logo
Maryland bill aims to limit settlement money for victims of abuse in juvenile detention center

Maryland bill aims to limit settlement money for victims of abuse in juvenile detention center

CBS News28-03-2025

A new Maryland bill aims to limit settlement money for victims of abuse in juvenile detention facilities.
At a House Judiciary hearing, fueled with passion on all sides, state lawmakers debated ways to strike a balance between properly compensating victims of alleged childhood sexual abuse in the Maryland Juvenile Justice System without bankrupting the state.
In 2023, the Child Victims Act, which removed the statute of limitations and allowed victims to receive up to $890,000 per occurrence of abuse, was made a law/.
Since then, 4,500 victims have filed claims, potentially putting the state on the hook for billions of dollars.
Co-council Adam Slater says there is only one proper solution.
"This bill is unacceptable and the government of Maryland must sit down with the survivors and come up with a mutually agreeable and acceptable solution, not one imposed on them," Slater said.
The amendments still need to pass the Maryland House and Senate and be signed by Gov. Wes Moore before the end of the session on April 7.
If passed, these amendments would take effect on October 1, 2025.
Democratic Delegate CT Wilson, a victim of childhood sexual abuse, introduced amendments to House Bill 1378, which would lower the payout cap for each claimant to $400,000.
It would also require an alternative dispute resolution process to promise transparency in these payouts.
"I wanted to make sure that whatever we do today, we don't so irreparably damage our state, that we must go to bankruptcy," Wilson said. "Because while the victims do need an opportunity to speak and they do need to come up in financial support, billions and billions of dollars is not what we can afford to do."
Opponents, including national civil rights attorney Ben Crump, say these amendments revictimize those who were sexually abused.
"That's not equal justice, that's a shame, before God to tell that person who has lived with this all their life that you don't have their day in court, and by the way, you can only get up to $400,000," Crump said.
Antoine Harris, who is one of the alleged victims, said he was sexually abused during his childhood at the hands of the state. He also said he was conceived after his mother was allegedly raped at 17 years old by a speech therapist at the Montrose juvenile training facility Montrose.
"I believe that we don't have to pay everybody at once; it can be spread out over time," Harris said. "This has been many years that we've been waiting for justice. So, to expect the state to pay it out all at once, that's not what I think is necessarily appropriate. The state is in a financial crisis, so the state can take time to pay us."
On March 19, the
alleged victims of sexual abuse in Maryland
juvenile detention facilities rallied near Baltimore's City Hall, calling for the state to be held accountable.
Alleged victims shared their stories of sexual, physical, and emotional abuse at the hands of staff within the juvenile justice system.
"How many more survivors need to come forward before the state finally takes responsibility? How many more children have to suffer before a change is made?" an alleged victim said.
A statement from the Department of Juvenile Services reads,
"DJS takes allegations of sexual abuse of children in our care with utmost seriousness…. DJS notes that all the claims brought under the Maryland Child Victims Act involve allegations from many decades ago. Beyond that, DJS will not comment on this pending litigation."
After the Child Victims Act became a law,
hundreds of lawsuits
were filed over sexual abuse claims against the Archdiocese of Baltimore, which spanned nearly 80 years.
In April 2023, the Maryland Attorney General's Office released
a 450-page report
that identified 156 priests, deacons, Catholic teachers and seminarians within the Archdiocese accused of abusing more than 600 victims. The incidents detailed in the report date back to the 1940s.
"The state is not above the law," said Jerry Block, a lawyer for sexual abuse survivors. "The state is just as accountable as the Catholic church or any other institution that perpetrated sexual abuse."
Recently,
more than a dozen former students
at McDonogh School, a Baltimore County private school, came forward in a new complaint, alleging they were sexually abused.
The alleged victims claim to have suffered sexual abuse by former dean Alvin Levy, former Spanish teacher Robert Creed, and two more faculty members while attending the school between the 1960s and 1980s.
WJZ previously highlighted one of four
lawsuits against McDonogh
, claiming the school was aware of the abuse and failed to protect students.
The lawsuit details the former student's account of being sexually assaulted several times by former dean Levy when he was 10 years old.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Secret Service Followed Protocol in Padilla Incident
Secret Service Followed Protocol in Padilla Incident

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Secret Service Followed Protocol in Padilla Incident

California Sen. Alex Padilla is getting plenty of mileage out of his scuffle with the Secret Service and federal authorities in Los Angeles Thursday. Padillas Senate and campaign accounts posted a total of seven outraged videos in the first 24 hours after the altercation. Viral videos of the incident show a Secret Service agent dragging a fuming Padilla out of a press conference with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and he identifies himself as a senator only as hes being pushed out the door. The agent then forces Padilla to the ground, while two agents handcuff him. Padilla, however, wasnt arrested. Within the hour, agents released him with no charges. Dozens of Democratic members of Congress then jumped to Padillas defense, denouncing the action while casting the Secret Service and FBI agents involved as an extension of what they labeled as President Trumps totalitarian police state. Sen. Schumer called the Secret Services use of force "cruel and unacceptable." "This was a deliberate attempt to intimidate an elected official whose only offense is standing up for the voiceless," Schumer said. "But its not just about Sen. Padilla, its about every person who dares to speak truth to power." Republicans and conservative commentators countered that it was all a big publicity stunt and noted that a Padilla staffer filmed the tussle and then quickly distributed it to the media in the room. "Sen. Padilla didnt want answers - he wanted airtime," Rep. Byron Donalds said on Fox News Thursday night. "Shoving past security for a viral moment is a stunt, not leadership. If he cared about solutions, hed have asked for a meeting. But like most Democrats, he just wants the spotlight." "Alex Padilla is an embarrassment to California," said Steve Hilton, who is running for governor in California as a Republican. "Hes a complete nonentity. Thats why they didnt recognize him … [he has] zero accomplishments and now this pathetic stunt as his only claim to fame." Yet, one Republican, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, an ardent Trump critic, condemned Padillas treatment as "shocking at every level" and "not the America I know." Secret Service experts argue nothing could be further from the truth - that the agent was simply following normal protocol. Padilla, they said, actually received preferential treatment by not being arrested and jailed for his menacing display. The Secret Service agent warned Padilla, whom agents did not recognize as a senator and who wasnt wearing his Senate pin, to back away from Noem and then forcibly removed him when he ignored their entreaties. "They can represent this however they want, but those agents made the right decision to get him out of the room," Charles Marino, a former Secret Service agent told RealClearPolitics. "He did not have a congressional pin on, he was yelling and closing distance very quickly to make it to the front of the room to confront Noem." "Look, hes not above the law. Anyone taking those actions would been treated far worse - they would have been arrested and been forced to spend some time in jail," Marino said. "Who was escalating the situation? When you look at Padillas action, taken in totality, the agents had no other choice." Instead of dragging him to a cell, federal agents released the senator after the incident. Then Noem met with Padilla for 15 minutes and gave him her cell phone number to discuss matters further. "We probably disagree on 90% of the topics, but we agreed to exchange phone numbers and continue to talk - that is the way it should be in this country," Noem told Fox News Thursday afternoon. The Homeland Security Department issued a statement Thursday defending the federal agents actions, arguing that Padilla chose "disrespectful political theater" over constructive congressional oversight. Padilla, the agency said, "interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem." "Mr. Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers repeated commands," the department added. "@Secret Service thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately." Several other Secret Service sources backed up Marinos account. "Any sudden movement towards a protectee that feels threatening, especially when that person has not been identified, the policy is 100% to prevent further escalation or movement toward Noem," said a source in the Secret Service community. "We would have done the same thing for anyone threatening [former DHS Secretary] Mayorkas." Even though the situation escalated very quickly, the agent still followed the basic rules of engagement for law enforcement, the source asserted. Agents and officers first ask a person to move away from the protectee, then they tell them firmly to move away, and if those warnings arent abided, then they can use physical force to move the threatening person away. "Its a pretty common law enforcement way of relaying information and taking action, because emotions can get the best of people, and agents are forced to err on the side of protection," the source added. After the two assassination attempts against Trump, agents are highly attuned to aggressive behavior and working to ensure theyre not involved in any security lapses. "In this day and age, you can see what a split-second hesitate could result in," one former agent remarked. "Could you imagine if the agent didnt respond, and Padilla got on the stage and hit [Noem]?" The agency has been knocked around for months for the egregious security failures in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13 and then nearly two months later during another close call against Trump at his West Palm Beach golf course. And just because its Padilla who was attending a press conference doesnt mean assaults against a Cabinet secretary or president are unlikely to occur. During a December 2008 press conference in Iraq, an Iraqi journalist threw both of his shoes at former President George W. Bush in a pique of outrage. Secret Service agents with their zero-fail mission have to be poised to respond to all types of unexpected threats, which sometimes come with no warning at all. Back in 2005, during Bushs visit to the country of Georgia, a man attempted to assassinate Bush and then-Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili by throwing a hand grenade at both of them. "Listen, we dont always know who you are if youre not wearing your [congressional] pin," the source said. "Youre coming at [Noem] in an aggressive manner, and you didnt heed our warnings to stop. If you get into the buffer zone, we have to take you down. All public officials should know, and I would hope understand, that." Susan Crabtree is RealClearPolitics' national political correspondent.

Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest
Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest

A new national poll indicates that Americans are divided over President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard and U.S. Marines to the nation's second most populous city. Aiming to extinguish escalating protests in Los Angeles sparked by immigration raids carried out by ICE at his administration's direction, Trump sent in National Guard troops and even mobilized Marines. The unrest and the moves by the president have dominated national headlines for a week. Forty-one percent of adults nationwide questioned in a Washington Post/George Mason University Schar School poll said they support the president's move, with 44% opposed and 15% unsure. The survey was conducted on Tuesday and questioned over 1,000 adults nationwide, including roughly 200 in blue-state California. First On Fox: Immigrant Voters Abandon Democrats On Immigration Issue Support for the president's actions among the California respondents stood at 32%, with 58% opposed. Read On The Fox News App The poll also highlighted an expected massive partisan divide. Click Here For The Latest Fox News Polling Eight-six percent of Republicans surveyed supported the president's deployment of the National Guard and Marines to the streets of LA, with more than three-quarters of Democrats giving a thumbs down on Trump's move. A third of independents approved of the sending of the troops, with nearly half opposed and nearly one in five unsure. Trump took control of California's National Guard without the permission of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, the first time in 60 years that a president has federalized National Guard troops without a governor's request. Newsom, leading the resistance to Trump's moves, took legal action to try and reverse the order. Trump Deployment Of Troops To Quell La Rioters Latest Page In President's Political Playbook A federal district court judge this week ruled that Trump's moves were illegal and ordered him to return control of the National Guard troops to Newsom. But a federal appeals court quickly temporarily blocked the lower court judge's ruling. The survey also indicates Americans are divided over whether they support (39%) or oppose (40%) the protests. Just over one in five (21%) were unsure of their support or opposition. Seventy percent of Democrats — but just 39% of independents and only 6% of Republicans — support the aims of the protesters. According to the poll, Americans are also divided over whether the protests have been mostly peaceful (35%) or mostly violent (37%).Original article source: Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest

Will Bay Area mass protests be peaceful? How events unfold could be crucial to Trump opposition
Will Bay Area mass protests be peaceful? How events unfold could be crucial to Trump opposition

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Will Bay Area mass protests be peaceful? How events unfold could be crucial to Trump opposition

Organizers of the Bay Area's No Kings rallies are enlisting some of their participants as peacekeeping marshals for the Saturday demonstrations, the volunteers tasked with snuffing out any flare-ups of violence or disorder. The events, which are among the estimated 2,000 rallies planned across the nation against President Donald Trump that day, come as the administration points to protests over this month's federal immigration raids, which have at times been marked by property damage and clashes with law enforcement, as justification to deploy the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles. The timing of the protests presents a challenge for Bay Area and national Democratic leaders, who know that it will play into Trump's hands if widespread violence erupts. Protest organizers have vowed to keep the actions peaceful, but as events in Los Angeles have shown, large protests can take a life of their own. 'Given the threats from the Trump administration, they're really going to be going out of their way to try to maintain, as much as possible, nonviolent discipline, so as not to give the authorities the excuse to crack down,' said Stephen Zunes, a professor of politics and international studies at the University of San Francisco. Stewart Chen, an Oakland Chinatown leader who is part of the planning committee for the city's march, said no one wants to give Trump an excuse to send troops to the Bay Area. 'I have been given assurances time and time again that this is going to be a family-friendly event,' said Chen, who is an immigrant from the Philippines. 'It's not going to be like L.A., we're not fighting ICE… we're just exercising our freedom of speech and freedom of peaceful assembly.' Still, officials aren't taking any chances. While they've spoken in support of protesters' rights to make their voices heard, they've also issued stern warnings about law-breaking. In San Francisco, Mayor Daniel Lurie stood next to the police chief, sheriff, district attorney and others Friday to deliver the message. 'We are … here to protect our small business owners and our residents and visitors,' Lurie said. 'I want to be crystal clear, if there is violence or destructive activity, law enforcement will step in. If you assault a police officer or break windows of a local business, you will be arrested.' Police arrested more than 150 people after a protest Sunday night in San Francisco. Chen, who became involved in the Oakland rally after the movement's nationwide organizers asked him to speak at the march's kickoff, said he passed on these assurances to everyone he's spoken to, which included officials with the California Highway Patrol, city councilmembers and the governor's office. Chen said national organizers are sending in about 100 people to participate in the marches and act as crowd control, and Chinatown's own, orange-vested patrol team will have several dozen members lining up along Eighth Street. The crowd-controllers' role, Chen said, will be to 'identify bad apples and point them out to police.' 'So if people start throwing projectiles or something, (the volunteers) mobilize, sort of surround them, get between them and the cops, and isolate them from the group,' Zunes said. In warning against violence Friday, Lurie and others were careful to express support for peaceful protests and the immigrant community. 'As mayor, my top priority is keeping everyone in San Francisco safe,' he said, 'and I'm fully committed to protecting everyone's first amendment rights.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store