and begin to fall in pairs. As a crowd surges towards the landing zone, a gunshot rings out. Nine more follow over a 90-second period. Sakhr al Qaraan, an eyewitness and Uday's neighbour, says that Uday was among those running after the first pallet to land. "He didn't see the other pallet it was tangled up with, and it fell on him moments later," says Sakhr. "People ran to collect the aid in cold blood, devoid of humanity, and he suffocated under that damned blanket - under the feet of people who had lost all humanity." The scene descended into chaos as Palestinians, some armed, tussled over the limited food available. By the time Uday was pulled from the crowd and rushed to hospital, it was too late. The UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not respond to a request for comment. Parachutes failed in half of airdrops analysed This was not the first time that airdrops at this location had posed a threat to those on the ground. The day before Uday was killed, the same plane had dropped aid over the site. The footage below, shared by the UAE Armed Forces, shows the view from inside the plane. Just before the footage ends, it shows that one of the parachutes was broken. Hisham al Armi recorded the scene from the ground. His video shows the broken parachute, as well as another that had failed completely. Military planes dropped aid at the site on eight consecutive days between 30 July and 6 August. Sky News verified footage showing parachute failures during four of those eight airdrops. Flight tracking data shows that almost all of the 67 aid flights over that period followed a similar route along the coast, which is densely packed with tent camps. An Israel Defence Forces (IDF) official told Sky News that the airdrops are routed along the coast, because this is where much of Gaza's population is now concentrated. An IDF spokesperson added the Israeli military "takes all possible measures to mitigate the harm to uninvolved civilians". Hisham al Armi told Sky News he is grateful to the countries that donated the aid, but "the negatives outweigh the positives". "Fighting occurs when aid is dropped, and some people are killed ... due to the crush and parachutes." Other dangers are also posed by the airdrops. The footage below, taken on 29 July, shows Palestinians venturing into the sea in order to chase aid that had drifted over the water. The IDF has banned Palestinians from entering the sea. One woman, a relative of Uday who witnessed his death, described the airdrops as the "airborne humiliation of the people". "There is not enough aid for them," she said. "It creates problems among the people, and some are killed just to obtain a little aid. And most people don't receive any aid, they remain hungry for days." Between 27 July and 1 August, Gaza received an estimated 1,505 tonnes of food aid per day via land routes - 533 tonnes short of what the UN's food security agency says is needed to meet basic needs. Based on flight tracking data, we estimated that airdrops added just 38 tonnes daily, 7% of the shortfall. "The quantities involved are minuscule in terms of the scale of the need," says Sam Rose, Gaza director of UNRWA, the UN agency previously responsible for distributing food in the territory. UNRWA claims it has enough food stationed outside of Gaza to feed the population for three months, but that Israel has not allowed the agency to bring in any food since 2 March. "We should be dealing with that rather than introducing something else which is costly, dangerous, undignified and somehow legitimises ... the access regime by suggesting that we found a way round it through airdrops," Rose says. COGAT, the Israeli agency responsible for coordinating aid deliveries, referred Sky News to a statement in which it said there is "no limit on the amount of aid" allowed into Gaza. An IDF spokesperson also denied restricting aid, and said the Israeli military "will continue to work in order to improve the humanitarian response in the Gaza Strip, along with the international community". In his interview five days before he was killed, Uday al Qaraan appealed to world leaders to open Gaza's borders. "What would happen if they just let the aid in?" he asked. "If you can fly planes and drop aid from the sky then you can break the siege, you can open a land crossing."
Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
Rail bosses could face jail over ticket dodger prosecutions
Rail bosses have been warned they could face prison time for using unqualified staff to prosecute alleged ticket dodgers, The Telegraph can reveal. Company directors have been warned by Department for Transport (DfT) lawyers that they may be 'criminally liable' for letting non-lawyers act as court prosecutors against passengers accused of not paying the right fare. Thousands of criminal cases brought against rail travellers before April 2016 could be erased 'because they were instituted unlawfully', according to an internal DfT memo seen by The Telegraph. In a crackdown, the Transport Secretary has now warned train bosses that 'any [ticket] enforcement must be proportionate and not punish those making genuine mistakes'. Britain's notoriously complex railway fares system offers 55 million different types of ticket, most of which have separate restrictions, terms and conditions on when and how they can be used. It comes after 75,000 wrongful fare evasion convictions had to be erased earlier this year after the Government realised train companies were prosecuting cases they had no legal authority to bring. Heidi Alexander said in a letter published by the Government on Wednesday that train companies must stop using so-called 'lay prosecutors' – staff with no formal legal training as solicitors or barristers – to bring court cases against train passengers. Such cases include one threatened last year against a 22-year-old Cambridge engineering student accused of underpaying his fare by £1.90. Using lay prosecutors in the past has broken the law, according to internal DfT legal guidance. Ms Alexander also accepted 'in full' an Office of Rail and Road report, which recommended simplifying the train ticketing system and concentrating on 'better passenger education' instead of prosecution for honest mistakes. 'My officials wrote to all operators in June on the specific issue of lay prosecutors,' said Ms Alexander in Wednesday's letter. 'It is your responsibility to ensure that you are adequately protecting revenue in a cost effective but lawful way, and where it is appropriate, you should continue using prosecutions as part of a robust and proportionate revenue protection strategy. 'However, as 'good' and 'efficient' operators, we would not expect you to use lay prosecutors to present cases in court and carry out other regulated legal activities until you are confident that it is lawful to do so, having taken advice as appropriate.' Critics say the erasure of thousands of fare evasion convictions earlier this year was based on a legal technicality, while some rail sources claim that those who were wrongfully punished were probably guilty of breaking train rules anyway. Others have sought to compare the rail prosecution saga to the Post Office scandal, which also involved state-backed companies carrying out private prosecutions against members of the public. Train company directors could face prison sentences if they are prosecuted for letting non-lawyers bring criminal cases against their passengers. It is a crime under section 14 of the Legal Services Act 2007 for a non-lawyer to carry out a 'reserved legal activity'. Breaking this law carries a prison sentence of up to two years or a £5,000 fine. Annual accounts for DfT's arms-length railway company, which were published in June, said: 'This is an emerging issue and at the time of the approval of the accounts there is no way to reliably estimate the value of any possible liability or the extent of any obligation arising in respect of the Group.' This means rail bosses do not yet know how many convictions will have to be erased, or how much they will have to return in wrongly-paid fines, compensation and legal costs. 'Enforcement must be proportionate' Although the taxpayer will have to reimburse victims of state-owned train companies, including LNER, Northern, TransPennine Express, South Western Railway and Southeastern, the position for private companies – particularly those franchises which have ceased to exist over the last 30 years of rail privatisation – is unclear. A government source said: 'Fare evasion costs the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of pounds a year and dents confidence in our railway, so we're dead serious about tackling it. 'But enforcement must be proportionate. We can't have operators going after an older person faced with an incomprehensible system, or a student who has made an honest mistake. 'We'll set out our full response to the ORR report in due course, and Great British Railways will simplify fares and ticketing – restoring a railway the public can be proud of again.' The DfT's legal advice said: 'There is a statutory defence that the accused 'did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that the offence was being committed.' 'The defence becomes less likely to be available with each passing day and in particular each passing day subsequent to legal advice being given.' 'Consideration will need to be given to the criminal liability of individual lay prosecutors, the TOCs and the individual liability of TOC directors under the relevant provisions.'
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Players devastated after winning share of £1.6m then Gala Bingo takes it back
Gala Bingo players who had thousands of pounds credited to their accounts were left devastated when they were informed their winnings did not exist. Several players received notifications saying they had won an online bingo game, with some able to withdraw the money. But they were informed there had been a 'technical error' and they would not be receiving the winnings. Emma Wills, a 34-year-old mother of three from London, was mistakenly credited £920. She told Sky News: "I was shocked, I was thinking, 'Oh my gosh, I can take the kids out somewhere nice while they're with me for the holidays, I can pay off a few of my debts, and I can give money for a car,' and obviously that quickly went out the window.' Technician Adam Wall, 45 and from North Wales, added he believed he had won enough money to start planning his wedding after winning £7,200. Those affected by the glitch were playing the Summer Nights Bingo promotion, which costs 1p a ticket and has a maximum prize pot of £150. But the error meant the prize pot increased, and players were instead credited with a share of more than £1.6m over the course of two hours. More than 170 people have joined the Facebook Group 'Justice for Gala Victims' to share their experiences. Players have shared screenshots showing their winnings in the Facebook group, with some apparently receiving prizes of more than £2,000. However, players later received a message that said: 'Unfortunately, due to a technical error on Monday 4 August, your account was incorrectly credited with Bingo winnings.' Some customers affected by the glitch have complained to Gala Bingo, with many receiving £20 in compensation. Gala Bingo has said it has informed the Gambling Commission of the incident and has apologised to those affected. A Gala Bingo spokesperson said: "We apologise to customers for a technical error which occurred during our Summer Nights Bingo promotion for a short period of time, resulting in all players receiving incorrect payouts. 'Our customer terms and conditions clearly state that in the event of a malfunction, winnings can be voided. Affected players have been contacted directly with a gesture of goodwill."
