People prefer to pay money to save time: study
Time is money. This saying has never sounded so true as it does today, in a world where every minute seems to count.
An international study published in the journal Econometrica provides quantified evidence of this.
It reveals that, on VTC platforms (Spain's Vehiculo de Transporte con Conductor, or private hire vehicle), users are ready to put their hand in the pocket to gain a few moments.
Researchers from several universities, including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), have studied Liftago, a Czech ride-sharing platform with an original approach.
On this application, drivers are not assigned automatically, but submit offers that passengers can compare. From wait times to fares to availability, everything is part of the negotiation on Liftago.
'It's like an eBay for taxis,' says MIT economist and study coauthor, Tobias Salz, quoted in a news release.
When faced with wait times, Liftago's users are prepared to pay more. — Freepik
By analysing nearly two million ride requests and over five million bids, the researchers found that time has become a precious resource that can effectively be bought and sold.
Indeed, faced with wait times, users are prepared to pay more. On average, they value their time at US$13.21 (RM56.40) per hour.
This figure rises significantly during working hours, when every minute 'taken' from their schedule is worth its weight in gold.
This behaviour has tangible effects. By saving time, users contribute – often without realising it – to increasing Liftago's revenues.
In fact, offers for fast journeys result in an average increase of 5.2% over the minimum price.
This mechanism increases the company's gains, but reduces those of consumers. In other words, the better these kinds of VTC platforms understand their customers' habits, the better they know how far they can raise prices without driving users away.
Creating inequalities
This race against time also creates inequalities. Not all customers are on an equal footing when it comes to the cost of the service.
The study shows that the top 25% of bids put a value on time that is three and a half times greater than the lowest 25%.
As a result, some consumers can afford faster journeys, while others have to put up with longer delays.
Although based on an uneven logic, this system continues to appeal.
'The majority of consumers still benefit,' says Tobias Salz. 'But the flip side is that the firm, by knowing every consumer's choke point, can extract the surplus. Welfare goes up, the ride-sharing platform captures most of that, and drivers – interestingly – also benefit from the system, although they do not have access to the data.'
More broadly, this study questions our relationship with time in an economy where data is valuable.
What happens when companies know everything about our habits?
What impact does this have on prices, our well-being and fairness? In a world where every second can be bought, time is becoming a new social marker, separating those who can afford to pay more to save time from those who just have to wait. – AFP Relaxnews
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
27 minutes ago
- The Star
Singapore: Jail and fine for Myanmar man linked to case involving three bank accounts that received over US$531mil in total
SINGAPORE (The Straits Times/ANN): A man linked to a case involving three bank accounts that received more than US$531 million (over S$680 million) in total was sentenced to two years' jail and a fine of S$109,000 on July 30. Myanmar national Nyan Win, 61, who had pleaded guilty to two counts of carrying on a business of providing a payment service in Singapore without a licence, will have to spend an additional six months behind bars should he fail to pay the fine. His Singaporean accomplice Zin Nwe Nyunt, 58, was sentenced to a year and six months' jail on July 14. Court documents stated that Nyan Win, a Singapore permanent resident, and Zin Nwe Nyunt's husband were childhood friends. At the time of the offences, Nyan Win was a director at Piyar International, a company that dealt with motor vehicles. In 2019, another Myanmar national known as Ko Phillip, who operated a commodities trading business, told Nyan Win he was looking for someone to incorporate a company in Singapore to assist in the operations of Ko Phillip's business. This company would then create corporate bank accounts that would be used to receive and transfer funds under Ko Phillip's instructions. He offered Nyan Win a commission of 0.5 Myanmar kyat (S$0.0003) per US dollar received under this arrangement. Nyan Win, who was interested in this opportunity, was uncertain whether he could set up a corporate bank account through Piyar International. Without revealing details, Deputy Public Prosecutor Ryan Lim said this was because banks had previously closed the company's corporate bank accounts. Nyan Win approached Zin Nwe Nyunt's husband and told him about this potential business opportunity with Ko Phillip. As the husband was holding a full-time job, details of which were not disclosed in court documents, he suggested that his wife could assist in the firm's incorporation. It was later agreed between Zin Nwe Nyunt and Nyan Win that the corporate bank accounts would be controlled by Nyan Win. Commissions would then be split between the pair. Zin Nwe Nyunt incorporated wholesale trading company Unione, and from July 2019 to May 2021, she opened accounts with three different banks through the firm. She then handed the banking details to Nyan Win, the court heard. DPP Lim said: 'Across 2020 and 2021, Nyan Win would liaise with Phillip to make arrangements for money to be received into Unione's corporate bank accounts. 'Nyan Win would also receive instructions from Phillip on where to transfer the money once it had been received into the bank accounts. Nyan Win would provide Zin with information regarding the incoming transactions for her to compute the commission amount.' Between January and July 2020, Nyan Win used one of Unione's bank accounts to receive more than US$150 million before the money was transferred out. Following these transactions, Zin Nwe Nyunt made more than $56,000 in commissions while Nyan Win received more than $34,000. On July 21, 2020, the bank closed the account because of the large number of suspicious transactions. The DPP told the court: 'Zin, Nyan Win and Unione did not have in force a valid licence from the Monetary Authority of Singapore and were not an exempt payment service provider.' Following the closure of this account, Zin Nwe Nyunt took instructions from Nyan Win and opened a corporate account with another bank. Between late July 2020 and April 2021, Nyan Win used this account to receive more than US$250 million before the money was transferred out. Zin Nwe Nyunt received nearly $76,000 in commissions, while Nyan Win pocketed more than $50,000. DPP Lim said that between August 2020 and March 2021, a third bank account was used to receive more than US$127 million. Over $119 million was then transferred out. In August 2021, the police received information that an Australian scam victim had transferred US$1.8 million to several bank accounts maintained by companies in Singapore. Investigations revealed three of these firms had transferred more than $480,000 to the third bank account. Investigators then uncovered links between Zin Nwe Nyunt, Unione and Nyan Win. The pair were charged in court in 2023. On July 30, Nyan Win's bail was set at $20,000, and he was ordered to surrender himself at the State Courts on Aug 7 to begin serving his sentence. - The Straits Times/Asian News Network
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Tesla loses lawsuit over fatal and deadly self-driving crash in 2019; company hit with US$243mil in damages
SACRAMENTO, United States (Xinhua): A Miami jury on Friday found Tesla's Autopilot system liable in a deadly 2019 crash. This first-of-its-kind ruling highlighted mounting safety worries about self-driving tech and could unleash a surge of similar lawsuits against automakers globally. Court documents showed Tesla owed US$242.6 million in damages: US$42.6 million for victims' pain and suffering, and US$200 million as punitive damages. The tragedy unfolded in Florida when George McGee's Tesla struck a car, killing 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and severely injuring her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. McGee confessed to cellphone distraction, yet jurors found Tesla 33 percent at fault. They deemed Autopilot defective for permitting use on unfit roads without sufficient safeguards or alerts. Tesla said in a statement, "Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology." Tesla said it will appeal. Since launching Autopilot in 2015, Tesla has faced growing scrutiny over the driving feature. U.S. regulators have investigated multiple crashes, including a probe opened by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in October 2024 into Tesla's Full Self-Driving system after four crashes in low-visibility conditions, including one pedestrian fatality, according to agency documents. In another inquiry in April 2024, the administration analyzed 467 Autopilot crashes with 54 injuries, leading to a recall of over 2 million vehicles for enhanced driver alerts, per agency records. In January 2025, it launched a probe into 2.6 million Tesla cars over remote driving features after four reported crashes. Meanwhile, the California Department of Motor Vehicles recently accused Tesla of misleading advertising by using terms like "Autopilot" and "Full Self-Driving." It is seeking to suspend Tesla's license to sell vehicles in the state, its biggest U.S. market, for at least 30 days and may also push for consumer warnings and restitution. According to local media, legal analysts viewed Friday's verdict as a watershed, marking the first major jury verdict against Tesla for a third-party death. - Xinhua
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Brazil grants BYD exemption from EV tariff hike, but not for as long as sought
Brazil announced a compromise in a dispute between Chinese EV maker BYD and traditional carmakers on Thursday, granting the company a short-term tariff break while moving forward with hikes that will hit it more aggressively in the long run. The decision was reached in a closed-door session of the Chamber of Foreign Trade (Camex) on Wednesday but not released publicly until Thursday. It follows weeks of heavy lobbying on both sides, with carmakers warning of mass lay-offs and BYD accusing rivals of trying to shut out competition. Under the measure, BYD will be allowed to import up to US$463 million worth of semi-assembled electric and hybrid vehicles over a six-month period without paying import taxes. This tariff-free window will apply during the first half of 2026, offering short-term relief as BYD ramps up local production. Separately, the government decided to bring forward a previously scheduled levy increase. The import tariff for electric and hybrid vehicle kits will now rise to 35 per cent in January 2027, a year and a half earlier than the original July 2028 timeline. Fully assembled vehicles will reach the same 35 per cent rate by July 2026, as previously planned. BYD had requested a reduced tariff through mid-2026 to ease the ramp-up of its new manufacturing plant in Camaçari, Bahia State. The company, investing R$5.5 billion (US$978 million) in the facility, argued that temporary relief was necessary as it builds up its local production capacity. But the proposal triggered an immediate backlash. In a joint letter to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, the National Association of Automotive Vehicle Manufacturers, or Anfavea, warned that the exemption could put R$180 billion in planned investment at risk and eliminate as many as 50,000 jobs. Signed by officials from Toyota, General Motors, Stellantis and Volkswagen, the letter accused BYD of seeking an unfair advantage and said Brazil risked becoming a low-complexity 'screwdriver economy'. Six state governors, mostly from Brazil's southern and southeastern industrial heartland, also opposed the measure, urging the government to delay the decision and consult regional leaders. Thursday's announcement attempts to strike a balance. BYD receives limited short-term relief, while Anfavea gets the accelerated tax schedule it sought. Anfavea praised the compromise, describing the six-month exemption as 'the upper limit' of what the industry could accept without jeopardising existing and future investment. 'We hope this matter is now definitively closed, with no room for further extensions,' Anfavea President Igor Cavet said. He also credited the outcome to coordinated pressure from carmakers, labour unions, governors and lawmakers, calling it a demonstration of the sector's strength. 'This is not just about the automotive industry,' he added. 'It's about the kind of industrial future we want for Brazil, one that generates innovation, skilled jobs and a stronger domestic supply chain.' For its part, BYD remained defiant. In a sharply worded open letter, the company referred to its rivals as 'dinosaurs' that panicked when forced to lower prices and offer better technology. The company, however, is yet to react to the government's decision. BYD began assembling its first vehicle in Brazil in July using semi-knocked down kits, in which the car arrives mostly built. The company plans to switch to fully knocked-down kits within 18 months and eventually reach 70 per cent local content by 2028 under an agreement with the Bahia government. The company is expanding its complex in Camacari, where construction on a second production facility is under way. Along with a rival Chinese brand GWM, BYD has rapidly captured market share in Brazil's electrified vehicle segment. Together, they account for more than 80 per cent of electric car sales and nearly half of all hybrid sales in the country. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
