Zelensky thanks EU, as Kyiv seeks place with Trump, Putin
A White House official said on Saturday that Trump was open to Zelensky attending, but that preparations currently were for a bilateral meeting with Putin. The Kremlin leader last week ruled out meeting Zelensky at this point, saying the conditions for such an encounter were "unfortunately still far" from being met. Trump said a potential deal would involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both (sides)", a statement that compounded Ukrainian alarm that it may face pressure to surrender more land.
Zelensky says any decisions taken without Ukraine will be "stillborn" and unworkable. On Saturday the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland and the European Commission said in a joint statement that any diplomatic solution must protect the vital security interests of Ukraine and Europe. "The path to peace cannot be decided without Ukraine", they said, demanding "robust and credible security guarantees" to allow Ukraine to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Zelensky said on Sunday: "The end of the war must be fair and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people today for the sake of peace in Ukraine, which is defending the vital security interests of our European nations".
A European official said Europe had come up with a counter-proposal to Trump's, but declined to provide details. Russian officials accused Europe of trying to thwart Trump's efforts to end the war. "The Euro-imbeciles are trying to prevent American efforts to help resolve the Ukrainian conflict", former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev posted on social media on Sunday. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in a vituperative statement that the relationship between Ukraine and the European Union resembled "necrophilia".
Roman Alekhin, a Russian war blogger, said Europe had been reduced to the role of a spectator. "If Putin and Trump reach an agreement directly, Europe will be faced with a fait accompli. Kyiv — even more so", he said.
No details of the proposed territorial swap that Trump alluded to have been officially announced. Russia, which mounted a full-scale attack of Ukraine in February 2022, holds about a fifth of the country and has claimed the regions of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia as its own, although it controls only about 70% of the last three. Russia has also taken pockets of territory in the Sumy and Kharkiv regions and said in recent weeks it has captured villages in the Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine says it holds a sliver of the Kursk region in western Russia.
Sergei Markov, a pro-Kremlin analyst, said a swap could entail Russia handing over 1,500 sq km to Ukraine and obtaining 7,000 sq km, which he said Russia would capture anyway within about six months. He provided no evidence to back any of those figures. Russia took only about 500 sq km of territory in July, according to Western military analysts who say its grinding advances have come at the cost of very high casualties.
Ukraine and its European allies have been haunted for months by the fear that Trump, keen to claim credit for making peace and hoping to seal lucrative joint business deals between the US and Russia, could align with Putin to cut a deal that would be deeply disadvantageous to Kyiv. They had drawn some encouragement lately as Trump, having piled heavy pressure on Zelensky and berated him publicly in the Oval Office in February, began criticising Putin and expressing disgust as Russia pounded Kyiv and other cities with its heaviest air attacks of the war. But the impending Putin-Trump summit, agreed during a trip to Moscow by Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff last week, has revived fears that Kyiv and Europe could be sidelined. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
2 hours ago
- Observer
Planned Gaza occupation sparks global condemnation
The Sultanate of Oman has strongly condemned and rejected Israel's decision to continue its military occupation of the Gaza Strip, viewing it as a clear violation of international law and a disregard for resolutions of international legitimacy. This position is in line with a broader international rejection of Israel's plans for complete military control over Gaza. Israel's security cabinet recently approved a plan by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the occupation of Gaza City, which means the Israeli military will take control of Gaza City while providing humanitarian aid to the civilian population outside the combat zones. This occupation represents a significant escalation by Israel, potentially leading to the forced displacement of tens of thousands of Gaza residents who are facing famine conditions due to Israel's humanitarian aid blockage. Oman has consistently supported the rights of the Palestinian people, calling on the international community, especially the member states of the United Nations Security Council, to fulfil their legal and moral obligations to stop the aggression and help Palestinians regain their rightful rights and end the Israeli occupation of lands within the pre-1967 borders. The recent condemnation from Oman comes amidst widespread international opposition to Israel's stated intention to assume full military control of Gaza. This decision to occupy violates international law, seeks to legitimise illegal occupation and goes against relevant international legitimacy decisions. The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and the Arab League Ministerial Committee (Gaza Contact Group) issued a joint statement unequivocally rejecting Israel's plan for full military occupation of Gaza, describing it as 'against international law, a serious escalation and a continuation of the occupation'. They also highlighted ongoing atrocities in Gaza and the Palestinian territories, warning that these violations could amount to crimes against humanity. Oman has been calling for an end to what they describe as Israel's 'genocidal war' on the Gaza Strip, urging the urgent delivery of humanitarian aid and emphasising the need for a complete and permanent ceasefire, an end to the oppression of Palestinians, and a halt to the 'genocide being committed by Israeli occupation forces in Gaza and across the Palestinian territories'. International organisations and leaders have echoed these concerns. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres criticised Israel's plan to take control of Gaza City, labelling it as 'a dangerous escalation' that would result in the forced displacement of Palestinians. European leaders, including Germany, the UK, Spain, the Netherlands, Slovenia and Finland, have also criticised Israel's decision, warning of exacerbated humanitarian crises and some, like Germany, have halted military exports that could be used in Gaza. On a positive note, a large group of UN members plan to recognise Palestinian statehood, including Australia, France, Canada and Britain, in addition to several nations that have already done so. This shift in recognition among Western countries is widely seen as a response to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and frustrations with Israel's conduct of the war, resulting in numerous Palestinian casualties and widespread suffering. It also reflects a growing international consensus that a two-state solution is the only viable path to peace, a solution that Israel's current government has largely rejected. While recognition alone may not immediately alter the situation on the ground, it is considered by supporters as a crucial step towards building momentum for a two-state solution and realigning global diplomacy with international law and principles of self-determination.
Observer
2 hours ago
- Observer
Is Trump winning on economic policy?
Six months into his second term, it is fair to say that US President Donald Trump has swept the board when it comes to economic policy – at least by the standards he set for himself. In fact, he has imposed his will to a degree no other post-World War II president, with the possible exception of Ronald Reagan, has been able to achieve. For starters, Trump got his One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed, despite a razor-thin majority in the House of Representatives and credible projections that his signature tax and spending package will add more than $3 trillion to the federal deficit over the coming decade (barring a miraculous AI-driven economic boom). And the southern US border is now more tightly controlled than it has been in decades. On tariffs in particular, Trump got what he wanted. Europe and Japan effectively capitulated – agreeing to eliminate their own trade barriers while accepting a 15 per cent US tariff on their exports. Given these humiliating terms, it was more than a little absurd to see European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen hail the deal as a success simply because Trump backed down from his initial threat of a 30 per cent tariff. Both the European Union and Japan also committed to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the US economy, with Trump exerting significant influence over where that money would be directed. His self-styled 'Tariff Man' persona clearly rattled world leaders, many of whom failed to recognise that his threats were unsustainable in the long run. In retrospect, they would have been better off calling his bluff. Instead, last Thursday, an emboldened Trump announced new tariffs on nearly every country in the world. While European policymakers were busy mitigating the impact of American tariff threats, Trump pushed through legislation aimed at bringing cryptocurrencies into the mainstream financial system with minimal oversight. Astonishingly, despite the Trump family's multi-billion-dollar crypto holdings, Congress has shown little interest in investigating the president's glaring conflict of interest. In fact, Trump has faced more public scrutiny for withholding the Jeffrey Epstein files than for his crypto dealings. Trump has faced more public scrutiny for withholding the Jeffrey Epstein files than for his crypto dealings. To be sure, the GENIUS Act does contain some worthwhile ideas. One provision, for example, requires that stablecoins – cryptocurrencies pegged to a traditional currency or commodity, usually the dollar – be backed by safe, liquid assets. But overall, instead of laying out clear guidelines for taming the crypto Wild West, the GENIUS Act amounts to little more than a regulatory skeleton. As several critics have noted, Trump's stablecoin framework bears striking similarities to the free-banking era of the 1800s, when the United States did not have a central bank. At the time, private banks issued their own dollar-backed currencies, often with disastrous consequences such as fraud, instability, and frequent bank runs. With thousands of stablecoins expected to flood the market, similar problems are bound to emerge. That said, some criticisms may be overstated, as today's leading issuers are generally more transparent and better capitalised than their nineteenth-century counterparts. A more urgent and underappreciated problem is that the new legislation will make it far easier to use dollar-based stablecoins for tax evasion. While large-denomination paper currency presents similar challenges, the scale of the threat posed by stablecoins is much greater. And yet, despite these risks, Trump once again got exactly the legislation he wanted. Fortunately, the US economy has remained resilient amid the uncertainty and chaos unleashed by Trump's tariff war. Although growth appears to be slowing, and the July jobs report was soft – a hard reality that Trump's firing of the technocrat in charge of producing the data will not change – second-quarter data show that the country is not yet in a recession. Likewise, higher tariffs have not yet triggered a surge in domestic inflation, and the US is on track to collect $300 billion in tariff revenue in 2025. So far, importers have been reluctant to pass those costs on to consumers, but that could change if the current tariff war ever winds down. Some analysts have even argued that the apparent success of Trump's heterodox policies proves that conventional economic models are wrong. I doubt that, though the jury is still out. This short-term optimism, however, overlooks long-term consequences. While some of former President Joe Biden's policies were damaging, numerous economists have warned that Trump's actions could prove devastating to American institutions and the global economic order. Most critically, the rule of law would be severely weakened if the expanded presidential powers Trump has claimed are allowed to become permanent. A big test is coming if the Supreme Court ultimately decides that he lacks the authority to impose tariffs without Congress's approval. If they stand, Trump's sweeping tariffs may have long-term effects on US growth. The rest of the world is unlikely to tolerate Trump's protectionist policies indefinitely. If he starts to look weak for any reason, expect foreign governments to retaliate with sweeping tariffs of their own. The Big Beautiful Bill could compound the damage, triggering a cycle of higher interest rates, rising inflation, and financial repression. Still, we should give Trump his due and acknowledge that his second presidency is off to a far stronger start than almost anyone – aside from Trump himself and his most fervent acolytes – could imagine six months ago. We should not be surprised by whatever comes next – and that might be the scariest part. @Project Syndicate, 2025
Observer
2 hours ago
- Observer
Ukrainian drone attacks kill three, target Moscow
MOSCOW: Three people were killed in overnight Ukrainian drone attacks on Russia's Tula and Nizhny Novgorod regions, a senior Russian regional official and the defence ministry said on Monday. Two people died and two were hospitalised following an attack before midnight on Sunday on the Tula region that borders the Moscow region to its north, Tula Governor Dmitry Milyaev said on the Telegram messaging app. One person was killed and two others were hospitalised following a Ukrainian attack targeting an industrial zone in the Nizhny Novgorod region in western Russia, Gleb Nikitin, the governor of the region, said on the Telegram. A Ukrainian security official said that Ukraine had targeted a Russian plant producing missile components in the Nizhny Novgorod region in the drone attack. At least four drones struck the Arzamas Instrument-Making Plant, which produces control systems and other components for Russia's Kh-32 and Kh-101 missiles, the official said. Russian air defence units destroyed a total of 59 Ukrainian drones overnight, including 12 over the Tula region, the Russian Defence Ministry said. The ministry only reports how many drones its units shoot down, not how many Ukraine launches. Seven drones were downed en route to Russia's capital overnight and on Monday morning, Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin said. Both sides deny targeting civilians in their strikes on each other's territory. Nevertheless, thousands of civilians have died in the full-scale war that Russia launched in Ukraine in February 2022. Meanwhile, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer supports US President Donald Trump's efforts to end the war with Ukraine, but Kyiv must be involved in any settlement about ending the fighting, his spokesperson said on Monday. US President Donald Trump will meet his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15 and Ukraine fears that the two leaders may try to dictate terms for ending the three-and-a-half-year-old war. "We will never trust President Putin as far as you can throw him, but we will support Ukraine and President Trump and European nations as we enter these negotiations", Starmer's spokesperson told reporters. "Any peace must be built with Ukraine, not imposed upon it and we will not reward aggression or compromise sovereignty. Ukraine will decide its own future and we will support it every step of the way". Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said that the US had pledged to consult with Europe ahead of a summit with Russia's Vladimir Putin, as European ministers prepare for discussions amidst fears Washington may dictate unfavourable peace terms to Ukraine. European Union foreign ministers were due to hold a video conference on Monday afternoon to discuss their support for Kyiv and the upcoming meeting. "The American side has promised that it will consult with European partners on its position before the meeting in Alaska", Poland's Tusk told a press conference. "I will wait... for the effects of the meeting between Presidents Trump and Putin — I have many fears and a lot of hope", he said. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Monday that concessions to Moscow would not persuade it to stop fighting in Ukraine and that there was a need to ramp up pressure on the Kremlin. European officials have sought to influence the White House's positioning ahead of the Alaska talks, emphasising the need to safeguard Ukraine's sovereignty, provide security guarantees and allow Kyiv to choose its own path. US Vice President JD Vance met European and Ukrainian officials over the weekend and European leaders are expected to conduct more outreach to Washington in the coming days. "Any deal between the US and Russia must have Ukraine and the EU included, for it is a matter of Ukraine's and the whole of Europe's security", EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said. European leaders have also underscored their commitment to the idea that international borders cannot be changed by force, as EU capitals fear a deal forced on Kyiv could create a dangerous precedent. "Regarding territorial issues, the Russian position is framed as a territorial swap, but it appears as a rather one-sided swap", a European Commission official said. "In the context of these talks, the US administration has been very involved and has shown interest in aligning positioning with Europe", the official said. "The most robust security guarantee would be that there are no limitations on Ukraine armed forces and third countries' support to Ukraine". — Reuters
