India accuses Pakistan of ‘cross-border terrorism' after Kashmir attack
India has cut off part of Pakistan's water supply and shut down the border after a terrorist attack in Kashmir triggered the worst diplomatic spat between the two countries in decades.
New Delhi has accused Islamabad of supporting 'cross-border terrorism', blaming its neighbour for the militant attack that left 26 people dead at a tourist resort in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir on Tuesday.
In response to the attack, India has downgraded its diplomatic ties with Pakistan and unveiled a raft of punitive measures.
They included suspending a key water-sharing treaty, shutting the main land border crossing between the neighbours, withdrawing several Indian diplomatic staff from Islamabad and ordering Pakistanis to return home.
Vikram Misri, the Indian foreign secretary, told reporters in New Delhi: 'The Indus Waters Treaty of 1960 will be held in abeyance with immediate effect, until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism.'
The 1960 Indus Water Treaty gave India and Pakistan each three Himalayan rivers and the right to hydropower and irrigation resources.
It also established the India-Pakistan Indus Commission, a bilateral body made up of representatives from the two nations and responsible for resolving any issues that arise.
Mr Misri added that the crossing at the Attari-Wagah border would 'be closed with immediate effect', although those with valid travel documents may return before May 1.
The closure is hugely symbolic, as soldiers from both nations have gathered at the Attari-Wagah border every evening since 1959 to perform a goose-stepping, chest-puffing ceremony in representation of the countries' rivalry.
The daily border ceremony has largely endured since its inception, watched on by cheering crowds, having survived several diplomatic flare-ups and military skirmishes.
India has also said it gave Islamabad's defence attachés and other military officials a week to leave New Delhi, as well as announcing its own defence, navy and air advisers would be withdrawn from Pakistan.
No group has claimed responsibility for the attack in the Muslim-majority region on Tuesday, where rebels have waged an insurgency since 1989.
The insurgents are seeking independence or a merger with Pakistan, which controls a smaller part of the Kashmir region and, like India, claims it in full.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
‘We had seconds to decide if India's missile was nuclear'
As President Trump deliberated over whether to enter Israel's war with Iran, there was another potential conflict taking his attention last week. His unexpected guest on Wednesday was Field Marshal Asim Munir, Pakistan's army chief, for a closed-door lunch in the cabinet room, the first time a US president had hosted a Pakistan military chief who was not also the head of state. With Trump was Marco Rubio, his secretary of state, and Steve Witkoff, the former property developer turned special representative for the Middle East. Munir was accompanied only by Lieutenant General Asim Malik, the national security adviser. There were no civilian officials, perhaps reflecting whom Trump sees as holding power in Pakistan. 'The reason I had him here was that I wanted to thank him for not going into the war [with India],' said Trump. 'And I want to thank PM [Narendra] Modi as well, who just left a few days ago.' Pakistan has said that although all-out war between the two nuclear powers was narrowly averted by US intervention last month after the deadliest fighting in decades, the conflict in a region that is home to 1.6 billion people is far from resolved. As a result Pakistan and India were now closer to nuclear war than at any previous point, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, the former foreign minister, told The Sunday Times. • No ceasefire will let India and Pakistan escape their history On the final day of clashes, he said, India had deployed a dual-use cruise missile capable of holding a nuclear warhead and Pakistan had had to make an immediate decision about whether it was under nuclear attack. 'In that atmosphere you've got only a few seconds to decide looking at an image: is this missile going to be used within the nuclear connotation or not? And in those split seconds decisions are made.' 'The escalation ladder was rising so fast,' Bhutto Zardari said. The situation in the region remained 'incredibly perilous'. He said: 'We've achieved a ceasefire but we haven't achieved peace. And that's problematic because following this recent conflict we have lowered the threshold for full-blown military conflict to the lowest it has ever been, to what I believe are dangerously low levels.' Bhutto Zardari was speaking while visiting London as head of a nine-member delegation of MPs sent by Shehbaz Sharif, the prime minister, to 'pitch for peace' and call for international talks to resolve the problem of Kashmir over which the two nations have fought three wars. He said Pakistan had agreed to the ceasefire because it was promised such a summit, which has not materialised. India has sent a rival delegation of politicians and diplomats led by the Congress MP Shashi Tharoor to London, Washington and elsewhere to argue that Pakistan is a sponsor of cross-border terrorism and a threat to global stability. The fighting between the two broke out last month after an April terrorist attack in the Indian-controlled part of Kashmir, which India blamed on Pakistan. Twenty-six people were shot dead in a meadow in the tourist resort of Pahalgam. • How the Kashmir massacre unfolded Islamabad denied responsibility but India launched strikes deep in Pakistan against what it claimed were terrorist training camps. Pakistan claimed that it shot down six Indian fighter planes before a US-brokered ceasefire came into force on May 10. Bhutto Zardari, 36, is leader of the Pakistan People's Party (PPP), which is in coalition with the ruling party, and the son of the president. His mother, Benazir Bhutto, was Pakistan's first female prime minister –— an office she held twice, the first time in 1988 just two months after giving birth to him. He insists that Pakistan had nothing to do with the Pahalgam attack, which was initially claimed by a little-known organisation called the Resistance Front that India says is an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba (L-e-T), a Pakistani terrorist group long linked to Pakistan's military intelligence. The Resistance Front later retracted the claim. MUZAMMIL AHMED/AFP/GETTY IMAGES 'To this day, they [the Indian government] haven't provided the Indian public, their allies, or us, or the media, with names of the individuals involved in this attack,' Zardari said. 'If they did indeed come from Pakistan, who are they? Where did they come from? What border crossing points did they use? Who facilitated them? One of the largest and supposedly most efficient intelligence agencies in the world should be able to share this information.' Groups that Delhi claims are proxies for Pakistan have a long history of attacks in India — most notably the Mumbai massacre in 2008 in which terrorists laid siege to five-star hotels, going door to door shooting guests, murdering 166 people. The only attacker captured alive said the terrorists were members of L-e-T. Bhutto Zardari admits Pakistan has 'a credibility problem', adding: 'I'm not denying Pakistan has a complicated past.' That past is personal for him. He was thrust into frontline politics in 2007, when he was 19 and his mother was assassinated by terrorists. His grandfather, who founded the PPP, was executed by the military. Both his uncles met mysterious ends. For years Pakistan's military differentiated between militant groups, using some for their own purposes while pursuing others. He argues things have changed. 'This credibility and perception problem is rooted in deep biases, tainted by Islamophobia, and obfuscates from our actual effort to combat terrorism. 'I grew up during 9/11. My mother championed the fight against terrorism — she warned the world then. She gave her life doing that. Ever since she was assassinated, I at every point have opposed appeasement with any groups. We took the fight to these guys and my generation living in Pakistan now has nothing to do with it. 'I don't believe we should punish the children of Pakistan today for whatever happened in the past, particularly when we've fought against these groups and continue to as we've proven before international forums and under extreme scrutiny. We can't be condemned for past mistakes.' Bhutto Zardari accused the West of worsening Pakistan's security situation by abandoning Afghanistan and 'leaving a vacuum' there. Pakistan's military intelligence historically had close links to the Taliban but since the group took power in 2021 it has turned against its former backers. 'The rest of the world may have moved on from Afghanistan and exited Kabul, but we're fighting terrorism from there,' Bhutto Zardari said. 'The single largest number of terrorist attacks anywhere in the world is Pakistan.' At a meeting in London with Hamish Falconer, the Middle East minister, the Speaker and MPs, Bhutto Zardari raised the subject of an international conference on Kashmir. Pakistan sees the UK as having a particular responsibility, given that the conflict dates back to the British partition of India in 1947. Bhutto Zardari said: 'At a time where the Pakistani army believes that we had a military upper hand in the conflict, we agreed to a ceasefire because we believed there was a commitment from the United States that we'd go on to have a dialogue in a neutral location on all friction points. 'Now that isn't happening. We don't want the international community to get a false sense of ease as a result of the ceasefire. There's still a very real threat.'
Times
10 hours ago
- Times
Pakistan to recommend Donald Trump for Nobel peace prize
Pakistan has announced that it will formally recommend President Trump as a nominee for the Nobel peace prize for his 'great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship' in securing a ceasefire its recent conflict with India. The announcement came on Saturday, hours after Trump took credit for a peace deal negotiated in Washington between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, and at a time the US leader is considering potential intervention in the Middle East. • US moves B-2 stealth bombers as Israel-Iran conflict continues 'The government of Pakistan has decided to formally recommend President Donald J Trump for the 2026 Nobel peace prize,' the Pakistani government wrote on social media. It said the decision was taken 'in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis'. It comes after Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, had an unprecedented one-on-one meeting with Trump on Wednesday at the White House, during which they engaged in discussions for more than two hours. Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the media wing of the Pakistan Armed Forces, reported that Munir conveyed his 'deep appreciation' for Trump's role in brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after a four-day conflict in May between the two nuclear-armed nations. Last month, Trump recounted his memory of the conflict while speaking to reporters. 'I said, 'Come on, we're going to do a lot of trade with you guys [India and Pakistan]. Let's stop it. Let's stop it. If you stop it, we'll do a trade. If you don't stop it, we're not going to do any trade.'' India, meanwhile, denied that the US president had any role in its ceasefire with Pakistan. 'The talks regarding cessation of military action were held directly between India and Pakistan under the existing channels established between both militaries,' India's foreign secretary, Vikram Misri, said in a press release on Wednesday. Some analysts have said Pakistan's nomination is absurd. Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani ambassador to the US and UN, said: 'Ingratiation cannot serve as policy. It is unfortunate that the government is recommending Trump for a Nobel peace prize. 'A man who has backed Israel's genocidal war in Gaza and called Israel's attack on Iran as 'excellent'. This move does not reflect the views of the people of Pakistan.' Despite concerns in Washington about Pakistan's close alignment with Beijing, Pakistan remains significant to the US. Islamabad has not alleviated these worries, particularly as it seeks new deals for advanced weaponry and technology from China, its primary arms supplier. Amit Ranjan, a research fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies at the National University of Singapore, told The Sunday Times: 'Trump's lunch with Field Marshal Munir suggests a growing closeness between Pakistan and the US. However, the nature of this relationship will depend on how China looks at it. 'The nomination is Pakistan's way to thank Trump for his role in the ceasefire during military confrontation with India.' Pakistan has had a complicated security relationship with the US, collaborating with Washington while also supporting militants opposing Nato forces in Afghanistan. General Michael Kurilla, the head of US Central Command, recently commended Pakistan's military, describing their collaboration as a 'phenomenal partnership' in the fight against Afghanistan-based militant Islamist group Isis-K. Trump expressed gratitude to Pakistan for handing over an Isis-K member suspected of involvement in a bombing that killed 13 American troops during the withdrawal from Afghanistan. In the past, Trump has received several Nobel peace prize nominations from his supporters, and is said to crave the award. However, on Friday he posted on social media to lament he will probably never win the accolade. 'No, I won't get a Nobel peace prize no matter what I do … whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me!' he wrote.
BBC News
11 hours ago
- BBC News
Pakistan plans to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
Pakistan has announced it plans to nominate US President Donald Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize, citing the role that Islamabad says he played in helping to negotiate a ceasefire last month between India and X, the Pakistani government said Trump deserved the award "in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis". India has denied the US served as a mediator to end the four days of fighting last month, and says it does not want any diplomatic intervention from a third has often suggested he should receive the Nobel Peace Prize, whose winner will be named in October. In May, Trump made a surprise announcement of a ceasefire between India and Pakistan following four days of fighting between the nuclear-armed neighbours. Pakistan's government said in its post on Friday: "President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi, which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation. "This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker."There was no immediate response from Washington or New has repeatedly said that India and Pakistan ended the conflict after a ceasefire brokered by the US, and also that he had used trade as a lever to make them agree. Pakistan has corroborated US statements about brokering the ceasefire, but India has denied month, Trump said he told India and Pakistan that a ceasefire was necessary in order for them to maintain trade with the US. "I said, 'Come on, we're going to do a lot of trade with you guys [India and Pakistan]. Let's stop it," he told reporters. The Nobel move was applauded by Mushahid Hussain, a former chair of the Senate Defence Committee in Pakistan's parliament."Trump is good for Pakistan," he told Reuters. "If this panders to Trump's ego, so be it. All the European leaders have been sucking up to him big time."But Maleeha Lodhi, Pakistan's former ambassador to the US, criticised the move as "unfortunate"."A man who has backed Israel's genocidal war in Gaza and called Israel's attack on Iran as 'excellent'," she wrote on X."It compromises our national dignity," she Friday, Trump posted on Truth Social that he had helped broker negotiations between multiple nations, but despite this: "No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do."Trump entered office vowing to quickly end global conflicts including the Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Gaza wars, although peace deals in both conflicts have eluded him so has frequently criticised President Barack Obama for winning a Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 after less than eight months as US president. In 2013, Trump called on the Norwegian Nobel Committee to rescind the award.
