logo
India Warns Pakistan Of 'Painful Consequences' Over Water War Threats And Hostile Rhetoric

India Warns Pakistan Of 'Painful Consequences' Over Water War Threats And Hostile Rhetoric

Hans India4 days ago
India has issued a stern warning to Pakistan following a series of aggressive statements from Pakistani leadership regarding water rights and the suspended Indus Waters Treaty, cautioning that any hostile action would result in severe repercussions. The Ministry of External Affairs characterized Pakistan's recent rhetoric as part of a deliberate strategy to promote anti-India sentiment and divert attention from domestic challenges.
MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal delivered a sharp rebuke during Thursday's press briefing, stating that Pakistan should moderate its inflammatory language as any aggressive move would have devastating consequences, referencing recent military exchanges between the two nations. The diplomatic confrontation intensified after Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif declared on Tuesday that India would not be permitted to take even a single drop of water belonging to Pakistan.
Sharif's defiant statement came in response to India's April 23 decision to suspend the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, implemented one day after the Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives. Speaking at a ceremony in Islamabad, the Pakistani premier threatened that India would face severe retaliation if it attempted to obstruct water flow, emphasizing that Pakistan considers such actions tantamount to acts of war.
The water dispute has become increasingly contentious, with former Pakistani Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari comparing the treaty suspension to an assault on the ancient Indus Valley Civilization. He warned that Pakistan would not retreat if compelled to engage in armed conflict over water rights, escalating the diplomatic tensions between the neighboring countries.
Pakistani Army Chief General Asim Munir further intensified the situation during an address to the Pakistani diaspora in Tampa, Florida, declaring that Islamabad would destroy any dam constructed by India to block water flow. He asserted that the Indus River system does not constitute Indian family property, suggesting military intervention if necessary to protect Pakistan's water interests.
India responded forcefully to General Munir's statements, accusing Pakistan of nuclear intimidation tactics and questioning the reliability of its nuclear command structure. The MEA condemned such threats as confirmation of the Pakistani military's connections to terrorist organizations and emphasized that such intimidation would not prevent India from protecting its national security interests. Indian officials expressed particular concern that these inflammatory remarks were delivered from the territory of a friendly third nation.
The diplomatic crisis has attracted unusual commentary from unexpected quarters, including actor-turned-BJP leader Mithun Chakraborty, who made bizarre threats involving missile strikes and dam construction. Though he later clarified his remarks targeted Pakistan's establishment rather than its citizens, his comments reflected the heightened tensions surrounding the water dispute.
The current confrontation stems from the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, India's military response launched on May 7 against terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir following the April 22 Pahalgam attack. The operation involved four days of intensive drone and missile exchanges before both countries agreed to cease hostilities on May 10, establishing a temporary truce that now appears increasingly fragile.
India's decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty represents a significant departure from decades of water-sharing arrangements between the two countries. The treaty, signed in 1960, has survived multiple wars and diplomatic crises, making its suspension particularly significant in bilateral relations. Pakistan has consistently maintained that any interference with water flow constitutes an act of war, while India argues that Pakistan's support for terrorism justifies reviewing all bilateral agreements.
The escalating rhetoric over water rights occurs against the backdrop of broader regional tensions, with both countries possessing nuclear weapons and maintaining substantial military forces along their shared border. The Indus River system provides crucial water resources for agriculture and hydroelectric power generation in both nations, making control over these waterways a matter of national survival for Pakistan.
The Ministry of External Affairs has characterized Pakistan's recent statements as following a predictable pattern of hostile rhetoric designed to mask internal governance failures and economic difficulties. Indian officials argue that Pakistan's leadership consistently resorts to anti-India propaganda to distract public attention from domestic challenges, including political instability and economic crises.
The water dispute represents one of several contentious issues between India and Pakistan, including territorial disputes over Kashmir, cross-border terrorism, and trade relations. The suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty adds another dimension to these longstanding conflicts and raises concerns about potential military escalation between the nuclear-armed neighbors.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hong Kong court hearing final arguments in Jimmy Lai's security trial
Hong Kong court hearing final arguments in Jimmy Lai's security trial

Business Standard

time10 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Hong Kong court hearing final arguments in Jimmy Lai's security trial

A Hong Kong court began hearing final arguments Monday in the landmark national security trial of former pro-democracy newspaper founder Jimmy Lai, who could be sentenced to up to life in prison if he is convicted. Lai, 77, was arrested in 2020 under a national security law imposed by Beijing following anti-government protests in 2019. He is being tried on charges of colluding with foreign forces to endanger national security and conspiring with others to issue seditious publications. Lai founded Apple Daily, one of the local media outlets that was most critical against Hong Kong's government. His high-profile case which has already stretched nearly 150 days, far beyond the original estimate of 80 days is widely seen as a trial of press freedom and a test for judicial independence in the Asian financial hub. Prosecutors allege that Lai asked foreign countries, especially the United States, to take actions against Beijing under the guise of fighting for freedom and democracy. On the first day of his testimony, he denied he had asked then-Vice President Mike Pence and then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to take action against Hong Kong and China during the 2019 protests. Later, when Lai's lawyer questioned him about an Apple Daily report saying he had asked the US government to sanction Beijing and Hong Kong leaders, he said he must have discussed it with Pompeo, as he had no reason to doubt the accuracy of the report by the now-defunct newspaper he founded. But Lai said he would not have encouraged foreign sanctions after the national security law was enacted on June 30, 2020. The closing arguments have been delayed twice, first due to weather then to concerns over Lai's health. On Friday, his lawyer, Robert Pang, said Lai had experienced heart palpitations while in prison. The judges wanted him to secure a heart monitor and medication first. After Friday's hearing, the Hong Kong government alleged foreign media outlets had attempted to mislead the public about Lai's medical care. It said a medical examination of Lai found no abnormalities and that the medical care he received in custody was adequate. It is unclear when the verdict will be delivered. Lai's yearslong detention, especially in solidarity confinement, has drawn concerns from foreign governments and rights groups. US President Donald Trump, before being elected to his second term in November, said he would talk to Chinese leader Xi Jinping to seek Lai's release: One hundred percent, I will get him out. In a Fox News radio interview released last Thursday, Trump denied saying he would 100 per cent save Lai, but rather that he would bring the issue up. I've already brought it up, and I'm going to do everything I can to save him, he said. China has accused Lai of stirring a rise in anti-China sentiments in Hong Kong and said it firmly opposes the interference of other countries in its internal affairs. Dozens of people waited in the rain Monday for a seat in the main courtroom to see Lai. Former Apple Daily reader Susan Li said she worried about Lai's health as he looked visibly thinner, and she would continue to pray for him. I wanted to let him know we are still here, she said. When Hong Kong, a former British colony, returned to China in 1997, Beijing promised to retain the city's civil liberties for 50 years. But critics say that promise has become threadbare after the introduction of the security law, which Chinese and Hong Kong authorities insist was necessary for the city's stability. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

One jawan killed and three injured in Naxalites' IED blast in Chhattisgarh
One jawan killed and three injured in Naxalites' IED blast in Chhattisgarh

Business Standard

time10 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

One jawan killed and three injured in Naxalites' IED blast in Chhattisgarh

The injured personnel are in stable condition and out of danger. They have received first aid and are being evacuated for further treatment ANI According to IG Bastar P Sundarraj, during an anti-Maoist operation by DRG team in Bijapur district's National Park area, an IED blast occurred in the morning. One DRG jawan, Dinesh Nag, was martyred, and three others were injured. The injured personnel are in stable condition and out of danger. They have received first aid and are being evacuated for further treatment. Detailed information will be provided after the completion of the operation. Earlier on August 14, the security forces neutralised two dreaded naxal cadres carrying a combined bounty of Rs 1.16 crore during a gun battle in Chhattisgarh's Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki district. Vijay Reddy, a member of the Dandkaranya Special Zonal Committee (DKSZC), who carried a bounty of Rs 90 lakh, and Lokesh Salame, Secretary of the Rajnandgaon-Kanker Border (RKB) division, with a reward of Rs 26 lakh on his head, were neutralised in a joint operation by the Chhattisgarh Police, District Reserve Guard (DRG), and the 27th Battalion of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) on August 13 in the state's insurgency-hit region. The gun battle erupted during a coordinated anti-Naxal operation, the ITBP said in a statement. "Security forces had been tracking the movement of the duo in the dense forest belt when the exchange of fire broke out." According to officials, the elimination of Reddy and Salame is considered a major blow to Naxal operations in the Dandkaranya region and along the Rajnandgaon-Kanker border. Weapons and other naxal-related materials were recovered from the site. The slain ultras were on the hunt among leaders of the North Bastar region for the past two decades. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Pakistan rides high on US ties after clash with India, but it won't last
Pakistan rides high on US ties after clash with India, but it won't last

Business Standard

time10 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Pakistan rides high on US ties after clash with India, but it won't last

Pakistan's military, buoyed by recent India clashes, sees itself central to regional politics, with Army Chief Munir twice visiting the US, meeting Trump, and addressing overseas Pakistanis Bloomberg Pakistan's army — and its chief Asim Munir — are brimming with confidence at the moment. A bit more caution would be wise: The generals, who hold the real power in Islamabad, have a history of over-promising and getting their country into trouble as a result. The military is reveling in what it sees as its new centrality in regional politics. Munir has been invited to visit the US twice in as many months. On the last trip, he had a long lunch with President Donald Trump. This time around, he visited US Central Command in Tampa, and spoke to overseas Pakistanis about the nation's growing importance. That is, at least, how the generals see their position at the moment. The military emerged from a bruising confrontation with India in May with its domestic and international position enhanced. Several major airbases were hit by airstrikes, which is a major escalation when compared to previous confrontations. But the Pakistani public was nevertheless pleased by reports that several Indian warplanes had been shot down. This buttressed the military's case that they were the nation's irreplaceable guardians — an argument that the jailed former prime minister, Imran Khan, has tried for some time to undermine. Even more importantly, both civilian and military leaders were effusive in their praise of Trump and his administration, whom they credited with brokering an end to hostilities. This infuriated New Delhi, which has always refused to let anyone intervene in its disputes with its neighbor, but it endeared the Pakistanis to the White House. The Trump administration has also thanked the South Asian country for its willingness to provide a back-channel to Iran at a time of heightened tensions. Pakistan's capture of an Islamic State leader accused of plotting a bomb attack in Kabul in 2021 that killed 13 US soldiers was also viewed as positive. But the president is probably most pleased that Islamabad said it had officially nominated him for the Nobel Peace Prize. Partly as a result of this campaign of praise, Pakistan has managed to win a reasonable trade deal from Trump: The lowest tariffs in South Asia, at 19 per cent. Trump also announced that 'both countries will collaborate on developing Pakistan's extensive oil reserves,' and that he would shortly identify the lucky US company that would lead this partnership. This announcement is a bit of a head-scratcher. Pakistan doesn't have a lot of proven, easily accessible oil reserves. It did announce a big find last year, but details are yet to be confirmed; similar announcements in the past have had to be reversed. Even if it's correct, it isn't clear if developing these new reserves would make financial sense. Nor will it be easy to find a corporate partner, given how challenging the security situation remains. Even Chinese companies investing in a state they consider a reliable client have found themselves caught in the middle of various internecine ethnic and religious conflicts. Chances are that the generals just dropped a promise that they would put vast and undiscovered new oil reserves at America's disposal into Trump's ear, and that helped convince him he was getting a better deal. A few other developments might have caught the president's attention. In April, for example, less than a week after terrorists killed 26 people in Kashmir, raising the prospect of war on the subcontinent, Pakistan's finance ministry announced that its new crypto strategy would be run in cooperation with World Liberty Financial. The official press release explained that 'World Liberty Financial is backed by the Trump family, including President Donald Trump and his sons.' In June, the president disclosed that the crypto firm had earned him $57.7 million last year. Iran, oil reserves, crypto. The buzzwords are new, but the strategy isn't. The Pakistani military has always found some way of making itself useful to powerful foreign backers, whether in Beijing, Washington or the Gulf. But, as successive US administrations have discovered, the generals' promises sound good but are rarely kept. The military reuses these methods because they always survive the fallout. Pakistan, however, rarely benefits. If anything, the entire region gets less stable when its generals get overconfident. In Tampa, Munir was relaxed and expansive when talking to the Pakistani diaspora: He warned that a nuclear exchange between the two would impact 'half the world.' Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, speaking on the nation's Independence Day, shot back that 'nuclear blackmail' was unacceptable.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store