Free The Doctor Who Helped Track Down Osama Bin Laden, US Congressman Tells Bilawal Bhutto
Dr Shakil Afridi, who helped the CIA locate Osama Bin Laden, remains imprisoned in Pakistan with US Congressman Brad Sherman urging Pakistan to release him
To the United States, he is a hero who played a crucial role in one of the most consequential manhunts in modern history. To Pakistan, he's a traitor whose actions embarrassed the nation and revealed gaping holes in its security establishment. Fourteen years on, Dr Shakil Afridi, the Pakistani doctor who aided the CIA in tracking down Osama Bin Laden, continues to languish in a prison cell with his fate sealed in secrecy, politics, and silence.
Now, his case has returned to the diplomatic spotlight.
US Congressman Brad Sherman reignited the call for Dr Afridi's release, urging a Pakistani delegation led by former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari to press Pakistan to free the incarcerated doctor. Releasing Dr Afridi would be a meaningful gesture, especially for the families who lost loved ones in the 9/11 attacks, Sherman said. His plea underscores a longstanding strain in US-Pakistan relations over the issue.
Who Is Dr Shakil Afridi?
Dr Shakil Afridi was a government doctor in the restive Khyber tribal region when he was approached to run a vaccination campaign; not for public health, but for espionage. Under the guise of a hepatitis B immunisation drive, Dr Afridi's job was to collect DNA samples from residents in Abbottabad, a military garrison town about 160 kilometres from Peshawar. US intelligence agencies hoped these samples would confirm the presence of Osama Bin Laden in a mysterious compound there.
According to reports from National Geographic and the BBC, in April 2011, Dr Afridi knocked on the gates of the fortress-like house where Bin Laden was hiding. The plan was to gather biological evidence without arousing suspicion. While it remains unclear whether he ever secured DNA samples from Bin Laden's relatives, the information he helped gather confirmed suspicions about the terror chief's location.
On May 2, 2011, US Navy SEALs stormed the Abbottabad compound and killed Osama Bin Laden. The raid stunned the world, and humiliated Pakistan. That Bin Laden had been living for years near a prestigious military academy without detection triggered global questions about Pakistan's role or negligence.
Dr Afridi's life had been tumultuous even before his involvement in the Bin Laden operation. In 2008, he was abducted by Mangal Bagh, a terrorist who led Lashkar-e-Islam, a Pakistani terror group. His family was forced to pay a ransom of 1 million Pakistani rupees for his release. Afterward, Dr Afridi briefly moved to the US but returned to Pakistan in 2009, reportedly dissatisfied with American life.
Twenty days after Bin Laden's death, on May 23, 2011, Pakistani authorities arrested Dr Afridi. Initially charged with treason – a charge not formally pursued – he was instead convicted in 2012 by a tribal court for allegedly financing Lashkar-e-Islam. Ironically, the 'financing" was the ransom money his family paid for his own freedom years earlier. He was sentenced to 33 years in prison under archaic colonial laws, later reduced to 23 years on appeal.
Dr Afridi, now held in the high-security Sahiwal Central Jail in Punjab province, has remained largely invisible since. A rare interview he gave to Fox News from prison in 2012 detailed how he was beaten and tortured by Pakistani intelligence operatives. His appeal remains pending in court, and his legal fate is tangled in bureaucratic inertia and political unease.
Did He Know the Target Was Osama Bin Laden?
A lingering mystery remains: Did Dr Afridi know he was helping hunt the world's most wanted terrorist? Some US officials suggest he had no idea. A National Geographic report claims that while he cooperated with the CIA, he likely did not know that the target was Osama Bin Laden. To Pakistan, however, the nuances hardly matter. His collaboration with a foreign intelligence agency was, in the words of former ISI chief Asad Durrani, 'one of the most unforgivable crimes".
'There was so much public outrage," Durrani said in a 2021 interview, 'his arrest possibly saved him from being lynched."
Since his arrest, Dr Afridi's family has vanished from public view. His wife, once a principal at a government school, and their three children have reportedly been living underground due to continuous threats from terrorist groups and hardline sympathisers. Their location remains undisclosed for safety reasons.
There were discussions over a possible prisoner swap – Dr Afridi in exchange for Dr Aafia Siddiqui, a Pakistani neuroscientist convicted in the US on terrorism charges. But the talks stalled, and no deal was ever reached.
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
9/11 attack Osama bin Laden pakistan
Location :
Islamabad, Pakistan
First Published:
June 09, 2025, 13:39 IST
News world Free The Doctor Who Helped Track Down Osama Bin Laden, US Congressman Tells Bilawal Bhutto
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Why are adults in China turning to pacifiers for stress relief?
In China, adult pacifiers priced between 10 and 500 yuan are selling in the thousands each month, according to local media. Made from silicone or rubber, these oversized dummies are marketed for anxiety relief, smoking cessation, and improved sleep. Dentists warn of risks such as misaligned teeth, jaw pain, and breathing difficulties with prolonged use Some online shops claim they sell more than 2,000 adult pacifiers a month. Representational Image/AI-generated via Perplexity by Firstpost Adult pacifiers, once unimaginable outside of infant care, have become a surprising consumer phenomenon in China. Marketed for purposes ranging from easing stress to aiding sleep, these oversized silicone and rubber products have sparked a wave of online purchases. While many consumers swear by their benefits, health experts warn of possible physical harm and question whether these pacifiers address deeper emotional needs, reported South China Morning Post (SCMP). From baby aisles to adult shopping carts In recent months, e-commerce platforms such as Taobao and have seen a surge in listings for adult pacifiers. These products, designed to fit the mouths of grown-ups, are considerably larger than their infant counterparts. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The nipple is generally transparent, while the shield can be found in a range of colours. Prices vary widely — some sell for as little as 10 yuan (approximately US$1.40), while premium versions are listed at up to 500 yuan (about US$70). According to figures reported in Chinese media, certain online shops are now selling thousands of these pacifiers every month. Some distributors have stated they move more than 2,000 units in that period. Promotional materials often highlight benefits such as promoting relaxation, improving sleep quality, providing psychological comfort, assisting in quitting smoking, and even encouraging proper breathing techniques. Why people are buying them The appeal of these products is evident in customer feedback. One reviewer wrote, 'It is high quality, soft, and I feel comfortable sucking it. It does not impede my breathing.' Another shared, 'It is amazing in helping me quit smoking. It gives me psychological comfort and makes me not so fidgety during my smoke cessation periods.' A third consumer commented, 'When I am under pressure at work, I suck on the dummy. I feel I am indulged in a sense of safety from childhood.' For some users, the pacifier functions as a tool for relaxation in stressful work environments, while others incorporate it into nighttime routines to aid in falling asleep, reported SCMP. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Several buyers have linked its use to managing anxiety or coping with feelings of burnout. A number of people attempting to quit smoking say the pacifier serves as a substitute oral fixation, helping them endure cravings without lighting a cigarette. The psychological explanation Mental health professionals say the practice may be tied to what is known as the 'regression phenomenon,' a psychological response in which adults revert to behaviours or objects associated with childhood comfort when faced with high stress or emotional strain. This behaviour, they note, can temporarily provide a sense of security and reduce anxiety. Zhang Mo, a psychologist in Chengdu, told SCMP, 'The real solution is not to treat themselves as a child, but to face the challenge directly and to solve it.' She explained that while these pacifiers might offer short-term relief, they could also prevent individuals from confronting underlying issues. Instead of addressing the root causes of stress or anxiety, the object may serve as an avoidance mechanism. Concerns from the medical community While consumer enthusiasm continues to grow, dental and medical professionals have raised multiple red flags about prolonged use. Tang Caomin, a dentist based in Chengdu, cautioned that extended use — particularly more than three hours per day — could lead to structural changes in the mouth. 'By sucking the dummy for more than three hours a day, the position of your teeth might change after a year,' he told SCMP. He also noted that frequent pacifier use could reduce jaw mobility and cause pain while chewing. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Tang expressed additional safety concerns, especially when the pacifier is used during sleep. If components become loose, there is a risk that parts could be inhaled or swallowed, potentially causing choking or suffocation. Other possible complications include oral infections from continuous contact with the device, and breathing difficulties if airflow is obstructed. 'The potential damage to customers' mouths by the pacifiers is intentionally played down by their sellers,' Tang remarked. Health experts also warn that relying on a pacifier to cope with stress could mask existing emotional or psychological conditions. Without proper treatment, these issues might worsen over time, even if the user experiences temporary comfort. Social media buzz divided The unusual sight of adults openly using pacifiers has generated intense discussion on Chinese social media. A topic related to the trend reportedly amassed more than 60 million views on one platform. Reactions have ranged from disbelief to humour. 'This world has become so mad that adults are using pacifiers,' one online user commented. Another quipped, 'Is this not a kind of stupid tax?' Some defend the practice as a harmless and personal choice, arguing that in an increasingly stressful society, adults should be free to seek comfort in any safe form they choose. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Others see it as a symptom of growing emotional fragility, particularly among younger generations. Short videos on platforms like TikTok show adults in the United States and South Korea using pacifiers in various scenarios — during traffic jams, in the middle of high-pressure workdays, or as a means to unwind before bed. In many cases, the users cite similar reasons to those given by Chinese buyers: reducing anxiety, relieving stress, and achieving better sleep. Not a long term solution However, medical and psychological professionals outside China echo the same concerns as their Chinese counterparts, stressing that while the pacifier may provide temporary relief, it is not a substitute for long-term mental health strategies or proper medical care. The popularity of adult pacifiers sheds light on the increasing need for accessible coping mechanisms in societies where stress, anxiety, and burnout are on the rise. Unlike structured interventions such as therapy, exercise routines, or mindfulness training, pacifiers offer a quick, low-effort form of relief that does not require significant lifestyle changes. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Craving some burger and chips? According to the AHA, these are the best and worst ultra-processed foods one can eat
Craving that juicy burger and crispy chips? Who isn't! Who'd have the strength to resist biting into a meaty piece of patty with loaded different toppings and condiments, while munching on the crispiness of the chips in between? Well, we might not have the will to say no to that good a meal, but as it turns out, we should be – for the sake of our health. Ultra-processed foods have sparked debate among nutrition experts, especially after a government report in May linked them to many chronic illnesses. The American Heart Association (AHA) has now issued a helpful new advisory detailing which ultra-processed foods are 'better,' which are 'worse,' and what that means for your health. So, before you dive in, hold that ketchup and read on. What are ultra-processed foods ? Ultra-processed foods (UPF) are industrially manufactured items made from food substances, often with added chemicals, that are far removed from their natural state. They typically contain ingredients like artificial colors, flavors, preservatives, and texture enhancers, which are rarely or never used in home cooking. Some examples of UPFs include soda, chips, packaged snacks, fast food, and commercially baked goods. In short, think of anything in the section of junk food, almost all of them come under the category of UPF. Now, the new AHA report reflects a growing concern in the health community, especially since ultra-processed foods make up as much as 70% of our food supply. 'Ultra-processed foods are such a large part of the American diet, and whatever we can do to steer our diet toward healthier options would be beneficial to our cardiovascular health,' says Cheng-Han Chen, M.D., interventional cardiologist and medical director of the Structural Heart Program at MemorialCare Saddleback Medical Center in Laguna Hills, CA, as reported by Prevention. So, which ultra-processed foods are less risky, and how should you adjust your diet? Types of foods Foods, based on how much processing they undergo, are ranked using the NOVA system: Unprocessed or minimally processed: Foods close to their natural state, like fruit, vegetables, and milk. Processed culinary ingredients: Items like oils or sugar derived from Group 1 foods, used in cooking. Processed foods: Foods changed by adding ingredients like salt or sugar, such as cheese or canned vegetables. Ultra-processed foods (UPFs): Industrially made items with many ingredients often not used at home, like high-fructose corn syrup, preservatives, artificial flavors, and colors. What does the report say The AHA describes ultra-processed foods as a rising public health issue. Most UPFs are high in saturated fat, added sugar, and sodium (HFSS), factors linked to heart disease, diabetes, stroke, obesity, and inflammation. Research also ties high UPF diets to higher rates of chronic illness and death. But the advisory also notes that not all UPFs are equally harmful; some may even offer health benefits. Experts say it's important to focus less on the broad category and more on identifying UPFs that are especially risky. So, is there any demarcation among the platter of ultra-processed foods? Turns out, there is. The healthiest ultra-processed foods Although the AHA doesn't call these foods healthy, it labels them as better choices within the UPF group. Examples of such foods include: Whole-grain breads and crackers are low in salt Yogurts with low sugar Tomato sauces Nut- or bean-based spreads Dry-roasted flavored chickpeas Dried fruit snacks without added sugar High-fiber, unsweetened cereals Plant-based alternatives like soy milk and tofu are low in salt, sugar, and saturated fat As Keri Gans, R.D., puts it, as reported by Prevention, 'Some ultra-processed foods can provide essential nutrients. In contrast, others are loaded with added sugar, sodium, and unhealthy fats. Knowing the difference helps you choose options that work best for your health and your lifestyle.' Danbee Kim, M.D., adds that these foods 'can actually provide useful nutrients and help people get affordable, convenient foods—especially when fresh options are harder to find.' Labeling some UPFs as more acceptable may help people make better choices instead of rejecting the entire group. Kathleen Moore, R.D.N., explains, 'Labeling all ultra-processed foods as 'bad' may discourage the consumption of some nutrient-rich convenient options... Sometimes it is useful to use some ultra-processed foods to save time or to incorporate balanced meal options when fresh foods are limited.' The least healthy ultra-processed foods As per the AHA, these should be limited or, better, avoided: Chicken nuggets, sausages, hot dogs Sugar-sweetened drinks Liquid cheese products Cookies, candies, gummy snacks Refined white breads and tortillas Ice cream and other dairy desserts Packaged ready-to-heat meals (e.g., boxed macaroni and cheese, frozen pizzas) Chips made from potatoes or tortillas Now comes the big question… Can you eat 'healthy' UPFs often? The simplest way to answer this question is not really. According to experts, yes, you can eat those UPFs – but always in moderation and never in abundance. As per Keri Gans, as reported by Prevention, 'These can provide beneficial nutrients and fit into a balanced diet. However, still pair them with plenty of whole and minimally processed foods for optimal health.' Dr. Chen agrees that whole foods should form the core of your diet, and these processed options should simply play a supporting role. Kathleen Moore adds that more than half of the diet should be unprocessed or minimally processed, especially for those with busy lives. Meanwhile, Dr. Kim suggests viewing 'healthier' UPFs as tools to help keep a balanced, practical diet, but not the main dish. How to cut back on ultra-processed foods As health experts always highlight how consuming UPFs on a regular basis is not good for health, it is also important to understand how you can cut down on those deliciously tempting food items. Here's how: Start with whole foods: Keep canned tomatoes, beans, oatmeal, fruits, vegetables, and grains at home. Gans recommends swapping white bread for 100% whole-grain. Cut the worst UPFs first: Sugary drinks, processed meats, sweets, and salty snacks should be the first to go. Make gradual improvements: Dr. Kim advises, 'It's about progress, not perfection. Swap out the unhealthy ones first, make room for healthier stand-ins when needed, and keep working toward a diet built mostly from whole, real foods.' The American Heart Association's latest advisory offers clarity: not all ultra-processed foods are equally unhealthy. While chicken nuggets and soda are the villains of this story, whole-grain breads, low-sugar yogurts, and plant-based milks can be secret heroes. It's all about smart swaps, tasty balance, and enjoying food without sacrificing your heart. In short, craving taste and convenience doesn't mean compromising health; you just need to choose wisely! 5 Vegetables that can help women to lose more weight
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
8 hours ago
- First Post
US suspends visas for Gazans after far-right influencer posts over medical evacuations
The US has suspended visitor visas for people from Gaza following criticism from far-right influencer Laura Loomer over the admission of wounded Palestinians for medical treatment. Palestinians carry aid supplies that entered Gaza through Israel, in Beit Lahia in the northern Gaza Strip. Reuters The United States government announced on Saturday that it is suspending visitor visas for people from Gaza, after a far-right influencer with close ties to President Donald Trump criticised the admission of wounded Palestinians for medical treatment. The move followed a series of angry social media posts by Laura Loomer, who has previously promoted racist conspiracy theories and falsely claimed the 9/11 attacks were an inside job. 'All visitor visas for individuals from Gaza are being stopped while we conduct a full and thorough review of the process and procedures used to issue a small number of temporary medical-humanitarian visas in recent days,' the State Department, led by Marco Rubio, posted on X. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On Friday, Loomer had urged the department to halt visas for Palestinians from Gaza, alleging they were 'pro-HAMAS… affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood and funded by Qatar,' though she offered no evidence. Her criticism was directed at the US-based charity HEAL Palestine, which last week said it had facilitated the arrival of 11 severely injured children from Gaza, along with their caregivers and siblings, for treatment in American hospitals. The charity described it as 'the largest single medical evacuation of injured children from Gaza to the US.'
