logo
TRADING DAY Bond alarms ring louder

TRADING DAY Bond alarms ring louder

Reuters21-05-2025

ORLANDO, Florida, May 21 (Reuters) - TRADING DAY
Making sense of the forces driving global markets
By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist
U.S. debt despair
Investors' unease about holding long-dated sovereign debt was magnified by a soft 20-year U.S. Treasury note auction, opens new tab on Wednesday, which slammed the dollar and stocks, pushed long bond yields higher and steepened the U.S. yield curve.
In my column today I take a closer look at the rising term premium on U.S. debt. How much higher can it go? More on that below, but first, a roundup of the main market moves.
I'd love to hear from you, so please reach out to me with comments at jamie.mcgeever@thomsonreuters.com, opens new tab. You can also follow me at @ReutersJamie and @reutersjamie.bsky.social.
Trading Day is also sent by email every weekday morning. Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also sign up here.
If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today.
Today's Key Market Moves
Bond alarms ring louder
After a poor 20-year government bond auction in Japan on Tuesday, it was the turn of a weak sale of 20-year U.S. debt on Wednesday to cast a cold, dark shadow over world markets and put investors on the defensive.
The trouble is, when supposedly safe-haven sovereign bonds are at the root of the deepening market angst, the selloff takes on a more worrisome significance. And when it's U.S. Treasuries specifically, the cause for concern is even greater.
Wednesday's auction of 20-year notes, the first sale of U.S. government debt since Moody's stripped the U.S. of its triple-A rating last week, drew softer demand than usual, but what soured sentiment and risk appetite was the high yield investors demanded.
That was always going to be the case really - investors of all stripes from every corner of the world will buy Treasuries, the only doubt is the price. It was clearly lower than expected on Wednesday, and markets reacted accordingly.
Washington's fiscal profligacy remains a major source of anxiety for bond investors. Non-partisan analysts say President Donald Trump's tax-cut bill proposals will add between $2 trillion and $5 trillion to the $36 trillion federal debt over the next decade.
The 20-year Treasury note auction provided fuel for the bond fire, but fixed income was already smoldering on Wednesday - long-dated Japanese yields were at record highs and figures showed UK inflation rose much faster than expected to 3.5% in April, the highest in over a year.
Tariffs, monetary stimulus, rising debt levels, poor fiscal discipline, growing policy risk, sticky inflation and soaring inflation expectations - these are some of the reasons investors around the world are reluctant to go long 'duration', or buy long-dated bonds. It's a potent mix, and all markets are feeling the heat.
U.S. markets, in particular, are under pressure as the rest of the world reevaluates its holdings of dollar-denominated assets in light of Trump's global trade war and drive to upend the world economic order of the past 80 years.
Steep declines in U.S. stocks, Treasuries and the dollar on Wednesday point to a nervy global session on Thursday.
How much higher can the U.S. term premium go? A lot
Financial markets have had a fairly muted reaction to Moody's decision to strip the United States of its triple-A credit rating last week, fueling hopes that the action will do little long-term damage to U.S. asset prices, as was the case when the U.S. suffered its first downgrade in 2011.
But given today's challenging global macroeconomic environment and America's deteriorating fiscal health, that may be wishful thinking. To monitor the impact in the coming months, a key indicator to watch will be the so-called 'term premium' on U.S. debt.
When Standard & Poor's Global became the first of the three major ratings agencies to cut America's top-notch rating in August 2011, there was little blowback because Treasuries were still widely considered the safest asset in the world. Demand for U.S. bonds went through the roof, despite S&P's landmark move, and yields and the term premium plummeted.
That's unlikely to happen now.
In 2011, the U.S. debt/GDP ratio was 94%, a record at the time reflecting a surge in government spending in response to the 2008-09 Global Financial Crisis. But the fed funds rate was only 0.25%, and inflation was 3% but falling. It dropped to zero a few years later and did not return to 3% until the pandemic in 2020.
It's a vastly different picture today. U.S. public debt is around 100% of GDP and projected to rise to 134% over the next decade, according to Moody's. Official interest rates are above 4%, inflation is 2.3% but expected to rise as tariff-fueled price hikes kick in. Meanwhile, consumers' short- and long-term inflation expectations are the highest in decades.
And while the $29 trillion Treasury market is still the linchpin of the global financial system, increasing U.S. policy risk is prompting the rest of the world to rethink its exposure to U.S. assets, including Treasuries - 'de-dollarization' is underway.
Put all that together, and it's easy to see why the 'term premium' - the risk premium investors demand for holding longer-term bonds rather than rolling over short-term debt - is liable to rise after this downgrade, unlike 2011. Especially given its relatively low starting point.
True, the term premium was already the highest in a decade before the Moody's downgrade on Friday, and is now 0.75%, or 75 basis points. But that is still well below the level in 2011 and slim by historical standards.
In July 2011, the term premium on 10-year Treasuries was over 2.0%, but quickly slumped after the S&P downgrade the following month to below 1% and was negative within a few years. Treasuries were downgraded, but their status as the world's undisputed safe-haven asset remained intact.
The last time Uncle Sam's debt or inflation dynamics were as concerning as they are today, the term premium was much higher. It rose to 5% during the 'stagflation'-hit 1970s, and was around 4% following the 'Volcker shock' recessions in the early 1980s triggered by the Fed's double-digit interest rates to quell double-digit inflation.
"The term premium has come up quite a bit recently and is likely going to rise more given the fiscal challenges the U.S. is facing," notes Emanuel Moench, professor at Frankfurt School of Finance & Management and co-creator of the New York Fed's 'ACM' term premium model.
"The worry some investors might have is a self-fulfilling debt crisis – a high debt/GDP ratio increases interest rates, which raises the interest rate burden of the government and means you can't so easily grow yourself out of this anymore. This may push the term premium higher."
The question is, how high can it go?
History suggests it can go a lot higher until Washington exerts some serious fiscal discipline, or until the squeeze on households, businesses and the federal government from higher market-based borrowing costs gets too much.
Some analysts reckon another 50 basis points this year, which would take the 10-year yield up to around 5.00%, a pivotal level for many investors and the historical post-GFC high from October 2023.
With fiscal uncertainty so high and policy credibility so low, it's a "tenuous" time right now for Treasuries, as Moench notes. The global environment is nervy too - Japan's 30-year yield this week soared to a record high.
BlackRock Investment Institute strategists point out that long-term Treasuries still carry a "relatively low risk premium versus the past", and their "starting point" in their portfolio construction is to assume a rising term premium and "persistent" inflation pressure. They are underweight long-dated Treasuries.
Treasuries will always attract buyers. It's just that the clearing price they accept may be lower, and the term premium they demand may be higher. The risk now is it's a lot higher.
What could move markets tomorrow?
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Finding the Best Solana Wallet: A Guide to Secure Solana Storage
Finding the Best Solana Wallet: A Guide to Secure Solana Storage

Geeky Gadgets

time19 minutes ago

  • Geeky Gadgets

Finding the Best Solana Wallet: A Guide to Secure Solana Storage

Navigating the world of cryptocurrencies can be both exciting and daunting, especially when it comes to choosing the right Solana wallet. With a plethora of options available, users must ensure they select a secure option that aligns with their digital asset needs. Understanding Solana wallets Solana wallets are essential tools for anyone looking to buy, store, swap, send, or receive Solana-based assets. These wallets allow users not only to hold Solana securely but also to interact seamlessly with web3 apps. The decentralized nature of these wallets offers users privacy and control over their funds, unlike traditional banking systems. When evaluating Solana wallets, one must consider features such as security protocols, user interface, and additional functionalities like staking and NFT support. Solana's architecture inherently supports high-speed transactions and low fees, making it a preferred choice among crypto enthusiasts who need an efficient system to handle their assets, including using a Solana wallet. The importance of crypto security and self-custody Cryptocurrency security hinges on the principle of self-custody. Unlike keeping money in a bank, where an institution holds custody, with cryptocurrencies such as Solana, the responsibility lies with the owner. This means holding private keys securely is fundamental to prevent potential theft or loss of funds. Hardware solutions have emerged as a popular choice due to their enhanced security measures. These devices store private keys offline, minimizing exposure to online threats. While termed as highly secure, owners must follow best practices in usage to maintain their assets' safety. Ledger, for example, is known for its robust security features, providing an excellent means to safeguard Solana-based assets. How self-custody impacts user experience With the rise of decentralized applications, maintaining full control over assets has potentially never been more important. Self-custody empowers individuals to participate actively in the crypto economy, fostering true ownership. It requires individuals to act responsibly, ensuring private keys are managed judiciously. The independence this setup offers makes it an attractive option for tech-savvy investors seeking autonomy over their digital wealth. Moreover, the ability to engage directly with staking opportunities exemplifies the freedom that self-custody brings. By managing personal assets, individuals can stake Solana tokens within their wallets to earn passive income through network participation—a compelling reason to consider Solana wallets as a strategic investment tool. Exploring different types of Solana wallets Selecting the most suitable Solana wallet involves understanding the nuances of each type. Below is an overview of the common categories: Hardware wallets: Known for exceptional security, these devices safely store private keys offline. Ideal for those prioritizing protection against hacks and malware. Known for exceptional security, these devices safely store private keys offline. Ideal for those prioritizing protection against hacks and malware. Software wallets: Offering flexibility with mobile and desktop versions, these wallets bring convenience and versatility, enabling users to connect easily with dApps and manage assets on-the-go. Offering flexibility with mobile and desktop versions, these wallets bring convenience and versatility, enabling users to connect easily with dApps and manage assets on-the-go. Web wallets: Accessible via internet browsers, these wallets provide straightforward access without requiring installation. However, they may present higher risks compared to hardware alternatives. Leveraging hardware solutions: A closer look at Ledger Among the myriad of choices, Ledger stands out as a leading provider of hardware wallets. Recognized for its durable design and intuitive interface, Ledger caters to those seriously committed to securing their Solana-based assets. Its advanced security features include a unique operating system and a secure chip, specifically engineered to protect against emerging cyber threats. Through Ledger Live, users gain access to a comprehensive dashboard for tracking their portfolio, participating in staking, and engaging with other web3 apps. Its broad compatibility with DEFI projects further enhances its appeal, positioning it as a smart choice for long-term Solana asset management. Secure Your Solana with Confidence and Control As Solana continues to power fast, low-cost blockchain transactions, choosing the right wallet becomes key to maximizing both security and usability. Whether you're managing NFTs, staking tokens, or diving into DeFi, embracing a self-custodial solution like Ledger offers unmatched protection and complete ownership of your digital assets. By taking control of your private keys and leveraging trusted tools, you set yourself up for a secure and empowered journey through the Solana ecosystem. Filed Under: Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Chevy Just Confirmed The Gas Blazer's Lifeline
Chevy Just Confirmed The Gas Blazer's Lifeline

Auto Blog

time40 minutes ago

  • Auto Blog

Chevy Just Confirmed The Gas Blazer's Lifeline

GM Investing In Diversification As you'll read elsewhere on this site, General Motors recently earmarked around $4 billion to upgrade three of its factories (in Kansas, Tennessee, and Michigan). The major takeaway is that the affordable Bolt EV will enter production this year, and another 'affordable EV' will follow in 2027. But GM isn't only focusing on keeping electric cars affordable, because it's also looking at how to make existing products more popular. The Blazer EV recently lost its RWD configuration due to low market demand, but rear-drive may be about to return with a gas engine instead. We're dreaming, of course, and wishing that Chevy decides to make it like the K5 Blazer and not the current model. But why would it? The current configuration of the gas-powered Blazer is arguably more popular than the EV, though GM is now the #2 brand in U.S. EV sales with 62,000 sold this year through May. Perhaps a hybrid is the right way forward, but GM didn't get that specific. 0:06 / 0:09 2025 Ford Maverick: 4 reasons to love it, 2 reasons to think twice Watch More GM's Gas Blazer To Be Revitalized In 2027 The Blazer was a gas-powered SUV of various descriptions for most of its life, but then it went electric as well. By maintaining combustion with a badge that was always associated with it, Chevy could sell the gas-powered model alongside and with the exact same stunning styling as the Blazer EV, giving customers the same sort of choice that BMW i7 and 7 Series buyers have. So will it continue with the same recipe, or will it try to steal sales from its old indirect but more off-road-focused rival, the Bronco? Doubtful. Yes, the gas-powered Blazer was expected to be killed off this year, at least according to GM Authority, and after trailing the Subaru Outback, Kia Sorento, and Hyundai Santa Fe in Q1 2025 (despite beating the Mitsubishi Outlander), it seemed plausible. However, this announcement only suggests a continuation of the segment contender; we can't see GM investing in a whole new direction for the platform in such uncertain times. GM's announcement says only that it will add production of a gas-powered Blazer SUV to its Spring Hill factory in Tennessee in 2027. Whether that's early or late in 2027 is also a mystery, but given how long plant upgrades can take, not to mention other potential stumbling blocks like supply chain delays, workforce shortages, and more, we might expect it toward the end of that year. On the other hand, the fact that Chevy is talking about it means the beginning of a long teaser campaign, and that suggests strong confidence in this plant upgrade schedule. Regardless of when the new Blazer arrives, the current one appeared back in 2019, so we hope Chevy can meet its own deadline without any hiccups. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. GM Spending $1 Billion On Combustion Engines Alone Although there are plenty of electric options popping up from GM's brands – the Cadillac Escalade IQ, GMC Hummer EV, and Chevrolet Silverado EV come to mind – the automaker hasn't survived 116 years by putting all its eggs in one basket. GM is catering for those who appreciate the serenity, ease of operation, and advancement of EVs (and as they continually improve, that number will surely grow). But for those who aren't quite ready to take a risk on lean infrastructure, recharging times that are not yet as quick as refueling, and potentially poor resale values, it's investing $1 billion to keep building on its internal combustion foundation. With one side of the company developing 1,064 horsepower from little more than fuel, spark, and compression, and the other side promising two affordable new EVs in the next couple of years, a gas-powered Blazer fits beautifully into the middle. Bravo, GM. We're watching closely. Source: Chevrolet About the Author Sebastian Cenizo View Profile

UK broadcasters hail rare win over Netflix in battle for streaming ads
UK broadcasters hail rare win over Netflix in battle for streaming ads

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

UK broadcasters hail rare win over Netflix in battle for streaming ads

Shows such as Netflix's TV history-making Adolescence and Disney's romp Rivals are among the latest hits to continue the subscriber juggernaut, as the US streamers continue to mount pressure on UK TV broadcasters. However, research reveals that a new breed of viewers being banked on to drive their next era of growth are watching up to 40% less content on some services, giving traditional broadcasters hope that their own streaming services will not ultimately be outmuscled in the battle over the rapidly growing £1bn-plus streaming ad market. It has been two and a half years since Netflix reversed its resistance to advertising, leading the charge to tap a new market as subscriber growth petered out and the cost of living crisis made consumers more open to paying less in return for seeing ads. The strategy has helped breathe life into stalling subscription growth. Netflix added the most customers in a quarter in its history in the final three months of 2024, with 55% choosing its ad-supported package. About a third of its 300 million-strong global subscriber base are now watching with ads. Disney+ followed suit in late 2022 and has since amassed 157 million ad-tier subscribers, including its US-only ESPN and Hulu services. And in February last year, Amazon started automatically introducing ads to the 200 million potential monthly viewers of Prime Video, requiring customers to pay if they wanted an ad-free experience. However, research into streaming households shows that homes that watch with ads are 'lighter' viewers, in the words of one media agency executive, compared with those who pay for higher-priced, ad-free packages. A snapshot of UK streaming in the fourth quarter of 2024 showed that Netflix households with advertising-supported subscriptions watched an average of 22 minutes less content a day than those with an ad-free subscription, a difference of almost 22%. Netflix is estimated to have about 17.6 million subscribers in total in the UK, of whom just over 4 million are on an ad-supported package, according to Ampere Analysis. At Amazon's Prime Video, which is estimated to have about 12 million UK users, the same trend has emerged. Viewers who accepted ads watched an average of 23 minutes less content a day than those who had opted to pay for an ad-free experience – a difference of 44%. While viewing minutes were not available for Disney+ UK subscribers, the research showed it had the narrowest gap, with those on ad-supported accounts watching just five fewer minutes of content a day on average than those paying for an ad-free subscription. Matt Ross, the chief analytics officer at the streaming research firm Digital i, says two distinct types of viewer have emerged, but adds that lower levels of viewing in ad-supported households is partly because those subscriptions also typically offer access on fewer devices. 'We've seen that more engaged viewers typically opt for ad-free tiers, valuing the uninterrupted experience they provide,' Ross says. 'More premium plans offer multiple simultaneous streams, which appeals especially to larger households and families. This combination of premium features and flexibility often results in higher daily activity for ad-free plans.' Nevertheless, the phenomenon of 'light viewers' will be grasped by UK broadcasters trying to stop the deep-pocketed US giants conquering the streaming advertising market in the same way as they have the world of paid subscriptions. 'The appeal of the global streamers' ad tiers to advertisers doesn't stack up against the streaming services offered by British broadcasters,' says one senior TV industry executive. Certainly in the UK, at least, the drive into advertising by the big US streamers has had a mixed reception from the media agencies that buy commercial space for brands. Netflix started with a gung-ho attitude, buoyed up by the success it had had building a huge paid subscriber base and the belief advertisers would leap at the chance to be able to place commercials in its mega-hits for the first time. However, it demanded almost 50% more than ITV or Channel 4's services charge for advertising, alongside a hefty commitment to a minimum spend, despite initially only having a small audience and extremely limited ability to target ads. 'The rollout was a disaster,' says the chief executive of one media agency. 'Take-up was underwhelming, to say the least. They had to try again six months later and lost their lead over rivals and are now behind the curve in terms of pricing, data and reach versus, say, Amazon.' Amazon charges about the same as the public service broadcasters' streaming services, while Disney+ charges more, despite having the smallest base of the big three US streamers, a situation the media executive describes as a 'mad outlier, given their volume'. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Last month Netflix rung the changes, announcing that Warren Dias, the head of UK's ad sales, was to leave after two years in the post. The world's biggest and most profitable streaming service has acknowledged it is still a newbie when it comes to the ad market. 'I think you can say that 2025 is the year that we transition from crawl to walk,' Greg Peters, the co-chief executive of Netflix, said in a recent call with analysts. Peters said overall viewing hours per subscriber on its ads plans internationally was similar to those on its standard non-ad plans, and that it expected to double advertising income this year as it focuses on improving ad targeting for brands. The company launched its in-house ad-tech platform in the US in April and intends to start rolling it out to other markets in the coming months. While UK broadcasters feel the tentative start by the US giants has given them the upper hand in the British streaming advertising, which is putting further pressure on the shrinking £3.58bn traditional TV ad market, there is a sense of foreboding that history may ultimately repeat itself. 'We were successful and revolutionised TV viewing,' says Damien Bernet, the vice-president of ad sales for the EMEA region at Netflix. 'We believe we are going to be able to do the same for ads.' More people visit and watch Netflix than any other streaming service in the UK, and in March it made TV history with Adolescence becoming the first programme on a streaming platform to top the weekly audience charts of all shows aired in Britain. In February, 65% of 18- to 64-year-old internet users accessed Netflix, compared with 59% for the BBC's iPlayer, 48% for Prime Video, 46% for ITVX and 34% for Channel 4's streaming service, according to survey data from Ampere Analysis. The US streamers' ad tier strategies have reignited overall growth, are rapidly increasing the scale and attractiveness of the offering for advertisers, and the cheaper pricing has made users more 'sticky' and less likely to think about cancelling. 'Fundamentally, advertising is a scale game, and in that regard many of the streamers are only just getting started,' says Richard Broughton, a director at Ampere. 'UK and European broadcasters will be far from complacent, given the competition they have faced for viewers over the past decade, but they have only a narrow window to batten down the hatches before they start to feel more pressure across their advertiser base too.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store