logo
I was right about the election, so here's my unsolicited advice for the obliterated Libs

I was right about the election, so here's my unsolicited advice for the obliterated Libs

The Advertiser08-05-2025

Basically, it's hard to be humble when you are as smart as me.
Soz. As I've been writing for months now, Peter Dutton was on the nose with women. And women wiped him out. A complete wipeout.
Worst result in the history of the Coalition. Now the Nationals are saying they want to back out of their long-standing arranged marriage. Geez, I back them to get out of that ASAP.
It seems to me that the men of Australia - particularly the men in the Liberal Party - had no interest in listening to their better halves. Their much smarter halves.
While there is nothing lovable about Mr Wormwood, the deplorable father in Roald Dahl's Matilda, he does say this one classic thing which is pertinent in this situation. "I'm right, you're wrong, and there's nothing you can do about it."
So what's next? I'm going to approach this two ways. First, some advice for the Labor Party. Then, some advice for the Liberal Party.
OK, so the Labor Party won a second and very convincing election. Strong mandate. Huge numbers. Huuuuuge numbers.
Here is what I hope it does. For heaven's sake, listen to people for whom cost-of-living is a serious issue - and that's the people on welfare payments of one kind or another. Raise the rate. Raise the bloody rate. What the hell is the matter with you?
Ditch these idiotic submarines and spend money where it will do best, which is improving the living standards of kids (kids!) currently living in poverty. I love a tax cut as much as the next person but I would love to be sure that all the kids at the kindy where my grandchildren go, get three square meals a day. Not just the ones with doting boomer grandparents.
Or, as Cassandra Goldie, ACOSS CEO for 15 years, put it, much more calmly than me: "Millions of Australians can't afford the basics of life. They can't afford food or rent or medicine. Their power bills frighten them ... voters face exactly the same long-term challenges as they did before the election."
Yeah Albo and co, raise the rate for all these payments: Jobseeker, Youth Allowance, Parenting Payment. Just do it in the first week of Parliament. That's not just Goldie and me saying it. It's also economists like Chris Richardson, Jeff Borland, Nicholas Gruen and Nicki Hutley.
Now, the hardest one. Tax reform. We just can't have the rich getting richer any longer. I recognise you can't just ditch negative gearing and capital gains tax discount for fear of frightening the horses - but surely you can start to pare back the extent of it. As AHURI's Michael Fotheringham told me: "Put a cap on negative gearing and then reduce that cap over an extended period would allow removal of a problematic policy setting without triggering market disruption." Yeah, do that. Slowly, slowly.
You now have - at least - two terms in government to bring people along with you on the journey. It wil be tough. The Coalition, tiny rump it is, now has, with Tim Wilson, the man I'd describe as its Chief Greed Officer after his effective campaign against changes to tax, back in parliament. And he's already reheating one of the Coalition's most toxic policies among voters: nuclear power.
Get a wriggle on with fixing housing. Pour money into the sector. Once you do that, the vile racism promoted by those gutless arseholes from the other side will disappear. It will no longer be us or them, it will be us AND them. Make enough housing to go around and it will no longer be a point of contention. "One of the reasons for the landslide," says Fotheringham, "was a genuine focus on housing supply, not just more for the same demand-side rubbish."
Climate is so key. Let's not approve any more mines and gas fields, let's reward people who actively work towards net zero. I think we don't have a lot of time left with this planet unless we attend to its needs. I selfishly begged and nagged for grandkids - and they need a future, as do you and yours.
"All the words scientists - and the United Nations - have made it clear that there is no need for any new coal, oil or gas projects if we are to avoid dangerous climate change. We cannot afford for Australia to keep expanding its massive fossil fuel export industry," says Ebony Bennett, deputy director of The Australia Institute and fellow columnist.
Now, Liberal Party, you won't pay any attention to me because you haven't in the past. But I was one of those angry women who kept writing about how Labor needed to fix its representation. Then it did. And look where it is now. You need to pay attention to your declining membership and your intransigence around women.
The only thing that's stopping you is a bunch of ideological warriors who've fought their way to blanket defeat. How ludicrous that the best you've got is Angus Taylor? How ridiculous is it that you are ignoring the host of talented people in your party because they have vaginas?
READ MORE:
Extremely very. I'm assuming there are voters who did not put the Liberal Party first because, even though their ideological positions line up, they could not afford to vote for a party which at one stage wanted to abolish work-from-home. Even Liberal voters have families who are on the juggle on the reg.
Your policies need to cater for everyone - not just Boomers with property portfolios. They will die soon. It is no wonder that those under 25 did not vote for you. You aren't recognising what modern life looks like - and if you don't do that, if you don't attend to the needs of those without homes or predictable careers, if you don't attend to those with families, your party won't exist any more. Your party, your choice.
Basically, it's hard to be humble when you are as smart as me.
Soz. As I've been writing for months now, Peter Dutton was on the nose with women. And women wiped him out. A complete wipeout.
Worst result in the history of the Coalition. Now the Nationals are saying they want to back out of their long-standing arranged marriage. Geez, I back them to get out of that ASAP.
It seems to me that the men of Australia - particularly the men in the Liberal Party - had no interest in listening to their better halves. Their much smarter halves.
While there is nothing lovable about Mr Wormwood, the deplorable father in Roald Dahl's Matilda, he does say this one classic thing which is pertinent in this situation. "I'm right, you're wrong, and there's nothing you can do about it."
So what's next? I'm going to approach this two ways. First, some advice for the Labor Party. Then, some advice for the Liberal Party.
OK, so the Labor Party won a second and very convincing election. Strong mandate. Huge numbers. Huuuuuge numbers.
Here is what I hope it does. For heaven's sake, listen to people for whom cost-of-living is a serious issue - and that's the people on welfare payments of one kind or another. Raise the rate. Raise the bloody rate. What the hell is the matter with you?
Ditch these idiotic submarines and spend money where it will do best, which is improving the living standards of kids (kids!) currently living in poverty. I love a tax cut as much as the next person but I would love to be sure that all the kids at the kindy where my grandchildren go, get three square meals a day. Not just the ones with doting boomer grandparents.
Or, as Cassandra Goldie, ACOSS CEO for 15 years, put it, much more calmly than me: "Millions of Australians can't afford the basics of life. They can't afford food or rent or medicine. Their power bills frighten them ... voters face exactly the same long-term challenges as they did before the election."
Yeah Albo and co, raise the rate for all these payments: Jobseeker, Youth Allowance, Parenting Payment. Just do it in the first week of Parliament. That's not just Goldie and me saying it. It's also economists like Chris Richardson, Jeff Borland, Nicholas Gruen and Nicki Hutley.
Now, the hardest one. Tax reform. We just can't have the rich getting richer any longer. I recognise you can't just ditch negative gearing and capital gains tax discount for fear of frightening the horses - but surely you can start to pare back the extent of it. As AHURI's Michael Fotheringham told me: "Put a cap on negative gearing and then reduce that cap over an extended period would allow removal of a problematic policy setting without triggering market disruption." Yeah, do that. Slowly, slowly.
You now have - at least - two terms in government to bring people along with you on the journey. It wil be tough. The Coalition, tiny rump it is, now has, with Tim Wilson, the man I'd describe as its Chief Greed Officer after his effective campaign against changes to tax, back in parliament. And he's already reheating one of the Coalition's most toxic policies among voters: nuclear power.
Get a wriggle on with fixing housing. Pour money into the sector. Once you do that, the vile racism promoted by those gutless arseholes from the other side will disappear. It will no longer be us or them, it will be us AND them. Make enough housing to go around and it will no longer be a point of contention. "One of the reasons for the landslide," says Fotheringham, "was a genuine focus on housing supply, not just more for the same demand-side rubbish."
Climate is so key. Let's not approve any more mines and gas fields, let's reward people who actively work towards net zero. I think we don't have a lot of time left with this planet unless we attend to its needs. I selfishly begged and nagged for grandkids - and they need a future, as do you and yours.
"All the words scientists - and the United Nations - have made it clear that there is no need for any new coal, oil or gas projects if we are to avoid dangerous climate change. We cannot afford for Australia to keep expanding its massive fossil fuel export industry," says Ebony Bennett, deputy director of The Australia Institute and fellow columnist.
Now, Liberal Party, you won't pay any attention to me because you haven't in the past. But I was one of those angry women who kept writing about how Labor needed to fix its representation. Then it did. And look where it is now. You need to pay attention to your declining membership and your intransigence around women.
The only thing that's stopping you is a bunch of ideological warriors who've fought their way to blanket defeat. How ludicrous that the best you've got is Angus Taylor? How ridiculous is it that you are ignoring the host of talented people in your party because they have vaginas?
READ MORE:
Extremely very. I'm assuming there are voters who did not put the Liberal Party first because, even though their ideological positions line up, they could not afford to vote for a party which at one stage wanted to abolish work-from-home. Even Liberal voters have families who are on the juggle on the reg.
Your policies need to cater for everyone - not just Boomers with property portfolios. They will die soon. It is no wonder that those under 25 did not vote for you. You aren't recognising what modern life looks like - and if you don't do that, if you don't attend to the needs of those without homes or predictable careers, if you don't attend to those with families, your party won't exist any more. Your party, your choice.
Basically, it's hard to be humble when you are as smart as me.
Soz. As I've been writing for months now, Peter Dutton was on the nose with women. And women wiped him out. A complete wipeout.
Worst result in the history of the Coalition. Now the Nationals are saying they want to back out of their long-standing arranged marriage. Geez, I back them to get out of that ASAP.
It seems to me that the men of Australia - particularly the men in the Liberal Party - had no interest in listening to their better halves. Their much smarter halves.
While there is nothing lovable about Mr Wormwood, the deplorable father in Roald Dahl's Matilda, he does say this one classic thing which is pertinent in this situation. "I'm right, you're wrong, and there's nothing you can do about it."
So what's next? I'm going to approach this two ways. First, some advice for the Labor Party. Then, some advice for the Liberal Party.
OK, so the Labor Party won a second and very convincing election. Strong mandate. Huge numbers. Huuuuuge numbers.
Here is what I hope it does. For heaven's sake, listen to people for whom cost-of-living is a serious issue - and that's the people on welfare payments of one kind or another. Raise the rate. Raise the bloody rate. What the hell is the matter with you?
Ditch these idiotic submarines and spend money where it will do best, which is improving the living standards of kids (kids!) currently living in poverty. I love a tax cut as much as the next person but I would love to be sure that all the kids at the kindy where my grandchildren go, get three square meals a day. Not just the ones with doting boomer grandparents.
Or, as Cassandra Goldie, ACOSS CEO for 15 years, put it, much more calmly than me: "Millions of Australians can't afford the basics of life. They can't afford food or rent or medicine. Their power bills frighten them ... voters face exactly the same long-term challenges as they did before the election."
Yeah Albo and co, raise the rate for all these payments: Jobseeker, Youth Allowance, Parenting Payment. Just do it in the first week of Parliament. That's not just Goldie and me saying it. It's also economists like Chris Richardson, Jeff Borland, Nicholas Gruen and Nicki Hutley.
Now, the hardest one. Tax reform. We just can't have the rich getting richer any longer. I recognise you can't just ditch negative gearing and capital gains tax discount for fear of frightening the horses - but surely you can start to pare back the extent of it. As AHURI's Michael Fotheringham told me: "Put a cap on negative gearing and then reduce that cap over an extended period would allow removal of a problematic policy setting without triggering market disruption." Yeah, do that. Slowly, slowly.
You now have - at least - two terms in government to bring people along with you on the journey. It wil be tough. The Coalition, tiny rump it is, now has, with Tim Wilson, the man I'd describe as its Chief Greed Officer after his effective campaign against changes to tax, back in parliament. And he's already reheating one of the Coalition's most toxic policies among voters: nuclear power.
Get a wriggle on with fixing housing. Pour money into the sector. Once you do that, the vile racism promoted by those gutless arseholes from the other side will disappear. It will no longer be us or them, it will be us AND them. Make enough housing to go around and it will no longer be a point of contention. "One of the reasons for the landslide," says Fotheringham, "was a genuine focus on housing supply, not just more for the same demand-side rubbish."
Climate is so key. Let's not approve any more mines and gas fields, let's reward people who actively work towards net zero. I think we don't have a lot of time left with this planet unless we attend to its needs. I selfishly begged and nagged for grandkids - and they need a future, as do you and yours.
"All the words scientists - and the United Nations - have made it clear that there is no need for any new coal, oil or gas projects if we are to avoid dangerous climate change. We cannot afford for Australia to keep expanding its massive fossil fuel export industry," says Ebony Bennett, deputy director of The Australia Institute and fellow columnist.
Now, Liberal Party, you won't pay any attention to me because you haven't in the past. But I was one of those angry women who kept writing about how Labor needed to fix its representation. Then it did. And look where it is now. You need to pay attention to your declining membership and your intransigence around women.
The only thing that's stopping you is a bunch of ideological warriors who've fought their way to blanket defeat. How ludicrous that the best you've got is Angus Taylor? How ridiculous is it that you are ignoring the host of talented people in your party because they have vaginas?
READ MORE:
Extremely very. I'm assuming there are voters who did not put the Liberal Party first because, even though their ideological positions line up, they could not afford to vote for a party which at one stage wanted to abolish work-from-home. Even Liberal voters have families who are on the juggle on the reg.
Your policies need to cater for everyone - not just Boomers with property portfolios. They will die soon. It is no wonder that those under 25 did not vote for you. You aren't recognising what modern life looks like - and if you don't do that, if you don't attend to the needs of those without homes or predictable careers, if you don't attend to those with families, your party won't exist any more. Your party, your choice.
Basically, it's hard to be humble when you are as smart as me.
Soz. As I've been writing for months now, Peter Dutton was on the nose with women. And women wiped him out. A complete wipeout.
Worst result in the history of the Coalition. Now the Nationals are saying they want to back out of their long-standing arranged marriage. Geez, I back them to get out of that ASAP.
It seems to me that the men of Australia - particularly the men in the Liberal Party - had no interest in listening to their better halves. Their much smarter halves.
While there is nothing lovable about Mr Wormwood, the deplorable father in Roald Dahl's Matilda, he does say this one classic thing which is pertinent in this situation. "I'm right, you're wrong, and there's nothing you can do about it."
So what's next? I'm going to approach this two ways. First, some advice for the Labor Party. Then, some advice for the Liberal Party.
OK, so the Labor Party won a second and very convincing election. Strong mandate. Huge numbers. Huuuuuge numbers.
Here is what I hope it does. For heaven's sake, listen to people for whom cost-of-living is a serious issue - and that's the people on welfare payments of one kind or another. Raise the rate. Raise the bloody rate. What the hell is the matter with you?
Ditch these idiotic submarines and spend money where it will do best, which is improving the living standards of kids (kids!) currently living in poverty. I love a tax cut as much as the next person but I would love to be sure that all the kids at the kindy where my grandchildren go, get three square meals a day. Not just the ones with doting boomer grandparents.
Or, as Cassandra Goldie, ACOSS CEO for 15 years, put it, much more calmly than me: "Millions of Australians can't afford the basics of life. They can't afford food or rent or medicine. Their power bills frighten them ... voters face exactly the same long-term challenges as they did before the election."
Yeah Albo and co, raise the rate for all these payments: Jobseeker, Youth Allowance, Parenting Payment. Just do it in the first week of Parliament. That's not just Goldie and me saying it. It's also economists like Chris Richardson, Jeff Borland, Nicholas Gruen and Nicki Hutley.
Now, the hardest one. Tax reform. We just can't have the rich getting richer any longer. I recognise you can't just ditch negative gearing and capital gains tax discount for fear of frightening the horses - but surely you can start to pare back the extent of it. As AHURI's Michael Fotheringham told me: "Put a cap on negative gearing and then reduce that cap over an extended period would allow removal of a problematic policy setting without triggering market disruption." Yeah, do that. Slowly, slowly.
You now have - at least - two terms in government to bring people along with you on the journey. It wil be tough. The Coalition, tiny rump it is, now has, with Tim Wilson, the man I'd describe as its Chief Greed Officer after his effective campaign against changes to tax, back in parliament. And he's already reheating one of the Coalition's most toxic policies among voters: nuclear power.
Get a wriggle on with fixing housing. Pour money into the sector. Once you do that, the vile racism promoted by those gutless arseholes from the other side will disappear. It will no longer be us or them, it will be us AND them. Make enough housing to go around and it will no longer be a point of contention. "One of the reasons for the landslide," says Fotheringham, "was a genuine focus on housing supply, not just more for the same demand-side rubbish."
Climate is so key. Let's not approve any more mines and gas fields, let's reward people who actively work towards net zero. I think we don't have a lot of time left with this planet unless we attend to its needs. I selfishly begged and nagged for grandkids - and they need a future, as do you and yours.
"All the words scientists - and the United Nations - have made it clear that there is no need for any new coal, oil or gas projects if we are to avoid dangerous climate change. We cannot afford for Australia to keep expanding its massive fossil fuel export industry," says Ebony Bennett, deputy director of The Australia Institute and fellow columnist.
Now, Liberal Party, you won't pay any attention to me because you haven't in the past. But I was one of those angry women who kept writing about how Labor needed to fix its representation. Then it did. And look where it is now. You need to pay attention to your declining membership and your intransigence around women.
The only thing that's stopping you is a bunch of ideological warriors who've fought their way to blanket defeat. How ludicrous that the best you've got is Angus Taylor? How ridiculous is it that you are ignoring the host of talented people in your party because they have vaginas?
READ MORE:
Extremely very. I'm assuming there are voters who did not put the Liberal Party first because, even though their ideological positions line up, they could not afford to vote for a party which at one stage wanted to abolish work-from-home. Even Liberal voters have families who are on the juggle on the reg.
Your policies need to cater for everyone - not just Boomers with property portfolios. They will die soon. It is no wonder that those under 25 did not vote for you. You aren't recognising what modern life looks like - and if you don't do that, if you don't attend to the needs of those without homes or predictable careers, if you don't attend to those with families, your party won't exist any more. Your party, your choice.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tasmanian premier set to call election today. What happens next?
Tasmanian premier set to call election today. What happens next?

ABC News

time8 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Tasmanian premier set to call election today. What happens next?

Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff is expected to go to the state's governor on Tuesday to seek a snap election, just 15 months after the last state election. Parliament will sit today to debate and pass a budget supply bill to ensure public servants can get paid during and after an election campaign. After that, Mr Rockliff intends to ask to dissolve parliament, with July 19 the earliest date an election can be held. It comes after the lower house passed Labor's no-confidence motion in Mr Rockliff on Thursday, citing the bungled rollout of new Spirit of Tasmania vessels, the state's poor budget position and previous suggestions to privatise state-owned companies. He did not speak to the media on Monday, instead taking part in an icy water slide fundraiser for a motor neurone disease charity. An election could have been avoided if the Liberals chose a new leader who would then need to get the confidence of the lower house, but cabinet minister Felix Ellis said Mr Rockliff has the support of the Liberal partyroom. "He is a man of experience, strength and compassion who has served our community for decades. "We back him in wholeheartedly." The two major parties continue to blame each other for the political impasse. Labor leader Dean Winter says the premier was to blame for losing the confidence of the lower house, while Mr Rockliff says Mr Winter is a "wrecker" . The Tasmanian Greens have called on Labor to attempt to form minority government with their support rather than go to an election, but Mr Winter has rejected this. Mr Winter said the party will not be making big spending promises if an election is called. "This will not be a spendathon from Labor," he said. "Our state cannot afford it. Labor has confirmed it will support the supply bill through parliament. It's likely to be the only parliamentary business of the day. There could be another lengthy debate however, as members can make speeches on the bill. The Legislative Council has also been recalled for the day to pass the supply bill, and members will have briefings while they wait for the supply bill to be approved by the lower house. The Tasmanian Industrial Commission last week determined that the state's politicians will get a 22 per cent pay rise on July 1, but both the Liberals and Labor say they will block this. A disallowance motion would be required to stop the pay rise. However, the government says this can occur when parliament returns after an election, with the pay increase on hold until then. Tasmania is the only state or territory that does not have its own political donation disclosure scheme, but one is set to start on July 1, potentially halfway through the election campaign. It would require all political donations above $1,000 to be publicly disclosed. The donations must be declared to the Electoral Commission within seven days, and then published seven days later, meaning donations won't start being published until one or two weeks into July. Independent upper house MLC Meg Webb called on the government to either bring the system forward to today, or ensure it starts on July 1. Mr Rockliff confirmed on Sunday that the disclosure system will start on July 1. The new laws also include public funding for campaigns, at $6 per vote once 4 per cent of the vote is achieved. Parties can apply for half of its anticipated funding up-front, based on its result at the previous state election. It's unclear whether this aspect of the bill will be in operation if an election is called. An election would also delay several pieces of legislation and the work of multiple parliamentary committees. The government intended to have its Macquarie Point stadium enabling legislation debated and passed in the lower house this month, and then the upper house in the first week of July. This will need to wait until after the election, and is subject to the new numbers in the lower house. Currently, both the Liberals and Labor have a combined 24 seats out of 35 to pass the stadium bill, but 10 out of 11 crossbenchers are opposed. The numbers in the Legislative Council will remain the same, with three independents required for the stadium bill to pass. A bill to allow for the rezoning of University of Tasmania land above Churchill Avenue in Sandy Bay will also be delayed, having already passed the lower house. A parliamentary committee examining the implementation of recommendations from the commission of inquiry into child sexual abuse in institutional settings will be paused. So, too, will a committee that is examining how the previous election was carried out. That committee will likely need to add a second election onto its workload.

Top gong for Morrison devalues all King's Birthday honours
Top gong for Morrison devalues all King's Birthday honours

The Age

time34 minutes ago

  • The Age

Top gong for Morrison devalues all King's Birthday honours

To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. KING'S HONOURS The King's Birthday honour awards are rendered meaningless by Scott Morrison's inclusion, a decision that insults Australians (' Politicians, scientists and costume designer feature in King's awards ', 8/6). His legacy, marred by robo-debt's heartless assault on vulnerable citizens, leaving families shattered, alone disqualifies him. But it doesn't end there. His sluggish COVID response, driven by others, not conviction; his callous 'I don't hold a hose' remark during the bushfires; and his dismissive stance on gender issues reveal a so-called leader who tarnished Australia's values. Awarding Morrison cheapens these honours. It's a stinging betrayal of robo-debt victims and all who suffered under his policies. Honours should celebrate integrity and selflessness. This decision exposes a system divorced from public sentiment. Australians deserve better: honours that inspire pride, not ones that reopen wounds and glorify failure. Sue Barrett, Caulfield South Brightening lives The name of the honours may have changed from Queen to King but the same old selection criteria still exists with many receiving honours for doing their jobs. The reasons set out for Scott Morrison's award includes: 'leadership of the national COVID-19 response' and 'leadership of Australia's contribution to AUKUS', both up for debate as to whether there was any leadership shown and whether many decisions were the right ones. Let's be realistic, the award was for being prime minister. However, it was great to see awards for people such as those on the front page of The Age who have done extraordinary things for many years, outside their jobs, to 'brighten lives from beyond the spotlight'. Phil Mackenzie, Eaglemont His duty to lead Scott Morrison was awarded the Companion of the Order of Australia but it was his duty as prime minister to take a leadership role in the COVID crisis, as with any crisis the country may experience. As for AUKUS, its worth is yet to be proven and indeed it may be very destructive in the future, both financially and its capabilities to keep us safe. By awarding him the highest honour only diminishes the whole system of awards, especially to those who are truly worthy. Judith Morrison, Nunawading Doubts about his achievements It would have been better if the award to Scott Morrison had read only 'For service to the people and parliament of Australia as prime minister'. His leadership of the COVID response was successful only because the states pushed him and his approach on the vaccines puzzled many. His leadership on AUKUS omits the breaking of the contract with France and the loss of international good behaviour it generated as well as doubts about the AUKUS deal itself. Robo-debt, his alienation of China and the dislike he received from people affected by the fires and floods don't rate a mention. He claimed the 2019 election result was a miracle but not that the 2022 election result was too. Adrian Tabor, Point Lonsdale Doing his job The award for Scott Morrison brings into question the very nature of the awards process. This is meant to be a criterion-based assessment process. The criteria includes that the 'outstanding achievement' should be 'above what might be expected through paid employment' – the former PM does not meet this criteria. Warren Prior, Williamstown Short memories I have vivid memories of both Daniel Andrews' and Gladys Berejiklian's relentless battle to cajole Morrison into action at the time. Morrison was also seen to be needlessly slow in co-ordinating the country's vaccine roll-out. Andrews has been repeatedly vilified for his and his team's exemplary actions in Victoria, which had some of the lowest fatality rates globally. I honestly wonder how far and how deep some people's memories run. Robert Boelen, Waratah Bay

Labor MP Jerome Laxale pushes to force climate considerations into environment laws
Labor MP Jerome Laxale pushes to force climate considerations into environment laws

ABC News

time38 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Labor MP Jerome Laxale pushes to force climate considerations into environment laws

The Albanese government is facing pressure from its backbench to move quickly on sweeping changes to environmental laws after a contentious gas project was granted provisional approval. Labor MP Jerome Laxale has said he will lobby the government to ensure that Australia's climate targets are considered when future coal or gas projects seek approval. Almost a fortnight ago Labor provisionally approved Woodside's bid to extend the life of its North West Shelf gas plant through to 2070. The approval is critical for the company's greater aim of developing the Browse gas field, Australia's largest untapped gas resource. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has made clear the approval was the only decision available under current environmental laws. "The environment minister had to deal with the North West Shelf project under the existing EPBC Act, that we did try to change in the last election," he said. "It was before the parliament for almost two years." During the last term of parliament, the government shelved plans for a rewrite of environmental laws but did try to establish a new environmental protection agency. An early blueprint outlining the aims of the new laws, the "Nature Positive Plan", indicated that emissions would be a factor in future environmental approvals. The stand-alone EPA legislation didn't pass the Senate after WA Premier Roger Cook lobbied the prime minister against doing a deal with the Greens. The prime minister has made clear the stalled reforms will be a priority in the government's second term. Environment Minister Murray Watt has been tasked with reworking the policy, which he says will seek to both protect the environment and serve the needs of businesses. Mr Laxale, who is a patron of Labor's Environment Action Network, said the new laws must consider Australia's climate ambitions. "We need to make sure that our big emitting projects don't jeopardise our ability to meet our emissions reductions target," he said. "That's the fundamental that I want to try and get into the law." One major project on the approvals horizon is Woodside's Browse project. Applications for both the project itself, and a carbon-capture and storage project alongside it, are both going through the state and federal approvals process. It's unclear if new environmental laws could be passed in time to affect Browse, and if the project would be subject to them should they be implemented. Heavily-emitting projects are already required to comply with Australia's climate targets through the safeguard mechanism. Under the safeguard rules, the North West Shelf project is subject to ever-lowering emissions caps towards net zero by 2050. But if the Browse gas project goes ahead, it would be subject to even tighter rules — needing to be net zero from the day it begins operating. The mechanism only tracks a project's direct emissions created in the process of extracting and processing fuel, meaning emissions from the gas produced and sold by a project like Browse are the responsibility of whoever buys and uses the gas. Woodside's plan to meet that net-zero test for Browse is at least partly through carbon capture and storage. After initially suggesting carbon capture and storage would be unfeasible for Browse, the company is now planning a floating system operated at sea. The Browse gas fields have a relatively high carbon content — as much as 12 per cent of the gas field is carbon dioxide. Woodside suggests the majority of that can be captured and buried, reducing Browse's direct (or "scope one") emissions by 53 million tonnes, or 47 per cent. But carbon capture and storage has a patchy track record in Australia, including some high-profile struggles. Chevron's Gorgon gas project is attempting carbon capture and storage, but as of late last year had captured about a third of the emissions it had promised. A different project, Santos' Moomba plant, has had more success. Greg Bourne, a former oil and gas industry executive who now works with the Climate Council, said he doubts Woodside can make its carbon capture plan work. "One only has to witness how difficult Chevron's Gorgon CCS project has been on land. To do it offshore is not only doubly difficult, it is multiply difficult to do," he said. But others argue carbon capture needs to work for Australia to meet its net zero ambitions. Alex Zapantis from the Global CCS Institute said drawing comparisons between the Gorgon and Browse carbon capture projects was unfair. "There is nothing technologically, fundamentally that prohibits you from re-injecting liquids of any sort, including carbon dioxide, into geological structures deep beneath the seabed," he said. "This is a well-established practice by the oil and gas industry. "And comparing Browse to Gorgon, it's not a valid comparison because the geological structures are completely different. They are different structures, they will have different characteristics." The Albanese government has made clear its desire to see more gas projects approved, and has adopted a "Future Gas Strategy" that sees a role for gas well beyond 2050. Mr Laxale agrees there is an important role for gas in the energy transition — but that role might not last forever. "I'd say we need gas, until we don't," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store