logo
This policy makes wellbeing possible – it isn't the one you think

This policy makes wellbeing possible – it isn't the one you think

The National23-05-2025

Here is this week's Scotonomics, we hope you will enjoy. This week the newsletter comes from William Thomson (follow me on X/Twitter!)
LATER this year, the WEAll Alliance Scotland will release its wellbeing manifesto. Scotonomics will be proposing that a government job guarantee scheme forms part of the manifesto.
WEAll Scotland gathered contributors for a wellbeing workshop in Glasgow last week. If there is to be a wellbeing economy (there certainly isn't one now) in Scotland after the next Holyrood election, then WEAll wants to suggest some policies.
This marks a different, and in my opinion, a much-needed change of direction from WEAll. Up until now, it has been keen to sketch the idea of wellbeing and to let others decide on those policies.
The need to get practical about a wellbeing economy reflects many of the conversations I've had over the past year. People don't struggle with the idea but very often their vision is rather hazy. With WEAll producing a 'wellbeing manifesto' for the next parliament, we may all be in a better position to action a wellbeing economy.
READ MORE: David Lammy can call us 'clickbait' all he wants. He can't change the facts
Aileen McLeod, director of WEAll Scotland, in her opening notes summarised the need for a wellbeing economy.
She said: 'Delivering the wellbeing economy agenda has been a political commitment of the Scottish Government for a number of years. While some progress has been made, there are concerns that the Government is retreating and falling back on an outdated economic model that cannot deliver the transformative change that people and communities across Scotland urgently need.
'The crisis and day-to-day difficulties we all face are being compounded by the combination of short-termism and populism. The very things that we need – more immigration, shorter working week and genuine green and just transition – are being portrayed as the problem.
"We are seeing a doubling down of the relentless focus on GDP growth at all costs, short-term profit maximisation over long-term societal wellbeing, where the power and control of the economy increasingly now lies in the hands of the wealthiest few. Rather than improving our lives, this logic is tearing societies and our planet apart and taking us down a very dangerous road.
'The challenge for us is how to sustain political effort in difficult times. We can take people with us by helping them to see and understand the connection between the economy and their everyday lives and we must also give politicians and policymakers policy solutions that are relevant, practicable, doable and deliverable.'
One such solution is a government job guarantee (GJG).
A GOVERNMENT JOB GUARANTEE
I HAVE suggested that a GJG should form the central plank of an independence campaign. I listed wellbeing policies in a Scotonomics discussion paper (job guarantee was included) but to be honest, this policy is unlikely to appear on anyone else's 'wellbeing' list. And here is the evidence from the wellbeing workshop.
People voted for their favourite 'fairness' wellbeing policy. The one vote for the government job guarantee was mine. Image: Author's
The job guarantee scheme is the policy most closely linked to Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) and in a sense it is when that theory becomes practical. It has always been at the centre of MMT as a stabilising policy for the economy. If everyone who wants a job is given one by the government, it stabilises the business cycle – it expands during a recession and contracts during a boom.
By setting a floor for wages, it also sets the price level for labour. And from there you can theorise that this in turn sets the price for everything that can be purchased in the issuer's currency. So, it's a three-for-one macro policy. It softens recessions, controls inflations and leads to full employment. Those facets should be enough for it to be on the table as a policy in every country in the world. I support the policy at a macro level and I want to expand it into the wellbeing economy.
Surely if everyone who wants a job has one there would be no better wellbeing policy than that?
A WELLBEING JOB GUARANTEE
TO make the case, specifically in a wellbeing context, I want to highlight the other policies offered up at the workshop last week.
The five wellbeing needs as identified by WEAll are dignity, purpose, nature, participation, and fairness. We have already seen the three policies we discussed on our table (image above) but it was interesting to see how seamlessly a job guarantee supported the ideas from the other groups.
Here they are:
Invest long-term in learning to respect nature at all stages of life
Mass participation via citizen assemblies
Structural approach to participation, e.g. built in at local level
Ethical consumerism campaigns
Restructuring of the economy to support more local/ethical businesses etc – with social and environmental focus
Participatory budgeting with more control passed to local communities
Investment in multi-use community spaces
Repair hubs and link to circular economy
Presumption in favour of community ownership
Mass participation with cultural events
Leverage and regulate public and private investment into nature-based solutions to support human and nature and wellbeing.
So, what do you think – is this a good list of wellbeing policies? I certainly think so.
One question that most people would ask is: where does the money come from for all of these policies? That's an easy one for an MMT economist. Finding the money is not the problem if Scotland has its own government that can create currency and purchase everything that is available in Scottish pounds. The same goes if the UK Government supports these policies. The question I want to ask is, who is it that does all the work?
Once you come to the profound realisation that it is not the job of the private sector to give everyone a job (they tend to minimise costs including labour costs) then a government job guarantee becomes a sensible response. Look at that list again.
Who trains and educates us all to keep our lifelong connection to nature? Who organises, manages and reports from the citizen assemblies? Who runs the campaigns? Who works for businesses that aren't profit motivated? Who provides resources, support and guidance to the volunteers on community councils? Who paints, fixes up and manages the community spaces? Who works in the repair hubs? If more community ownership is the target, who ensures those people have the necessary skills? Who organises and runs the cultural programmes? And finally, who is it that develops and supports all those nature-based solutions – tree planting, floor damage repairs, peat restoration?
A job guarantee is the glue that makes all of this possible.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar responds to claim by-election candidate 'can't string sentence together'
A final thought. Attendees also included a 'universal basic income' (UBI) on their list and there was general agreement on this policy in the group. A basic income is part of a job guarantee scheme, with an income paid to anyone unwilling or unable to work. So why isn't a job guarantee scheme as popular as a UBI in a wellbeing discussion?
My response is that very few people know about the policy. I hope that once more people engage with the idea, they will see why it should top any list of wellbeing policies.
Final works from Aileen: 'The wellbeing economy is the most important and relevant agenda of our times for responding to the interlinked crises and challenges we face and for delivering lasting change with security for all.
'We all have a role to play in ensuring the wellbeing economy approach is high on the political agenda and getting Scotland on track'.
I believe that a government job guarantee scheme should be central to that vision and will be working over the coming months to raise the profile of a policy that should be at the heart of a wellbeing policy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Huge compensation sum paid to seven wrongfully jailed Scots prisoners revealed
Huge compensation sum paid to seven wrongfully jailed Scots prisoners revealed

Scottish Sun

time39 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

Huge compensation sum paid to seven wrongfully jailed Scots prisoners revealed

Payouts are granted when new evidence shows 'beyond reasonable doubt' inmates were wrongly convicted Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) MORE than £3million has been paid out to wrongfully jailed prisoners, we can reveal. Figures show the compensation cash was handed to seven lags released due to miscarriages of justice in the last decade. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 More than £3million was paid out to seven lags who were wrongfully imprisoned Credit: Alamy Some £1.2million was split by five innocent cons between 2015 and 2020 while another two have shared £1.99million in the last five years. Payouts are granted when new evidence shows 'beyond reasonable doubt' inmates were wrongly convicted — or there was a 'serious default' or error by cops or authorities. Scottish Labour warned Nats ministers' 'neglect' of the system could lead to taxpayers stumping up for more payouts. Justice spokeswoman Pauline McNeill said: 'One case of wrongful imprisonment is too many and every effort must be made to prevent these miscarriages of justice occurring. 'That is why it is extremely important to closely scrutinise any changes to the criminal justice system to ensure they do not risk creating miscarriages of justice.' She added: 'There is a real risk that the pressure on our justice system caused by SNP neglect and the dwindling number of defence lawyers could contribute to this problem. 'First and foremost, we must try to prevent miscarriages of justice because of the human cost, but there are also millions being taken from frontline services to pay for these appalling mistakes.' Scotland's most famous miscarriages of justice include Patrick Meehan who received a royal pardon after being wrongfully convicted of the 1969 murder of Rachael Ross in Ayr. In 1973, Stuart Gair was wrongfully jailed for the murder of Margaret McLaughlin in Carluke. And Joe Steele spent 18 years in jail for the Ice Cream War murders after being wrongly convicted of starting a fire which killed six members of the Doyle family in 1984. First convicts leave Barlinnie after Scottish Government release 360 prisoners early due to overcrowding Ministers across the UK have also been forced to apologise for the wrongful prosecution of hundreds of Post Office subpostmasters - some of whom served jail sentences.

PM announces full inquiry into grooming gangs after resisting calls for probe
PM announces full inquiry into grooming gangs after resisting calls for probe

North Wales Chronicle

timean hour ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

PM announces full inquiry into grooming gangs after resisting calls for probe

The Prime Minister said he had read 'every single word' of an independent report into child sexual exploitation by Baroness Louise Casey and would accept her recommendation for the investigation. Earlier this year the Government dismissed calls for a public inquiry, saying its focus was on putting in place the outstanding recommendations already made in a seven-year national inquiry by Professor Alexis Jay. Prof Jay's 2022 report concluded there had been institutional failings across the country and tens of thousands of victims in England and Wales. But speaking to reporters travelling with him on his visit to Canada, the Prime Minister said: 'From the start I have always said that we should implement the recommendations we have got because we have got many other recommendations… I think there are 200 when you take all of the reviews that have gone on at every level and we have got to get on with implementing them. 'I have never said we should not look again at any issue. I have wanted to be assured that on the question of any inquiry. That's why I asked Louise Casey who I hugely respect to do an audit. 'Her position when she started the audit was that there was not a real need for a national inquiry over and above what was going on. 'She has looked at the material she has looked at and she has come to the view that there should be a national inquiry on the basis of what she has seen. 'I have read every single word of her report and I am going to accept her recommendation. That is the right thing to do on the basis of what she has put in her audit. 'I asked her to do that job to double check on this; she has done that job for me and having read her report, I respect her in any event. I shall now implement her recommendations.' Asked when it would be launched, Sir Keir said the probe would be implemented under the Inquiries Act, which will take 'a bit of time to sort out' and would be done in 'an orderly way'. This means the inquiry will be able to compel witnesses to give evidence. It is understood the inquiry will be national in scope, co-ordinating a series of targeted local investigations. A national row over grooming gangs was ignited in January after tech billionaire Elon Musk used his X social media platform to launch a barrage of attacks on Sir Keir and safeguarding minister Jess Phillips. It followed the Government's decision to decline a request from Oldham Council for a Whitehall-led inquiry into child sexual abuse in the town. The Government later commissioned a 'rapid' audit by Lady Casey into the nature and scale of group-based child sexual abuse, which had been due to take three months but was delayed. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, who has repeatedly attacked Sir Keir over his resistance to launching another national probe, said the Prime Minister had to be 'led by the nose to make the correct decision'. 'Keir Starmer doesn't know what he thinks unless an official report has told him so,' she said. 'Just like he dismissed concerns about the winter fuel payment and then had to U-turn, just like he needed the Supreme Court to tell him what a woman is, he had to be led by the nose to make the correct decision here. 'I've been repeatedly calling for a full National Inquiry since January. It's about time he recognised he made a mistake and apologised for six wasted months. 'But this must not be the end of the matter. There are many, many more questions that need answering to ensure this inquiry is done properly and quickly. 'Many survivors of the grooming gangs will be relieved that this is finally happening, but they need a resolution soon, not in several years' time. Justice delayed is justice denied.' Reform UK leader and Clacton MP Nigel Farage said the move was a 'welcome U-turn' and would 'expose the multiple failings of the British establishment'.

More UK jets being sent to the Middle East as Starmer calls for de-escalation
More UK jets being sent to the Middle East as Starmer calls for de-escalation

North Wales Chronicle

timean hour ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

More UK jets being sent to the Middle East as Starmer calls for de-escalation

The Prime Minister said further military assets are being deployed to provide 'contingency support' across the region amid escalating hostilities between the two long-time foes. Additional refuelling aircraft have been deployed from UK bases and more fast jets will be sent over, it is understood. The UK already has RAF jets in the Middle East as part of Operation Shader. Speaking to reporters travelling with him on a visit to Canada, Sir Keir declined to rule out intervening in the conflict entirely but made clear he would continue pressing for de-escalation and said the 'intense' developments over the weekend would be discussed in detail at the G7 summit. 'These are obviously operational decisions and the situation is ongoing and developing and therefore I'm not going to get into the precise details, but we are moving assets, we've already been moving assets to the region, including jets, and that is for contingency support across the region. So that is happening,' he said. Sir Keir added: 'Our constant message is de-escalate, and therefore everything we're doing, all discussions we're having are to do with de-escalation.' Asked whether he would rule out UK involvement, he said: 'I'm not going to get in to that.' Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the Government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Iran launched missile and drone attacks on Israel overnight after a series of Israeli strikes on the heart of Tehran's nuclear programme and armed forces. Tehran's UN ambassador said 78 people had been killed and more than 320 wounded in Israel's attacks, while its response was said to have killed at least three and wounded dozens. A Cobra meeting of high-level ministers was convened on Friday afternoon to discuss the situation. The same is not expected on Saturday but Whitehall officials were expected to be meeting. The conflict was ignited by early morning Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear bases on Friday. Israel said the barrage was necessary before Iran got any closer to building a nuclear weapon, although experts and the US government have assessed that Tehran was not actively working on such a weapon. Iran retaliated with waves of drones and ballistic missiles, with explosions lighting up the skies over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Both the UK and the US have insisted they were not involved in the Israeli strikes and that the country acted unilaterally. Sir Keir would not be drawn on whether the UK was given notice of Israel's attack after reports that the country was not forewarned following the Government's decision to sanction two far-right Israeli ministers last week. 'In relation to Israel, I had a good and constructive discussion with Prime Minister Netanyahu yesterday, and that included discussions about the safety and security of Israel, as you would expect, between two allies,' he said. Asked if Britain had been told in advance of Israeli's military plans, the Prime Minister said: 'I'm not going to go into what information we had at the time or since. 'But we discuss these things intensely with our allies. But I'm not going to get into precisely what we knew, because it's a constant flow of information between our allies, and between us and the US.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store