logo
Map reveals where surging medical costs are leading people to early preventable deaths

Map reveals where surging medical costs are leading people to early preventable deaths

Daily Mail​4 hours ago

Fresh data has revealed the most expensive countries to get routine medical care — and it's bad news for Americans.
The report found US residents pay the most for 21 out of 24 common medical procedures — including a C-section, an ambulance ride or a night at the hospital.
For each procedure, the cost in the US was compared to that in 24 similar countries, including Australia, Denmark, Sweden and South Korea.
Among the most stark comparisons was that for an angioplasty, a minimally invasive 2.5-hour procedure carried out 1.2million times a year where doctors open blocked or narrowed blood vessels to slash the risk of a heart attack.
Americans are slapped with a bill of $281,500 for the procedure, according to the report, about 727 times the $388 billed for the care in Australia, the cheapest country.
Other examples include the daily price for a hospital bed, where the US was also the most expensive country at $6,500 — more than six times the bill in Denmark at $935 on average and 31 times that in Latvia at $200.
And a hip replacement, for which the US charges on average $40,300, or more than five times the $7,800 charged in Turkey.
With healthcare so expensive - both preventative and emergent - people may opt to skip life-saving care and treatment because they can't afford it, which could lead to a host of early and preventable deaths.
The costs are based on data pulled from healthcare websites like debt.org — which tracks surgery costs — and medicaltourism.com — which tracks healthcare prices in several countries. The researchers say these are the latest numbers available.
The report, from insurance company William Russell, says they reflect the total cost of a procedure, rather than only the amount paid by patients after health insurance.
Out of the 24 procedures examined, the US was found to be the most expensive for some of the most common, including a heart valve replacement, a hip replacement, removal of hemorrhoids, and an MRI scan.
There were only three procedures the US was not the most expensive: An appendectomy, which is more expensive in Colombia, cataract surgery, more expensive in Austria, and gastric sleeve surgery, more expensive in South Korea.
Colombia charged $66,320 for an appendectomy, or appendix removal, which was about $20,000 more than what is billed in the US.
Austria charged $7,880 for cataract surgery, compared to $3,000 in the US, while South Korea charges $17,970 for gastric sleeve surgery, compared to $16,00 in the US.
It wasn't clear why these procedures were more expensive in these other countries compared to the US.
But Colombia has a large private hospital system, which may drive up costs, while both Austria and South Korea will send foreigners to specialized centers for treatment that are more expensive.
While the dataset revealed the stark difference between the US and other countries, some data was incomplete, with each country only compared to a select number of others rather than the full 24 countries.
A spokesperson for William Russell said: 'The US is consistently the most expensive country for medical events, recording the highest cost for all but three of the 24 procedures we examined.'
For over two decades, the United States has consistently had the highest healthcare costs in the world—largely due to its fragmented, predominantly private insurance system, where prices are often negotiated behind closed doors and vary widely depending on the insurer, provider, and location.
About 26million Americans, or nearly one in 10 people, do not have health insurance because of the prohibitive costs.
In many other similar nations, health systems have been nationalized or countries regularly negotiate with big pharmaceutical companies to reduce prices.
Most recently, President Donald Trump is trying to bring down the price of medications under his most-favored-nation request, or request health insurance companies to price their drugs sold in the US at the same level as the lowest price paid in a select group of developed countries.
It comes after a survey warned that a record number of Americans are now struggling to pay for basic healthcare, while insurance company profits reach new heights.
Over a third of US adults (about 91 million people) could not access quality healthcare if they needed it today, based on the latest West Health-Gallup Healthcare Affordability Index.
It also found that about four in 10 adults are saddled with debt from unpaid medical or dental bills, while 70million say they avoid visiting the doctor out of fear of high costs.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Doctors are using unapproved AI software to record patient meetings, investigation reveals
Doctors are using unapproved AI software to record patient meetings, investigation reveals

Sky News

time13 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Doctors are using unapproved AI software to record patient meetings, investigation reveals

Doctors are using AI software that does not meet minimum standards to record and transcribe patient meetings, according to a Sky News investigation. NHS bosses have demanded GPs and hospitals stop using artificial intelligence software that could breach data protection rules and put patients at risk. A warning sent out by NHS England this month came just weeks after the same body wrote to doctors about the benefits of using AI for notetaking - to allow them more time to concentrate on patients - using software known as Ambient Voice Technology, or "AVT". Health Secretary Wes Streeting will next week put AI at the heart of the reform plan to save the NHS in the 10-year plan for the health service in England. But there is growing controversy around software that records, transcribes and summarises patient conversations using AI. In April, NHS England wrote to doctors to sell the benefits of AVT and set out minimum national standards. However, in a letter seen by Sky News, NHS bosses wrote to doctors to warn that unapproved software that breached minimum standards could harm patients. The 9 June letter, from the national chief clinical information officer of NHS England, said: "We are now aware of a number of AVT solutions which, despite being non-compliant ... are still being widely used in clinical practice. "Several AVT suppliers are approaching NHS organisations ... many of these vendors have not complied with basic NHS governance standards. "Proceeding with non-compliant solutions risks clinical safety, data protection breaches, financial exposure, and fragmentation of broader NHS digital strategy." Sky News has previously revealed the danger of AI "hallucinations", where the technology makes up answers then lies about them, which could prove dangerous in a healthcare setting. 1:59 NHS England sets minimum standards but does not tell NHS trusts and healthcare providers which software providers to use. Sky News can now reveal there is growing pressure on NHS England and similar bodies to be more proactive. Dr David Wrigley, deputy chair of the British Medical Association's GP committee, said: "Undoubtedly, as a GP myself and my 35,000 colleagues, we've got responsibilities here - but in such a rapidly developing market when we haven't got the technical knowledge to look into this. "We need that help and support from those who can check that the products are safe, check they're secure, that they're suitable for use in the consulting room, and NHS England should do that and help and support us." Dr Wrigley continued: "We're absolutely in favour of tech and in favour of taking that forward to help NHS patients, help my colleagues in their surgeries. "But it's got to be done in a safe and secure way because otherwise we could have a free for all - and then data could be lost, it could be leaking out, and that just isn't acceptable. "So we are not dinosaurs, we're very pro-AI, but it has to be a safe, secure way." The spectre of dozens of little-known but ambitious AI companies lobbying hospitals and surgeries to get their listening products installed worries some healthcare professionals. There are huge profits to be made in this technological arms race, but the question being asked is whether hundreds of different NHS organisations can really be expected to sift out the sharks. Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said the letter was "a really significant moment". He said it was right for the NHS to experiment, but that it needed to be clearer what technology does and does not work safely. "My own view is that the government should help in terms of the procurement decisions that trusts make and should advise on which AI systems - as we do with other forms of technology that we use in medicine - which ones are safe," Mr Taylor said. "We'll need [government] to do a bit more to guide the NHS in the best way to use this." When pressed whether in the short term that actually makes it sound like it could be quite dangerous, Mr Taylor replied: "What you've seen with ambient voice technology is that kind of 'let a thousand flowers bloom' approach has got its limits." 0:45 Earlier this year, the health secretary appeared to suggest unapproved technology was being used - but celebrated it as a sign doctors were enthusiastic for change. Mr Streeting said: "I've heard anecdotally down the pub, genuinely down the pub, that some clinicians are getting ahead of the game and are already using ambient AI to kind of record notes and things, even where their practice or their trust haven't yet caught up with them. "Now, lots of issues there - not encouraging it - but it does tell me that contrary to this, 'Oh, people don't want to change, staff are very happy and they are really resistant to change', it's the opposite. People are crying out for this stuff." Doctors who use AI that complies with national standards already say there are big benefits. Anil Mehta, a doctor in the health secretary's Ilford constituency, told Sky News he backed his MP's drive for more AI technology in healthcare. "I spend 30% of my week doing paperwork," he said. "So I think once I've explained all of those features of what we're doing, patients are extremely reassured. And I haven't faced anybody that's not wanted to have me do this. He added: "(I) think that consultation with your doctor is extremely confidential, so that's not changed at all. "That remains confidential - so whether it's a vulnerable adult, a vulnerable child, teenager, young child with a parent, I think the concept of that confidentiality remains." An NHS spokesperson said: "Ambient Voice Technology has the potential to transform care and improve efficiency and in April, the NHS issued guidance to support its use in a safe and secure way. "We are working with NHS organisations and suppliers to ensure that all Ambient Voice Technology products used across the health service continue to be compliant with NHS standards on clinical safety and data security."

Should wealthy people be allowed to buy their way on to drug trials? It sounds unethical – but it could help save other sufferers like Tom and Rosie
Should wealthy people be allowed to buy their way on to drug trials? It sounds unethical – but it could help save other sufferers like Tom and Rosie

Daily Mail​

time18 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Should wealthy people be allowed to buy their way on to drug trials? It sounds unethical – but it could help save other sufferers like Tom and Rosie

It was a handwritten birthday party invitation that finally made Mel Dixon realise something was wrong. Her firstborn son, Tom, then four, had struggled with feeding since birth. He'd screamed after having milk. He was clumsy. His speech lagged behind his peers. And he had a subtle but persistent tremor – a shakiness in his hands that was hard to explain.

At-home HPV test kits to be offered to thousands of women in England
At-home HPV test kits to be offered to thousands of women in England

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

At-home HPV test kits to be offered to thousands of women in England

Women who have delayed coming forward for cervical screening will be offered a test to be taken at home, NHS England has DIY test kits, available from January, contain a long cotton-wool bud to swab the lining of the test is for human papillomavirus (HPV), which causes most cervical cancers, and women between the ages of 25 and 64 are offered it every few more than five million women aren't up to date with the test, according to the government. The Department for Health and Social Care in England said the scheme would tackle "deeply entrenched barriers" that keep women away from cervical can be due to embarrassment, discomfort, lack of time as well as religious or cultural 68.8% of women currently take up the offer of cervical cancer screening - well below the NHS England target of 80%.Younger women, those with a disability, ethnic minority communities and LGBT+ groups are more likely to miss appointments.A recent trial showed the rollout of home test kits across England could increase the proportion screened to 77% over three Department of Health said women who had rarely or never attended cervical screening would be offered a self-sample kit to complete at home. The kits are sent out "in discreet packaging" and the return postage is pre-paid. The test checks for HPV alone, but if that's detected then women will be invited for to see a doctor who will check for cell changes which could indicate and Social Care secretary Wes Streeting said: "We know the earlier cancer is diagnosed the better the chances are of survival. "By making screening more convenient, we're tackling the barriers that keep millions of women from potentially life-saving tests."Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said "beating cervical cancer means beating it for everyone" adding that at-home testing "helps to bring us closer to that goal". 'I'm absolutely thrilled' Hazel Stinson, 49, from Kent, suffers from chronic fatigue syndrome and was last able to visit the GP for a cervical screening six years says she is "absolutely thrilled" that at-home testing is being rolled out across England."This will mean that I and millions of other people just like me will be able to have the test when otherwise they might not be able to do it," she Stinson said as someone with chronic fatigue, which is also known as myalgic encephalomyelitis or ME, "the most important thing is to advocate for yourself".She says she has always been left "feeling fearful" that her inability to attend the GP regularly for tests like cervical screening could really affect her health."I'm unwell enough as it is - I really don't want anything else on top of this," she explained. NHS England recently announced a separate change to the timing of cervical screening women aged 25-49 have a negative test for HPV from this summer, they will wait five years until their next screening appointment instead of three. Research shows they're at very low risk of cervical cancer and can safely wait longer to be screened again. Main symptoms of cervical cancer vaginal bleeding that's unusual for you – including during or after sex, between periods or after the menopause - or heavier periods than usualchanges to vaginal dischargepain during sex or in the lower back, lower tummy or between the hip bones (pelvis)Source: NHS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store