Attorneys: 'Alligator Alcatraz' detainees held without charges, barred from legal access
A virtual hearing in federal court in Miami was being held Monday on a lawsuit that was filed July 16. A new motion on the case was filed Friday.
Lawyers who have shown up for bond hearings for 'Alligator Alcatraz' detainees have been told that the immigration court doesn't have jurisdiction over their clients, the attorneys wrote in court papers. The immigration attorneys demanded that federal and state officials identify an immigration court that has jurisdiction over the detainees and start accepting petitions for bond, claiming the detainees constitutional rights to due process are being violated.
'This is an unprecedented situation where hundreds of detainees are held incommunicado, with no ability to access the courts, under legal authority that has never been explained and may not exist,' the immigration attorneys wrote. 'This is an unprecedented and disturbing situation.'
The lawsuit is the second one challenging 'Alligator Alcatraz.' Environmental groups last month sued federal and state officials asking that the project built on an airstrip in the heart of the Florida Everglades be halted because the process didn't follow state and federal environmental laws.
Critics have condemned the facility as a cruel and inhumane threat to the ecologically sensitive wetlands, while Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and other Republican state officials have defended it as part of the state's aggressive push to support President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration.
U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has praised Florida for coming forward with the idea, as the department looks to significantly expand its immigration detention capacity.
___
Follow Mike Schneider on the social platform Bluesky: @mikeysid.bsky.social
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Trump's Weak Dollar Dream Will Be A Nightmare' Because His Policies Are 'Highly Inflationary,' Economist Peter Schiff Says
President Donald Trump's views about the dollar are getting strong pushback from economists like Chief Economist and Global Strategist Peter Schiff. 'Trump said he wants a strong dollar but he also wants a weaker dollar. He says a strong dollar makes you feel better, but a weak dollar makes you richer,' Schiff wrote on X last week. He added that although Trump claims he crushed inflation, his policies are highly inflationary, saying, 'Trump's weak dollar dream will be a nightmare.' Don't Miss: Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can Trump Defends a Weaker Dollar, But Economists Aren't Buying It What caused Schiff's comments is what Trump told reporters at the White House on Friday: 'It doesn't sound good, but you make a hell of a lot more money with a weaker dollar, not a weak dollar, but a weaker dollar than you do with a strong dollar.' Trump argued that a strong dollar 'sounds good' and helps with inflation, but he also said, 'You can't sell tractors, you can't sell trucks, you can't sell anything.' He claimed that countries like China and Japan have long pushed for weaker currencies to dominate global markets. Financial experts, however, warn that Trump's stance could $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. 9i Capital Group Chief Executive Officer Kevin Thompson told Newsweek that while a weaker dollar helps U.S. exporters and multinational corporations, it can be bad news for households. 'The U.S. is a consumer-driven, import-heavy economy,' he said. 'A weaker dollar makes imports more expensive, which can drive inflation. So while there are benefits on the corporate side, it also hurts households by increasing the cost of everyday goods.' Thompson also took issue with Trump's claim that the U.S. has 'wiped out inflation.' 'He's dead wrong,' Thompson told Newsweek. 'We're still seeing elevated prices in areas like energy, particularly piped gas, and in household essentials. Food costs continue to climb, especially meat, and many families are seeing higher utility bills.' The dollar has dropped over 10% this year compared to a basket of foreign currencies. The last time the dollar weakened this much early in a year was has said a weaker dollar could help U.S. manufacturers compete globally and boost tourism. He cited the recent rise in Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT) shares as an example of how a declining dollar benefits heavy industry. Still, economists caution that a weaker dollar also means Americans pay more when they travel abroad and face higher prices on imported goods. While the president insists his policies are aimed at strengthening the economy, critics argue that continued deficit spending and rising debt are already shaking global confidence in the dollar. As Schiff wrote on X back in May, 'The yield on 10-year Treasuries is back up to 4.5% as the U.S. dollar resumes its broad-based decline. Despite the trade truce, the world is losing confidence in the dollar and our ability to get our fiscal house in order. The consequences of de-dollarization will be profound.' Read Next: How do billionaires pay less in income tax than you?.UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? CATERPILLAR (CAT): Free Stock Analysis Report This article 'Trump's Weak Dollar Dream Will Be A Nightmare' Because His Policies Are 'Highly Inflationary,' Economist Peter Schiff Says originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WGAE Members Ratify CBS News Digital Contract
The Writers Guild of America East said that members ratified a three-year contract with CBS News Digital, marking the first such deal on a collective bargaining agreement. The 46-member bargaining unit includes writers, reporters, editors, and producers at CBS News' digital platforms including its mobile website, social media channels and the CBS News app. More from Deadline FCC Chair Launches Inquiry Into NBCU Over Treatment Of Local Affiliates Donald Trump Claims Wall Street Journal Wants To Settle His Defamation Lawsuit Over Jeffrey Epstein Story Broadcast TV Lobby Praises FCC Chairman For Deregulatory Push, Even As He Also Investigates Some Of Their Members The contract includes minimum salaries and guaranteed pay raises, as well as extra pay for overnight shifts, long days and weeks and standby shifts, the guild said. The contract also includes either a 3% increase or a ratification bonus in the first year, a guaranteed minimum 3.5% pay increase in the second year, and a 3% pay increase in the third year. It also includes the option to be paid out for comp time, guaranteed minimum severance for layoffs, and employment protections for generative AI. That latter includes 1.5 times severance if laid off because of AI implementation. The contract also includes codification of existing remote work policies through Dec. 31, 2027, with employees on a hybrid schedule not required to work more than two days in the office, while fully remote workers can continue to do so. Beth Godvik, WGAE VP of broadcast/cable/streaming/news, said in a statement, 'Establishing protections like guaranteed raises and pay that actually matches the job duties being performed will allow our members to build sustainable careers in news.' A CBS News spokesperson did not immediately return a request for comment. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Emmys, Oscars, Grammys & More 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery
Gizmodo
3 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Judge Accuses Elon Musk and Sam Altman of ‘Gamesmanship' in Court
Elon Musk scored a small win in court on Tuesday in his case against Sam Altman, but the judge wasn't impressed with either side's tactics, reprimanding them for 'gamesmanship.' Calling out both sides for having 'repeatedly over-litigated the case,' U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granted Musk's motion to strike several of Altman's defenses. This is the latest in Musk's ongoing feud with Altman. Musk originally filed the lawsuit last year in a federal court in Northern California, accusing Altman and OpenAI of fraud. Musk claims he was misled into co-founding and funding OpenAI in 2015 under the belief that it would remain a non-profit. The lawsuit claims that Altman built a secretive network of for-profit OpenAI affiliates, took control of the non-profit's board, engaged in self-dealing, and diverted the non-profit's talent and tech for financial gain. The resulting corporate structure, the suit says, is now worth an estimated $100 billion. The filing frames Musk's case as 'a textbook tale of altruism versus greed.' Notably, Musk dropped a similar suit against OpenAI earlier last year. Altman's team responded by filing 55 affirmative defenses, introducing new facts not mentioned in Musk's original complaint. In a December blog post, OpenAI claimed that when Musk was still with the organization, he actually wanted it to become for-profit with himself at the helm. On Tuesday, Judge Gonzalez Rogers trimmed that list of 55 defenses, ruling that some were 'irrelevant, redundant, insufficient, or immaterial.' She also criticized Musk's legal team for trying to strike all the defenses, saying they failed 'to take the high ground.' Instead, the judge slimmed down the defenses by 16, leaving 39 in the case. 'The Court will not waste precious judicial resources on the parties' gamesmanship,' Judge Gonzalez Rogers wrote. 'OpenAI's deflective strategy of wild distraction is wearing thin on everyone,' said Marc Toberoff, Musk's lead lawyer in the case, in a statement emailed to Gizmodo. 'We look forward to prosecuting this case on the real issues: OpenAI's ongoing fraud and complete betrayal of its charitable mission.' Attorneys representing Altman did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Gizmodo. This isn't the first time the judge has seemed unimpressed with the case. Business Insider reported in February that Judge Gonzalez Rogers expressed doubt about Musk's claim of 'irreparable harm,' saying, 'I have billionaires versus billionaires.' Jury selection for the case is scheduled to begin on March 30. Musk helped start OpenAI with Altman and others back in 2015, but he left in 2018 after disagreements about where the company was headed. Since then, he launched his own AI for-profit company, xAI, to go head-to-head with OpenAI. The rivalry between them has only gotten more intense, even extending into the world of politics. Earlier this year, Musk stepped down from his role at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and got into a public back-and-forth with President Donald Trump on social media. Around the same time, Altman joined Trump for a long one-on-one meeting. Shortly after, Trump publicly praised Altman's AI infrastructure efforts, which Musk has not been shy about criticizing.
