
The history of Aberdeen Harbour in 30 archive photos
For many visitors, the Tall Ships has been a rare opportunity to spend time in Aberdeen's historic dockland, a hub of commerce for centuries.
Aberdeen Harbour, now known as the Port of Aberdeen, holds the incredible record for being the oldest existing business in Britain having been founded in 1136.
As early as the 13th Century, Aberdeen's trade was wholly sea-borne, making it the commercial capital of the north of Scotland.
The historic harbour also played a crucial role in the building of King's College in Old Aberdeen.
Bishop Elphinstone himself sent wool, salmon, barrels of trout and money to the continent from the harbour in exchange for carts, wheelbarrows and gunpowder needed to quarry the stone for the college.
By the 16th Century, Aberdeen's merchants were trading with the Baltic regions of Prussia and Pomerania, and Poland.
As the 17th Century approached, the harbour's one quay was inadequate to meet this demand.
King James the VI intervened and issued a charter to repair the pier, shore and create a bulwark at Torry to deepen the entrance to the harbour.
In just over 200 years, until the last shipyard closed in 1992, 3,000 ships were built in Aberdeen.
Many of these were built under the Aberdeen Line, including the famous clipper Thermopylae.
As technology advanced, so did the harbour, with additions like lighthouses, new docks and steam power.
The rapid growth of the fishing industry in the 19th Century made Aberdeen Harbour the chief centre of the Scottish fish trade.
In 1921, historian Victorian Elizabeth Clark published 'The Port of Aberdeen', a comprehensive book looking at the city's maritime heritage.
She said: 'If the history of the port in the twentieth century reveals as great a measure of progress as that which marked the nineteenth, if it produces changes and improvements in the commercial life of the city as beneficial as those of last century, the continued prosperity of Aberdeen as a seaport will be assured.'
While days of shipbuilding, coal deliveries and the quayside railway may be long gone, Clark could never have foreseen the discovery of oil.
Oil brought some of the greatest changes to Aberdeen Harbour through extensive modernisation which saw the port rebuilt.
Now the Port of Aberdeen is as busy as ever. In 2023, it became Britain's oldest-existing business with the country's newest harbour – Aberdeen South Harbour.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
35 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Surprise inflation hike: Here's how much rail fares might rise next year in Scotland
ScotRail passengers may again see lower rise than for cross-Border operators Sign up for the latest news and analysis about Scottish transport Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Rail passengers could face fare increases of nearly 6 per cent next year - but ScotRail's ticket prices are likely to again rise less sharply. A potential rise of 5.8 per cent for cross-Border and other English train operators was signalled by the publication on Wednesday of July's retail prices index (RPI) measure of inflation, on which rail fare increases have traditionally been based. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad ScotRail fares increased by 3.8 per cent in April | PA RPI increased by more than expected to 4.8 per cent from 4.4 per cent in June, with rail fares normally hiked by 1 per cent more than the July rate. However, Transport Scotland said any ScotRail fares increase would be based instead on the consumer prices index (CPI) measure of inflation, which excludes items like mortgage payments, and was 3.8 per cent in July, up from 3.6 per cent the previous month. This year, ScotRail fares were increased by 3.8 per cent in April while those of English operators went up by 4.6 per cent in March. That followed an 8.7 per cent ScotRail hike in April last year and 4.8 per cent in July 2023. A spokesperson for Transport Scotland said: 'Any potential fares increase for 2026 is under consideration and, as per previous commitments, will be based on CPI, not RPI.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, the Scottish Government agency sought to highlight the permanent scrapping of ScotRail peak fares in 12 days' time on September 1, which are in some cases twice the off-peak fare. Like the Scottish Government, the UK Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap on fare rises next year, and whether it will retain the RPI +1 per cent formula. The UK Department for Transport said there would be an update on changes to fares later this year. Its spokesperson said: 'Transport Secretary [Heidi Alexander] has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.' The latest inflation figures came as train punctuality across Britain was at its worst for more than five years. Figures from the Office of Rail and Road regulator showed trains reached 66.7 per cent of their scheduled stops within 1 minute of schedule in the year to July 19. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The latest ScotRail figures showed 89.7 per cent of its trains arrived within five minutes of schedule over that period - one percentage point below target. Maryam Eslamdoust, general secretary of the TSSA rail union, said: 'It's vital that the government protects the travelling public from any unnecessary rise in rail fares as a result of this inflation spike.


Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Scottish National Investment Bank: Taxpayer nursing £77m ‘paper loss' in year of ups and downs
'We will navigate conducive and challenging economic climates with a focus on delivering long-term societal and economic impact' – Willie Watt, chairman Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The taxpayer-owned Scottish National Investment Bank has flagged a 'healthy pipeline' of opportunities as its latest accounts revealed a paper loss of £77 million amid a tough economic backdrop. SNIB was set up in 2020 to invest in companies and projects with potential to deliver both 'financial returns and societal benefits'. It is wholly owned by Scottish Government ministers, on behalf of Scottish taxpayers, but operates independently from government. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Publishing SNIB's latest annual report, chairman Willie Watt said 'continued progress' had been made in developing the bank's capabilities and investment portfolio in the face of a 'challenging economic context'. Scott Winston, CEO of Pulpex, and Al Denholm, CEO of the Scottish National Investment Bank. Pulpex is one of the investments the bank made in the period covered by the accounts. Picture by Andrew Cawley For the second year, the bank's income of £34.5m exceeded its operating costs, at £16.2m, with income increasing by 78.8 per cent year-on-year, while its portfolio grew to 42 businesses and projects. In the year under review, it committed £145m and 'crowded in' a further £324m, meaning the bank has leveraged its capital to increase additional investment in Scotland. Since it was launched in November 2020, SNIB has committed more than £785m and crowded in a further £1.4 billion. However, the bank warned that many of the ventures it had invested in were operating in a challenging economic environment, contributing to an unrealised or paper loss of £77m due to valuation changes within the portfolio. There were no realised losses. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The bank's commitment (£145.1m) and deployment figures (£157.5m) for the year were both below its targets, but it noted that this year also marked the first time that the Scottish Government has awarded greater flexibility to the institution's annual investment budget. Chief executive Al Denholm said: 'Investment opportunities don't come to us in a linear way, and we would never compromise our robust due diligence process to rush a deal through before the end of a financial year. 'The challenge we have in making investment decisions within the constraints of a yearly budget cycle was an issue highlighted in Audit Scotland's report on the bank. We are, therefore, very pleased the Scottish Government has introduced greater flexibility, enabling us to carry over some investment budget allocation. Looking forward, we have a healthy pipeline of investment opportunities. 'We hold our investments over a longer term and would expect to see our valuation change and level off as our portfolio matures,' he added. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Watt said: 'Ongoing market volatility has followed years of geopolitical and economic uncertainty, creating a challenging environment for growing businesses and investment. In these difficult economic times, the role of a development bank is even more important. 'We have a long-term goal of developing a vibrant, self-reinforcing and high-investment ecosystem in Scotland that makes a lasting contribution to our economic prosperity. We will navigate conducive and challenging economic climates with a focus on delivering long-term societal and economic impact.'

The National
2 hours ago
- The National
£145m Perthshire estate sale raises concerns over land ownership
The 5530-hectare Griffin Forestry Estate in Aberfeldy was sold to a partnership including the UK investment firm Gresham House in July, in what land reform campaigners have claimed is one of the most expensive rural estate acquisitions ever. Concerns have been raised over the sale as campaigners claim that Gresham House's acquisition of the estate means the firm is now likely the second largest landowner in Scotland. The partnership of firms also included the international investment firm Searchlight Capital Partners, a Cayman Island partnership and Gresham House Forest Fund, a Scottish limited partnership, whose partners include City of Cardiff Pension Fund and Swansea Council Pension Fund. READ MORE: Western Isles MSP tells Labour hopeful to apologise for Gaelic 'disrespect' Griffin Forestry Estate comprises the Griffin and Moness estates and was sold to Julia Hands around 20 years ago. A wind farm was then constructed. In 2012, Julia gifted the estate to her husband, Guy Hands. It was then put on the market in 2023 for offers over £130m. Dr Josh Doble, director of Policy and Advocacy for the campaign group Community Land Scotland (CLS), said the sale of the Griffin Forestry Estate to Gresham House Fund is another 'concerning example' of land ownership in Scotland concentrating into the hands of anonymous corporate investors. Dr Doble said: 'These opaque ownership structures have allowed Gresham House, as the apparent umbrella entity behind this purchase and many others, to repeatedly publicly deny that they are a significant landowner in Scotland.' He added that the sale also sets a 'remarkable and quite unbelievable' precedent that an average-sized Highland estate can sell for astronomical sums. Dr Doble added the sale is 'completely removed from the reality' of many Highland communities who are in dire need of investment in local housing, travel infrastructure and local services. 'This disparity raises the serious question of who is benefiting from Scotland's natural resources and how a remote corporate entity such as Gresham House can justify an apparent investment of £145m in a Highland estate, and how much of that investment will be benefiting the local area,' Dr Doble said. The £145m sale price of the Griffin Forestry Estate would mean the land was valued at more than £26,000 per hectare. (Image: Savills) CLS added that Gresham House FF VI LLP have just fundraised £375m for its forestry investment fund, adding that it demonstrates that industrial forestry, along with wind farm leases, is highly profitable, but the sector still benefits from subsidies and tax breaks. Dr Doble said: 'The rationale for such seemingly generous handouts to wealthy corporate investors seems unclear, if the government is seeking to incentivise trees being planted (regardless of their type or wider benefit) then it seems the buoyant industrial forestry market should be enough of a driver without handouts from the public purse.' The campaign group have urged the Gresham House Forest Fund to work 'closely and meaningfully' with the local communities about their plans for the Griffin estate, as well as what benefits from their ownership will be shared with the local people. Dr Doble said: 'It's time for a serious conversation about who owns Scotland's forests and who stands to benefit. 'We cannot allow opaque transactions such as this to keep occurring, when there is little oversight over which entities are buying large parts of Scotland and who actually benefits from that ownership.' (Image: Savills) He added that the Land Reform Bill, which is currently in Parliament, will provide some transparency over sales such as this and potentially allow for the breaking up of an estate such as Griffin into smaller parcels. However, he stated that there should be public oversight over who the end purchaser is. 'Ownership of land by pension funds from around the UK and offshore firms in the Cayman Islands will not mean land is owned to meet public priorities, local community needs or local economic development,' Dr Doble said. 'It will be based on maximising profit and extracting that profit to shareholders. Scotland's land and its people are our most precious resources. They both deserve better land ownership than that.'